SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL63 v Porsche v GTR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 01:40 AM
  #51  
kindafast's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 3
W210 E55 & W204 C63
My .02 is don't get an SL63, they are overpriced and slow. Buy a GTR for performance and with the $ you save an E350 for luxury. It is like having your cake and eating it too...
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 03:25 AM
  #52  
Fantasm's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Car Whore
since when is $85K vs $125K considered "poor mans"?
$40K difference when you are at those levels already, is really nothing in the big picture.
Its cheaper than Turbo yes, but "poor mans"?? No... hardly.

The GTR is faster and in some ways better than the 911TT, the 911TT is in some ways better than the GTR.

No one car is perfect.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 07:41 AM
  #53  
sound 8's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 19
From: U.K.
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by kindafast
My .02 is don't get an SL63, they are overpriced and slow. Buy a GTR for performance and with the $ you save an E350 for luxury. It is like having your cake and eating it too...
Your forgetting Convertible!
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 02:00 PM
  #54  
FLSL55's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 801
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
SL65
I can't believe you guys are comparing an SL63 to a 911TT or a GT-R.....

They are totally different cars. The SL is a grand tourer. NOT a sports car. It's heavy and far from nimble. It’s way off the straight line pace of a GT-R or 911TT.

BTW: a GTR with JUST a software flash ran a 10 second ¼ mile pass at over 129mph.
Not even an SLR can keep up with that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsNieUrafx8
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 02:10 PM
  #55  
sound 8's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 19
From: U.K.
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by FLSL55
I can't believe you guys are comparing an SL63 to a 911TT or a GT-R.....

They are totally different cars. The SL is a grand tourer. NOT a sports car. It's heavy and far from nimble. It’s way off the straight line pace of a GT-R or 911TT.

BTW: a GTR with JUST a software flash ran a 10 second ¼ mile pass at over 129mph.
Not even an SLR can keep up with that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsNieUrafx8
I agree, the SL63 is better looking, makes a better sound, and is a covertible.
I know you can get a 977 convertible but it's a soft top

If I didn't want a covertible I would pick the GTR everytime.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2017 | 04:16 PM
  #56  
danger450's Avatar
Junior Member
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: FL
2016 S63 Coupe & 2014 E550 4MATIC Sedan
A GT-R ... LOL

I don't want a Japanese car that looks like an Altima with a body kit, and has as much plastic on the inside as a 90's Pontiac Grand Am. Barf.


Originally Posted by sound 8
I agree, the SL63 is better looking, makes a better sound, and is a covertible.
I know you can get a 977 convertible but it's a soft top

If I didn't want a covertible I would pick the GTR everytime.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 AM.