Stay away from M6's
#51
Originally Posted by newton22
Two letters, DR.![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#52
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 W211
Hey guys,
I just picked up my M6 on Wednesday and I gotta tell you this is a rocket. Even though I have not pushed past 6000 rpm I can tell you the high revving engine makes alot of power. I still like the thrust of 516 tq but this engine is amazing....and the smgIII is great. Better that I expected. Both cars are amazing but the M6 is a little more fun to drive....Just my thoughts....
I just picked up my M6 on Wednesday and I gotta tell you this is a rocket. Even though I have not pushed past 6000 rpm I can tell you the high revving engine makes alot of power. I still like the thrust of 516 tq but this engine is amazing....and the smgIII is great. Better that I expected. Both cars are amazing but the M6 is a little more fun to drive....Just my thoughts....
#53
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
congrats on the M6..... I never get the high revving less torque is more fun, better, or amazing.... what are the real advantages of a motor like the M5/M6 vs the E55K motors?
Originally Posted by JTS
Hey guys,
I just picked up my M6 on Wednesday and I gotta tell you this is a rocket. Even though I have not pushed past 6000 rpm I can tell you the high revving engine makes alot of power. I still like the thrust of 516 tq but this engine is amazing....and the smgIII is great. Better that I expected. Both cars are amazing but the M6 is a little more fun to drive....Just my thoughts....
I just picked up my M6 on Wednesday and I gotta tell you this is a rocket. Even though I have not pushed past 6000 rpm I can tell you the high revving engine makes alot of power. I still like the thrust of 516 tq but this engine is amazing....and the smgIII is great. Better that I expected. Both cars are amazing but the M6 is a little more fun to drive....Just my thoughts....
#54
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 W211
I think the M6 handles alot better and the sound of the engine revving as the car changes gears adds a different element than my E55. The M6 feels alot lighter and has a lower centre of gravity. I love them both but they are very different.
#55
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 E63
Originally Posted by JTS
Hey guys,
I just picked up my M6 on Wednesday and I gotta tell you this is a rocket. Even though I have not pushed past 6000 rpm I can tell you the high revving engine makes alot of power. I still like the thrust of 516 tq but this engine is amazing....and the smgIII is great. Better that I expected. Both cars are amazing but the M6 is a little more fun to drive....Just my thoughts....
I just picked up my M6 on Wednesday and I gotta tell you this is a rocket. Even though I have not pushed past 6000 rpm I can tell you the high revving engine makes alot of power. I still like the thrust of 516 tq but this engine is amazing....and the smgIII is great. Better that I expected. Both cars are amazing but the M6 is a little more fun to drive....Just my thoughts....
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#56
Super Member
Please... the M6 results are just a tick under their M5 results... and all are around E55 times from way back when in 2003 until 100mph and over. So, I really don't understand what all the fuss is about. I can't wait to run into either car with my K2. And if I was stock, I'd still hang with them all day. The day I make a right turn to avoid any BMW, including my own NOS'd up piece of crap from 1991, is the day someone should take my license away.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
#57
Originally Posted by DFW01E55
A BMW salesman in Dallas told me that you get 5 all out launches, after that your warranty is void. Pretty good deal, buy a $90k car and get to launch 5 times!
thats BS because the law prohobits dealers from doing that because it is illegal to void warrenty based on the way you drive your vehicle........ or some **** like that, all i know is that they can not void your warrenty because it is against the law for them to want to do that
#58
Launch mode will not net a higher trap. It will net a better 60ft.
A key example is supras. Weather it has 400 or 800hp on street tires they all run 12s mostly but traps differ greatly. 120s for the 400 and 135s for the 800. This I know first hand
I guess the only way to prove this is to have some one do it with launch control and with out.
Again a high trap is tells you how powerful a car is. Launching a car is dependent on traction.
A key example is supras. Weather it has 400 or 800hp on street tires they all run 12s mostly but traps differ greatly. 120s for the 400 and 135s for the 800. This I know first hand
I guess the only way to prove this is to have some one do it with launch control and with out.
Again a high trap is tells you how powerful a car is. Launching a car is dependent on traction.
#60
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by DFW01E55
A BMW salesman in Dallas told me that you get 5 all out launches, after that your warranty is void. Pretty good deal, buy a $90k car and get to launch 5 times!
The dealer was talking, like so many other dealers, out of his/her a$$. They can't sell a car here with a feature that will void your warranty after five uses. The same lawyers that caused BMW to decide not to offer the full blown launch control will have a field day with BMWNA if they tried to screw customers like that. If you follow M5Board, it is amazing how much misinformation the dealers were spewing on a car about which they were clueless. Frightening. Thank God for internet boards to sort through all the garbage.
As for the M6 1/4 test - very impressive. But I stopped relying on magazine tests long ago, especially corrected ones. We'll all just wait for them to hit the strip. Having said that, even if it runs a 12.4 @ 118 vs. my 12.1-12.2 @ 116-117, I am ready to accept that it will pull on me as speed builds. That's the nature of a 7 speed that keeps the RPM's in the sweetspot for so long. I will still sleep at night.
Time will tell how well the M6 does here in the US. I am not convinced that there is a strong enough market for that car. I just hope it doesn't turn out like the 8 series. Manufacturers will think twice before going out on a limb for a high performance car in this market - making us all suffer for it.
And my stock E55 has run through the traps many times in the 116's and 117's.
#63
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'07 Porsche 997TT
Originally Posted by MB_Steve
Doesn't surprise me that you would say that at all. When you are in the E55 it moves so smoothly you wouldn't even notice that you are doing triple digits. I am sure the Gallardo feels like it is doing 100mph when you are doing 100 mph. Unless you run them side by side at the track I don't think you can say which is faster. There are tuned E55s on this board that run mid-to high 11 seconds. My comment was that a Renntech, K2, or Brabus car would outrun a stock Gallardo. Unless your stock Gallardo is running 11s I don't think you can say it is exceptionally fast.
#64
Originally Posted by cte430
Interesting comment about the "feel" of triple digit speeds. When I posted here my thoughts on the 997S vs. the E55 when I got the car, one of the things I noticed (and still applies today) is that high speeds in the porsche do not feel nearly as fast as what you are actually doing, compared to the E55. Did that make any sense? LOL. I find myself doing triple digit speeds much more often, and more comfortably and securely, than I ever did in the E55.
#65
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'07 Porsche 997TT
Originally Posted by MB_Steve
Mayeb your E55 needed a wheel alignment because mine feels like it is floating on air at 100mph. As a mattter of fact, a baby could sleep in the backseat while at those speeds. Not in a Porsche, Lamborghini, or Ferrari. In most true sports cars where the driver is in touch with the road, you feel like you are doing triple digits. I speak from experience.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#66
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
Originally Posted by cte430
Did not need alignment. You made my point for me: "...floating on air at 100 mph". sorry, I don't want to feel like i'm floating at those speeds. Trust me, you're not being bounced around in the 997 - I too speak from experience
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
We can talk back and forth about the experience, but there are enough guys on this board w/ both 996/997s and E55s to tell.
And by the way, those of us that went to the AMG challenge in Fortuna even have a video of us doing laps at 145mph in an E55 while straight CHILLIN with the AC blasting!! No WAY would that ride have been ANYWHERE near as cush in a Pcar.
#67
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,824
Received 259 Likes
on
185 Posts
Originally Posted by abalto
Do not ever believe a single word that any car dealer tells you, unless it is in writing...period! ![wwf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/chairshot.gif)
![wwf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/chairshot.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#68
Originally Posted by Fikse
heh, you've got both.... I know your not bashing either.... ![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Here is a stock Gallardo dyno graph:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Lamborghini...slip-8854.html
puts down the same horsepower as the E55's, but is 100+ pounds shy on the torque side....
even so, with the Gallardo 900 pounds lighter than the E55, I can't see how the E55 can hang, even though track numbers show that it should....
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Here is a stock Gallardo dyno graph:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Lamborghini...slip-8854.html
puts down the same horsepower as the E55's, but is 100+ pounds shy on the torque side....
even so, with the Gallardo 900 pounds lighter than the E55, I can't see how the E55 can hang, even though track numbers show that it should....
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#69
MBWorld Fanatic!
Met first M5 in London on road yesterday - as I was about to turn onto a freeway - and the bugger did not take the on ramp - that would have been a nice blast. I also parked next to one the other day and it is considerably higher than the E ... do they have the same drag coef?
Interesting that in that Clarkson / Topgear comparison the 997S was faster than the Aston (obviously) and the M6 by some margin over the ~2 mile road section they tested on. Road was pretty wet though which would favour the P-car's better grip.
Interesting that in that Clarkson / Topgear comparison the 997S was faster than the Aston (obviously) and the M6 by some margin over the ~2 mile road section they tested on. Road was pretty wet though which would favour the P-car's better grip.
#70
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Magic City
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by AMG Rider
I hate to say this, but M6 is pretty damn fast!!!!!
My friend in Korea has one, so we go out for ride all the time~
We raced stock E55, 996 Turbo, SLK55, CLK55, and many other~
But it just walks away~!!!!!!! (after coupe seconds, 996 Turbo was just a dot in the mirror~it was that bad~) Kinda sad, but somethin that we have to admit even though we hate bimmers~~~lol
I think the M6 is in the different level than all of our car~~(More like Lamborghini Gallardo)
But im curious to see which one is faster between M6 vs E55 K2~~~
what do u guyz think?
My friend in Korea has one, so we go out for ride all the time~
We raced stock E55, 996 Turbo, SLK55, CLK55, and many other~
But it just walks away~!!!!!!! (after coupe seconds, 996 Turbo was just a dot in the mirror~it was that bad~) Kinda sad, but somethin that we have to admit even though we hate bimmers~~~lol
I think the M6 is in the different level than all of our car~~(More like Lamborghini Gallardo)
But im curious to see which one is faster between M6 vs E55 K2~~~
what do u guyz think?
![bs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bs.gif)
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
#71
Originally Posted by MiamiE55
![bs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bs.gif)
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
#72
Super Member
Originally Posted by 355Spider
It's really impossible for any of us to say as I don't think any of us have driven or raced one yet but why would that be so hard to believe? It has more hp and less weight than an E55. It does look like preliminary reports from most of the testing done on the car will put it faster than both the TT and the E55.
But ain't no one walking away from no one here, gots it? 0-60 in 4.2, 4.1, 4.3... those are very very close margins. In fact, just looking at the variability in driver 0-60' times alone represents a much larger variance than any of these 1/4 times and 0-60 times.
I know this because my K2 pulls very hard hard against a stock E55. But every K2 owner here will also tell you it doesn't dramatically walk away from the stock car with an overwhelming fury. In fact, give the stock car a blip of a lead... a half sec difference in launches... and the K2 isn't catching it until almost triple digits. And that's with an almost 100hp gain.
So, talk about more power in the M6 and M5 is so negotiabe, its moot. While everyone here is ultra specific about car specs and times, lets also realize that some people know how to drive and some don't. Some are also a lot heavier at 300 pounts that that 180lb driver... but you don't see us listing our own "curb weights" in our drag times. And in this whole power comparison, its as relevant as any of the other statistics we're throwing out there.
My conclusion: More 17 year old girls in E55s will stomp more 17 year old girls driving M6s or M5s! That's because they don't require 400 settings and buttons to go fast. Hehe. They just fly right out of the box with a mash of the pedal...
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Loren
#73
Member
Originally Posted by sdsilverm3
It doesn't matter the amount of torque once you're already moving. In the perfect world, all that torque would make a big difference from a dig but since most of us live in reality all the extra 200 ft-lbs of torque will do is smoke the tires (street tires). AMG cars have a ton of torque but rarely can we ever use 100% of it off the line. ![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)