SLK55 (R171) 2004 - 2010: SLK200K, SLK280, SLK350, SLK55, SLK55 Black Series

New SLK55 Faster than SL600

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-22-2005, 11:32 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
StephenK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2006 SL600, 2001 S500, 1996 SL320
New SLK55 Faster than SL600

Curious what you SLK55 guys think about this. A person who lives down the street from me recently bought a new SLK55 (which both looks and sounds quite nice), but he has been ranting about how powerful his car is and thinks it is faster than my Renntech modified SL600.

I have never been drove an SLK55, so I don't know. What do you guys think.
Old 11-22-2005, 11:38 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Falco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SFV, CA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 SLK55
Originally Posted by StephenK
Curious what you SLK55 guys think about this. A person who lives down the street from me recently bought a new SLK55 (which both looks and sounds quite nice), but he has been ranting about how powerful his car is and thinks it is faster than my Renntech modified SL600.

I have never been drove an SLK55, so I don't know. What do you guys think.

I wish....but no...you should be low 12's to possibly high 11's while slk55 stock is probably mid to high 12's...
Old 11-22-2005, 11:41 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
StephenK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2006 SL600, 2001 S500, 1996 SL320
That's sort of what I thought

That's sort of what I thought.

I have very little track experience, but the last time I ran a 1/4 mile, I was 11.958 @ 120.27mph. I rented a track in Gainesville for a day this next month, to see exactly what my car is really capable of doing.

Anyone else who is nearby who wants to join in for the day, email me.
Old 11-22-2005, 11:52 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
medici78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
'03 G500, '13 G63, '17 GLS63,
I dont know what kind of crack your neighbor is smoking, but there is no way in hell he can hang with you unless he slaps a supercharger on his SLK55, and even then, I still wouldnt take any bets.
Old 11-22-2005, 11:57 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
StephenK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2006 SL600, 2001 S500, 1996 SL320
I don't know

I don't know where he is getting his thoughts about this from. Maybe I should be polite and let him show me on a nice open stretch one day.
Old 11-23-2005, 06:34 AM
  #6  
Almost a Member!
 
gdsmith56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harpers Ferry, WV
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK55, Ford F350 Diesel, WV Jetta TDI
Maybe I should be polite and let him show me on a nice open stretch one day.
That's what I would do ... if I had the faster car.
Old 11-23-2005, 07:33 AM
  #7  
Newbie
 
JosephN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It all depends how you drive the car... of course on track it will lose to the sl600, but on the road, an slk has the agility, pace, and pure slk passion to win over so called scared drivers.

example; My oldere brother just received him GT3 porsche and I took it around London, where I was on a freeway, a Modena was playing with me.. I didnt want to risk any messing up of the car, but he was just a little bit too ****y... like your friend.. so its the way you drive the car.

On track; an sL600 is superior,
on terrain; the driver makes the win.
Old 11-23-2005, 08:47 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by JosephN
It all depends how you drive the car... of course on track it will lose to the sl600, but on the road, an slk has the agility, pace, and pure slk passion to win over so called scared drivers.

example; My oldere brother just received him GT3 porsche and I took it around London, where I was on a freeway, a Modena was playing with me.. I didnt want to risk any messing up of the car, but he was just a little bit too ****y... like your friend.. so its the way you drive the car.

On track; an sL600 is superior,
on terrain; the driver makes the win.
When you say track I assume you mean drag strip? The SL600 is a fast car but its not a good track car compared to the SLK55.

Which type of GT3 did your brother get one of the last 996 models?
Old 11-23-2005, 09:13 AM
  #9  
Member
 
novabenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Radnor, PA
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2009 C63
Assuming a drag race, the SL600 should win.
The SLK55 hits the 1/4 mile in 12.7 seconds.
Old 11-23-2005, 10:52 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
jmejones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about 0-60? or 5-60? Who wins? For the cost differential the SLK55 wins even if it's a 4.0 versus 4.3
Old 11-23-2005, 11:09 AM
  #11  
Super Member
 
Shinigami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 55 AMG
With a supercharger on the SLK, it will eat the SL600. That's a fact. We're talking about 4, or even sub 4 second times 0-60mph.

A stock SLK 55 might do better on an auto-x course or a track, since it's lighter and can take corners quite well. But the SL600 will win on a drag race no problem (unless you really mess up during a launch... almost impossible to do with an automatic gearbox).

Just go find a nice empty spot and swap cars for a 5-10 minute drive around the countryside. That should give him and you a better idea of what the cars are capable of.
Old 11-23-2005, 12:40 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NOTKTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
g
Originally Posted by StephenK
That's sort of what I thought.

I have very little track experience, but the last time I ran a 1/4 mile, I was 11.958 @ 120.27mph. I rented a track in Gainesville for a day this next month, to see exactly what my car is really capable of doing.

Anyone else who is nearby who wants to join in for the day, email me.
Which track did you book in Gainesville?
Old 11-23-2005, 12:45 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
StephenK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2006 SL600, 2001 S500, 1996 SL320
Gainesville Raceway

Originally Posted by NOTKTS
Which track did you book in Gainesville?
The Gainesville Raceway.
Old 11-23-2005, 07:12 PM
  #14  
Newbie
 
JosephN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah its the newest GT3, really a sensational car to drive.. all yellow. very sick car to drive and oh boy is it fun. but i want my slk
Old 11-24-2005, 04:23 AM
  #15  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by JosephN
yeah its the newest GT3, really a sensational car to drive.. all yellow. very sick car to drive and oh boy is it fun. but i want my slk
The 996 is the old model i.e. not the 997 that has round front lights rather than fried egg shape.
Old 11-24-2005, 05:47 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
benzmodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
W203 slightly modified
Originally Posted by Shinigami
With a supercharger on the SLK, it will eat the SL600. That's a fact. We're talking about 4, or even sub 4 second times 0-60mph.

A stock SLK 55 might do better on an auto-x course or a track, since it's lighter and can take corners quite well. But the SL600 will win on a drag race no problem (unless you really mess up during a launch... almost impossible to do with an automatic gearbox).

Just go find a nice empty spot and swap cars for a 5-10 minute drive around the countryside. That should give him and you a better idea of what the cars are capable of.
Dropping an SL55 engine into an SLK would be ideal. I think Steve knows a dealership who ordered an SL55 engine by mistake and is stuck with it.
Old 11-24-2005, 05:53 AM
  #17  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by benzmodz
Dropping an SL55 engine into an SLK would be ideal. I think Steve knows a dealership who ordered an SL55 engine by mistake and is stuck with it.


The SLK55 engine IS the SL55 engine isn't it? the only real difference being the SLK doesn't have the supercharger/turbo that the SL does.
Old 11-24-2005, 12:06 PM
  #18  
Super Member
 
LETO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: central pennsylvania
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
12 CLS550, 09 CLS550, 04Cooper,10 Cooper S
Originally Posted by Shinigami
With a supercharger on the SLK, it will eat the SL600. That's a fact. We're talking about 4, or even sub 4 second times 0-60mph.

A stock SLK 55 might do better on an auto-x course or a track, since it's lighter and can take corners quite well. But the SL600 will win on a drag race no problem (unless you really mess up during a launch... almost impossible to do with an automatic gearbox).

Just go find a nice empty spot and swap cars for a 5-10 minute drive around the countryside. That should give him and you a better idea of what the cars are capable of.
Especially if it is a carlsson SLK55
Attached Thumbnails New SLK55 Faster than SL600-carlssonslk05m.jpg  
Old 11-24-2005, 02:59 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
benzmodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
W203 slightly modified
Originally Posted by SLK55AMG


The SLK55 engine IS the SL55 engine isn't it? the only real difference being the SLK doesn't have the supercharger/turbo that the SL does.
Most of us can deal with the concept SAME and DIFFERENT around the age of five.
Old 11-24-2005, 04:28 PM
  #20  
Super Member
 
RennTechV12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2008 Bentley GTC, Porsche GT2/EVOMS GT700, 1968 Dodge Charger Hemi
Originally Posted by SLK55AMG


The SLK55 engine IS the SL55 engine isn't it? the only real difference being the SLK doesn't have the supercharger/turbo that the SL does.
And the SLK has the new 7 speed transmission.
Old 11-24-2005, 05:58 PM
  #21  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by benzmodz
Most of us can deal with the concept SAME and DIFFERENT around the age of five.
Sorry I just figured you didn't know any better
Old 11-24-2005, 10:05 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NOTKTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
g
Originally Posted by StephenK
The Gainesville Raceway.
Could you email me details at NOTKTS@gmail.com

I'm very intrested
Old 11-24-2005, 10:08 PM
  #23  
Super Member
 
RennTechV12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2008 Bentley GTC, Porsche GT2/EVOMS GT700, 1968 Dodge Charger Hemi
Originally Posted by NOTKTS
Could you email me details at NOTKTS@gmail.com

I'm very intrested
What are you gonna take...the bull or the horse?
Old 11-24-2005, 10:10 PM
  #24  
Member
 
mrkbbd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'05 MB CLK 320A; '06 BMW X5 4.8is
didn't C&D get ~3.8s 0-60 out of a stock sl600
Old 11-24-2005, 10:12 PM
  #25  
Member
 
mrkbbd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'05 MB CLK 320A; '06 BMW X5 4.8is
actually 3.6s
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=7782


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New SLK55 Faster than SL600



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.