SLK32 AMG (R170) 2001 - 2004: Discuss the SLK32 AMG.

SLK32 Dyno Test Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-20-2001, 08:08 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
LN 32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 SLK32 AMG
SLK32 Dyno Test Results

I've posted this previously elsewhere, but thought I'd add it here as well...

We put the car in 'W' mode and turned off ESP. Three runs were completed on my 2002 AMG SLK32 with approximately 1200 miles on the odometer. The tests were run on a 2001 model Mustang Eddy Current 4 wheel dyno. Here are the results using conversion factors of 123% and 121%, respectively (more on parasitic loss below):

First set are based on 123% wheel to crank conversion (aka parasitic loss):
<b>
Run#1 352 ftlbs 355 hp
Run#2 351 ftlbs 359 hp
Run#3 347 ftlbs 353 hp </b>

Second set of numbers are based on 121% conversion factor:
<b>
Run#1 346 ftlbs 350 hp
Run#2 345 ftlbs 353 hp
Run#3 342 ftlbs 347 hp </B>

<i>How we determined the parasitic loss conversion factor (wheel output to crank output):</i>

The 123% factor is a number that falls almost directly into the middle of % conversion factor (high 127% and low 118%) normally applied to a Mustang Eddy-Current Dyno and the 121% conversion factor was developed by dividing dyno wheel hp into manufactured stated hp output for each run and then averaging the results.
<i>
Averaging results of all runs for each conversion factor: </i>

Now averaging hp and torque for all runs for each conversion factor, the average for 123% is <b>350 ftlbs and 356 hp </b>and the average for 121% is <b>344 ftlbs and 350 hp</B>. Manufacturer stated ratings are 332 ftlbs and 349 hp.

In all three runs max toque was reached at approximately 4500 rpm and hp at 5750 rpm.

Since I haven't gotten around to scanning the dyno sheets, photos of the monitor showing the output at the wheels are located at here. (Note: This is not crank hp (i.e., hp at the crank with accessories) or torque, but rather wheel hp and torque, shown prior to application of any conversion factor. Crank hp is what is advertised by manufacturers.)
Old 11-20-2001, 08:19 PM
  #2  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
What does using the "W" mode do for you instead of the "S" mode. I know what is does in regards to daily driving- starting in 2nd gear instead of first but does it give you more peak HP or peak torque??
Old 11-20-2001, 08:28 PM
  #3  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
LN 32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 SLK32 AMG
Putting it in 'W' mode does only what you stated (i.e., start in 2nd gear). It does nothing to affect peak horsepower or torque.
Old 11-20-2001, 09:49 PM
  #4  
Don
Junior Member
 
Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GLC 63
Originally posted by LN 32
Putting it in 'W' mode does only what you stated (i.e., start in 2nd gear). It does nothing to affect peak horsepower or torque.
You might mention that the W-mode also changes the shift point thresholds. In fact, the reason you used the W-mode was to help prevent downshifts during the dyno test.
Old 12-01-2001, 01:15 AM
  #5  
Newbie
 
speeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Laguna Hills, CA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Need Comments on 2002 SLK32AMG

Hello--
I'm going for a test drive in a 2002 SLK32AMG tomorrow & would appreciate any feedback on potential problems with the electric roof, engine, supercharger, etc. Does anyone know of a dealer with a competitive price in the Orange County, CA area?
Thanks,
Bob
Old 12-14-2001, 04:16 PM
  #6  
Super Member
 
jswedberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C32 AMG
Question

Maybe I'm a little slow - you said your numbers were rear-wheel horsepower? Or does the parasitic-loss conversion make it "equivalent" to crank HP?



Do your numbers mean that the MB figures are on the mark, more or less?

Or

Does that mean that Mercedes is EXTREMELY conservative on their (crank) horsepower figures?
Old 12-14-2001, 04:31 PM
  #7  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
LN 32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 SLK32 AMG
If you look at the linked charts, you will see the wheel HP shown on the dyno.

Mercedes' numbers seem very close to the mark to me.... maybe slightly conservative, but well within the normal variation.
Old 04-20-2004, 02:26 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
newsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Re: Need Comments on 2002 SLK32AMG

Originally posted by speeder
Hello--
I'm going for a test drive in a 2002 SLK32AMG tomorrow & would appreciate any feedback on potential problems with the electric roof, engine, supercharger, etc. Does anyone know of a dealer with a competitive price in the Orange County, CA area?
Thanks,
Bob
Hey, just wonder how your test drive ever turned out and what you ended up getting, I'm in your same boat!
Old 07-11-2004, 05:02 AM
  #9  
Newbie
 
cvayala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central California
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 SLK32 AMG
Finally!! I thank you for posting those pics, I got my 32 used with RennTech mods, I also received a dyno sheet showing about 330 hp at the wheels, I needed something to compare it with. Thanks again.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SLK32 Dyno Test Results



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.