SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL65 Specs from Inside Line
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 303
Likes: 166
From: VA
c63 BS; lc500; F-pace SVR; Jaguar P8, c63 p31
SL65 Specs from Inside Line
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Sorry...I didn't see this until after I posted the link to the same article. I didn't check it out before because I thought from the title that it was the "regular" SL65. 
Tom
Tom
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 1
From: CA
2010 CL65
Will be interested to see what is NBR of SL65 Blk vs SL63 030....
Am rather disappointed in these 65 Blk specs and apparent lack of tech innovation...
Not sure how the heavy 65 motor (?250 lbs heavier than 63 motor) will work in terms of chassis/wt balance, steering precision for a 4000lb track-oriented car...
And the gearbox sounds boring vs MCT...
Perhaps a fixed-roof SL63 030 would have provided a more dynamically interesting 4000lb car at far less cost and w/greater daily-useability....
Have doubts about SL65 traction on public roads; ground clearance issues of 65 Blk for daily urban use (esp as it lacks ABC and ability to raise car for pkg garage ramps, etc)....and greater width of 65 Blk makes it a less nimble/more bulky car for tight mtn twisties....
Am rather disappointed in these 65 Blk specs and apparent lack of tech innovation...
Not sure how the heavy 65 motor (?250 lbs heavier than 63 motor) will work in terms of chassis/wt balance, steering precision for a 4000lb track-oriented car...
And the gearbox sounds boring vs MCT...
Perhaps a fixed-roof SL63 030 would have provided a more dynamically interesting 4000lb car at far less cost and w/greater daily-useability....
Have doubts about SL65 traction on public roads; ground clearance issues of 65 Blk for daily urban use (esp as it lacks ABC and ability to raise car for pkg garage ramps, etc)....and greater width of 65 Blk makes it a less nimble/more bulky car for tight mtn twisties....
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 19
From: Kuwait
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
Will be interested to see what is NBR of SL65 Blk vs SL63 030....
Am rather disappointed in these 65 Blk specs and apparent lack of tech innovation...
Not sure how the heavy 65 motor (?250 lbs heavier than 63 motor) will work in terms of chassis/wt balance, steering precision for a 4000lb track-oriented car...
And the gearbox sounds boring vs MCT...
Perhaps a fixed-roof SL63 030 would have provided a more dynamically interesting 4000lb car at far less cost and w/greater daily-useability....
Have doubts about SL65 traction on public roads; ground clearance issues of 65 Blk for daily urban use (esp as it lacks ABC and ability to raise car for pkg garage ramps, etc)....and greater width of 65 Blk makes it a less nimble/more bulky car for tight mtn twisties....
Am rather disappointed in these 65 Blk specs and apparent lack of tech innovation...
Not sure how the heavy 65 motor (?250 lbs heavier than 63 motor) will work in terms of chassis/wt balance, steering precision for a 4000lb track-oriented car...
And the gearbox sounds boring vs MCT...
Perhaps a fixed-roof SL63 030 would have provided a more dynamically interesting 4000lb car at far less cost and w/greater daily-useability....
Have doubts about SL65 traction on public roads; ground clearance issues of 65 Blk for daily urban use (esp as it lacks ABC and ability to raise car for pkg garage ramps, etc)....and greater width of 65 Blk makes it a less nimble/more bulky car for tight mtn twisties....
also i find all the tech talk funny because the way some make it out to be, you would think the car is a 1990 model
presafe/ night vision and what not are funky things and hardly musts now.Some will argue but SAFTY! with regard to pre-safe.
yes its nice, but the safety on these cars is pretty high to start with, so your not really going to die because you do not have it, but it can help
7g tranny? has not really shined now has it, and it has been having its fair share of issues. MTC sounds wicked but will just have to wait and see
SMG any one? that was suposse to be the tech of all tech and gasp
they are changing it to DSG It will eat the rest of the MB line up pretty bad if they make a good job of it. Put the SL where it belongs Sport Luxury
for the traction doubts..it has 325/30ZR20 rears
Last edited by Zod; Apr 16, 2008 at 05:51 AM.
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 4
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Something on 4 wheels..
OK, now I can get a $250K+-SL (hmm, can't be opened any more so should it still be considered an SL?)...
But why should I get that car over the Porsche 911 Turbo Coupe? The Porsche has the better handling, the better acceleration and I can almost configurate every single screw to suit my personal taste. I don't want to add the price-advantage because there are several people out there who believe that doesn't matter...
The SL65 Blk. should be considered a nice collector's car but I prefer a SL63 030 where I can still open the top.
But why should I get that car over the Porsche 911 Turbo Coupe? The Porsche has the better handling, the better acceleration and I can almost configurate every single screw to suit my personal taste. I don't want to add the price-advantage because there are several people out there who believe that doesn't matter...
The SL65 Blk. should be considered a nice collector's car but I prefer a SL63 030 where I can still open the top.
Trending Topics
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 6
300ce
Will be interested to see what is NBR of SL65 Blk vs SL63 030....
Am rather disappointed in these 65 Blk specs and apparent lack of tech innovation...
Not sure how the heavy 65 motor (?250 lbs heavier than 63 motor) will work in terms of chassis/wt balance, steering precision for a 4000lb track-oriented car...
And the gearbox sounds boring vs MCT...
Perhaps a fixed-roof SL63 030 would have provided a more dynamically interesting 4000lb car at far less cost and w/greater daily-useability....
Have doubts about SL65 traction on public roads; ground clearance issues of 65 Blk for daily urban use (esp as it lacks ABC and ability to raise car for pkg garage ramps, etc)....and greater width of 65 Blk makes it a less nimble/more bulky car for tight mtn twisties....
Am rather disappointed in these 65 Blk specs and apparent lack of tech innovation...
Not sure how the heavy 65 motor (?250 lbs heavier than 63 motor) will work in terms of chassis/wt balance, steering precision for a 4000lb track-oriented car...
And the gearbox sounds boring vs MCT...
Perhaps a fixed-roof SL63 030 would have provided a more dynamically interesting 4000lb car at far less cost and w/greater daily-useability....
Have doubts about SL65 traction on public roads; ground clearance issues of 65 Blk for daily urban use (esp as it lacks ABC and ability to raise car for pkg garage ramps, etc)....and greater width of 65 Blk makes it a less nimble/more bulky car for tight mtn twisties....
Ted
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
SL65 AMG
I dont see how a porsche turbo is faster or can out handle the sl65 blk, since we have no clue what the black can do. I know for a fact that my sl65 stock was faster then any 997tt tip or 6spd. As far as curves went all 997tt no doubt. My car runs with 500whp c6 z06's and evoms stg 4 turbos so I am sure with more power and 500lbs less it would be a very fast car. Add the real suspension and less flex with the hard top and that will be the fastest car in that price range. I know some will say the zr1 or gt2 but as far as I know the gt2's are going for 50-75k over msrp (250-275k?)and I am sure the vett will be 20k over (125-135k for the vett?)and we still need to see what it can really do. I wish the sl65 blk had the new mct tranny but it is not a deal breaker and I cant wait to buy an sl65 blk.
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 4
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Something on 4 wheels..
I've yet to see a stock SL65 that was faster than a 997tt - especially tip. 0-60 of a 997 tip is 3.5 sec. the 65 has the power to deliver such a time but can't get that much poer on the pavement. as far as I know, the Porsche is lighter and has AWD. If I recall correctly, Mercedes is rating the SL65 4.2 sec from 0-60. Maybe it can break the 4 sec barrier, but 3.5? No way..
The 65 is just too heavy and doesn't have the traction a 997 turbo has.
And you're right: The 997 tt is in a different price-class, no matter if compared to a stock SL65 or the SL65 Blk.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 277
Likes: 1
From: MI
2011 Hyundai Elantra GLS
SL 65 Black Series will crack 0-60mph in 3.2 to 3.4 seconds in my reckoning. Less weight, more power (though same torque), stickier and wider rear tires. It will probably also at least break SLR times at the 'Ring, around 7min 30 sec or so. It will have at least 1.01g withstance to lateral acceleration. As a sum of its parts, its an unbeatable combination, though taken individually, a 5 speed and older V12 may not sound much. I am excited about this vehicle, though not in the market for it, for sure.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 2
2007 S600
I had the privilege today of driving an AMG for the first time in my life.
It was an SL 65AMG. It should be called an SL65 OMG (ohmygod) , the power was outrageous.
If you guys are talking about something more powerful than the current SL65, then we are talking some serious torque. I can't imagine the Porsche is even faster! Wow. I guess I'll have to test drive one of those bad boys one day.
BTW, the 2005 SL65 I test drove today is for sale at $100K, 14000 miles on it, and is silver with red leather just in case anyone is interested. Seemed like a good deal to me considering it was approaching $200K new. PM me if you are interested. I'm not the one selling it but I can get you in touch with the independent seller. He sells exotics.
I also drove a Maybach 57S today and it only had 6000 miles on it and is for sale just under $200K !!!
It was an SL 65AMG. It should be called an SL65 OMG (ohmygod) , the power was outrageous.
If you guys are talking about something more powerful than the current SL65, then we are talking some serious torque. I can't imagine the Porsche is even faster! Wow. I guess I'll have to test drive one of those bad boys one day.
BTW, the 2005 SL65 I test drove today is for sale at $100K, 14000 miles on it, and is silver with red leather just in case anyone is interested. Seemed like a good deal to me considering it was approaching $200K new. PM me if you are interested. I'm not the one selling it but I can get you in touch with the independent seller. He sells exotics.
I also drove a Maybach 57S today and it only had 6000 miles on it and is for sale just under $200K !!!
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 4
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Something on 4 wheels..
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 5
From: Sherman Oaks, CA
06 CLS55 w/ P030, 05 Jag S Type R, 05 TBird-68 Dodge Charger R/T-440 w/4speed I'm original owner
I had the privilege today of driving an AMG for the first time in my life.
It was an SL 65AMG. It should be called an SL65 OMG (ohmygod) , the power was outrageous.
If you guys are talking about something more powerful than the current SL65, then we are talking some serious torque. I can't imagine the Porsche is even faster! Wow. I guess I'll have to test drive one of those bad boys one day.
BTW, the 2005 SL65 I test drove today is for sale at $100K, 14000 miles on it, and is silver with red leather just in case anyone is interested. Seemed like a good deal to me considering it was approaching $200K new. PM me if you are interested. I'm not the one selling it but I can get you in touch with the independent seller. He sells exotics.
I also drove a Maybach 57S today and it only had 6000 miles on it and is for sale just under $200K !!!
It was an SL 65AMG. It should be called an SL65 OMG (ohmygod) , the power was outrageous.
If you guys are talking about something more powerful than the current SL65, then we are talking some serious torque. I can't imagine the Porsche is even faster! Wow. I guess I'll have to test drive one of those bad boys one day.
BTW, the 2005 SL65 I test drove today is for sale at $100K, 14000 miles on it, and is silver with red leather just in case anyone is interested. Seemed like a good deal to me considering it was approaching $200K new. PM me if you are interested. I'm not the one selling it but I can get you in touch with the independent seller. He sells exotics.
I also drove a Maybach 57S today and it only had 6000 miles on it and is for sale just under $200K !!!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 19
From: Kuwait
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
then its awd all the way my friend. Only way you can get as good a times as an awd car can get on normal roads is if u run glue for tires and they are like 300+ width with these cars i feel, or else it ESP blinking heaven (am talking 65/ modded 55) here, even stock 55 have trouble on normal roads unless they are fitted with good tires.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 5
From: Arizona
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
If history serves us correctly, the Black series cars will make great bargains in a couple of years! That's when it will go on my list.
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda,Md.
Bentley Arnage Red Label
Sure, we don't know the numbers yet. The statement 'under 4 seconds' could have many meanings: 3.9, 3.8 etc.
I've yet to see a stock SL65 that was faster than a 997tt - especially tip. 0-60 of a 997 tip is 3.5 sec. the 65 has the power to deliver such a time but can't get that much poer on the pavement. as far as I know, the Porsche is lighter and has AWD. If I recall correctly, Mercedes is rating the SL65 4.2 sec from 0-60. Maybe it can break the 4 sec barrier, but 3.5? No way..
The 65 is just too heavy and doesn't have the traction a 997 turbo has.
And you're right: The 997 tt is in a different price-class, no matter if compared to a stock SL65 or the SL65 Blk.
I've yet to see a stock SL65 that was faster than a 997tt - especially tip. 0-60 of a 997 tip is 3.5 sec. the 65 has the power to deliver such a time but can't get that much poer on the pavement. as far as I know, the Porsche is lighter and has AWD. If I recall correctly, Mercedes is rating the SL65 4.2 sec from 0-60. Maybe it can break the 4 sec barrier, but 3.5? No way..
The 65 is just too heavy and doesn't have the traction a 997 turbo has.
And you're right: The 997 tt is in a different price-class, no matter if compared to a stock SL65 or the SL65 Blk.
The Porsche is faster because the 0-60 is a tick faster because of the awd? Finish the 1/4 mile and the Porsche will be looking at the 65's tail lights everytime. Tip or 6 speed.
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda,Md.
Bentley Arnage Red Label
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 4
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Something on 4 wheels..
1/4 mile 2007 SL65 : 12.1 sec. @ 119.4mph
1/4 mile 2007 911TT : 11.6 sec. @ 118.5 mph
Here are the two links where Edmunds.com listed all important numbers of these 2 cars. I don't see any number where the SL is outperforming the 911. Both cars are VERY close.
Porsche:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do.../pageId=119535
SL65:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do.../pageId=119176
Last edited by FloridaE55; Apr 21, 2008 at 02:23 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda,Md.
Bentley Arnage Red Label
Really? Every time? Well, at least NOT when Edmunds tested these 2 cars:
1/4 mile 2007 SL65 : 12.1 sec. @ 119.4mph
1/4 mile 2007 911TT : 11.6 sec. @ 118.5 mph
Here are the two links where Edmunds.com listed all important numbers of these 2 cars. I don't see any number where the SL is outperforming the 911. Both cars are VERY close.
Porsche:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do.../pageId=119535
SL65:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do.../pageId=119176
1/4 mile 2007 SL65 : 12.1 sec. @ 119.4mph
1/4 mile 2007 911TT : 11.6 sec. @ 118.5 mph
Here are the two links where Edmunds.com listed all important numbers of these 2 cars. I don't see any number where the SL is outperforming the 911. Both cars are VERY close.
Porsche:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do.../pageId=119535
SL65:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do.../pageId=119176
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
C63S coupe, X5M
I really don't think Edmunds should be the place to go for what the SL65 can do. It's a RWD monster with nearly 738 lb ft of torque, launching makes a huge difference on how it will do on the track.
Check dragtimes.com... I see 11.664 for a stock SL65.
E55's can do 12.1 stock (and lower), no way the 65 is slower.
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 4
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Something on 4 wheels..
I really don't think Edmunds should be the place to go for what the SL65 can do. It's a RWD monster with nearly 738 lb ft of torque, launching makes a huge difference on how it will do on the track.
Check dragtimes.com... I see 11.664 for a stock SL65.
E55's can do 12.1 stock (and lower), no way the 65 is slower.
Check dragtimes.com... I see 11.664 for a stock SL65.
E55's can do 12.1 stock (and lower), no way the 65 is slower.
The SL65 has def. more power - but as I said, it tends to be quite difficult to get the best performance from the engine to the road - especially with the somewhat narrow stock-tires and RWD only. A stock-car is only as good as its weakest link.
My comparison was not based on NUMBERS - I wanted to see which car tends to be quicker. The question was: Can a STOCK 911 TT hold up to a STOCK SL65's 1/4 mile time - and IMO, it can, even after checking dragtimes.com.
I'm not saying that 12.1 is the best time the SL65 can do, BUT, to be fair - who tells us that the 911 TT can't do better than 11.6? That's why I was comparing apples to apples, a test performed under the same circumstances by the same company. Comparing times from different sources is always questionable.
Getting the optimum out of the SL65 depends very much on the driver and the raod-conditions. You need a perfect launch to have a chance. IMO, it's easier to push the Porsche to its limit. That's why I still doubt the Porsche will only see the SL's backlights in 98% of the races.
Oh, BTW, if I would only had one car and I would have to decide between the 911 and the SL65, I would pick the Mercedes (hard-top, technical-gadgets, options more 'every-day'-friendly etc.). The Porsche is just the winner to fullfill your pure "need for speed"...
Last edited by FloridaE55; Apr 21, 2008 at 04:41 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda,Md.
Bentley Arnage Red Label
Looking at dragtimes.com their isn't one 911 turbo that does the 1/4 in 11.6 except for the modded ones. Most are in the low 12's. Even Treynor who has some of the faster SL65 times has a modded Promotive 911 turbo time on there at 11.4 which is one of the quickest ones. 11.6 may be a factory ringer sent to the journalists.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
C63S coupe, X5M
*edit*
He ran 11.5 stock...
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...564&highlight=
Ran my SL65 this weekend at the strip.....
11.5 @ 122 Bone stock with Drag Radials
With more practice on the drag radials, the car has more in it. Best 60' time was still 1.7X.
Track prep was very good and the cold weather was great!
I will post time slips in the next couple of days.
Schiz
11.5 @ 122 Bone stock with Drag Radials
With more practice on the drag radials, the car has more in it. Best 60' time was still 1.7X.
Track prep was very good and the cold weather was great!
I will post time slips in the next couple of days.
Schiz
Last edited by Murtaza; Apr 21, 2008 at 06:43 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 4
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Something on 4 wheels..
Looking at dragtimes.com their isn't one 911 turbo that does the 1/4 in 11.6 except for the modded ones. Most are in the low 12's. Even Treynor who has some of the faster SL65 times has a modded Promotive 911 turbo time on there at 11.4 which is one of the quickest ones. 11.6 may be a factory ringer sent to the journalists.
Here's the problem with dragtimes.com: You have a bunch of tested 65s - but only one tested 911 - so saying that this number is the best the car can do is just wrong - since every time depends on many circumstances...In addition, does the tested car have the optional Sport-Chrono-Package? This "torque-booster" might have an influence as well...
Keep in mind: We are talking about the CURRENT 911 turbo. In addition, the one listed at 12.2 is not a tip and the other two - identical cars - are listed at 11.7. The quickest modded 911 I found was 10.990 - but again, I'm not looking at the modded ones.
But anyway, talking about the "quicker" car by simply comparing drag-times that are almost identical makes no sense to me. As soon as you exit the first curve, the Porsche has the advantage. And even when you are driving 3 miles straight on - the Porsche is faster as well - simply due to its top-speed of 193mph compared to the SL's 155mph. Keep in mind - we are comparing STOCK...
Last edited by FloridaE55; Apr 21, 2008 at 08:03 PM.
