SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL55 vs. SL600
Mainly, that it may be much quicker than I orginally thought!!
Any additional insight any of you might provide as to pros and cons on SL55 vs. SL600 would be much appreciated!
Mainly, that it may be much quicker than I orginally thought!!
Any additional insight any of you might provide as to pros and cons on SL55 vs. SL600 would be much appreciated!
Do a search on this forum since this topic has been discussed in excruciating detail.
Last edited by lkirchner; Jun 20, 2011 at 03:30 PM. Reason: Correct
The opinions are going to be geared towards whichever vehicle, that particular poster bought. 55K owners are going to say the SL55 is better, but they're wrong. The SL600 is better. See?
Quick and dirty.
SL600 - Faster than SL55 (Both stock and modded dollar for dollar), smoother, more refined, shares same brakes as SL55. Torque for days. The 321 AMG package, is a must have on the SL600. Without it, the car looks bland, like a plain ole SL500/SL550. The interior of the SL600 is amazing. Leather or wood on EVERY surface, other then the electronic components. Even the dash is leather, and the seats are Executive Leather. Whatever that is.
SL55 - More raw, sounds better with stock exhaust, and better tuned suspension. Car is fast, and car feels fast. Whereas the V12TT gets you to warp speed without drama.
SL65 - Best of both worlds.
SL63 - Pointless, other than the 7speed tranny. Slowest of the bunch. (Cue Sound8)
Whichever you decide, get a 2005+. The 2003-2004 have the archaic electronics.
Searching this forum will yield hours of reading.
Last edited by Benz-O-Rama; Jun 20, 2011 at 03:38 PM.
The SL600 also has lower production, and to some people, more cachet that the SL55 (which get the boy racer tag). The interior of the SL600 is undoubtedly more lux than the SL55.
The SL600 is more nose heavy, and at low speeds I found it a little pokey.
Both cars are great. You should really just test drive each one if possible and see what you like better.
I ended up with the 55. I liked it better for my typical driving and I found a lovely green one that I could not pass up.
Good luck in your search.
Trending Topics




The SL55 FEELS faster as it has a more violent power delivery. The stock exhaust note sounds great.
The SL600 is faster but does not feel faster due to the torque and V12 power delivery. With just basic software on an SL600, you get SL65 type power.
I personally like the feel of the SL55 better and that is the car I am actively shopping for, but if a screaming deal comes up on an SL600...I might jump.
Drive both, see what one you like better. Both are cars are incredible.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Why?
It is more exclusive, SL55's are much more prevalent.
It is quieter, more comfortable and refined for day to day driving.
Suspension does not give up much vs. 55, but agree it is more nose heavy.
It is the luxo flagship, everything inside and outside is absolute top quality.
The V12 is a torque monster, with just a tune it delivers mind boggling performance and OEM reliability. The engine puts a smile on my face every time I drive it. It is a sleeper....unless one sees the V12 badges on the side, most drivers just think you have an SL500....heh heh. I love having a stealthy V12 TT under the hood.
Lastly, if you prefer the more visceral personality of the 55, be sure to test drive an SL65; you'll spend a little more but it will probably be worth it.
Drive all three, and get what you prefer. You won't go wrong. Do get a warranty when you buy.
Last edited by NCE500; Jun 22, 2011 at 10:18 PM.
I had a stock 55 before my 63, and my test road gives me 130 by the
marker and the best the 55 was 126.
If I want just straight line speed I would go for a heavily modded SL600
which will be very close to A SL65. However the SL600 is not popular
here, I drove a stock one and it felt ponderous, very quiet not at all
sporty, and it isn't an AMG so I guess suspension and brakes wont be as good. Between 55 and 600 I would choose 55 as long as it was modified,
and the 600 if that was modifies and the 55 stock.
Neither can compare with the 63 as a package.



, I would go for the V12 in a heartbeat!I've had a 3 or 4 600's, both stock and tuned, and since last year a tuned 65.
To be honest, I would recommend the 600.
7 days a week. And twice on sundays.
Of course the 65 is a better car, but I myself have difficulties to defend that giant leap in price between the two...
At least here in Europe.
I hope some people can. I'm just saying I can't.

So I consider my opinion unbias, since I'm recommending a car I don't even have!
Most people here praise there own stuff, like there's no tomorrow...

So, get a 600!

Preferably with the AMG-plastic!
Then ecu & "straight pipe" it, and you'll have the most car for buck!!!

Good Luck!



Since we do allot of MB/AMG tuning, I get to drive them all.
The 600's chassis really isn't set up to be a sports car and every one I have driven seemed floaty and was a bit overwhelmed by the extra power (we add ~100hp).
As for the interior of the 600's being more luxurious, I'm not sure of that. They have wood, but the instrument binnacle and the headliner is just plastic (at least in the cars I have driven). Whereas the 55 is covered in Alcantara.
I like the general quality of the leather in the SL65 the best.
But between the 55 and 600; if you want a fast luxo cruiser the 600 is the choice. If you want an overall more sporting package the SL55 will work.
Whichever you choose, they are both a credit card charge away from even more power!
The 600 gets an Alcantara headliner, upgraded glove soft napa leather thats exclusive to the V12s, leather dash, leather door inserts, leather door pulls, leather covered armrest, leather seat backs and leather storage shelf.
Also with the suspension lowered with DAS or a lowering module, I be willing to bet that it's just as capable round the bends, as your 55K.
Equipped with the 321 AMG package, it gets all of the AMG body work, plus the steerig wheel shifters.
Last edited by Benz-O-Rama; Jun 25, 2011 at 07:44 AM.
http://www.cars.com/go/search/detail...5&aff=national
Anything to be concerned about? You all know MUCH more then me!
Thanks
Steve
The 600 gets an Alcantara headliner, upgraded glove soft napa leather thats exclusive to the V12s, leather dash, leather door inserts, leather door pulls, leather covered armrest, leather seat backs and leather storage shelf.
Also with the suspension lowered with DAS or a lowering module, I be willing to bet that it's just as capable round the bends, as your 55K.
Equipped with the 321 AMG package, it gets all of the AMG body work, plus the steerig wheel shifters.
We have lowered the 600s and they still seemed out of their depth, suspension wise.
As for that black 600. I can put an '05 600 in your garage with 24K miles for $45K to your door (in most parts of the US). Call me if you are interested. 602-430-6671
We have lowered the 600s and they still seemed out of their depth, suspension wise.
As for that black 600. I can put an '05 600 in your garage with 24K miles for $45K to your door (in most parts of the US). Call me if you are interested. 602-430-6671
No sir, all standard equipment. The only options for the R230 SL 600s are:
Keyless Go
Distronic/Parktronic
Power trunk
Pano roof
321 AMG package (body moldings and shifter buttons)
Everything else I mentioned above is standard equipment.
Maybe you're confused by the guage binnacle. That indeed is plastic on the 600, whereas the AMG cars get suede there.
Also, the 600s get the EXACT same braking components as the SL55s.
Getting a tweaked alignment, i.e. close to what the factory does with the SL55 suspension settings, cost less than $200 at my MB dealer. Mine does not give up much to an SL55 suspension wise anymore, at least the 55s I've driven.
The net is with a little enthusiast owner tweaking and tuning, the 600 becomes a stealthy powerful and comfortable "super car". I am as smitten with mine as the day I got it, and again the day it was tuned.
Last edited by NCE500; Jun 25, 2011 at 05:05 PM.




The supercharges V8's have problems with the inter-cooler pump (easily solved with an aftermarket pump), leaky valve covers, and clutch pack issues.
The known V12 problems include coil packs (but I hear really only the first year had the most problems), and turbo cooling system.
I honestly have always been disappointed with the power delivery of V12 engines in general. I've driven naturally aspirated BMW V12's, the previous generation SL600 (non turbo), and the R230 SL600. The characteristics of all of the V12's were incredible smoothness, and the ability to get to ridiculous speeds without even noticing it. For all the torque these engines produce, you really can't FEEL the power.
If your goal is pure performance, time numbers, or absolute luxury...the SL600 is the best choice.
If your goal is neck snapping acceleration, the SL55 is your choice as it is basically a luxury convertible with a hot-rod engine.



I've had problems with the "ignition banks" or "ignition cassets" on the V12.
(Not sure that's the right word for it, but the engine has one on each side.)
That thing, plus the spark plugs on the same side, is what they change when this happens.
That sure is a weak point, and something I've had problems with on 2 or 3 of the 600's I've had!!!
And you don't necessary feel anything when you drive it.
Sometimes, only the "engine failure lamp" comes on...
Cost to repair that (for us here in Sweden) is about 2500,- dollars.
Last edited by maxabo; Jun 26, 2011 at 05:36 AM. Reason: adjustments


