SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL65 Catless Downpipes
I have been having the same war with myself. I just put my exhaust back on in an effort to focus on the intake issue. I am also not crazy about having the filters in the hot engine bay. I don't see a ton of room behind the grill either, but need to investigate some more. Intake is a bigger problem than the exhaust for me (I have no mufflers, only cats).
Not sure what that means? Stock airbox with new piping, or no airbox? Curious what you're going to dyno for?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I guess I could relocate my horns and remove some brackets, etc...

OEM engine cover can fit over this as well
Here's pics of the OEM airbox

As you can see in these pics, the pipe from the air filter to the turbo is very narrow

Interested in your results for sure. I'm of the belief that the increase in CFM will overcome the initial warmer temp of the charge air.
Last edited by Benz-O-Rama; Apr 4, 2014 at 08:17 AM.
Last edited by blackbenzz; Apr 4, 2014 at 10:37 AM.
Initial temp of air ingestion will be higher, no doubt, when sitting still. Say, at the drag strip starting line. But, the filters sit right behind the line of demarcation, where the snorkel ingress is. When the car is in motion, and not ingesting static air, the charge air might be moving at a rate quick enough to render under hood heat irrelevant. Well, not irrelevant, but only subject to same amount of soak you'd see from a stock setup. Add to that, the gain in CFM might also overcome the possibility of power loss from spark retardation due to increased IAT. The main issue I see is the material used. Metal gets hot, real hot. So if the tubes used get superheated, I can see IAT, in stop and go, traffic get stratospheric. Double whammy, right? Static under hood air ingestion, plus superheated plumbing...
I dunno. Discuss...
Last edited by Benz-O-Rama; Apr 4, 2014 at 01:20 PM.
Initial temp of air ingestion will be higher, no doubt, when sitting still. Say, at the drag strip starting line. But, the filters sit right behind the line of demarcation, where the snorkel ingress is. When the car is in motion, and not ingesting static air, the charge air might be moving at a rate quick enough to render under hood heat irrelevant. Well, not irrelevant, but only subject to same amount of soak you'd see from a stock setup. Add to that, the gain in CFM might also overcome the possibility of power loss from spark retardation due to increased IAT. The main issue I see is the material used. Metal gets hot, real hot. So if the tubes used get superheated, I can see IAT, in stop and go, traffic get stratospheric. Double whammy, right? Static under hood air ingestion, plus superheated plumbing...
I dunno. Discuss...
https://mbworld.org/forums/sl55-amg-...ke-thread.html






