W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

E63 Vs M5 video.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-31-2006, 07:40 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
egxpimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Ferrari F1 Factory
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F248 F1
Originally Posted by W420
Cool. Thanks!! I'll dig around too and see if I can find a dyno! I have a SilverstoneII with black interior. I should update my sig. My bro has a 06 E55 (designo graphie), also an amazing car.. and we get to switch keys. One of the perks living together. heheh
Oh lucky you...how i envy you hahaha two great cars under one roof!

My driving style would fit better behind a v10, 7 speed SMG3 gearbox... that thing would always be at the track if i had one!
Old 11-01-2006, 07:29 AM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ahmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,545
Received 154 Likes on 125 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Bob, here's a formula that will have you beating up on 63's and 55's alike.

Take 1 part E60 M5
Add 1 set, SuperSprint headers
Add 1 set, SuperSprint catbacks
Add 1 Hamann ECU

Voila- 640 horsepower.

I just realized we're the same age. Do it to it man, you're gonna love this car, ultimate stealth capabilities and the dynamic seats are the shiznite. Just remember to get the red interior, do not pass go, get the red interior.
You obviously never owned an M5 before! Cause if you did, you'd know that those mods would give you no more than 30 to 40 hp's IF YOU'RE LUCKY!!!!
Old 11-01-2006, 08:04 AM
  #28  
Member
 
7 speed SMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 E60 M5
Originally Posted by Ahmed
You obviously never owned an M5 before! Cause if you did, you'd know that those mods would give you no more than 30 to 40 hp's IF YOU'RE LUCKY!!!!
Yeah 640hp is waaaay too much... i think that with these mods you're actualy closer to 550-560hp... remember that the car has more than the 507 quoted by bmw (around 520hp).
Old 11-01-2006, 08:15 AM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
enzom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Ahmed
You obviously never owned an M5 before! Cause if you did, you'd know that those mods would give you no more than 30 to 40 hp's IF YOU'RE LUCKY!!!!
Actually, he does.

I do agree, though, that you are not going to pick up 100 rwhp on an NA car with just those mods. No chance. Forget manufacturer's claims. They are always bloated.
Old 11-01-2006, 09:12 AM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,710
Received 544 Likes on 361 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by Ahmed
You obviously never owned an M5 before! Cause if you did, you'd know that those mods would give you no more than 30 to 40 hp's IF YOU'RE LUCKY!!!!
I'm just going by what I read on some performance website, Hamann's a pretty reputable tuner and a lot of Bimmer owners trust them. Obviously you must not have looked at the picture in my sig, or ask the guys on this board that I've met in person whether I own an M5 or not. Go play in your sandbox.

Last edited by Cylinder Head; 11-01-2006 at 09:49 AM.
Old 11-01-2006, 10:21 AM
  #31  
Member
 
zangerbenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
I'm just going by what I read on some performance website, Hamann's a pretty reputable tuner and a lot of Bimmer owners trust them. Obviously you must not have looked at the picture in my sig, or ask the guys on this board that I've met in person whether I own an M5 or not. Go play in your sandbox.


we dont interested in your slow beemer.
tell us about your fast supra.
what it has and some pictures of the engine bay.
Old 11-01-2006, 10:25 AM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,710
Received 544 Likes on 361 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by zangerbenz
we dont interested in your slow beemer.
tell us about your fast supra.
what it has and some pictures of the engine bay.
Zanger I'm pretty sure I read you off the laundry list of mods on my Sup on one of your very first threads. Built motor, higher compression for some low-end juice, titanium valvetrain, race ported head, IT76 Dual BB Turbo, and a 4" titanium pipe all the way back with no cats. Loud is not the word. The clutch is the trickest item on the car, its a carbon/carbon RPS unit that feels like a stock clutch and slips like a stock clutch (until you get it hot, then it just grabs like R. Kelly at an all-girl school dance). She's too much car for me, way too much, I built her back when I was pretty sure I was bulletproof.

No pics of the engine bay on my new computer, its not very pretty right now anyway, I need someone to polish it for me.

Last edited by Cylinder Head; 11-01-2006 at 10:27 AM.
Old 11-01-2006, 10:39 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55 RUSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E55K
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Bob, here's a formula that will have you beating up on 63's and 55's alike.

Take 1 part E60 M5
Add 1 set, SuperSprint headers
Add 1 set, SuperSprint catbacks
Add 1 Hamann ECU

Voila- 640 horsepower.


You will only get 567HP with those upgreades and moded E55 will spank M6 which stock to sotck is even faster then M5 up to 140 rolling starts and till 160 from dead stop....beleive ME my friend has Hamann M6 which has exactly same upgrades...

Without LC he does stand any chance...but rolling start he start to pull hard on ME after 140 !!!

Last edited by E55 RUSS; 11-01-2006 at 10:44 AM.
Old 11-01-2006, 10:44 AM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,710
Received 544 Likes on 361 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by E55 RUSS
You will only get 567HP with those upgreades and moded E55 will spank M6 which stock to sotck is even faster then M5 up to 140 rolling starts and till 160 from dead stop....beleive ME my friend has Hamann M6 which has exactly same upgrades...

Without LC he does stand any chance...but rolling start he start to pull hard on ME after 140 !!!
Where did I read this damn 640 number??? I must be going crazy, I'm usually spot-on and now I'm "that guy".
Old 11-01-2006, 10:56 AM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
stevebez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,066
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, LRD4 HSE, R107 280SL
Dont worry whats a 100hp between friends ?

I cannot see anywhere close to 640hp without some F/I or NOS.

550hp sounds about right with ecu / headers etc etc ... around 10% gain.
Old 11-01-2006, 12:06 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
enzom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 E55
Originally Posted by stevebez
Dont worry whats a 100hp between friends ?

I cannot see anywhere close to 640hp without some F/I or NOS.

550hp sounds about right with ecu / headers etc etc ... around 10% gain.

I picked up about 11% peak rwhp with the same mods on my C5 Z06 - from 352 to 392 rwhp. So 560 hp is not unreasonable for an M5. If the ecu allows more "quality" revs, then it could be a bit more. But I am pretty sure the power curve starts dropping at redline anyway on that motor, so more rev's won't give you more peak power. Only way to really change that is with a new cam.


Anyway, 50 ponies is a nice number.
Old 11-01-2006, 04:36 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ahmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,545
Received 154 Likes on 125 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
I'm just going by what I read on some performance website, Hamann's a pretty reputable tuner and a lot of Bimmer owners trust them. Obviously you must not have looked at the picture in my sig, or ask the guys on this board that I've met in person whether I own an M5 or not. Go play in your sandbox.
I'm gonna cut you some slack and assume it was a typo! 540 sounds more reasonable!

Cheers
Old 11-01-2006, 04:42 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ahmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,545
Received 154 Likes on 125 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by enzom
Actually, he does.

I do agree, though, that you are not going to pick up 100 rwhp on an NA car with just those mods. No chance. Forget manufacturer's claims. They are always bloated.
Oh OK, my bad!

Since he's an M5 owner and a lover obviously, here's a little treat for him! There's only one thing that ticks me off about the E60... and thats the electronics taking over the driving pleasure! I really did enjoy my E39!

This is a friends car that I had the pleasure of driving the other day, and i mean "really" driving! Damn the SMG though!!







Old 11-01-2006, 04:50 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,710
Received 544 Likes on 361 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by Ahmed
Oh OK, my bad!

Since he's an M5 owner and a lover obviously, here's a little treat for him! There's only one thing that ticks me off about the E60... and thats the electronics taking over the driving pleasure! I really did enjoy my E39!

This is a friends car that I had the pleasure of driving the other day, and i mean "really" driving! Damn the SMG though!!

Very nice car, I love it blacked out but I can't say I'm a fan of the wheels. There are a number of ways to make the electronic nannies on the M5 go away, and basically turn it into a teutonic rocket sled of doom, but you need to wade through about 50+ menus (exaggeration) to get to them, and eventually you can program it all into one lovely M button. Now every time I feel like hurting my license I can turn off the traction control, set the SMG to self-destructing 80 millisecond shifts, the diff to lock-and-rock, and the suspension to rigor mortis stiff, its a beautiful thing.
Old 11-01-2006, 04:57 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
thats a nice Ac shnitzer M5er!!!!
Old 11-01-2006, 09:27 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
houston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
04 E55
The Title to this thread is very misleading...
Old 11-01-2006, 09:50 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by houston
The Title to this thread is very misleading...

Thats why we need to correct this thread with a video!!!!


So whos gonna do it?
Old 11-01-2006, 10:02 PM
  #43  
Member
 
AMG_Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS63 Silver/charcoal, RRS S/C stornoway grey/ebony
Originally Posted by Ahmed
Oh OK, my bad!

Since he's an M5 owner and a lover obviously, here's a little treat for him! There's only one thing that ticks me off about the E60... and thats the electronics taking over the driving pleasure! I really did enjoy my E39!

This is a friends car that I had the pleasure of driving the other day, and i mean "really" driving! Damn the SMG though!!







i saw this car in bahrain before the wheels were changed. this is one hot m5!!
Old 11-01-2006, 10:26 PM
  #44  
Almost a Member!
 
limitup's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just traded my M5 for an E63 ... they are so close in 1/4 times it's negligible. Whoever posted earlier about 640hp in the M5 with those mods was mistaken. Maybe 30-40 extra hp tops as a few others have said. The E63 is a much better all around daily driver, no question about it. The only thing to really worry about is that supposedly Dinan is coming out with a stroker motor package that will realistically bring the M5 to 600+ hp. It's gonna cost a ****load though!
Old 11-01-2006, 11:19 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by limitup
I just traded my M5 for an E63 ... they are so close in 1/4 times it's negligible. Whoever posted earlier about 640hp in the M5 with those mods was mistaken. Maybe 30-40 extra hp tops as a few others have said. The E63 is a much better all around daily driver, no question about it. The only thing to really worry about is that supposedly Dinan is coming out with a stroker motor package that will realistically bring the M5 to 600+ hp. It's gonna cost a ****load though!
what exactly made you switch?
Old 11-01-2006, 11:56 PM
  #46  
Almost a Member!
 
limitup's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had all sorts of SMG and other problems. They had already replaced the transmission once, and lately it started exhibiting the same problems again and I knew it was only a matter of time. The car had left me stranded numerous times because it wouldn't start, and I just can't put up with that in a brand new 90k car. To make matters worse BMW has no clue what's wrong with the trannies so there is no solution in sight. I had other problems with the car too but that was the big one.

Even if it wasn't for that I probably would have traded it in for the E63 anyway. The M5 is just too "raw" for a daily driver in my opinion. Even in "comfort" mode the shifts are not smooth, the suspension is not soft enough, the rear end clunks like crazy, etc. If you drive 10/10s everywhere you go then yeah the M5 is a great driver's car, but I don't and I was getting really sick of all the annoyances the rest of the 98% of the time. When I'm cruising around, picking up a client, going out to dinner, etc. that crap just doesn't fly. I dunno maybe I'm getting old lol ...
Old 11-02-2006, 12:31 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
E55_POWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 Brilliant Silver E55
Bob. Dinan 3.91 Diff is the best bang for the buck! I love the new diff in my M6, car feels different now...70+ against a stock M5, by 120 I was about to rear end him. I asked if he was really on it, and he said he was. Not sure if the Diff made THAT much of a difference or if BMW lied about the M6 specs.

The Black M5 looks awesome, but too bad the AC wheels kinda messed up the look. I'm gonna guess that the wheels were chosen since the aero kit all seems to be AC
Old 11-02-2006, 12:33 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
E55_POWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 Brilliant Silver E55
Originally Posted by limitup
I had all sorts of SMG and other problems. They had already replaced the transmission once, and lately it started exhibiting the same problems again and I knew it was only a matter of time. The car had left me stranded numerous times because it wouldn't start, and I just can't put up with that in a brand new 90k car. To make matters worse BMW has no clue what's wrong with the trannies so there is no solution in sight. I had other problems with the car too but that was the big one.

Even if it wasn't for that I probably would have traded it in for the E63 anyway. The M5 is just too "raw" for a daily driver in my opinion. Even in "comfort" mode the shifts are not smooth, the suspension is not soft enough, the rear end clunks like crazy, etc. If you drive 10/10s everywhere you go then yeah the M5 is a great driver's car, but I don't and I was getting really sick of all the annoyances the rest of the 98% of the time. When I'm cruising around, picking up a client, going out to dinner, etc. that crap just doesn't fly. I dunno maybe I'm getting old lol ...
Nah, that about sums it up. M5 and M6 drove identically, not a good around town car compared to the AMG cars. Can't wait for the S8 to use as my daily. I hope it doesn't suck **** like most Audis do. Fingers crossed.
Old 11-02-2006, 01:02 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
darren_dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'06 M5
Here's my thoughts:

The front aero kit on the black M5 in Bahrain is RDSport, the rear fin on the trunk deck lid is AC.

The HP gain from headers, full exhaust, charcoal filter removal, and ecu is no more than roughly 50-60 hp.

You can add Kellener (Schrick) cams for additional HP to push the M5 E60 to near 600 hp.

The HP does not drop off in the M5 right at redline. In fact, there is additional room to bump the limiter and gain more HP, but you risk voiding the warranty. The redline setting is visible (detectable) by the dealer unfortunately. The engine is tested to 9k rpms.

I've driven the E63 and now own the M5 E60 and all I can tell you is the M5 is wicked sick fast (and faster than the E63). I took RayJ (from this board) for a ride today at lunch and he about threw up and said this car would definitely beat his E55 (unmodded).

I'm not trying to stir up a hornets nest, but I just noticed this thread and thought I'd share a bit of my research from when I deciding on whether to buy this car or not.

Hope everyone is doing well.

Cheers,

Darren
Old 11-02-2006, 11:24 AM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Air Marshall Eldritch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,815
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
John Deere
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
I know the price of the headers is prohibitive, I mean the stock ones are a work of art and if/when I remove them I'll probably have them mounted, but the performance gains are outright astonishing. With a catback and an ECU you'll be out-running bullet trains.

Did this just turn into M5Board?
Hey Gustav, I thought we banned you?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E63 Vs M5 video.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.