Air filter test data
http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm









I'll say this. I have Green Filters and I see an appreciable difference in "response".... which I attribute to a less restricted airflow, not very empirical but rather experiencial.
Can't talk about the dirt aspect, although when I opened up the airbox, lots of bugs and things trapped....Gave it a high pressure blow job.
Also don't know about HP gains....I just notice better throttal "response"..
Trending Topics
I must admit....all this info is starting to spook me.
Thanks for any info.
**just surfed the EVO website and could not find them....can someone help me out....and if they are not on the site...any idea why this "best filter of alll time" would not be aggressively promoted.
Thanks again
Last edited by Jakpro1; Sep 3, 2005 at 10:04 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I must admit....all this info is starting to spook me.
Thanks for any info.
**just surfed the EVO website and could not find them....can someone help me out....and if they are not on the site...any idea why this "best filter of alll time" would not be aggressively promoted.
Thanks again
This is a give and take situation. You cant have both unfortunately...
Any material that is more pourous is obviously going to let more particles through it. It's a matter of finding the right compromise between how pourous and/or how restrictive (more paper like) you want the filter.
Regardless of what people tell you or what you read, there is NO WAY that a paper filter has the same CFM rate as a K&N or BMC filter and that is why you feel the car more responsive. Less throttle required to get it going.
I used a FOAM race filter on my Porsches and my vettes when I wanted to do drags and other fun stuff.. I switched back to my BMC filters when I was running on the street.
I check my throttle body inlet and my filter housings almost every week or two. I inspect the throttle plate for residue and it is basically clean other than the oil residue that I notice from the PCV system.
I am sure that the particle size and amount of the "dirt" that is let through with BMC & K&N filters is not harmful to the engine otherwise you would hear all kinds of horror stories on the net.
That's my $0.02 anyways..
If you have a NA engine I would think that restriction might have some effect but with a FI I think restriction is neglible. Also if you look at the size of the 2 filters (one is the same size as my Vette's one filter) you would think that the surface area of the MB filters are more than adequate.
I am not going away from stock simply because I don't race and 2 or 8 HP makes no difference on the street. I rely on my wonderful reflexes and skill to smoke the guy next to me. :p HA HA
Got a real nice dyno in town that does all the high hp ricers so at least the thing shouldn't be flying off the unit.....I hope.
Yes, they sure do make them for the W211 E55. We have them on our site under the W211 E-Class section.
I wish we had a manufacturer that made a stainless steel mesh filter for our cars.
Why do they like them MUCH better? I don't think there's any comparison out there for flow or filtering between the K&N and Greenies, right? So what's the basis for them liking them so much better?
Lots of folks have had problems with K&N's. The opposite with the Green's.

Product A and Product B offer the same thing.
B works.
Which do you pick?


