Just back from Dyno.....not tooooo shabbyyyyy! 462RWHP.
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Just back from Dyno.....not tooooo shabbyyyyy! 462RWHP.
Here are the first 2 pulls as the rest got progressively worse.
Nice little dyno. Brand new dynojet 248.
Of course with it being a Benz, the whole shop has to stop and watch. Mouths wide open as she pulled 462 first pull and 455 on pull 2.
What a friggin car. This guy had a Camaro with tubbing and all that *****.....the guy running the dyno told me mine pulled more hp and boatload more torque that he did.
Only downer if any is that those are corrected numbers for sea level just like Klee does. Acutally rear wheel at elevation was 395.
***Air fuel ratio question.....we started with around 14 at about 2000rpm and she went suuuuuper rich up to redline down to about 10. With an A/F of 14.....that's a little to lean to be thinking about NOS system isn't it? Any input would be great.
Overall again, the Benz impresses, I am happy and life is good.
Scan sucks, but least you can see the numbers.
Nice little dyno. Brand new dynojet 248.
Of course with it being a Benz, the whole shop has to stop and watch. Mouths wide open as she pulled 462 first pull and 455 on pull 2.
What a friggin car. This guy had a Camaro with tubbing and all that *****.....the guy running the dyno told me mine pulled more hp and boatload more torque that he did.
Only downer if any is that those are corrected numbers for sea level just like Klee does. Acutally rear wheel at elevation was 395.
***Air fuel ratio question.....we started with around 14 at about 2000rpm and she went suuuuuper rich up to redline down to about 10. With an A/F of 14.....that's a little to lean to be thinking about NOS system isn't it? Any input would be great.
Overall again, the Benz impresses, I am happy and life is good.
Scan sucks, but least you can see the numbers.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Last edited by Jakpro1; 10-17-2005 at 09:13 PM.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Jakpro1
Here are the first 2 pulls as the rest got progressively worse.
Nice little dyno. Brand new dynojet 248.
Of course with it being a Benz, the whole shop has to stop and watch. Mouths wide open as she pulled 462 first pull and 455 on pull 2.
What a friggin car. This guy had a Camaro with tubbing and all that *****.....the guy running the dyno told me mine pulled more hp and boatload more torque that he did.
Only downer if any is that those are corrected numbers for sea level just like Klee does. Acutally rear wheel at elevation was 395.
***Air fuel ratio question.....we started with around 14 at about 2000rpm and she went suuuuuper rich up to redline down to about 10. With an A/F of 14.....that's a little to lean to be thinking about NOS system isn't it? Any input would be great.
Overall again, the Benz impresses, I am happy and life is good.
Scan sucks, but least you can see the numbers.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Nice little dyno. Brand new dynojet 248.
Of course with it being a Benz, the whole shop has to stop and watch. Mouths wide open as she pulled 462 first pull and 455 on pull 2.
What a friggin car. This guy had a Camaro with tubbing and all that *****.....the guy running the dyno told me mine pulled more hp and boatload more torque that he did.
Only downer if any is that those are corrected numbers for sea level just like Klee does. Acutally rear wheel at elevation was 395.
***Air fuel ratio question.....we started with around 14 at about 2000rpm and she went suuuuuper rich up to redline down to about 10. With an A/F of 14.....that's a little to lean to be thinking about NOS system isn't it? Any input would be great.
Overall again, the Benz impresses, I am happy and life is good.
Scan sucks, but least you can see the numbers.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#5
Administrator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
WOW!!!! You don't mess around when you say you are going to do something.
I expected a dyno in a couple of weeks, not 12hrs.
I think the dyno sounds pretty good. Now that you know you car is making the power, drive to sea level and find a track.
I expected a dyno in a couple of weeks, not 12hrs.
I think the dyno sounds pretty good. Now that you know you car is making the power, drive to sea level and find a track.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#7
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
Nice numbers!!
Was I close or what...![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I guessed 460rwhp and 500rwtq.. I did say though that I expected the K2 car to pull 515rwtq - 530rwtq which is bang on with your 529rwtq.
That is a very healthy beast you have. I hope to be joining that league of numbers VERY soon..
Enjoy the roasting power!
P.S-> I just gotta say.. damn.. 490lb/ft of torque at 2,000RPM!!! If that isn't a tire shredder, I don't know what is..![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Was I close or what...
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I guessed 460rwhp and 500rwtq.. I did say though that I expected the K2 car to pull 515rwtq - 530rwtq which is bang on with your 529rwtq.
That is a very healthy beast you have. I hope to be joining that league of numbers VERY soon..
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Enjoy the roasting power!
P.S-> I just gotta say.. damn.. 490lb/ft of torque at 2,000RPM!!! If that isn't a tire shredder, I don't know what is..
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Last edited by vrus; 10-17-2005 at 11:18 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 Brilliant Silver E55
Jak, don't you have Stage2?
I got similar numbers with just ECU and Pulley from Renntech.
When I was Klemann S2 in my CL55, I pulled similar numbers as you did...I think your ECU may need repogramming.
I got similar numbers with just ECU and Pulley from Renntech.
When I was Klemann S2 in my CL55, I pulled similar numbers as you did...I think your ECU may need repogramming.
#10
Senior Member
Originally Posted by E55_POWER
Jak, don't you have Stage2?
I got similar numbers with just ECU and Pulley from Renntech.
When I was Klemann S2 in my CL55, I pulled similar numbers as you did...I think your ECU may need repogramming.
I got similar numbers with just ECU and Pulley from Renntech.
When I was Klemann S2 in my CL55, I pulled similar numbers as you did...I think your ECU may need repogramming.
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/123721-500-rwhp-what-does-take.html
Where's the bottle neck?
BTW Jack, Nice BEAST
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
I think your ECU may need repogramming.
Mine pulled right around 480 stock at Kleemann, while Gid_e_ups pulled 516 stock at Kleemann on the same dyno. That's a 36 hp diff.....if I had Gid's motor...I would have been posting rear wheel near 500.
Just nature of the beasts....wish I got the upper scale, but just didn't. 36 hp is no biggee though. I am happy.
Thanks for the input.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Jakpro1
I could have Klee check but one thing is for sure. The 5.5 has to have the biggest hp differences of any motor I have EVER seen.
Mine pulled right around 480 stock at Kleemann, while Gid_e_ups pulled 516 stock at Kleemann on the same dyno. That's a 36 hp diff.....if I had Gid's motor...I would have been posting rear wheel near 500.
Just nature of the beasts....wish I got the upper scale, but just didn't. 36 hp is no biggee though. I am happy.
Thanks for the input.
Mine pulled right around 480 stock at Kleemann, while Gid_e_ups pulled 516 stock at Kleemann on the same dyno. That's a 36 hp diff.....if I had Gid's motor...I would have been posting rear wheel near 500.
Just nature of the beasts....wish I got the upper scale, but just didn't. 36 hp is no biggee though. I am happy.
Thanks for the input.
#14
Senior Member
Originally Posted by E55AMG99
Were the pulls made under the same temp, bulb and baro conditions, same operator, same tires/wheels, same tire pressure, etc? All these variables can lead to a difference that big.
Correction factor "should" do away with most of these variables. I don't write DynoJet code though..
Tire pressure and wheel size could not create that much variation IMO. Unless you have some ultra bling 22s.
Last edited by E552006; 10-18-2005 at 12:35 AM.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by E552006
Correction factor "should" do away with most of these variables. I don't write DynoJet code though..
Tire pressure and wheel size could not create that much variation IMO. Unless you have some ultra bling 22s.
Tire pressure and wheel size could not create that much variation IMO. Unless you have some ultra bling 22s.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,555
Received 1,069 Likes
on
857 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
I'm guessing around 385 RWHP uncorrected and around 435 to 450 RWHP corrected.