March 03 Car and Driver E55
Lows:An M5 is more fun. Electronics actually drive the car.
Artificial brake and steering feel.
0-60 4.5sec
0-100 9.8
1/4 mile 12.7 @ 117
70-0 175 ft (~20ft longer than M5)
300ft skipad .83 g
14mpg C/D observed
They list the price as $74,000 and comment " This is one of those rare cars that are simply not overpriced, even at $74,000"
But I'm not too thrilled about the skidpad and 70-0 numbers. The W210 E55 did better. March 2000 C&D tested the W210 E55 at .90g and 161 ft (70-0). March 2000 R&T also got .90g, and the E55 (122 ft) was better than the M5 (129 ft) in braking in 60-0. The W210 E55 was a better balanced car vs. the M5 (too much understeer) in R&T's opinion. I'm not sure if the new E55 has improved in the handling and braking departments.
Expected the comment about the M5 coming from C&D, they've got BMW on their brain or are on BMW's payroll. Rare to see anything beat a BMW in any of their comparison tests.
Testing on the SL55 and E55 has been consistent (same sytem, of course).
Trending Topics
The positive remarks where the powerful engine, the tranny, the drivers invironment, the sound of the engine wich they compared to a NASCAR. The bad things where the fuel consumption. But at the end they said that the combination of the engine and the chassie gave the E55 the lead in the class of the superlimos!
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




but when the fly by wire brake system is really handy is in emergency stops...
Fly-By-Wire was a term and aspect used by General Dynamics to describe the internal flight control systems on the USAF F-16 Fighter Jet when introduced back in the late 70's. Cars don't fly so Mecedes has 'coined' the wrong term.
but when the fly by wire brake system is really handy is in emergency stops...it'll almost instantly grab the brakes unlike traditional ones...where there is a slight delay...and u never know when u might need that extra whatever tenths of a second to stop from hitting something...so i guess mercedes always puts saftey in front of sports in any regard
In the end... they take longer to stop from the point of pedal application.
In the magazine tests, they know when they are going to hit the brakes And hit them hard. -- the intelligent braking system is for the everyday (non-test) driver who may not react as quickly and as decisively as one would in a test situation. Thus, the brake system "anticipates" an emergency situation and reacts with full braking. There is some obvious trade-off but in the end, a much better system for everyday driving.
People are stupid so we are giving you a system that is less responsive when used to it's full capabilities because.... well, people are stupid. Not to mention that they'll fall for the marketing BS we'll use in promoting it. Bigger is better!
They should require folks to learn how to control their vehicles rather than the poor excuse for drivers exams and this would not be an issue. Honestly, I'm surprised this performance "trade-off" flies in the European market. Doubly so because this is the "high performance" AMG model. Don't give me watered down junk for the "average" drivers, give me the real deal!

BTW: There does not have to be a trade-off. You can still have excellent brakes and let the computer give you full braking under certain circumstances. In this case we get a system that isn't as capable as before but "trades-off" with marketing BS.
Last edited by Mr Johnson; Feb 1, 2003 at 10:37 PM.




Any chance of you digitizing your Tivo show and distributing it to us?
Thanks
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...threadid=29270




!!!!
Wonder if it would be cheaper to find an early model W210 E55AMG and then add the Kleeman Supercharger . . .
:-) neil
1988 360TE AMG
1993 500E





...Wonder if it would be cheaper to find an early model W210 E55AMG and then add the Kleeman Supercharger . . .



FAST

