SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Dyno chart - SL 65 stock
05-09-2007, 06:21 PM
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
not sure if this was a general question or one for adam...but with the tune of the cay dynoed you can expect 12.20's-11.80's at about 118-120 depending on traction. I dont personally calculate 0-60 as these cars dont have traction in first thru second...with drag radials super low 4's maybe high 3's? I hope this helped
05-09-2007, 06:25 PM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not sure if this was a general question or one for adam...but with the tune of the cay dynoed you can expect 12.20's-11.80's at about 118-120 depending on traction. I dont personally calculate 0-60 as these cars dont have traction in first thru second...with drag radials super low 4's maybe high 3's? I hope this helped
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lj2bqjQ5odM
Last edited by Speed Thrills; 05-09-2007 at 06:33 PM.
05-09-2007, 06:57 PM
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
I guess they vary because those times you gave me seem to be the average for stock 65s. 11.8 is what I have seen most of the time for a decent stock launch of a 65.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lj2bqjQ5odM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lj2bqjQ5odM
05-09-2007, 07:15 PM
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
05-09-2007, 08:15 PM
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=E55JAY;2194214]sorry i guess i misunderstood the question, just tryin to help 
Heres a compilation of the fastest modified V12 Bi-Turbos in the country, maybe this will help a bit. Which tuner are you going with?
Used Kleemann on my CLS but was recomended to go with Renntech for the 65. Amazing they charge so much just to load a program into your ECU. At least with the CLS they did the pulley as well. I'm going to drive for a few days and dyno it. Then I'll make my decision.
Heres a compilation of the fastest modified V12 Bi-Turbos in the country, maybe this will help a bit. Which tuner are you going with?Used Kleemann on my CLS but was recomended to go with Renntech for the 65. Amazing they charge so much just to load a program into your ECU. At least with the CLS they did the pulley as well. I'm going to drive for a few days and dyno it. Then I'll make my decision.
05-09-2007, 11:00 PM
#32
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SL65
[QUOTE=david_101;2194038]i guess i just don't know enough about power generation and delivery to understand why those dyno numbers are good relative to the specs.QUOTE]
Crank (specs) vs wheel (dyno)
Crank (specs) vs wheel (dyno)
05-09-2007, 11:56 PM
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Ok guys,
Sorry took so long, been tuning couple of AMGs today. I haven't scan the dyno results yet but with ECU alone we got 71 rwhp and 40 lbs torque. (we blitz from Fremont to San Jose for the ECU to adapt, hence we ran pretty hot on the dyno)
Since NSM has been kind enough to let us have the car till tomorrow afternoon, we are going to redyno the car in the early morning again.
Here are the final numbers as far as i can remember.
561 hp and 714.3 lbs torque
Oh yeah, like NSM said, the SL 65 biggest enemy as you can see in the picture below is located at the far right.
Sorry took so long, been tuning couple of AMGs today. I haven't scan the dyno results yet but with ECU alone we got 71 rwhp and 40 lbs torque. (we blitz from Fremont to San Jose for the ECU to adapt, hence we ran pretty hot on the dyno)
Since NSM has been kind enough to let us have the car till tomorrow afternoon, we are going to redyno the car in the early morning again.
Here are the final numbers as far as i can remember.
561 hp and 714.3 lbs torque
Oh yeah, like NSM said, the SL 65 biggest enemy as you can see in the picture below is located at the far right.
Last edited by AdamG@NorCal; 05-10-2007 at 12:56 AM.
05-10-2007, 12:22 AM
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
490 at the wheels equates to 588 crank, which is slightly lower than the factory rating. However, 673 ft-lbs at the wheels equates to 808 at the crank...70 more than the factory rating. 
05-10-2007, 12:22 AM
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok guys,
Sorry took so long, been tuning couple of AMGs today. I haven't scan the dyno results yet but with ECU alone we got 71 rwhp and 40 lbs torque. (we blitz from Fremont to San Jose for the ECU to adapt, hence we ran pretty hot on the dyno)
Since NSM has been kind enough to let us have the car till tomorrow afternoon, we are going to redyno the car in the early morning again.
Here are the final numbers as far as i can remember.
561 hp and 714.3 lbs torque
Sorry took so long, been tuning couple of AMGs today. I haven't scan the dyno results yet but with ECU alone we got 71 rwhp and 40 lbs torque. (we blitz from Fremont to San Jose for the ECU to adapt, hence we ran pretty hot on the dyno)
Since NSM has been kind enough to let us have the car till tomorrow afternoon, we are going to redyno the car in the early morning again.
Here are the final numbers as far as i can remember.
561 hp and 714.3 lbs torque
05-10-2007, 02:22 PM
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Ok guys,
Sorry took so long, been tuning couple of AMGs today. I haven't scan the dyno results yet but with ECU alone we got 71 rwhp and 40 lbs torque. (we blitz from Fremont to San Jose for the ECU to adapt, hence we ran pretty hot on the dyno)
Since NSM has been kind enough to let us have the car till tomorrow afternoon, we are going to redyno the car in the early morning again.
Here are the final numbers as far as i can remember.
561 hp and 714.3 lbs torque
Oh yeah, like NSM said, the SL 65 biggest enemy as you can see in the picture below is located at the far right.
Sorry took so long, been tuning couple of AMGs today. I haven't scan the dyno results yet but with ECU alone we got 71 rwhp and 40 lbs torque. (we blitz from Fremont to San Jose for the ECU to adapt, hence we ran pretty hot on the dyno)
Since NSM has been kind enough to let us have the car till tomorrow afternoon, we are going to redyno the car in the early morning again.
Here are the final numbers as far as i can remember.
561 hp and 714.3 lbs torque
Oh yeah, like NSM said, the SL 65 biggest enemy as you can see in the picture below is located at the far right.
05-10-2007, 02:36 PM
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-10-2007, 02:49 PM
#38
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 SL 55 AMG, 01 Turbusa/8.43 @ 183..1/4 mi.
Ok That's It.........."That Is All I Can Stand, Cuz I Can't Stands NoMore"...(Popeye)
Dave is now lookin' to trade + cash his -55 for a nice -65..........
SD
P.S. Right Corner = CHP cars........two of 'em. Yes?
Dave is now lookin' to trade + cash his -55 for a nice -65..........
SD
P.S. Right Corner = CHP cars........two of 'em. Yes?
05-10-2007, 04:35 PM
#39
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SL65 AMG
05-10-2007, 06:01 PM
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
05-10-2007, 06:46 PM
#43
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Michael, 65 engine on the 55? 
You are really a speed junkie...
Speed_thrills, congrats again...take pics please.
Dave..the car can only go faster from here!!!
Jude, dont tempt Dave now
You are really a speed junkie...Speed_thrills, congrats again...take pics please.
Dave..the car can only go faster from here!!!
Jude, dont tempt Dave now
05-10-2007, 07:22 PM
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well they are grossly under powered for a modern sports car, let a lone a "high end" sports car. They have just under 400hp and if you get a good run they can break in to the high 12s in the 1/4 mile. Dont get me wrong, they look great and handle even better and many people cant tell the 360s from the 430s (all though most of us here can) on the road. It will most likely be out of warranty and very expensive to fix and or mod.
05-10-2007, 07:40 PM
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
V12-Biturbo
damn post mods = 869 crank torque Eegaad!
Last edited by Thericker; 05-10-2007 at 07:45 PM.
05-10-2007, 07:48 PM
#46
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Well they are grossly under powered for a modern sports car, let a lone a "high end" sports car. They have just under 400hp and if you get a good run they can break in to the high 12s in the 1/4 mile. Dont get me wrong, they look great and handle even better and many people cant tell the 360s from the 430s (all though most of us here can) on the road. It will most likely be out of warranty and very expensive to fix and or mod.
05-10-2007, 08:18 PM
#47
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Michael,
Get the revised bottom mount intercooler, TB without the recirculation flap, and get Renntech dual top mount SLR styled intercooler. Also dont forget the speedshift and reinforced tranny.
Get the revised bottom mount intercooler, TB without the recirculation flap, and get Renntech dual top mount SLR styled intercooler. Also dont forget the speedshift and reinforced tranny.
05-10-2007, 09:40 PM
#48
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63S coupe, X5M
05-10-2007, 10:37 PM
#50
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
No updates. We done two dyno runs today. Same consistent results.
Jude, check your email, i think Tony has send you some info. If you need help tomorrow, call us on our cells.
Jude, check your email, i think Tony has send you some info. If you need help tomorrow, call us on our cells.
