SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: New 2005 SL65 owner...baselined...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-26-2013, 09:00 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ttboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CTS-V
New 2005 SL65 owner...baselined...

Hi all. Just picked up an 05 SL65 a few weeks ago. I bought it under the impression it was lightly modded, but as near as I can tell, it only has a heat exchanger and no mufflers...but a stock tune.

Drove to the track last Wednesday night on street tires and managed a 11.81 at 118ish on the first pass. Just pulled up around the water box and just took off nice and easy. Next pass tried to power brake a smidge and promptly spun about 100ft or so. 3rd pass, tried to duplicate 1st pass, but the track went away...(obviously car #604) Tech guy thought it was appropriate...

Then I went to my tuner's shop (Porsche /Audi tuner, not MB),and strapped it on his Mustang dyno just to baseline. 494whp/648wtq. This in at 18psi. We thought a stock SL65 was supposed to make 22 psi or so?

So obviously I am currently shopping for a ECU/TCU tune.
Attached Thumbnails New 2005 SL65 owner...baselined...-8-21-13-run-1.jpg   New 2005 SL65 owner...baselined...-8-21-13-run-2.jpg   New 2005 SL65 owner...baselined...-8-21-13-run-3.jpg  
Old 08-26-2013, 11:28 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
V12TTenthusiast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
06 SL65AMG, 13 Tesla Model S 60kwh, 02 Jaguar S-Type 3.0, 12 S550 4 Matic, 07 E320 Bluetec, 06 LX470
I think 18 sounds about right, but I can't remember where I heard it from. To be honest I'm trying to do a turbo upgrade on my SL65 but I need to find a shop who can do it since the only turner I'm aware of that did a turbo mod on the 600s and 65s is speedriven.

You mentioned you have a HE, but if you havent already get an upgraded IC pump too

Also if your planning to come down to the eurocharged opening in the DC area you should look into there ECU/TCU tune, I've been told by alot of people there tune is amazing and I'm planing to get mine down when it opens.

I've been curious tho how does the car sound w/o the exhaust? I'm annoyed how quiet the car is, and I'm thinking about doing exhaust upgrades maybe a custom x pipe set up
Old 08-27-2013, 06:52 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ttboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CTS-V
Originally Posted by V12TTenthusiast
I think 18 sounds about right, but I can't remember where I heard it from. To be honest I'm trying to do a turbo upgrade on my SL65 but I need to find a shop who can do it since the only turner I'm aware of that did a turbo mod on the 600s and 65s is speedriven.

You mentioned you have a HE, but if you havent already get an upgraded IC pump too

Also if your planning to come down to the eurocharged opening in the DC area you should look into there ECU/TCU tune, I've been told by alot of people there tune is amazing and I'm planing to get mine down when it opens.

I've been curious tho how does the car sound w/o the exhaust? I'm annoyed how quiet the car is, and I'm thinking about doing exhaust upgrades maybe a custom x pipe set up
I couldn't find any other data regarding factory boost level, so I'm sticking with 18psi being stock. The place I bought it from said they sent it to the dealer for a "checkup"...I'm assuming they flashed it back to stock...and probably with a more mellow file.
I am ASSuming that I have a pump too. I haven't gotten it up on my lift yet, but I would think if someone went through the effort to put on a HE, they would pump it too. I'll check it soon..and do it if it's not done.

The exhaust is intoxicating..DO IT. I still have the cats, but no mufflers. It sounds awesome and passed emissions here. Very exotic just cruising around, but wails when WOT. I don't like obnoxious..and it's not. DO IT..you will not be dissappointed.

I have been considering a Eurocharged tune(s). I have actually had some email dialogue with Jerry, as I THOUGHT this car MAY have had a Eurocharged tune before. Not crazy about the 5hr drive to VA JUST to get it...Might just custom tune it local with their tune...we'll see.
Old 08-27-2013, 08:04 AM
  #4  
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Received 248 Likes on 214 Posts
In theory you should see 21 psi. I personally have not seen it on any stock car. 18 sounds right.

Your 1/4 and trap sounds about right too.

You are not down on power.
Old 08-27-2013, 09:26 AM
  #5  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
pas6201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 F150 FX4 Ecoboost, 03 e46 M3 (sold), 05 E55 (build is on), 03 Escalade (going to sell)
Originally Posted by V12TTenthusiast
I think 18 sounds about right, but I can't remember where I heard it from. To be honest I'm trying to do a turbo upgrade on my SL65 but I need to find a shop who can do it since the only turner I'm aware of that did a turbo mod on the 600s and 65s is speedriven.

You mentioned you have a HE, but if you havent already get an upgraded IC pump too

Also if your planning to come down to the eurocharged opening in the DC area you should look into there ECU/TCU tune, I've been told by alot of people there tune is amazing and I'm planing to get mine down when it opens.

I've been curious tho how does the car sound w/o the exhaust? I'm annoyed how quiet the car is, and I'm thinking about doing exhaust upgrades maybe a custom x pipe set up
Turbo upgrades are possible for the SL65 EC has a V12TT that the build was just finished and the car will be on the dyno sometime next week for actual numbers.

If you want to talk about possible upgrades feel free to shoot me a PM or email paul@eurocharged-dc.com
Old 08-27-2013, 09:53 AM
  #6  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes on 242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
I have precision 51mm impeller hybrids on my S600 last sat my boost hit 23.5 psi on the top of third gear.
All you need to do is cooling and downpipes on these cars and they will be a beast.

Like I said 12 psi seems a bit low. You should probably get a reflash.
Old 08-27-2013, 10:04 AM
  #7  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
pas6201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 F150 FX4 Ecoboost, 03 e46 M3 (sold), 05 E55 (build is on), 03 Escalade (going to sell)
Originally Posted by shardul
I have precision 51mm impeller hybrids on my S600 last sat my boost hit 23.5 psi on the top of third gear.
All you need to do is cooling and downpipes on these cars and they will be a beast.

Like I said 12 psi seems a bit low. You should probably get a reflash.
I thought he said he was seeing 18psi?
Old 08-27-2013, 10:51 AM
  #8  
Member
 
greekviking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2007 s600
Shardul

Are you using the stock injectors with your 51mm turbos ?
Looks like you might be borderline with that setup.
Old 08-27-2013, 11:21 AM
  #9  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes on 242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Originally Posted by greekviking
Shardul

Are you using the stock injectors with your 51mm turbos ?
Looks like you might be borderline with that setup.
YES. bigger injectors is my next upgrade.
Old 08-27-2013, 11:22 AM
  #10  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes on 242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Originally Posted by pas6201
I thought he said he was seeing 18psi?
info I received from the OP over PM
Old 08-27-2013, 12:23 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Max.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,681
Received 38 Likes on 37 Posts
E55
Did the same, muffler delete on my buddies SL65 and it sounds amazing. I can tell you when I raced my stock e55 with ic pump against my buddies Sl65 with ic pump. He pulled away from me about 2 cars on a highway roll.
Old 08-27-2013, 03:11 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by shardul
I have precision 51mm impeller hybrids on my S600 last sat my boost hit 23.5 psi on the top of third gear.
All you need to do is cooling and downpipes on these cars and they will be a beast.

Like I said 12 psi seems a bit low. You should probably get a reflash.
We offer two types of turbo options. One being modified stock turbo's( like the one's shardul has) and second are our custom big turbo's and a complete build. We also offer great cooling modifications(our intercoolers and so on) and downpipes, along with our ecu/tcu tunes. Let us know if you have more questions at info@speedriven.com
Old 08-27-2013, 04:05 PM
  #13  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes on 242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Originally Posted by Speedriven1
We offer two types of turbo options. One being modified stock turbo's( like the one's shardul has) [/EMAIL]
Compliments of Marcin @ Speedriven
Old 08-27-2013, 06:54 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ttboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CTS-V
Yes..I am making 18psi, not 12.
Old 10-23-2013, 09:38 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ttboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CTS-V
UPDATE - DYNO!!!

OK..might as well update my own thread. As you recall, I have a front mount HE, a (new) Bosch 010 pump, and no mufflers. I now have a stage 2 Eurcharged flash. Finally got on the dyno today. Mustang dyno, 60deg ambient in the shop. Baselined again today, peak numbers were 506/668 stock, and flashed was 530/754. We were very consistant with cool down and IATs, etc...These are obviously peak numbers, the power under the curve is excellent. I have 20-60whp improvement over the entire rpm range and upwards of 120ftlb improvement early on. Boost spiked at 23.5psi and tapered off to 18.5 or so. Plenty of fuel everywhere. It's a shame we can't get the boost to carry out a little bit further, car would be stupid......I'll post a cleaner dyno sheet when I get one. I plan to try another 60-130 too...been 8.16 spinning so far, preflash was 9.70.

Thanks Eurocharged.
Old 10-24-2013, 03:36 PM
  #16  
Member
 
falconsprint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2001 Lamborghini Diablo, 2009 SL65 (sold), 1998 CL600 (sold), 1989 560SEL (sold)
You should be getting about 555-565 rwhp with a eurocharged tune.
Old 10-24-2013, 03:40 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ttboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CTS-V
Originally Posted by falconsprint
You should be getting about 555-565 rwhp with a eurocharged tune.
Thanks for the input. On who's dyno? And how is it calibrated? And with what mods? Honestly, I don't really care about the number..only care about the power under the curve. Trap speed? that number I care about. 60-130? I also care about that number too. The car is significantly faster than it was, so the number is just that...a number...
Old 10-24-2013, 04:21 PM
  #18  
Member
 
falconsprint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2001 Lamborghini Diablo, 2009 SL65 (sold), 1998 CL600 (sold), 1989 560SEL (sold)
Here's a link to a thread with my dyno chart. This was part of a EuroCharged dyno-tune day in the SF Bay area. It was a "Dyno-Mite" dyno. I had my car baselined when it was stock. It was 490 rwhp. So an increase of 75 rwhp.

Not saying anything wrong with your car or your tune. Just giving you other data points to consider.

Also don't forget that the Eurocharged tune remaps the throttle sensitivity. In other words, it gets rid of that dead peddle feel that most Mercedes have over the first portion of throttle movement. Most likely when you say the car feels faster what you are actually feeling in the change in throttle sensitivity.
Old 10-24-2013, 04:30 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Benz-O-Rama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
Originally Posted by ttboost
Thanks for the input. On who's dyno? And how is it calibrated? And with what mods? Honestly, I don't really care about the number..only care about the power under the curve. Trap speed? that number I care about. 60-130? I also care about that number too. The car is significantly faster than it was, so the number is just that...a number...
YES! This guy gets it! My measly ole 600 trapped 126 on a cold day with negative density altitude. ECU/TCU/Muffler delete/BMC filters. That's it, that's the list.

Dyno numbers mean squat. Now, the delta between pre/post mods while strapped down during the same session mean something. But the final figure? Meh...

1/4 trap will tell you more than any peak dyno number will, especially the back 1/2 of the 1/4.

One particular dyno shop I used to use, I don't think my car ever broke 500, same mods. Ridiculously low reading in-floor AWD dyno that reads lower than any dyno dynamics dyno, which is the traditional heart breaker.

Last edited by Benz-O-Rama; 10-24-2013 at 04:41 PM.
Old 10-24-2013, 09:28 PM
  #20  
Member
 
falconsprint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2001 Lamborghini Diablo, 2009 SL65 (sold), 1998 CL600 (sold), 1989 560SEL (sold)
Originally Posted by Benz-O-Rama
YES! This guy gets it!
ok, I understand dyno numbers are relative. But if I read post #15 correctly he only gained 25hp from the eurocharged tune. That doesn't sound right if his car was stock. Send the dyno graph to eurocharged and ask for their opinion.
Old 10-24-2013, 09:41 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ttboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CTS-V
Originally Posted by falconsprint
ok, I understand dyno numbers are relative. But if I read post #15 correctly he only gained 25hp from the eurocharged tune. That doesn't sound right if his car was stock. Send the dyno graph to eurocharged and ask for their opinion.
I did. Jerry is very satisfied with the improvements, and chose not to make any changes. I could probably pick up another 15-20hp, but at the risk of safety...I would rather be a little rich...err to the safe side...25hp was the smallest improvement. Made upwards of 50-60whp in most of the midrange. The car already had a front mount heat exchanger and no mufflers, so baseline is different than a stock car. I appreciate your input, and understand your point. The reality is: my results coincidently mirror the dyno sheet EC advertises on their website...give or take a few...I will try to get some more trap speed and 60-130 numbers soon. THAT will tell me where I stand in comparison to any other cars. I haven't seen many other real world numbers posted around here, so hard to tell. I would expect it to run mid 120's...It already trapped 122 and I couldn't get full throttle until the 330...I'll go back with drag radials. I've been consistantly picking up 25-26mph on the back half...so I know it's running well.
Old 10-25-2013, 09:10 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Benz-O-Rama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
Originally Posted by falconsprint
ok, I understand dyno numbers are relative. But if I read post #15 correctly he only gained 25hp from the eurocharged tune. That doesn't sound right if his car was stock. Send the dyno graph to eurocharged and ask for their opinion.
Wasn't a shot at you. Sorry if it came off that way. It's just refreshing to read that someone uses 1/4 trap, over peak dyno numbers to use as a barometer against other vehicles. As I sure you do, I read countless threads stating how their car put down 550, 575 etc, then you see their timeslip and it's an 11.60@120 or so.... The ET is a direct result of your 60', but the trap, that tells me everything I need to know. The back half mph gain, after the 1/8th is something that's overlooked as well. You can identify heat soak, timing issues, etc.

A dyno just cannot provide the needed CFM of air to for cars to ingest to simulate road conditions. However, they are invaluable tuning tools. Well, at least the eddy current ones are, vs an inertia dyno.


OP,
Car had aftermarket HE? My guess is the car already had some flavor of tune. Can't imagine someone adding that, without a tune too. Falconsprint is right, the pre/post gain doesn't fall in line with stock vs tuned numbers. Your ending number seems right in line though, so my guess is Jerry was able to find more, safe power over whatever was on there.

What was your AFR?

A tuned 600 and vs a tuned 65 are close enough, that you can use my timeslips as a reference. If you check dragtimes under SL600, I have a bunch up there. All were at MIR, in favorable D/A

Last edited by Benz-O-Rama; 10-25-2013 at 09:15 AM.
Old 10-25-2013, 02:02 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ttboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CTS-V
Yep. car had a EC front mount heat exchanger and no mufflers when I bought it. It was supposed to be flashed, but turned out it wasn't. I remember when Jerry drove it in DC, at the open house, he was so sure it was flashed, he pulled my ECU and checked it on the bench. It was, in fact, stock, which my 118 trap speed proves. I have some suspicion that someone robbed the Bosch pump, as it had the stock one. Why one would install a front mount heat exchanger and leave the stock pump is beyond me. I have since installed the 010 pump. The first time we had it on the dyno for a baseline, we made many many pulls in the 460-470 range...only after it had cooled all the way down did we made a "money run" and made the 494. So in REALITY it likely did pick up the 60-70 that eveyone thinks I am missing. Again, these are numbers are from THIS dyno, on THIS day, which is all that matters. A/F is on the rich side, which Jerry prefers (as does anyone else with common sense), and we all think that there isn't much power to gleen from leaning it out some, but there IS some safety to lose...so we are leaving it alone.
Old 10-26-2013, 12:06 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RaceHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 55 Likes on 50 Posts
CL65
Hey it sounds like everything worked out well for you. I look forward to seeing some new time slips and your 60-130 pulls. I'd guess you could expect 125-127 mph traps based on conditions. These cars really love the cooler weather.
Old 10-26-2013, 03:25 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ttboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CTS-V
Well..on the way to the track this morning, I lost the right side coil. Luckily I had just left and got on the hwy, so I could limp home with half an engine. So probably no more timeslips for me this year...unless I can sneak down to E-town, which will likely net me 1 pass, before they promptly kick me out...probably not worth it for a timeslip...


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: New 2005 SL65 owner...baselined...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 PM.