Dyno Results after RENNtech Pulley/ECU...
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
Dyno Results after RENNtech Pulley/ECU...
456.28 and 505.70, dyno graph here:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...slip-8995.html
RENNtech needs to reflash my ecu with a newer program, waiting to get my recalls done first....
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...slip-8995.html
RENNtech needs to reflash my ecu with a newer program, waiting to get my recalls done first....
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 1
From: Mia
2005 E 55
Originally Posted by Fikse
456.28 and 505.70, dyno graph here:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...slip-8995.html
RENNtech needs to reflash my ecu with a newer program, waiting to get my recalls done first....
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...slip-8995.html
RENNtech needs to reflash my ecu with a newer program, waiting to get my recalls done first....
I think it's time for a track rental.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 3
From: Sin City
12' C63 P31, 06' Supercharged Range, 08' BMW 550i
Those are indeed strong numbers. I'm pulling 480rwhp and 549 rwtq with pulley, ecu, headers, and IC mod. I thought those were strong numbers. You throw on headers (deleting your primary cat) and an IC/mod and you'll top those numbers very easily... Congrats on a very strong E55
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
very nice.... do you have the dyno sheet to post? I'm starting a collection of them....
Derek, my car made 419 stock, but different dyno, it was the Viper club's dyno day.... temp at the dyno yesterday was 91 degrees, 28% humidity.... not sure if that matters.....
BTW, my car made more power/torque than quite a few Vipers there....
Derek, my car made 419 stock, but different dyno, it was the Viper club's dyno day.... temp at the dyno yesterday was 91 degrees, 28% humidity.... not sure if that matters.....
BTW, my car made more power/torque than quite a few Vipers there....
Originally Posted by dragonAMG
Those are indeed strong numbers. I'm pulling 480rwhp and 549 rwtq with pulley, ecu, headers, and IC mod. I thought those were strong numbers. You throw on headers (deleting your primary cat) and an IC/mod and you'll top those numbers very easily... Congrats on a very strong E55
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Fikse
Derek, my car made 419 stock, but different dyno, it was the Viper club's dyno day.... temp at the dyno yesterday was 91 degrees, 28% humidity.... not sure if that matters.....
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Fikse
I think the SAE numbers were about 10hp/10tq less.....
Originally Posted by http://www.land-and-sea.com/dyno-tech-talk/corrected-horsepower.htm
The most common are the SAE standards. The older J607 standard considers that the engine was run on a 60°F day with 0% humidity and a barometric pressure of 29.92 in-Hg or the newer SAE J1349 standard of 77°F (25°C) day with 0% humidity and a barometric pressure of 29.234 in-Hg (99 KPa). Also the ECE standard is the same as the SAE J1349, but does not use mechanical efficiency in the calculations. The DIN standard which corrects to 68°F (20° C) day with 0% humidity and a barometric pressure of 29.92 in-Hg (101.3 KPa) and the JIS standard corrects 77°F (25° C) day with 0% humidity and a barometric pressure of 29.234 in-Hg (99 KPa), but uses different correction curves than the others (as a substitution for using mechanical efficiency factors). Further, we have the J1995 corrects 77°F (25° C) day with 0% humidity and a barometric pressure of 29.53 in-Hg (100 KPa).
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
it would, I used what ever was used for my original dyno..... it's dynojet's software, and they have all of those correction factors available... I would say the latter SAE standard, since the JIS factor is within 1HP....
odd that the totally uncorrected numbers are within 2HP/TQ of the SAE numbers, and it was really hot and humid....
thanks for the notes on the factors....
odd that the totally uncorrected numbers are within 2HP/TQ of the SAE numbers, and it was really hot and humid....
thanks for the notes on the factors....
Originally Posted by Grumpy666
Yeah, that's not too bad - a little over 2%. Now the question becomes which SAE standard was used? I did a quick Google and found this summary of correction standards:
Wouldn't it be nice if life were easy and there was only one standard . . .
Wouldn't it be nice if life were easy and there was only one standard . . .
Last edited by Fikse; Jun 11, 2006 at 07:21 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Fikse
odd that the totally uncorrected numbers are within 2HP/TQ of the SAE numbers, and it was really hot and humid....
