Okay, so Dr Scholls is out....how bout R134??
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Okay, so Dr Scholls is out....how bout R134??
Uh huh.....you KNOW you're loving this idea. Spray it right on the front of the intercooler radiator.
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![](http://img.alibaba.com/photo/50660443/R134a_Refrigerant.jpg)
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by OzE55
We all care so much we drive supercharged V8s!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#7
R-134a does not affect the ozone layer like the R-12 it replaced.
What I don't get is how this can be effective. If you do it manually, by the time you spray the IC heat exchanger and then jump into the car to race, the cooled water has already passed through the IC.
If you can set it up to spray remotely, it's still not the same as spraying an air-to-air IC. With an air-to-water heat exchanger, there is a lot more mass to cool due to the cooling fluid. It won't be as effective as spraying the actual air-to-air IC, which actually cools the intake charge.
Then there's the cost factor of using refrigerant . . .
What I don't get is how this can be effective. If you do it manually, by the time you spray the IC heat exchanger and then jump into the car to race, the cooled water has already passed through the IC.
If you can set it up to spray remotely, it's still not the same as spraying an air-to-air IC. With an air-to-water heat exchanger, there is a lot more mass to cool due to the cooling fluid. It won't be as effective as spraying the actual air-to-air IC, which actually cools the intake charge.
Then there's the cost factor of using refrigerant . . .
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 424
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1985 380 SL 2001 SL 500 2007 E350 Sport 2008 T & C Ltd.
Originally Posted by Grumpy666
R-134a does not affect the ozone layer like the R-12 it replaced.
What I don't get is how this can be effective. If you do it manually, by the time you spray the IC heat exchanger and then jump into the car to race, the cooled water has already passed through the IC.
If you can set it up to spray remotely, it's still not the same as spraying an air-to-air IC. With an air-to-water heat exchanger, there is a lot more mass to cool due to the cooling fluid. It won't be as effective as spraying the actual air-to-air IC, which actually cools the intake charge.
Then there's the cost factor of using refrigerant . . .
What I don't get is how this can be effective. If you do it manually, by the time you spray the IC heat exchanger and then jump into the car to race, the cooled water has already passed through the IC.
If you can set it up to spray remotely, it's still not the same as spraying an air-to-air IC. With an air-to-water heat exchanger, there is a lot more mass to cool due to the cooling fluid. It won't be as effective as spraying the actual air-to-air IC, which actually cools the intake charge.
Then there's the cost factor of using refrigerant . . .
#9
Super Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55 AMG + Mustang GT
You can easily make your own intercooler sprayer (spray whatever you wish, but I highly recommend CO2) for less than $50. All of the parts can be found at a local Lowe's or any other hardware store. You can then spray from the inside of the car whenever you wish, rather than running outside and spraying the intercooler everytime you're at a stoplight and ready to race someone.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)