SLK55 (R171) 2004 - 2010: SLK200K, SLK280, SLK350, SLK55, SLK55 Black Series

SLK55 or Z4MCoupe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-01-2006, 04:07 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cntlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55AMG W203; 330i E90
SLK55 or Z4MCoupe?

Our SLK55 base price is $125K, Z4M Coupe is $101K.
I am always keen on SLK but the price performance of Z4M Coupe seems to have an advantage. Which one will you get ?
And, shall I wait for the SLK63 ?
When is the SLK facelift due to launch ?
Old 07-01-2006, 04:11 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HLG600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,799
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
R230 SL63 | W220 S55
Oh man, that's a tough one. I recently saw the new M Coupe and it looked great. To my tastes, I would take the SLK for the torquier feel of the 5.4 Litre AMG V8. Although the M engine is a work of mechanical art, the torque rating a little more than 100 short of the AMG. Right now, I would probably go with the SLK55 after some thought. If and when there is an SLK63, I would take that hands down...even over the new M V8, if it ever makes it into the M Coupe.
Old 07-01-2006, 05:52 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
PC Valkyrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55 AMG, 135i, 911 GT3, GLE43 AMG
Between the SLK55, M Roadster, and M Coupe, I would get the M Roadster.

Like many people here, I already have experienced the C55 AMG and its engine. For me to get a 2 seat sports car, it definitely will be a "fun" car. And a big part of the "fun" is the open top experience, and a manual stick shift transmission. With the amazing E46 M3 engine in its engine bay, rowing through gears will be a pleasure in either the M Roadster or M Coupe. Sure, the M Coupe will probably handle a bit better than the M Roadster, but I'm not skilled enough to take these cars to their limits on everyday twisty roads to take advantage of coupe's extra rigidity. So the M Roadster for me so I can enjoy some top down driving!!
Old 07-01-2006, 10:03 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG_55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mymbonline
more than likely my next car will be z4 m coupe.
the roadster is a piece of **** from what i read.
the coupe is 2.5 times stiffer
Old 07-02-2006, 12:23 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MercedesFTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cee Fiddy Five
Roadster isn't that bad at all. I test drove it the other day. Simple and clean manual tranny. Nothing about sport modes and stuff like that (I mean I heard the M5 is bad...but I found the M3 to be already too complicated! with the smg of course). Havn't even seen a coupe around here yet. So can't say much about that.

Have you considered the Boxter S or Cayman? I've only driven the Boxter S, but from what I hear the Cayman is MUCH better than the Boxter...which right now paints a picture of this supercar priced for mere mortals, because the Boxter S is already amazing.

Havn't had the chance to test drive the SLK55...because it is kinda out of my price range (boxter belongs to a friend), and the only used one is in a far away dealership. But even used the M Roadster is still cheaper.
Old 07-02-2006, 12:51 AM
  #6  
Member
 
AMG4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
slk55 will destroy the z4m in straightline acceleration for sure. alone with the z4m, it will pretty much kill everything else in the bmw lineup except for m5 and m6 but it will be just as fast.
facelift is due in 2008 if you wanna wait.
z4m will probably have better handling but its not like the slk 55 has bad handling. you use acceleration all the time as for handling, forget about it unless its a track car.
Old 07-02-2006, 08:48 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Evil Duffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey/Brooklyn
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'99 C230 K
I was at flemmington BMW on friday and checked out the new Z4 M coupe, I have to admit I love its design, its just mean looking. The roadster is nice but if I wanted the convert, id go with the SLK for sure. Its really a toss up between the two, although I felt that the seats in the amg are more comfortable for driving than the m coupe.

Trending Topics

Old 07-02-2006, 09:01 PM
  #8  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Lack of hardtop?
SLK55 all the way if you must.

Mmmm, hardtop convert... so sexy.
Old 07-03-2006, 06:38 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by MercedesFTW
Have you considered the Boxster S or Cayman? I've only driven the Boxster S, but from what I hear the Cayman is MUCH better than the Boxster...which right now paints a picture of this supercar priced for mere mortals, because the Boxster S is already amazing.
.
I had a Cayman S on loan for a few days to compare to my Boxster S..... I was expecting the differences to be fairly easy to spot but the Cayman is only a small step up. The feeling of speed is virtually the same in both cars although the Cayman was a couple of tenths quicker to 60mph (I have a datalogger), handling wise the Cayman did feel a little stiffer and cornered just that little bit faster and flatter but its marginal....... if you are driving at 8 tenths there will be hardly any difference between a Boxster S (the new one) and the Cayman S but if you have the ability to take the Cayman to 10 tenths it would prove to be a better drivers car than the Boxster.

One area that the Cayman feels different is its traction when exiting a corner..... in the dry its is virtually impossible to break traction at the rear wheels whereas the Boxster S allows a small amount of slip...... obviously better traction is good most of the time but I find the Boxster to be a little more fun knowing that I can provoke a small slide when I want to.

The new updated MY07 Boxster S gets the same engine as the Cayman S so the straight line speed advantage of the Cayman will vanish...... so the Boxster S will have the speed AND be a lot cheaper than the hardtop
Old 07-03-2006, 06:59 AM
  #10  
Member
 
ash-c32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: london
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
996 C4, previously owned 996 c2, c32 amg, 350z, R33 GTR, R34 GTR
Cayman S or SLK55

The Z4M is ugly beyond belief - sad trout face and a rear end that has no styling- just my opinion

The cayman is a superb car in every way except it feels so slow for 295hp
the slk is fantastic but needs a manual box and less-intrusive esp.
Old 07-03-2006, 08:39 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mick1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C320wz
Originally Posted by ash-c32
Cayman S or SLK55

The Z4M is ugly beyond belief - sad trout face and a rear end that has no styling- just my opinion

The cayman is a superb car in every way except it feels so slow for 295hp
the slk is fantastic but needs a manual box and less-intrusive esp.
I, too, prefer the Cayman S over the Z4M based upon its design.

Old 07-03-2006, 10:46 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cntlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55AMG W203; 330i E90
I did not ask opinion about the Cayman S but it is nice to see the subject brought up again. Thank you. Our local CaymanS price is obviously already in the top luxury catagory ~135K for just base price - and that only gets me a poor man's Porsche, while SLK55 and Z4M are tops of the lines!
Basically, Porsches are designed to have superb aerodynamics, otherwise, they are fundemental pretty ugly cars except shadowed by its sports reputation. I am still keen to wait for the handsome SLK63 facelift.
Old 07-03-2006, 11:04 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
ndabunka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No longer car shopping...
New Z4 coupe.... Didn't they call that a 260Z originally?

The 260z was a great car in it's time (small 2-seater with a 6 cylinder eengine and sporty handling) and it's about time someone brought it back. I just never thought it would coem under the BMW label....
Old 07-04-2006, 05:33 AM
  #14  
Member
 
drakon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 197
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1990 560 SEC (modified), SLK55, CLK500
Wow! porsche has a much higher markup than the bmw and benz in HK?

Anyhow, i LOVE the proportions of the Z4 roadster, but the front end looks aweful, and the coupe looks really cheap (i keep thinking civic hatchback when i look at the Z4coupe). the rear slope looks unfinished. if i was looking for a coupe, i'd DEFINITELY go for the porsche, meanwhile, for the convertible, the SLK55 wins handsdown in EVERY category for me except for fuel economy and at-the-limit handling.
Old 07-04-2006, 05:50 AM
  #15  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by cntlaw
Our local CaymanS price is obviously already in the top luxury catagory ~135K for just base price - and that only gets me a poor man's Porsche, while SLK55 and Z4M are tops of the lines!
Old 07-04-2006, 06:38 AM
  #16  
Super Member
 
Shinigami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 55 AMG
The SLK 63, if it comes out, will surely be a lot more expensive then the 55...

The first and most obvious difference between the two cars is the convertible experience versus the coupé experience. The second most obvious difference is the transmission.
Old 07-04-2006, 08:18 AM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mick1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C320wz
Originally Posted by cntlaw
Our local CaymanS price is obviously already in the top luxury catagory ~135K for just base price - and that only gets me a poor man's Porsche, while SLK55 and Z4M are tops of the lines!
They are all poor man's cars ! (by this definition)

You acknowledged the existence of a Porsche 911 without acknowledging the existence of a Mercedes-Benz SL55 and a BMW M6.

Cayman S vs 911 => Cayman S = Poor man's Porsche
SLK55 vs SL55 => SLK55 = Poor man's Mercedes-Benz
Z4M vs M6 => Z4M = Poor man's BMW

Last edited by mick1; 07-04-2006 at 08:22 AM.
Old 07-04-2006, 03:32 PM
  #18  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by mick1
They are all poor man's cars ! (by this definition)

You acknowledged the existence of a Porsche 911 without acknowledging the existence of a Mercedes-Benz SL55 and a BMW M6.

Cayman S vs 911 => Cayman S = Poor man's Porsche
SLK55 vs SL55 => SLK55 = Poor man's Mercedes-Benz
Z4M vs M6 => Z4M = Poor man's BMW
Well said that man!

To add another example to ram home the point......

Ferrari 430 Vs Ferrari Enzo = 430 is the poor mans Ferrari!
Old 07-04-2006, 05:41 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MercedesFTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cee Fiddy Five
Pfft...everyone knows the Boxter is the poorman's porche!
Old 07-21-2006, 10:47 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cntlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55AMG W203; 330i E90
Originally Posted by mick1
They are all poor man's cars ! (by this definition)

You acknowledged the existence of a Porsche 911 without acknowledging the existence of a Mercedes-Benz SL55 and a BMW M6.

Cayman S vs 911 => Cayman S = Poor man's Porsche
SLK55 vs SL55 => SLK55 = Poor man's Mercedes-Benz
Z4M vs M6 => Z4M = Poor man's BMW

There is no such thing called poor man's Benz, because if you drive a Benz you are always recognized to be rich. The only I can think of, BMW cars are poor man's Benz.
Old 07-21-2006, 12:55 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SLK55R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'10 Porsche Turbo PDK, 500e, GL450
poor mans?

I don't know if this applies to the BMW's or Mercedes. To be honest I could have easily afforded an SL. I chose the SLK because its much more sporty. In my opinion ... other than things like the DTM this is the sportiest Mercedes yet.

Last edited by SLK55R; 07-21-2006 at 01:22 PM.
Old 07-21-2006, 01:02 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
vivianlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002M3
Originally Posted by cntlaw
There is no such thing called poor man's Benz, because if you drive a Benz you are always recognized to be rich. The only I can think of, BMW cars are poor man's Benz.
so, basically what you saying are to buy a car to please everyone else and how you care he or she looked upon you??? pity...
Old 07-21-2006, 01:04 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
vivianlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002M3
Originally Posted by SLK55AMG
Well said that man!

To add another example to ram home the point......

Ferrari 430 Vs Ferrari Enzo = 430 is the poor mans Ferrari!
lol... well said
Old 07-21-2006, 09:21 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
cntlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55AMG W203; 330i E90
Originally Posted by vivianlove
so, basically what you saying are to buy a car to please everyone else and how you care he or she looked upon you??? pity...

I shall avoid to take anything personal in this discussion, After all, use a bit of our sense of humor and let's just have a laugh.
Have a nice day.
Old 07-22-2006, 09:57 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MBZ SLK
Originally Posted by cntlaw
I shall avoid to take anything personal in this discussion, After all, use a bit of our sense of humor and let's just have a laugh.
Have a nice day.
I don't blame the way you think, society molds you into what you are. I live in a small city, Littleton, CO and notice big cities like NY, LA, HK, Shanghai, London and such all think the same way. It's what ppl think, not what you think. I buy a benz to impress, I buy a benz so ppl think I'm rich. I know so many guys in LA that barely could afford a nice car, lives in an apt with many others but that doesn't matter, I drive a nice car. I'm not saying everyone from the big city is like this, this is just from my observation. I used to drive a M3(back when it was rare) and all my friends from LA used to think I'm crazy for not driving it downtown to showoff. I prefer to take it to the mountains and enjoy the road and scenery. I buy the car for myself and that is all. *flame suit on*


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: SLK55 or Z4MCoupe?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 PM.