W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

It is going to get turboed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-20-2006, 02:28 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
300ce
It is going to get turboed

........Ok, I am GOING to turbo my W210 E55. If the car disintegrates, so be it. I was advised to use single turbo, but on this forum there is a lot of conversation about twin turbos. Since you can make the same HP with a single turbo, what exactly is the advantage of double turbo's?

Ted
Old 11-20-2006, 02:31 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,729
Received 561 Likes on 371 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Big singles tend to work better on engines with one cylinder bank, because all of the air is flowing through one manifold into one big turbo. Two cylinder banks on either side of the engine makes plumbing two relatively smaller turbos a bit easier. I'd go for two turbos on a V8 every time. Think about it, if you put a big single to one side of your V8, the piping for the other side is going to be longer than the piping on the near side, causing all kinds of boost issues.
Old 11-20-2006, 02:34 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ghostrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KCMO, but Houston is my home.
Posts: 1,843
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
01 CLK 430
Originally Posted by Ted Baldwin
........Ok, I am GOING to turbo my W210 E55. If the car disintegrates, so be it. I was advised to use single turbo, but on this forum there is a lot of conversation about twin turbos. Since you can make the same HP with a single turbo, what exactly is the advantage of double turbo's?

Ted
I tried my best to get this to happen on my car, but the shops were kind of reluctant to take it on. If you want I can share with you as much info as I was able to gather. GOOD LUCK!!!
Old 11-20-2006, 02:39 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ghostrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KCMO, but Houston is my home.
Posts: 1,843
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
01 CLK 430
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Big singles tend to work better on engines with one cylinder bank, because all of the air is flowing through one manifold into one big turbo. Two cylinder banks on either side of the engine makes plumbing two relatively smaller turbos a bit easier. I'd go for two turbos on a V8 every time. Think about it, if you put a big single to one side of your V8, the piping for the other side is going to be longer than the piping on the near side, causing all kinds of boost issues.
I was thinking the same thing, by using a shorty style header type exhaust manifold (EM) to attach the turbos to, instead of merging the two pipes that come off of each EM to install a single turbo at that point.
Old 11-20-2006, 02:40 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
1 turbo=much lag, Twin turbo= barely lags

Originally Posted by Ted Baldwin
........Ok, I am GOING to turbo my W210 E55. If the car disintegrates, so be it. I was advised to use single turbo, but on this forum there is a lot of conversation about twin turbos. Since you can make the same HP with a single turbo, what exactly is the advantage of double turbo's?

Ted
Single turbo's lag is much more noticeable. A goodexample is with the turbo diesels. Drive a BMW 530d and then the twin turbo 535d (same 3liter engine) back to back. The 530d seems nice but the 535d is in a different league. It uses a small turbo to handle lown rpm's and then the big turbo kicks in hiher up. Twin turbos's are what make the 911 Turbo such a great everday proposition. Drive a heavily boosted Evo and you'll see exactly why one big turbo is just not that great of an idea. You'll end up with very peaky output using one turbo and with an automatic it'd be even mopre noticeable.
Old 11-20-2006, 03:06 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Well, we should finally see what the AMG tranny can handle.

Interesting if you get tranny limp mode the 65 guys get.

Take it to um Ted!!!
Old 11-20-2006, 03:16 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Schiznick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
SL65, E55T, Pending S65
So Ted, when are you going to buy my SL65 and start tuning that? I will even throw in a slightly used set of rims and drag radials

Schiz
Old 11-20-2006, 03:52 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
stevebez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,066
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, LRD4 HSE, R107 280SL
twin turbo ... much simpler install and you can locate them more or less where the primary cat canister is. Should have enuf space and could bolt straight onto a shorty header like the evosport or renntech.

The mechanicals will be easy ... the ECU well - you need some guy to tackle that for you ... thats going to be the toughest part.

Whats comperssion on motor ? Might need to fit shorter con rods to get compression more inline depending on what type of boost you going to run... It aint gonna be easy but should be loads of fun seeing that blow by a K4 W211 K4.... ??? Well will it or wont it ?

Good luck!!!
Old 11-20-2006, 03:52 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
300ce
Originally Posted by Schiznick
So Ted, when are you going to buy my SL65 and start tuning that? I will even throw in a slightly used set of rims and drag radials

Schiz
...........Don't sell your SL65. You just ran 11.5 bone stock. A W210 E55 is a much less expensive car to rip to shreads. I can only imagine how much it will cost to buy an SL65 engine if I blow it to bits..........knowing me, I probably will.

Jakpro1 Well, we should finally see what the AMG tranny can handle.

Interesting if you get tranny limp mode the 65 guys get.

Take it to um Ted!!!

..........I am told that if this works, getting to the 65 power and torque values will be a worst case scenario. That much higher power and torque numbers are expected. I have learned that the torque limit on the 5speed transmissions is around 900LBft. What I don't know is if this limit is mechanical or if it is software limited at the transmission control module. More importantly, the mechanical limit could be 900LBft but the software limit might be somewhere lower than that. This is what I won't like to happen. I am unable to confirm that this is or is not the case. Anyone know?

..........Engine is being taken out of the car as we speak for reinforcements. Unfortunately, the project will take a while. Upto 6months I am told, because everything will have to be custom fabricated since no pre-made kits exist.

........regarding twin vs single turbo's. I have learned that generally(not always) twin turbos reduce turbo lag, and that the pipping is actually easier on engines with two cylinder banks. Single turbos are simpler and easier to trouble shoot. The best option is sequentil twin turbos but it is a big headache to get the kinks worked out in an aftermarket application. Finally space contraints more so than any other reason drive the use of single vs twin turbos.

Ted
Old 11-20-2006, 03:59 PM
  #10  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
ChicagoX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W211 E55
I'm probably not with the popular opinion on this one. I would go single to keep it simpler. The "vee" configuration can be overcome easily with a crossover or merge pipe, and the extra space can be utilized by the intercooler circuit.

I would love to see a Squires-type rear mount on a W210.

EDIT: You might want to contact Turbonetics.

Last edited by ChicagoX; 11-20-2006 at 04:01 PM.
Old 11-20-2006, 04:10 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
300ce
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
I'm probably not with the popular opinion on this one. I would go single to keep it simpler. The "vee" configuration can be overcome easily with a crossover or merge pipe, and the extra space can be utilized by the intercooler circuit.

I would love to see a Squires-type rear mount on a W210.

EDIT: You might want to contact Turbonetics.

.............thanks for your response. I am using turbonetics. I tennd to agree with you regarding the use of single turbo. The turbo lag issue is important to me since I want this to be a daily driver. We shall see.

Ted
Old 11-20-2006, 04:15 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
Beowulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Gwinnett County, GA
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Too much is never enough. Who's handling the project?
Old 11-20-2006, 04:24 PM
  #13  
Super Moderator
 
BenzoBoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
W221
Best of luck!!!
Old 11-20-2006, 04:24 PM
  #14  
Out Of Control!
 
JamE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA, NV, CO
Posts: 21,005
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ted,

After said and done what figures/numbers are you looking at? Also how much is this project going to cost if you don't mind me asking?
Old 11-20-2006, 04:29 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
300ce
Originally Posted by JamE55
Ted,

After said and done what figures/numbers are you looking at? Also how much is this project going to cost if you don't mind me asking?
..............hoping for 1000crank HP. Not trying to be coy, but I am not sure about cost since everthing is to be custom fabricated. I am ware of such big projects like Sleestack's that did not go far. Lets just say that, if it is not impossible to do this, IT WILL BE DONE!

...........MBS motors are handling the project. I have a long and very positive relationship with them.

Ted
Old 11-20-2006, 04:35 PM
  #16  
Out Of Control!
 
JamE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA, NV, CO
Posts: 21,005
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ted Baldwin
..............hoping for 1000crank HP. Not trying to be coy, but I am not sure about cost since everthing is to be custom fabricated. I am ware of such big projects like Sleestack's that did not go far. Lets just say that, if it is not impossible to do this, IT WILL BE DONE!

...........MBS motors are handling the project. I have a long and very positive relationship with them.

Ted
That would definitely be something to see. I've been offered a project like that but passed on it just because of how long the project will take and ofcourse the cost. Good luck!
Old 11-20-2006, 05:25 PM
  #17  
Member
 
gujupimpster89@'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
97 e420
wow im actually excited to see the results of this project, it would be a sick car well good luck with ur project
Old 11-20-2006, 05:41 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ghostrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KCMO, but Houston is my home.
Posts: 1,843
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
01 CLK 430
Originally Posted by Ted Baldwin


........regarding twin vs single turbo's. I have learned that generally(not always) twin turbos reduce turbo lag, and that the pipping is actually easier on engines with two cylinder banks. Single turbos are simpler and easier to trouble shoot. The best option is sequentil twin turbos but it is a big headache to get the kinks worked out in an aftermarket application. Finally space contraints more so than any other reason drive the use of single vs twin turbos.

Ted
That was the conclusion of my findings.
Old 11-20-2006, 06:02 PM
  #19  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by JamE55
That would definitely be something to see. I've been offered a project like that but passed on it just because of how long the project will take and ofcourse the cost. Good luck!
I totally understand with the one year it has taken for you to get your carbon fiber done
Old 11-20-2006, 06:11 PM
  #20  
Out Of Control!
 
JamE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA, NV, CO
Posts: 21,005
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Vic55
I totally understand with the one year it has taken for you to get your carbon fiber done
Glad you understood.
Old 11-20-2006, 06:18 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
newton22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
BMW E39
Originally Posted by Ted Baldwin
..............hoping for 1000crank HP. Not trying to be coy, but I am not sure about cost since everthing is to be custom fabricated. I am ware of such big projects like Sleestack's that did not go far. Lets just say that, if it is not impossible to do this, IT WILL BE DONE!

...........MBS motors are handling the project. I have a long and very positive relationship with them.

Ted
Whoa, I was reading this thread thinking "nice, nice, turbo 210, that guy is probably shooting for the 500 hp club" until I read 1000.

Dayyuum.
Old 11-20-2006, 06:51 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
300ce
Originally Posted by newton22
Whoa, I was reading this thread thinking "nice, nice, turbo 210, that guy is probably shooting for the 500 hp club" until I read 1000.

Dayyuum.
..........I already have close to 600crank HP with the current Kleemann S8 configuration. So it wouldn't make sense to aim for 500crank HP. Our engines can take the boost. The problem is with engine management software.

Ted
Old 11-20-2006, 06:57 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
newton22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
BMW E39
Originally Posted by Ted Baldwin
..........I already have close to 600crank HP with the current Kleemann S8 configuration. So it wouldn't make sense to aim for 500crank HP. Our engines can take the boost. The problem is with engine management software.

Ted
My mistake, I didn't realize you had a heavily modified 210.
Old 11-20-2006, 06:59 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
300ce
Originally Posted by newton22
My mistake, I didn't realize you had a heavily modified 210.
........no problem. The s/c is going out to be replaced by turbos.

Ted
Old 11-20-2006, 07:07 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fast55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ventura County USA
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'06 E55, '05 SLK55, a few others
Ted, say it ain't so!!! You already have one of the baddest 210's ever. Why would you butch this car???? Not sure of your budget, but wouldn't it make sense to find another W210 to use as a test mule???


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: It is going to get turboed



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM.