W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

M5 vs E63 AMG, AUTOCAR Finally tests the two ... guess whos quicker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-04-2006, 10:17 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
M5 vs E63 AMG, AUTOCAR Finally tests the two ... guess whos quicker?

ok got this from e60.net the times are kinda wiered but here it goes.

The e63 amg

finally got my hands on this issue of autocar

0-62mph (tested may 17th)
m5: 4.6s
e64: 4.3s

0-124mph (tested june 11th)
m5: 12.4s
e63: 12.1s


they also state

"The E63 Speed sensitive steering has meatier weighting and more feel than an m5's, and with the aid of traction electronics the E63 can make quite ludicrously rapid progress on twisty roads"


Anyways here a picture i took with my phone , as my scanner is not working... apologies but hopefully you should just make out the time from 0-62



I mean 12.1 thats way too fast, but still that means e63 is still faster?

Comments?

http://forums.e60.net/index.php?showtopic=28634
Old 09-04-2006, 11:12 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bfnnrgn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL65
Interesting. Thats with the EU LC on the M5 to so they'd really be crushed stateside. Could it really be true the E63 is faster than our beloved E55 out of the hole?
Old 09-04-2006, 11:15 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Any idea how they measure 0-60....oops 62 I mean.

They using radar or something.
Old 09-04-2006, 11:24 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
there is another thing i found here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AYly_3i4gY

read the comment... could it be true? Could 7g gearbox help it to be that fast? lets at least hope so!
Old 09-04-2006, 11:28 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
2K6E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMGs
We cant wait until 9/15 for the real results!
Old 09-04-2006, 11:31 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bfnnrgn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL65
Originally Posted by 2K6E55
We cant wait until 9/15 for the real results!
We should have something to mull over after Darren and I race Tuesday evening.
Old 09-04-2006, 11:36 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fikse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
0-124MPH in 12.1 and even 12.4 seconds is VERY quick for these cars..... we should have some real world 1/4 mile times tomorrow from Derek!
Old 09-04-2006, 11:38 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
also did you know that The M5's standing km time 22.7 And The new ML63 Standing KM is 23 flat, now take 1000 pounds of the e63 and i dont even know how fast that would be.

official info on BMW here
http://www.autobase.cz/download/m5/m...anding%20km%22

And for some reason AMG website took off the ml63 0-1000m data, or i'm blind. I saw it there before tho!

Last edited by BoBcanada; 09-04-2006 at 11:59 PM.
Old 09-04-2006, 11:54 PM
  #9  
Super Moderator
 
BenzoBoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
W221
Quite interesting...
Old 09-05-2006, 05:55 AM
  #10  
xX^
Almost a Member!
 
xX^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63 is obviously a faster car then E55
Old 09-05-2006, 07:13 AM
  #11  
Super Member
 
dbasons55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 976
Received 75 Likes on 44 Posts
thats strange



look at this article from autobild they have different numbers at least the E63 ran 12.7s at the quarter mile faster than the M5 which took 13.14s,,....

but the 0-200 KM which is 0-124.27 MPH
E63 at 15.0s
M5 at 13.5s

check it out

http://www.autobild.de/test/neuwagen...rtikel_seite=1

even those numbers i wouldn't really believe
there is something wrong i have raced the E63 and he didnt stand a chance if it really runs in the low 12 to 124MPH then i shoudn't have been able to pass him, cuz the S65 runs 0-124MPH in 13.3s, so what the hell is going on can't anyone just ends this story with some real number?!

and here are some numbers out of the same magazine for the E55

http://www.autobild.de/test/neuwagen...rtikel_seite=3

Last edited by dbasons55; 09-05-2006 at 07:34 AM.
Old 09-05-2006, 09:19 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
stevebez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,066
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, LRD4 HSE, R107 280SL
I dont get it - I drove the B5 before I bot the E55 and I tell you its day and night ... the E55 is wayyyy faster - at least by seat of pants shove you in your seat type pull. When I test drove the B5 I had an old E39 M5 hanging all the time not far in my rear view mirror.

Also they would not let me pull off max throttle in first gear - they said "it could damage the gearbox" LOL !!!!!!

I just dont know what to think ... the E55 is the most brutal sedan I have ever driven - period! P.S. still need to test an M5 (E60) and the E63 (13-16th October is my test date.)

Last edited by stevebez; 09-05-2006 at 09:24 AM.
Old 09-05-2006, 04:49 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
E63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=stevebez;1744329]I dont get it - I drove the B5 before I bot the E55 and I tell you its day and night ... the E55 is wayyyy faster - at least by seat of pants shove you in your seat type pull. When I test drove the B5 I had an old E39 M5 hanging all the time not far in my rear view mirror.
QUOTE]

What's a "B5"?
Old 09-05-2006, 05:09 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
medici78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
'03 G500, '13 G63, '17 GLS63,
[QUOTE=E63AMG;1744584]
Originally Posted by stevebez
I dont get it - I drove the B5 before I bot the E55 and I tell you its day and night ... the E55 is wayyyy faster - at least by seat of pants shove you in your seat type pull. When I test drove the B5 I had an old E39 M5 hanging all the time not far in my rear view mirror.
QUOTE]

What's a "B5"?
Alpina B5 perhaps?
Old 09-05-2006, 07:08 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MiamiAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Magic City
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by BoBcanada

"The E63 Speed sensitive steering has meatier weighting and more feel than an m5's, and with the aid of traction electronics the E63 can make quite ludicrously rapid progress on twisty roads"
Lol, you gotta love that....
Old 09-06-2006, 05:46 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55 RUSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E55K
Originally Posted by Fikse
0-124MPH in 12.1 and even 12.4 seconds is VERY quick for these cars..... we should have some real world 1/4 mile times tomorrow from Derek!
I think 12.1 to 124 is BS...Kleemann k3 does that in 11.8 dont beleive mags...

German mags have diff results...M5 win there...

Also I think AMG are not that stupid and woudnt make E63 slower then E55...as BMW M woundnt make M5 slower then E55...

One thing I wish AMG would of done is introduce LC control on thier cars...it works awesome on M5...jumps like 4wd car...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: M5 vs E63 AMG, AUTOCAR Finally tests the two ... guess whos quicker?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 AM.