SLK/R171: MB SLK 63!? Camo'ed, in Montvale NJ by MB USA HQ
#1
MB SLK 63!? Camo'ed, in Montvale NJ by MB USA HQ
Hi all!
I posted this on a BMW forum but no one there knew... surprise.
I just saw this on my way home and am wondering why a SLK with manufacturer's plates would drive around MB HQ in Montvale NJ camo'ed up and de-badged.
It did not sound like an AMG, neither did it have quad exhaust pipes. The wheels look like regular SLK 350 issue and the camo was only on the front and rear bumper as well as lights.
Sorry for the crappy pics, the crackberry's cam is not its best feature.
Any ideas?
Thx in advance, this is bugging me.
I posted this on a BMW forum but no one there knew... surprise.
I just saw this on my way home and am wondering why a SLK with manufacturer's plates would drive around MB HQ in Montvale NJ camo'ed up and de-badged.
It did not sound like an AMG, neither did it have quad exhaust pipes. The wheels look like regular SLK 350 issue and the camo was only on the front and rear bumper as well as lights.
Sorry for the crappy pics, the crackberry's cam is not its best feature.
Any ideas?
Thx in advance, this is bugging me.
#3
Badging was removed.
The exhaust pipes had large openings, but only a small pipe was visible. The car had Michigan Manuf. plates.
#5
#7
I highly doubt thats a 63, as a matter of fact, it looks like a regular 350, the bumper is too small, the 63 bumper would have to look like 55 or even more aggressive.....they gotta test it over there first then stateside....
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 290
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500