I read in one post that there was substantial difference between the 2006 and 2007 SL65's. Could someone that's in the know post the detailed differences between the two cars? I was looking at a 2006 (assuming they were the same as a 2007), but it sounds like that's not the case.
Super Member
I don't think there were any significant changes.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
Very minimal cosmectic differences; no changes in performance either.Originally Posted by jjprusk
I read in one post that there was substantial difference between the 2006 and 2007 SL65's. Could someone that's in the know post the detailed differences between the two cars? I was looking at a 2006 (assuming they were the same as a 2007), but it sounds like that's not the case.
The SL55 engine was improved for 2007. That may be what you heard.
Senior Member
Quote:
Both have same HP rating. 07 has a few cosmetic changes including front aero gills and different exhaust tips. Main interior change in 07 is new steering wheel with paddle shift activators instead of the standard buttons ( you can get this 07 steering wheel for around $700). Get a low mile 06 and you'll save over 60k like I did.Originally Posted by whoover
The SL55 engine was improved for 2007. That may be what you heard.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Minim cosmetic diffces....but would argue signif perf/handling/feel diffces (esp for those w/zero interest in dragstrips but much interest in twisties fun)...
'07 has faster-reacting ABC 2.0 (ABC 1.0 in '06 is almost 5 yr old tech); tighter steering (some 10%); new exhaust; much improved, thick-rimmed sport steering wheel w/paddleshifters...
IMO, biggest perf weakness of SL65 is awful brake pedal feel (too much travel before bite) and poor real-world traction, even in mid-range accel on bumpy fwys...
On '07, MB was offering cheap $0 down, 2 yr leases (some $3800/mo incl CA sales tx)....
Given how poor SL sales have been post-'07 mid-cycle refresh (down some 40% y-o-y), may see another attempt at a cosmetic refresh in next yr (impacting resale/trade-in values/lease terms)....
And would suspect CL63/65 will further kill SL55/65 sales/values, as CL is light-years ahead of SL in tech content/interior aesthetics/ergonomics....just compare the SL65's cheap blk plastic buttons/switchgear, ancient infotainment systems, old-tech sport seats w/limited adjustment/massage/ventil capabilities, lack of intelligent headlights, lack of latest-tech BrakeAssist/Distronic coupling, old Parktronic "bullet holes", sat radio lump on trunklid, etc vs CL63/65.....
SL55 was a brilliant, iconic car 5 yrs ago upon launch but 599 and new CL63/65 have changed benchmarks....at least until a fully revised, latest-tech SL comes out in ?'09...
'07 has faster-reacting ABC 2.0 (ABC 1.0 in '06 is almost 5 yr old tech); tighter steering (some 10%); new exhaust; much improved, thick-rimmed sport steering wheel w/paddleshifters...
IMO, biggest perf weakness of SL65 is awful brake pedal feel (too much travel before bite) and poor real-world traction, even in mid-range accel on bumpy fwys...
On '07, MB was offering cheap $0 down, 2 yr leases (some $3800/mo incl CA sales tx)....
Given how poor SL sales have been post-'07 mid-cycle refresh (down some 40% y-o-y), may see another attempt at a cosmetic refresh in next yr (impacting resale/trade-in values/lease terms)....
And would suspect CL63/65 will further kill SL55/65 sales/values, as CL is light-years ahead of SL in tech content/interior aesthetics/ergonomics....just compare the SL65's cheap blk plastic buttons/switchgear, ancient infotainment systems, old-tech sport seats w/limited adjustment/massage/ventil capabilities, lack of intelligent headlights, lack of latest-tech BrakeAssist/Distronic coupling, old Parktronic "bullet holes", sat radio lump on trunklid, etc vs CL63/65.....
SL55 was a brilliant, iconic car 5 yrs ago upon launch but 599 and new CL63/65 have changed benchmarks....at least until a fully revised, latest-tech SL comes out in ?'09...
Quote:
2007 SL55 is 510 HP vs. 493 in 2006. A larger throttle body is the reason, I believe. Again, I'm talking about SL55, not SL65.Originally Posted by Speed Thrills
Both have same HP rating. 07 has a few cosmetic changes including front aero gills and different exhaust tips. Main interior change in 07 is new steering wheel with paddle shift activators instead of the standard buttons ( you can get this 07 steering wheel for around $700). Get a low mile 06 and you'll save over 60k like I did.
Senior Member
Quote:
Topic is "65" not "55"Originally Posted by whoover
2007 SL55 is 510 HP vs. 493 in 2006. A larger throttle body is the reason, I believe. Again, I'm talking about SL55, not SL65.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
ExploreMBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
'07 has faster-reacting ABC 2.0 (ABC 1.0 in '06 is almost 5 yr old tech); tighter steering (some 10%); new exhaust; much improved, thick-rimmed sport steering wheel w/paddleshifters...
IMO, biggest perf weakness of SL65 is awful brake pedal feel (too much travel before bite) and poor real-world traction, even in mid-range accel on bumpy fwys...
On '07, MB was offering cheap $0 down, 2 yr leases (some $3800/mo incl CA sales tx)....
Given how poor SL sales have been post-'07 mid-cycle refresh (down some 40% y-o-y), may see another attempt at a cosmetic refresh in next yr (impacting resale/trade-in values/lease terms)....
And would suspect CL63/65 will further kill SL55/65 sales/values, as CL is light-years ahead of SL in tech content/interior aesthetics/ergonomics....just compare the SL65's cheap blk plastic buttons/switchgear, ancient infotainment systems, old-tech sport seats w/limited adjustment/massage/ventil capabilities, lack of intelligent headlights, lack of latest-tech BrakeAssist/Distronic coupling, old Parktronic "bullet holes", sat radio lump on trunklid, etc vs CL63/65.....
SL55 was a brilliant, iconic car 5 yrs ago upon launch but 599 and new CL63/65 have changed benchmarks....at least until a fully revised, latest-tech SL comes out in ?'09...
Where is your source for this info? Any other info on the ABC 2.0?Originally Posted by WSH
Minim cosmetic diffces....but would argue signif perf/handling/feel diffces (esp for those w/zero interest in dragstrips but much interest in twisties fun)...
'07 has faster-reacting ABC 2.0 (ABC 1.0 in '06 is almost 5 yr old tech); tighter steering (some 10%); new exhaust; much improved, thick-rimmed sport steering wheel w/paddleshifters...
IMO, biggest perf weakness of SL65 is awful brake pedal feel (too much travel before bite) and poor real-world traction, even in mid-range accel on bumpy fwys...
On '07, MB was offering cheap $0 down, 2 yr leases (some $3800/mo incl CA sales tx)....
Given how poor SL sales have been post-'07 mid-cycle refresh (down some 40% y-o-y), may see another attempt at a cosmetic refresh in next yr (impacting resale/trade-in values/lease terms)....
And would suspect CL63/65 will further kill SL55/65 sales/values, as CL is light-years ahead of SL in tech content/interior aesthetics/ergonomics....just compare the SL65's cheap blk plastic buttons/switchgear, ancient infotainment systems, old-tech sport seats w/limited adjustment/massage/ventil capabilities, lack of intelligent headlights, lack of latest-tech BrakeAssist/Distronic coupling, old Parktronic "bullet holes", sat radio lump on trunklid, etc vs CL63/65.....
SL55 was a brilliant, iconic car 5 yrs ago upon launch but 599 and new CL63/65 have changed benchmarks....at least until a fully revised, latest-tech SL comes out in ?'09...
Had anyone driven both the 06 and the 07 to see if this diff really shows?
MBWorld Fanatic!
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateFeb 2002
- Location2000 ft over the FL coast in a B-17
- Posts:6,061
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I driveVarious
-
Likes:395
-
Liked:326 Times in 230 Posts
Quote:
Good catch. There was also a change in the supercharger for the 07 SL55's...Originally Posted by whoover
2007 SL55 is 510 HP vs. 493 in 2006. A larger throttle body is the reason, I believe. Again, I'm talking about SL55, not SL65.
Currently Active Users (1)


