R171 -> 911 or SL
06-14-2007, 04:13 AM
#51
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
06-14-2007, 02:48 PM
#53
HI guys let continue this thread.!!
I've got a test drive on a used 997 black w/ black
First impres the *** is so hot. The looks is very good but almost same as VW (front light)
Drive the car ( for about 15min )
I dont think its accelerate better than my 55
The sound is too soft also ( compare 55 )
The rear have more space
Very good handling !
I dont find any comfy and bigger inside on 997 ( That i tot b4 )
And the best things is i've been a superstar for 15min, everybody look at me
when pass by
Finally i said its not better than SLK 55 AMG
The dealer will give another test drive next week
997S and 997 Turbo
That's all for the breaking news
To be continued
I've got a test drive on a used 997 black w/ black
First impres the *** is so hot. The looks is very good but almost same as VW (front light)
Drive the car ( for about 15min )
I dont think its accelerate better than my 55
The sound is too soft also ( compare 55 )
The rear have more space
Very good handling !
I dont find any comfy and bigger inside on 997 ( That i tot b4 )
And the best things is i've been a superstar for 15min, everybody look at me
when pass byFinally i said its not better than SLK 55 AMG
The dealer will give another test drive next week
997S and 997 Turbo
That's all for the breaking news
To be continued
Last edited by lontong; 06-14-2007 at 02:51 PM.
06-15-2007, 01:41 AM
#54
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
For the record, I agree with all your other points
06-15-2007, 03:52 AM
#55
i think this is really not a difficult situation... obviously if u can afford the price, u would have chosen 911 or SL at the beginning instead of SLK right?
SLK should not be compared with 911 or SL... they are in complete different league... maybe u should compare with cayman or boxster, C55, CLK55 or whatever...
SLK should not be compared with 911 or SL... they are in complete different league... maybe u should compare with cayman or boxster, C55, CLK55 or whatever...
06-15-2007, 10:44 AM
#56
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'93 RX-7, SLK55
i think this is really not a difficult situation... obviously if u can afford the price, u would have chosen 911 or SL at the beginning instead of SLK right?
SLK should not be compared with 911 or SL... they are in complete different league... maybe u should compare with cayman or boxster, C55, CLK55 or whatever...
SLK should not be compared with 911 or SL... they are in complete different league... maybe u should compare with cayman or boxster, C55, CLK55 or whatever...
We looked at both the SL55 & N/A 911. Guess what? We selected the SLK55 (it was smaller/more nimble than the SL, accelerated just as quick, but handled & braked better). The SL had a little nicer interior, but was an absolute BARGE. The 911 Carerra offered no peformance benefit, lacked instant V8 torque & was ~ 50% more money. The value proposition just wasn't there (and everyone on the planet has a 911). They are extremely nice cars, it just didn't offer much performance value & the wife didn't like the newer/more sedate styling. Different league? Hmmm, no. A Carerra GT or an SLR, THAT is a "different league".
06-15-2007, 12:32 PM
#57
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
215
After driving the SLK55 @ the AMG challenge (both regular and 030), I have to say i was very impressed with the handling, the power, the overall package. (for a mercedes)
However, The 997s is a much better drivers car. It looks, sounds, handles much better.(and it has a six speed
) Not taking anything away from the SLK, but in this comparison, the 997S is clearly the uber sports car
However, The 997s is a much better drivers car. It looks, sounds, handles much better.(and it has a six speed
) Not taking anything away from the SLK, but in this comparison, the 997S is clearly the uber sports car
06-15-2007, 12:39 PM
#58
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'93 RX-7, SLK55
After driving the SLK55 @ the AMG challenge (both regular and 030), I have to say i was very impressed with the handling, the power, the overall package. (for a mercedes)
However, The 997s is a much better drivers car. It looks, sounds, handles much better.(and it has a six speed ) Not taking anything away from the SLK, but in this comparison, the 997S is clearly the uber sports car
However, The 997s is a much better drivers car. It looks, sounds, handles much better.(and it has a six speed
) Not taking anything away from the SLK, but in this comparison, the 997S is clearly the uber sports car Sounds better - See above (surprising you like a buzzing 6 over a throaty V8, but again...it's personal preference
) Mannual tranny - Yes, just not such a big deal to some Buyers (some actually prefer a good manual autobox....just depends on people's preference)
06-15-2007, 01:28 PM
#59
i think this is really not a difficult situation... obviously if u can afford the price, u would have chosen 911 or SL at the beginning instead of SLK right?
SLK should not be compared with 911 or SL... they are in complete different league... maybe u should compare with cayman or boxster, C55, CLK55 or whatever...
SLK should not be compared with 911 or SL... they are in complete different league... maybe u should compare with cayman or boxster, C55, CLK55 or whatever...
I'm just looking to change some bigger car, price is not a big problem once we in love
But i do understand what you mean... But come on not every people own expensive car is rich. ( Some do leasing )
But we do CASH for about 2.5 billion $IDR for SLK 55
you do the calculationDont know your country price but mayb 3 for 1 here
Not try to be cocky but cant accept your statement.
Peace man
Last edited by lontong; 06-15-2007 at 01:31 PM.
06-15-2007, 01:33 PM
#60
Looks better? Your opinion - subjective.
Sounds better - See above (surprising you like a buzzing 6 over a throaty V8, but again...it's personal preference )
Mannual tranny - Yes, just not such a big deal to some Buyers (some actually prefer a good manual autobox....just depends on people's preference)
Sounds better - See above (surprising you like a buzzing 6 over a throaty V8, but again...it's personal preference
) Mannual tranny - Yes, just not such a big deal to some Buyers (some actually prefer a good manual autobox....just depends on people's preference)
You my man !!
06-15-2007, 03:08 PM
#61
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
215
Looks better? Your opinion - subjective.
Sounds better - See above (surprising you like a buzzing 6 over a throaty V8, but again...it's personal preference )
Mannual tranny - Yes, just not such a big deal to some Buyers (some actually prefer a good manual autobox....just depends on people's preference)
Sounds better - See above (surprising you like a buzzing 6 over a throaty V8, but again...it's personal preference
) Mannual tranny - Yes, just not such a big deal to some Buyers (some actually prefer a good manual autobox....just depends on people's preference)
06-15-2007, 10:51 PM
#62
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Lotus Elise SLK55
How is a N/A in a " different league"? Funny stuff. We looked at both the SL55 & N/A 911. Guess what? We selected the SLK55 (it was smaller/more nimble than the SL, accelerated just as quick, but handled & braked better). The SL had a little nicer interior, but was an absolute BARGE. The 911 Carerra offered no peformance benefit, lacked instant V8 torque & was ~ 50% more money. The value proposition just wasn't there (and everyone on the planet has a 911). They are extremely nice cars, it just didn't offer much performance value & the wife didn't like the newer/more sedate styling. Different league? Hmmm, no. A Carerra GT or an SLR, THAT is a "different league".
We looked at both the SL55 & N/A 911. Guess what? We selected the SLK55 (it was smaller/more nimble than the SL, accelerated just as quick, but handled & braked better). The SL had a little nicer interior, but was an absolute BARGE. The 911 Carerra offered no peformance benefit, lacked instant V8 torque & was ~ 50% more money. The value proposition just wasn't there (and everyone on the planet has a 911). They are extremely nice cars, it just didn't offer much performance value & the wife didn't like the newer/more sedate styling. Different league? Hmmm, no. A Carerra GT or an SLR, THAT is a "different league".Last edited by Addicted2Speed; 06-15-2007 at 10:54 PM.
06-15-2007, 11:25 PM
#63
Senior Member
It might be an age thing when it comes to preferences. Most of the younger crowd prefer the SLKs. The only people that I've ever seen driving 911s are semi balding men in their 50s. (ran across a brand new one - an S- this morning and the guy looked like Tony Sopranos)
I think the 911 was always thought as the epitome of sports car. And perhaps it once was (or was the only one). But there are so many other up and coming cars that are just as good and/or slightly better than the 911s.
I think the new turbo version is pretty wicked fast though.
I think the 911 was always thought as the epitome of sports car. And perhaps it once was (or was the only one). But there are so many other up and coming cars that are just as good and/or slightly better than the 911s.
I think the new turbo version is pretty wicked fast though.
06-16-2007, 02:13 AM
#64
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'93 RX-7, SLK55
06-16-2007, 02:21 AM
#65
It might be an age thing when it comes to preferences. Most of the younger crowd prefer the SLKs. The only people that I've ever seen driving 911s are semi balding men in their 50s. (ran across a brand new one - an S- this morning and the guy looked like Tony Sopranos)
I think the 911 was always thought as the epitome of sports car. And perhaps it once was (or was the only one). But there are so many other up and coming cars that are just as good and/or slightly better than the 911s.
I think the new turbo version is pretty wicked fast though.
I think the 911 was always thought as the epitome of sports car. And perhaps it once was (or was the only one). But there are so many other up and coming cars that are just as good and/or slightly better than the 911s.
I think the new turbo version is pretty wicked fast though.
They'r not looking for price to enjoy and feel the speed
Love your comment bro
06-16-2007, 05:12 AM
#67
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
Same thing here. I can afford a 997S and SL55 and still chose an SLK55... I test drove all cars extensively. 997S, SL55, and SLK55 are all very close in performance. I did not choose the 997 because I couldn't justify spending 100k for 355hp, no torque, and so-so interior. I did not pick SL55 because it was more of a cruiser and handled like a boat, it just wasn't that fun to drive (in my opinion), and I also didn't like the 5-speed tranny. SLK55, on the other hand, was perfect IMO. What is on a different league is SL65 and 997TT, which I couldn't afford.
(they arent better but just as good)i do have a full leather option though that comes with a "special" interior color (cocoa)
as for torque, its definitely not as good as a n/a 55 but its not lacking. i made 65-70 ---- 100 in 6th gear vid because many people that were thinking of going from an amg to a 997s kept worrying about the tq., will post later
anyways, it more than makes up for it up top
06-16-2007, 05:14 AM
#68
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
It might be an age thing when it comes to preferences. Most of the younger crowd prefer the SLKs. The only people that I've ever seen driving 911s are semi balding men in their 50s. (ran across a brand new one - an S- this morning and the guy looked like Tony Sopranos)
I think the 911 was always thought as the epitome of sports car. And perhaps it once was (or was the only one). But there are so many other up and coming cars that are just as good and/or slightly better than the 911s.
I think the new turbo version is pretty wicked fast though.
I think the 911 was always thought as the epitome of sports car. And perhaps it once was (or was the only one). But there are so many other up and coming cars that are just as good and/or slightly better than the 911s.
I think the new turbo version is pretty wicked fast though.
btw,
im 24
06-16-2007, 06:57 AM
#69
Senior Member
I think these are all around the 911s price and performance: Z06, R8, (upcoming) GTR, Exige S, M6, and Viper are some to name.
And I'm not doubting that there are some young 911 drivers out there, like there are gay republicans. I'd just never seen one my self.
And I'm not doubting that there are some young 911 drivers out there, like there are gay republicans. I'd just never seen one my self.
Last edited by Lizard; 06-16-2007 at 07:49 AM.
06-17-2007, 06:15 PM
#70
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
and its not all about #'s, if it was, id be driving a z06 right now.
i can show you REAL proof (from people that make a living testing cars, they actually drive them all, un****inbelievable, aint it
) that a 911 is the best all around sports car
06-17-2007, 06:21 PM
#71
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
EVO magazine, although they dont have a sports car category, the classify it as coupes/gt's, which would actually help your argument casue an m6 is by no means a sports car.
"OUR CHOICE" 997s
"BEST OF THE REST" R8, v8 vantage
Autocar also called the 997s the best sports car, cant find the mag right now though, very recent issue.
"OUR CHOICE" 997s
"BEST OF THE REST" R8, v8 vantage
Autocar also called the 997s the best sports car, cant find the mag right now though, very recent issue.
06-17-2007, 07:29 PM
#72
EVO magazine, although they dont have a sports car category, the classify it as coupes/gt's, which would actually help your argument casue an m6 is by no means a sports car.
"OUR CHOICE" 997s
"BEST OF THE REST" R8, v8 vantage
Autocar also called the 997s the best sports car, cant find the mag right now though, very recent issue.
"OUR CHOICE" 997s
"BEST OF THE REST" R8, v8 vantage
Autocar also called the 997s the best sports car, cant find the mag right now though, very recent issue.
06-17-2007, 11:44 PM
#73
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
06-17-2007, 11:54 PM
#74
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 SLK55 AMG Iridium Silver
no one in their right mind would trade in a SLK55 for an SL500. that's just WRONG. the SL500 is one of the heaviest, ugliest roadsters ever made. not to mention how ****ing slow it is for the money. the 911, maybe...
