Question E55 vs. S55 Performance
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
‘11 SLS, ‘19 GT63 s Edition One
Question E55 vs. S55 Performance
Hi Everyone,
I've been lurking around this site for a while, and have been AMAZED by the amount of info and the helpful people/characters that are on this site.
So here's my question, I have a 2006 E55 with 4500 miles. The other day a friend that has a 2005 S55 and I went head to head in a parking lot at California Speedway, and we were neck and neck. He told me that the S55 has more HP than E55, is that correct, but we were both surprised that the S55 stayed with the E55.
Can you guys shed some light on this. Is the S55 performance the same as E55? And does the S55 have more HP? If so, what's the difference in tuning?
Cyrus
I've been lurking around this site for a while, and have been AMAZED by the amount of info and the helpful people/characters that are on this site.
So here's my question, I have a 2006 E55 with 4500 miles. The other day a friend that has a 2005 S55 and I went head to head in a parking lot at California Speedway, and we were neck and neck. He told me that the S55 has more HP than E55, is that correct, but we were both surprised that the S55 stayed with the E55.
Can you guys shed some light on this. Is the S55 performance the same as E55? And does the S55 have more HP? If so, what's the difference in tuning?
Cyrus
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Irvine and San Diego, CA
2006 S55 & 97 T88h Supra
ive always had that same question.
E55 and CLS55 share the same 469 hp rating on MBUSA.com and the SL/CL/S55 all share the same 493 hp rating also but isnt it the same motor for all 5 vehicles? If there is a difference, is it just all electronics?
E55 and CLS55 share the same 469 hp rating on MBUSA.com and the SL/CL/S55 all share the same 493 hp rating also but isnt it the same motor for all 5 vehicles? If there is a difference, is it just all electronics?
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 785
Likes: 113
From: Scottsdale, Arizona
2020 S63 Coupe, 2006 Hummer H1 Alpha, 2018 McLaren 720S, 2022 Porsche 911 TurboS, 2022 Tesla Model X
I think it is mainly related to the different exhaust systems, maybe the electronics as well.
The 2007 SL get a new HP increase from the 55k engine which I believe is related primarily to a throttle body enlargement from 74mm to 80mm.
The 2007 SL get a new HP increase from the 55k engine which I believe is related primarily to a throttle body enlargement from 74mm to 80mm.
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 790
Likes: 17
From: West Palm Beach
2004 S500
This should be very very close. There is less than a 200 lb weight difference between the two cars. With equal gearing, it will come down to traction and reaction time as well as weight of the driver.
I have been up aginst E500's before with no real diffinitive outcome any time that it's happened.
On a twisty curvy road however, the outcome will advantage the E car due to it's shorter wheel base.
I have been up aginst E500's before with no real diffinitive outcome any time that it's happened.
On a twisty curvy road however, the outcome will advantage the E car due to it's shorter wheel base.
Banned
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
From: The Ferrari F1 Factory
F248 F1
^ I don't know if wheel base would matter alot. Look at the Enzo vs. Mc12. The chassis of the MC12 is basicly the same as the Enzo, only extended /wheel base made bigger so it can corner better. Hence F1, F12003GA Ferrari car had a poor design. They tried to make the wheel base shorter = suffer around turns alot, it lost alot of mechanical grip. Costa made the same mistake with the F2005. Now look at the F2002 and F2004 and the present F248. The concept is a longer wheel base hence improving mechanical grip around the bends.
In this case it's more about balance. How well balance the car is, and other factors that i don't feel like going into right now
haha i'm lazy.
In this case it's more about balance. How well balance the car is, and other factors that i don't feel like going into right now
haha i'm lazy.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
There are threads here with dyno pics showing that the E55 dyno's the exact same as all the rest of it's bigger supercharged brethren regardless of MB's posted 469 vs 493hp.!
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
8 Oddball Mercedes Ideas That Actually Made it to Production
Verdad Gallardo
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look
Verdad Gallardo
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
Tell that to the Top Fuel guys....... 
Banned
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
From: The Ferrari F1 Factory
F248 F1
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
Tell that to the Top Fuel guys.......
I don't know who Top Fuel guys are. But i don't think they are sophisticated as an F1 enginner. Anyways this how it goese.
Like i said the Ferrari F1 team has played with short wheel base chassis Ferrari has opted to go for a longer wheel base because it is better around the turns, but it is not as good for acceleration. Renault on the other hand, has always gone for a shorter wheel base, distrubuting more weight in the back. Go look at an F1 start and you will the Renaults rocket off the starts, and out of a turn- no match for the Ferraris, but when it comes around the high speed turns, Ferrari has the advantage. Patty Syms. of Renault F1 team has confirmed that a shorter wheel base gives them that rocket start. But they pay a price with it. The rear tyres wear out alot faster, AND they lose FRONTOL MECHANICAL GRIP. Renault found a genious way to keep their fast acceleration AND find a solutiono for lost of mechanical grip because of short whee base chassis. Hence the saga with front dampers on a F1 car, which help them make up for frontol end grip along with their great aero package thy have. I'm no Renault fan, but what they HAD (dampers are ban now) was a very, very good package. They had everything an F1 car needs:
Great acceleration
Great mechanical grip/front and back
Great aero package
Now they are suffering front mechanical grip because they dont have the dampers. Let's see what solution they come up with in order to correct the chassis next. Btw, if you didnt know, a chassis is VERY crucial in F1. So a team electing to go for a shorter/longer wheel base means A LOT on how thee engis are going to tackle the cons of each chassis.
