SLK/R170: OEM Air Filter VS K&N air filter
#1
OEM Air Filter VS K&N air filter
hi everyone,
i never have problems replacing my air filters. but lately i came across this K & N filter from this site http://www.overnightautoparts.com/st...ke_code=MB&x=1
I was wondering will it really save me gas and get better performance? or is it just one of those gimmicks?
i never have problems replacing my air filters. but lately i came across this K & N filter from this site http://www.overnightautoparts.com/st...ke_code=MB&x=1
I was wondering will it really save me gas and get better performance? or is it just one of those gimmicks?
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#2
there are no filters better than the stock airfilter, only because that K&N crap has larger porous holes in the filter media, and that allows more dirt to pass through the filters and into the engine, and thus contaminating your engine oil. Leave that stuff to the ricers.
If you want more airflow through the OEM filters buy a larger airbox from an E55 class car or buy that carbon fiber airbox from renntech, but use paper filters. Forget the oiled foam and cotton, it has it's place on clean racetracks but not on the street. Do a search on the crossfire forum for more specs on which airbox fits the slk320. Unless you have the smaller Kompessor motor, then Im not sure what the next size airbox is available for you? you might have to make a custom CAI.
If you want more airflow through the OEM filters buy a larger airbox from an E55 class car or buy that carbon fiber airbox from renntech, but use paper filters. Forget the oiled foam and cotton, it has it's place on clean racetracks but not on the street. Do a search on the crossfire forum for more specs on which airbox fits the slk320. Unless you have the smaller Kompessor motor, then Im not sure what the next size airbox is available for you? you might have to make a custom CAI.
Last edited by DynamicS; 05-29-2007 at 05:15 PM.
#5
I know SI has their own kit, and there is also a couple others. On the crossfire forum one guy is installing a set from a late model Lexus. You should be able to burn holes in Supermans' cape
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I dont own the SLK but on my S500 I noticed a realy bad drop in gas milage on city streets. I averaged 11 mpg in the city and around 24 on highway as opposed to the 18 and 26 on oe filters. stay with oe filters.
Last edited by kenstudios; 05-31-2007 at 01:01 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Florida, Tampa
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1993 190E 2.6
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Educate me, but doesn't K&N make performance filters? I bought one. I love it. I know people who swear by them and wont put anything else in them. Its the first thing they by there cars.
As far as letting more dirt in the engine. I have a K&N in a 1993 190e 2.6. I have about 35K miles on that filter with no cleaning. I get my oil changed and when the oil comes out. Its clean. For having such an old engine, and a filter that "lets more dirt in" why is my engine oil so clean? My valves looks great. No build up from what I can see.
I thought K&N made filters for rally cars when they first came out. Cars that do nothing else but drive through dirt. They suck in dirt all day long. Every day. For some reason I think if a stock filter kept more dirt out. They would use them. I might not know something that someone else does. So please let me know. If you can convince me Ill go to MB and get a stock filter for my car following day. But, I'm pretty sure K&N (and from what Ive heard, GREEN) filters are the best.
Yes, the oil based filter can mess up your MAF. I cant defend that at all.
#10
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Educate me, but doesn't K&N make performance filters? I bought one. I love it. I know people who swear by them and wont put anything else in them. Its the first thing they by there cars.
As far as letting more dirt in the engine. I have a K&N in a 1993 190e 2.6. I have about 35K miles on that filter with no cleaning. I get my oil changed and when the oil comes out. Its clean. For having such an old engine, and a filter that "lets more dirt in" why is my engine oil so clean? My valves looks great. No build up from what I can see.
I thought K&N made filters for rally cars when they first came out. Cars that do nothing else but drive through dirt. They suck in dirt all day long. Every day. For some reason I think if a stock filter kept more dirt out. They would use them. I might not know something that someone else does. So please let me know. If you can convince me Ill go to MB and get a stock filter for my car following day. But, I'm pretty sure K&N (and from what Ive heard, GREEN) filters are the best.
Yes, the oil based filter can mess up your MAF. I cant defend that at all.
well if the rally cars used an OEM type filter, they would get clogged up with dirt and loose power, the streets are far less dusty so paper is Ideal. This is the same reason dirt bikes use oiled Foam style instead of a paper or cotton, the dirt and sand will plug both materials, yet it sluffs off the foam filters
#11
most likely your drop in mpg was due to contaminated MAF from the oil and dust from the K&N??
#12
#13
Bazzle
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 E550 Sport
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#15
OK, yesterday I ran with OE filters and I averaged 21 mpg. This morning I just switched to K&N and drove around the block and this was the results.
Last edited by kenstudios; 06-02-2007 at 10:10 AM.
#16
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Baltimore Maryland
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
slk32 Renntech
My slk32 I use high flow filters.
Paper filters are absolute filters. Filter holes has to be smaller than the dirt particles to trap. The drawback is small filter holes result in slower flow. And very small dirt particles usually get through. Advantage is that 95-99% of dirt bigger than the holes will get trapped.
Oiled filters (and fleece filters) are "probability" depth filters. Oil makes the holes "sticky" to all size dirt so bigger holes can be used to trap small particles, which allows higher air flow.
Probability filters are tricky as some percentage of small particles will get through not sticking. The advantage is that it can trap a good percentage of very very small particles. Much smaller than the size of the holes, at say 80-90%. This is something the paper filter has difficulty doing.
At the same total dirt trap level (big and small), a good oil filter can flow 100% more air than the paper filter. They can be designed to flow even more, that is when the total trap level will go down. So much R&D is needed. They get bad names because of some brands of oiled filters just want to increase flow at the cost of lower trap level. K&N should be
Anyway, the design principles are different for the two. I don't know how much HP it gave me. But they work fine on my car for 3 years now.
Paper filters are absolute filters. Filter holes has to be smaller than the dirt particles to trap. The drawback is small filter holes result in slower flow. And very small dirt particles usually get through. Advantage is that 95-99% of dirt bigger than the holes will get trapped.
Oiled filters (and fleece filters) are "probability" depth filters. Oil makes the holes "sticky" to all size dirt so bigger holes can be used to trap small particles, which allows higher air flow.
Probability filters are tricky as some percentage of small particles will get through not sticking. The advantage is that it can trap a good percentage of very very small particles. Much smaller than the size of the holes, at say 80-90%. This is something the paper filter has difficulty doing.
At the same total dirt trap level (big and small), a good oil filter can flow 100% more air than the paper filter. They can be designed to flow even more, that is when the total trap level will go down. So much R&D is needed. They get bad names because of some brands of oiled filters just want to increase flow at the cost of lower trap level. K&N should be
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Anyway, the design principles are different for the two. I don't know how much HP it gave me. But they work fine on my car for 3 years now.
Last edited by jerryxu; 06-21-2007 at 11:56 PM.
#19
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lodi, California
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 SLK 320
I have K&N filters in my car and can tell you that there is no increase in horsepower at all. They dont even change the sound. On my other car Toyota Solara I can hear and feel a difference..
I dont see that they are worth the extra cost in the SLK. It appears that these cars have plenty of air flow from stock.
I dont see that they are worth the extra cost in the SLK. It appears that these cars have plenty of air flow from stock.
#20
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
98 slk230, 98 ml230, #8 #24 and #17 Nascar race cars for promotional events see my home page.
Air filters..
I really respect Bazzle and his contributions but, I disagree that K&N is a good filter.
Why don't you just go ahead and dump the filter oil into the intake system thats where its gonna end up anyway.. Hello M.A.F. sensor.
K&N do not filter as well as a paper filter.
I have only used K&N on my dirt track cars, where you had to constantly clean and oil filters due to the mud.
Thats on a carbereted V-8 motor which your abusing anyway. Not a sensitive fuel injected vehicle that your trying to maintain and get max service life and performance out of.
Take a look at WIX filters and do a comparision..
Anyway Bazzle and others in here are great!! I just disagree on this one..
Just my opinion........... Dum,
Why don't you just go ahead and dump the filter oil into the intake system thats where its gonna end up anyway.. Hello M.A.F. sensor.
K&N do not filter as well as a paper filter.
I have only used K&N on my dirt track cars, where you had to constantly clean and oil filters due to the mud.
Thats on a carbereted V-8 motor which your abusing anyway. Not a sensitive fuel injected vehicle that your trying to maintain and get max service life and performance out of.
Take a look at WIX filters and do a comparision..
Anyway Bazzle and others in here are great!! I just disagree on this one..
Just my opinion........... Dum,
Last edited by dumokie; 11-06-2007 at 11:09 AM. Reason: spelling