E55 vs E63 - MBUSA Comments
Looks like MBUSA will post some comparisons on the AMG private lounge site.
Here are excerpts from MBUSA response
"Like you, we were also interested in head-to-head comparisons of the cars,
both under acceleration, as well as on the track where other performance
characteristics (braking, handling, lateral acceleration) could be
compared.
Basically, the E63 AMG is a much smoother and more linear performer,. For
acceleration, this means that the 0-60 mph times are more consistent and
easily achieved, whereas with the E55 AMG Kompressor, the torque being
available at a much lower engine speed, frequently causing wheelspin (and
ESP / ASR actuation) under hard acceleration. Our tests yielded more
consistent results for the E63 AMG, although in some cases the E55 AMG
delivered a lower elapsed time at the dragstrip.
On the road course racing track we used, the advantage of the E63 AMG was
much greater. On the same day under identical conditions, out pro driver
lapped the 1.48 mile track at 3-4 seconds quicker in the E63 AMG
consistently. This can be attributed to the superior compound brakes,
revised suspension, 7 speed AMG Speedshift automatic with shift paddles as
well as the lower weight of the engine (-47 lb) over the front axle.
Further, our drivers found the E63 AMG much smoother, more progressive and
easier to drive fast.
We plan to show information and other cool stuff from our testing on
Mercedes-amg.com/privatelounge very soon so that you can see the E63 AMG
results for yourself."
Put my E63 order on hold pending release of comparison data.
every present publication i've seen shows mb claiming the e63 to be undeniably quicker in every category and now they are saying that it's just more "consistent"...wtf??? subtle little statements like this hidden in several paragraphs of e63 praise sounds like spin control to me.
i'd be really pissed if i just gave up an e55 for this. and this doesn't help mb against all the detuned e55 conspiracy theories either.
Last edited by chiromikey; Sep 13, 2006 at 12:29 AM.
I don't think most amg owners care about lap times at the track. Atleast I don't. I just want a good looking 4 door grocery getter/kid hauler that will bruise a few egos on the street ala 55, 65 600 etc. If I cared about lap times I would buy a Pcar not a 4 door sedan. (which I have) Why MB is going down that road is beyond me. Stick to the niche of building torque monsters and let BMW focus on F1 technology for 4 doors (they do it well, but it's not for me).
Even though I have not had it on the track, believing that it is far superior to the E55 is not hard to believe. The initial bite on the brakes is almost as good as my Noble, truly impressive. Had I never had an E55, I would be COMPLETELY satisfied with the E63- it's a fine car.
That being said, it's going back. Honestly, I think the E55 prefers the thought of the M6 next to it.
This is what I heard from Rob Allen sitting 10 feet away from him during his presentation at AMGFEST last month. Personally when it comes time to sell my '05 E55 down the road I will seriously consider the E63.
Looks like MBUSA will post some comparisons on the AMG private lounge site.
Here are excerpts from MBUSA response
"Like you, we were also interested in head-to-head comparisons of the cars,
both under acceleration, as well as on the track where other performance
characteristics (braking, handling, lateral acceleration) could be
compared.
Basically, the E63 AMG is a much smoother and more linear performer,. For
acceleration, this means that the 0-60 mph times are more consistent and
easily achieved, whereas with the E55 AMG Kompressor, the torque being
available at a much lower engine speed, frequently causing wheelspin (and
ESP / ASR actuation) under hard acceleration. Our tests yielded more
consistent results for the E63 AMG, although in some cases the E55 AMG
delivered a lower elapsed time at the dragstrip.
On the road course racing track we used, the advantage of the E63 AMG was
much greater. On the same day under identical conditions, out pro driver
lapped the 1.48 mile track at 3-4 seconds quicker in the E63 AMG
consistently. This can be attributed to the superior compound brakes,
revised suspension, 7 speed AMG Speedshift automatic with shift paddles as
well as the lower weight of the engine (-47 lb) over the front axle.
Further, our drivers found the E63 AMG much smoother, more progressive and
easier to drive fast.
We plan to show information and other cool stuff from our testing on
Mercedes-amg.com/privatelounge very soon so that you can see the E63 AMG
results for yourself."
Put my E63 order on hold pending release of comparison data.
Ted
Trending Topics
every present publication i've seen shows mb claiming the e63 to be undeniably quicker in every category and now they are saying that it's just more "consistent"...wtf??? subtle little statements like this hidden in several paragraphs of e63 praise sounds like spin control to me.
i'd be really pissed if i just gave up an e55 for this. and this doesn't help mb against all the detuned e55 conspiracy theories either.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
delivered a lower elapsed time at the dragstrip.
On the road course racing track we used, the advantage of the E63 AMG was
much greater.
Well there you have it, course we all knew it but now it's confirmed. This is a track car built pretty much with an M5 on the wall with the words "We're comin" printed.
I would say mission accomplised and GREAT JOB AMG. All those years we have heard how, "It handles like a pig compared to the M5 are finally over"
You did it, we are all proud...........now cut the ***** and slap the forced induction back on and let's get back to the business of brute force before you lose 75% of your sales base.
I want twisties, I will always buy Bimmer, I want luxury/nose bleed power from satanic torque, I buy AMG.
Least the mystery is over. It's an F1 car, while we all love our Nitro Funny Cars.
Well there you have it, course we all knew it but now it's confirmed. This is a track car built pretty much with an M5 on the wall with the words "We're comin" printed.
I would say mission accomplised and GREAT JOB AMG. All those years we have heard how, "It handles like a pig compared to the M5 are finally over"
You did it, we are all proud...........now cut the ***** and slap the forced induction back on and let's get back to the business of brute force before you lose 75% of your sales base.
I want twisties, I will always buy Bimmer, I want luxury/nose bleed power from satanic torque, I buy AMG.
Least the mystery is over. It's an F1 car, while we all love our Nitro Funny Cars.
But I'm pretty sure Brabus, Renn or Kleeman will fit a low boost kompressor to increase torque. The tranny has limitations as we know, but all we need is torque to be sooner and the WHOLE problem is solved. Of course the FI on the engine will increase HP as well, but the design should be based on created torque at the lower RPMS.
So if you would imagine this.
6.3 with low boost Komp
575hp
525lbs torque at around 2.5k rpms
7 spds
better handling
better braking
I'm not taking in consideration price of the mod, but since a K2 with IC mod runs about $10k+... it would not be very more than that.
Just food for thought.
All my fun is between 0 to 70 MPH. And I want to go from 0 to 70 right this instant, anytime I want. If not for that, I wouldn't bother with an AMG at all. I'm Soooo glad I bought my 2006 E55, it's flawless and fantastic. I'll drive it for years to come.
Now, my question to the community is, why not make our next car an E550 and buy the Kleemann S/C for it? Has anyone created a S/C E550 yet? I'll bet it would compare quite nicely to the 03-06 E55k. I'll bet it could be as fast as any E55 or E63 in the 1/4 and would cost less.
Cheers
To me, I'll gladly give up a slightly lower 1/4 time for better "all" around performance.
That's what makes a great performance car, not just straight line performance.
I guess if you're into racing red light to red light, then the E55 is for you. Better yet....get a GT500, one company put $2500 (give or take) into one and ran a 11.06 1/4 at 131mph and a 10.99 at 129mph.
All my fun is between 0 to 70 MPH. And I want to go from 0 to 70 right this instant, anytime I want. If not for that, I wouldn't bother with an AMG at all. I'm Soooo glad I bought my 2006 E55, it's flawless and fantastic. I'll drive it for years to come.
Now, my question to the community is, why not make our next car an E550 and buy the Kleemann S/C for it? Has anyone created a S/C E550 yet? I'll bet it would compare quite nicely to the 03-06 E55k. I'll bet it could be as fast as any E55 or E63 in the 1/4 and would cost less.
Cheers
To me, I'll gladly give up a slightly lower 1/4 time for better "all" around performance.
That's what makes a great performance car, not just straight line performance.
I guess if you're into racing red light to red light, then the E55 is for you. Better yet....get a GT500, one company put $2500 (give or take) into one and ran a 11.06 1/4 at 131mph and a 10.99 at 129mph.
Ted

What to do?
Guess there are some positives and negatives in both regards.
There is indeed a big *** price difference.
All my fun is between 0 to 70 MPH. And I want to go from 0 to 70 right this instant, anytime I want. If not for that, I wouldn't bother with an AMG at all. I'm Soooo glad I bought my 2006 E55, it's flawless and fantastic. I'll drive it for years to come.
Now, my question to the community is, why not make our next car an E550 and buy the Kleemann S/C for it? Has anyone created a S/C E550 yet? I'll bet it would compare quite nicely to the 03-06 E55k. I'll bet it could be as fast as any E55 or E63 in the 1/4 and would cost less.
Cheers
After the engine boost to about 480hp (100hp for the komp on a 5.5L engine)
wheels and tires, suspension, better brakes,
it will still have a power limitation and will lake the AMG name, which add a bit of value to any MB.
I paid 53k for my 03 with 15k miles... A new E550 would be easily in the 60's.
O5 E55's are going for the low 60's now. Therefore right now the E550 with mods is not cost effective. Your theory will be true a few years from now, when one can pick up a E550 cheaper.
But I'm pretty sure Brabus, Renn or Kleeman will fit a low boost kompressor to increase torque. The tranny has limitations as we know, but all we need is torque to be sooner and the WHOLE problem is solved. Of course the FI on the engine will increase HP as well, but the design should be based on created torque at the lower RPMS.
So if you would imagine this.
6.3 with low boost Komp
575hp
525lbs torque at around 2.5k rpms
7 spds
better handling
better braking
I'm not taking in consideration price of the mod, but since a K2 with IC mod runs about $10k+... it would not be very more than that.
Just food for thought.
You're forgetting one teeny little difference... which takes us back to the original problem: The K2 would have 630 torque, quite a difference...

Loren
I like the functionality of a wagon - hunting dog in the back etc, and in particular the sleeper status of the E55 wagon. The extra weight on the rear also addresses some of the traction issues and since I don't plan on going on a road course the faster lap times in the E63 do not compensate for the lower torque. As Derek said the E63 is a fine car that most people will be happy with, unless they have recently owned an E55.






