W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

E60 M5 boys dreaming lol

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-18-2005, 09:53 AM
  #26  
H50
Almost a Member!
 
H50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMWM3 BMWM5 E55
Originally Posted by BoBcanada
Yes but there's few minuses in M5 which i find annoying...

1. LC gonna destroy your clutch if you use it too much
2. As ex E55 owner I loved the torque around the town, you just press not even a half a pedal and you can pass any car not even going more then 4.500 rpms, with m5 you'de have to work that engine...

But there's also few minuses with E55 that i found.

1. Although it launches like a rocket you have to feather a pedal coz ESp kicks in and cuts the power, depending on the surface, So It needs an LSD. But i also drove in the winter even with stock tires i found that it drives beautifully in the winter.

2. Suspension must be harder.

3. When you do not watch your speedo you can get into troubles.


I do love M5 and E55, but what I decided is that M5 was made to be fast in upper speeds 100km/h + where's E55 monsterous torque makes it all around.

I'm still deciding on what my next car will be and as much as i love the new M5 I still think that i'll go with CLS or SL55! The torque it has is just so much fun, + you can get more out of it
I do agree with you here, but believe there is a enough of torque in the M5 which you can easily pass other cars at low rpm even with the P400.
As for the E55 its sure had plenty of power but the lack of driving feeling for ex the steering is too soft, also the suspension . After driving the M5 you feel the difference. The M5 is a true sport car, a nice wieghted steering, and you can change the damper setting from comfort to sport which has a big difference the ride becomes more harder and stiffer. Also on bends you can feel that there is no body roll as in the E55 which you feel that you gona loose the back any minute when you approach a bend with high speed.

As for LC i dont think its that hard on the clutch, it is made for such things and had been tested. The only thing you cant do LC repetitvely you have to wait for 10 minutes or drive for a distance to cool up the clutch.
Old 06-18-2005, 08:28 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
zdkdeeier493's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Also, it doesn't have 507 horse power, but it actually has around 525 - 530 ponies, just a matter of time when all the dyno freaks with figure out. BMW decided to call it 507 horse power because it was a magic number or so to BMW."

WTF? Come on now, seriously...this guys gotta be kidding.

Last edited by zdkdeeier493; 06-18-2005 at 08:34 PM.
Old 06-19-2005, 03:11 AM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,694
Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Eleanor Owner
"Also, it doesn't have 507 horse power, but it actually has around 525 - 530 ponies, just a matter of time when all the dyno freaks with figure out. BMW decided to call it 507 horse power because it was a magic number or so to BMW."

WTF? Come on now, seriously...this guys gotta be kidding.
He means the engine is underated.
Old 06-20-2005, 02:37 AM
  #29  
Super Member
 
krispykrme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: fremont, ca
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 E55
Originally Posted by Eleanor Owner
"Also, it doesn't have 507 horse power, but it actually has around 525 - 530 ponies, just a matter of time when all the dyno freaks with figure out. BMW decided to call it 507 horse power because it was a magic number or so to BMW."

WTF? Come on now, seriously...this guys gotta be kidding.
why not, same with E55. We all know that E55 does not put 469 at crank, it's more like 490. So why can't BMW do the samething that MB is doing?

BTW, please look up what 507 means to BMW.

Unlike MB that down rate E55's output due to stupid marketing issue with S55/SL55. At least BMW picked 507 (which means something in BMW's history).
Old 06-20-2005, 02:38 AM
  #30  
Super Member
 
krispykrme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: fremont, ca
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 E55
Originally Posted by Mardeth
The shorter gears compensate for the "lack" of torque... And I cant see how the LC can be any harder on the clutch than a hard launch on a similarly powered manual.
No, but BMW has no control or prevent you from killing your clutch with manual. But LC can be used to protect the a$$ that like to kill clutch.
Old 06-20-2005, 01:08 PM
  #31  
Almost a Member!
 
wolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't doubt the BMW engine is underrated at 507. Given all the test results I've seen I would believe 520 - 530 without any trouble.

600 HP with just an ECU upgrade is ridiculous though. I don't doubt the engine is capable of 600 HP with some modifications. But unless there is something really unusual going on, the best I've seen with N/A engines for ECU upgrades by 'aftermarket tuners' is minimal.

Better breathing, altered timing, and an rpm increase could certainly give 600 HP - but getting more air into an N/A engine is not easy.
Old 06-20-2005, 05:36 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Erik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ALPINA B12 5,7 Coupe #22/57
[QUOTE=wolverine]

600 HP with just an ECU upgrade is ridiculous though. I don't doubt the engine is capable of 600 HP with some modifications. But unless there is something really unusual going on, the best I've seen with N/A engines for ECU upgrades by 'aftermarket tuners' is minimal.

[/QUOT]

Agree, BUT what they could have done is to develop the car and run it in a 600 Hp version, either to test components to see if they can take the stress or just to see how it will run under such setup.

If either of this scenarios are correct, it is very easy for them to use a slitghly detuned version in the car. Remeber on this car only electronics change the Hp from 400 to 507 Hp. In theory they could have a lot of reserves still not used. Do I belive that, actually I have no idea.

Only a change in the VANOS departement has enourmous effect on the power.
I lost almost 100 Hp at max rpms when my VANSOS ****ed up in my M3. Everything was normal until 6000 rpms and then it was all over.

Already in Sept 2000 I was told about this engine and at that time it was running at 500 Hp, during the almost 5 years its not that hard to belive they have tested cofiguration at more than 500 Hp.

The main question is, will they ever put that into production, and what would the downside ( if any ) be on the userfriendlyness.






[QUOTE=wolverine]

Better breathing, altered timing, and an rpm increase could certainly give 600 HP - but getting more air into an N/A engine is not easy.

[/QUOT]

The engine need a looooot of air even today, thats why it has no foglights.
Old 06-20-2005, 05:39 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Erik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ALPINA B12 5,7 Coupe #22/57
Originally Posted by wolverine

600 HP with just an ECU upgrade is ridiculous though. I don't doubt the engine is capable of 600 HP with some modifications. But unless there is something really unusual going on, the best I've seen with N/A engines for ECU upgrades by 'aftermarket tuners' is minimal.
Agree, BUT what they could have done is to develop the car and run it in a 600 Hp version, either to test components to see if they can take the stress or just to see how it will run under such setup.

If either of this scenarios are correct, it is very easy for them to use a slitghly detuned version in the car. Remeber on this car only electronics change the Hp from 400 to 507 Hp. In theory they could have a lot of reserves still not used. Do I belive that, actually I have no idea.

Only a change in the VANOS departement has enourmous effect on the power.
I lost almost 100 Hp at max rpms when my VANSOS ****ed up in my M3. Everything was normal until 6000 rpms and then it was all over.

Already in Sept 2000 I was told about this engine and at that time it was running at 500 Hp, during the almost 5 years its not that hard to belive they have tested cofiguration at more than 500 Hp.

The main question is, will they ever put that into production, and what would the downside ( if any ) be on the userfriendlyness.






Originally Posted by wolverine

Better breathing, altered timing, and an rpm increase could certainly give 600 HP - but getting more air into an N/A engine is not easy.
The engine need a looooot of air even today, thats why it has no foglights.
Old 06-21-2005, 12:01 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Marcus Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Real Cars
The M5 will need an engine tear down to make 600hp, which I would estimate to cost between $25-$40k including parts and reassmbly. This is assuming the drivetrain can handle the power and not need to be upgraded as well. You guys who think with boltons you can get 600hp out of normally aspirated 12.0:1 compression ratio V10 are living in absolute la-la-land. E55 owners take note, you will be able to quote this post of mine in 1 year and say "Marcus was right."

A bolt on 600hp E60 M5 is not even realistic enough to be considered a pipedream. It's complete fantasy. Do not argue this point using the E39 M5, E46 M3, hp/liter, nothing. Go learn about engines first.

I thank you for this comedic relief post of the day.

-m
Old 06-21-2005, 01:12 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Erik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ALPINA B12 5,7 Coupe #22/57
Originally Posted by Marcus Frost
A bolt on 600hp E60 M5 is not even realistic enough to be considered a pipedream. It's complete fantasy. Do not argue this point using the E39 M5, E46 M3, hp/liter, nothing. Go learn about engines first.

I thank you for this comedic relief post of the day.

-m
Hi Marcus. I agree in principle 100%.

Its no way in hell a NA engine will gain close to 20% only by ECU upgrades, thats a no brainer, no point of discussing......
Your AMG55 engines could probably get 20% using ECU but not much more.

But what neither you or I know, is what that engine is build for in the first place. Thats only guessing. I still belive they could have developed this engine for more than 507-520 or whatever the real Hp it has. Since the engine already has a program to reduce the power, much like the old ZR-1 it is POSSIBLE that the system could be used to also increase from the poweroutput it has today.

Also I am sure that the M guys know excactly what AMG is planning and must be planning something to be prepared for than one.......

As I said, Its possible, but not very likly. I would guess we will see a 50 Hp increase within 2 yersa or so, or maybe in the M6 CSL,......... IF they decide to put it in production.....


WE can pick up this in a year and see if you was right....

Last edited by Erik; 06-21-2005 at 01:15 PM.
Old 06-21-2005, 02:01 PM
  #36  
Almost a Member!
 
wolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mardeth
Im guessing that 550 will be easy. Intake, ECU and exhaust (inc. headers) enough to break the 600 barrier?
I agree 550 HP should be easy. But if you're starting at 530, it's not that much of a jump. Based on the road tests I've seen, it's hard to believe the engine is only putting out 507 HP. 520 - 530 HP at the crank is probably close to the actual output. I'll also bet the drivetrain losses are very small, maybe less than 10%. That would give you 470 - 480 HP at the wheels.
Old 06-21-2005, 10:47 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,694
Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts
2005 E55
theres 2 chips out or coming out very soon that get 550hp.One was an italian tuner and was over 550 so who knows what this engine is capable of.

And to the person that said BMW can't make an m power NA engine staying NA has no clue of what m engines can do.

delage has a NA kit that gets the e46 m3 to 420hpNA.Hartge has a kit thats gets 540hp NA on the old m5.Why is it so hard to beleive that this engine cant make 600hp staying NA.The m6 csl is supposed to have 550hp whan it comes out and thats the same engine.

add some bigger throttle bodies,track pipes and maybe cams and 600 should be doable.
Old 06-21-2005, 11:25 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Marcus Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Real Cars
Originally Posted by skratch77
theres 2 chips out or coming out very soon that get 550hp.One was an italian tuner and was over 550 so who knows what this engine is capable of.

And to the person that said BMW can't make an m power NA engine staying NA has no clue of what m engines can do.

delage has a NA kit that gets the e46 m3 to 420hpNA.Hartge has a kit thats gets 540hp NA on the old m5.Why is it so hard to beleive that this engine cant make 600hp staying NA.The m6 csl is supposed to have 550hp whan it comes out and thats the same engine.

add some bigger throttle bodies,track pipes and maybe cams and 600 should be doable.
skratch,

I have forgotten more about engine building than you know. I have argued with you in the past and all you do is post unsupported uninformed banter. Look at Erik's post - I know Erik favors BMW but he KNOWS you aren't getting 100hp from the S85 with "bigger throttle bodies, track pipes, and a set of cams" You are seriously on drugs to think that.

You need to re-read my post before you say anything. First off, these packages you describe deal with a completely different motors and have ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING on this discussion. It would be the equivalent of saying "XXX company makes a 100hp upgrade package for my E55, it should work on my C32" It doesn't work. These packages you describe involve SIGNIFICANT modifcations to the engine and involve pulling the motor and replacing internals.

I've been around many, many Honda engines that put the BMW hp/l claims to shame. Motors that rev to 11krpm all day with super-exotic components and ridiculous amounts of money invested in them. The amount of ECU control and the limit to which the motor is already built to are the limiting factors. In addition, we'll have to see the E60 drivetrain with it's SMG can handle the extra power - fortunately with the 55 series we share a drivetrain with cars that have over 700tq - the E60 M5 does not have this luxury.

-m
Old 06-21-2005, 11:48 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,694
Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts
2005 E55
Hello...I said theres already 2 chips that claim more than 550.I also said that this engine could be detuned from the get go.Its fun to read how all you people laugh at people over at the m5board because someone said this engine might get 600hp.

IT WILL

what don't you get about it.If all other mpower engine broke well over 115hp/l whay can't this F1 type do it???

Think about that a little ....just sit back chill out and think.

eurobanh just put out a CHIP for the old m5 and get 30-35 rwhp.Thats with just a chip.
Old 06-21-2005, 11:49 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,694
Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts
2005 E55
Hello...I said theres already 2 chips that claim more than 550.I also said that this engine could be detuned from the get go.Its fun to read how all you people laugh at people over at the m5board because someone said this engine might get 600hp.

IT WILL

what don't you get about it.If all other mpower engine broke well over 115hp/l whay can't this F1 type do it???

Think about that a little ....just sit back chill out and think.

eurobanh just put out a CHIP for the old m5 and gets 30-35 rwhp.Thats with just a chip.
Old 06-22-2005, 12:20 AM
  #41  
Super Member
 
04E55 AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04E55AMG, 05Dodge RAM 1500 Quad Cab, 02Montero Limited
Originally Posted by Marcus Frost
skratch,

I have forgotten more about engine building than you know. I have argued with you in the past and all you do is post unsupported uninformed banter. Look at Erik's post - I know Erik favors BMW but he KNOWS you aren't getting 100hp from the S85 with "bigger throttle bodies, track pipes, and a set of cams" You are seriously on drugs to think that.

You need to re-read my post before you say anything. First off, these packages you describe deal with a completely different motors and have ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING on this discussion. It would be the equivalent of saying "XXX company makes a 100hp upgrade package for my E55, it should work on my C32" It doesn't work. These packages you describe involve SIGNIFICANT modifcations to the engine and involve pulling the motor and replacing internals.

I've been around many, many Honda engines that put the BMW hp/l claims to shame. Motors that rev to 11krpm all day with super-exotic components and ridiculous amounts of money invested in them. The amount of ECU control and the limit to which the motor is already built to are the limiting factors. In addition, we'll have to see the E60 drivetrain with it's SMG can handle the extra power - fortunately with the 55 series we share a drivetrain with cars that have over 700tq - the E60 M5 does not have this luxury.

-m
Thank you for educating those who have no clue what they say
Old 06-22-2005, 12:32 AM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,694
Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts
2005 E55
some more for you guys to think about.The enzo has 660 hp with its 6.2 NA v12.they just made an enzo fxx with over 800 NA hp with the same engine.I guess there the only ones other than honda that can break 120hp/l.
Old 06-22-2005, 02:06 AM
  #43  
Member
 
Mardeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No one said anything about an 100hp increase, more like a 70hp increase. 20-30hp for full exhaust, 20-30hp for ECU and 10-15 for an intake. That should get us pretty close to 600 IF the car is underrated....

Total cost: ~5000$

EDIT: I started to think about it. If the ECU gets you to 600, then bolt-ons might get you to 650 and a bit more advanced tuning to 700?! I can dream right?

Last edited by Mardeth; 06-22-2005 at 02:20 AM.
Old 06-22-2005, 03:00 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Erik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ALPINA B12 5,7 Coupe #22/57
Originally Posted by Mardeth
No one said anything about an 100hp increase, more like a 70hp increase. 20-30hp for full exhaust, 20-30hp for ECU and 10-15 for an intake. That should get us pretty close to 600 IF the car is underrated....

Maybe, maybe not, but that i NOT the topic here. The topic was the claim from a "dealer" that the engine could reach 600 Hp with ECU modification ONLY......,

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E60 M5 boys dreaming lol



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 AM.