Dyno Results - Bone Stock
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 1
From: NJ
2005 E55
Dyno Results - Bone Stock
Finally took my car to get dyno'd. I can't figure out how to resize the scan to make it fit here, so I posted it here:
http://www.dropshots.com/zoomin.php?...070414&cimg=12
Car put down 419.11 rwhp and 455.82 rwtq. SAE corrected. These are about average for our cars. (Uncorrected, the numbers were 438.08 and 470.47, respectively.)
As you can see from the graph, the A/F was off the charts above 6,000 rpm. I know the factory program is designed to protect the motor, but I was surprised to see it dive so far down to 10:1. Imagine how much more there is to uncork with a modest tune.
Oh, by the way, my engine was built by "P. Pankratz"
http://www.dropshots.com/day.php?use...4&ctime=091612
http://www.dropshots.com/zoomin.php?...070414&cimg=12
Car put down 419.11 rwhp and 455.82 rwtq. SAE corrected. These are about average for our cars. (Uncorrected, the numbers were 438.08 and 470.47, respectively.)
As you can see from the graph, the A/F was off the charts above 6,000 rpm. I know the factory program is designed to protect the motor, but I was surprised to see it dive so far down to 10:1. Imagine how much more there is to uncork with a modest tune.
Oh, by the way, my engine was built by "P. Pankratz"
http://www.dropshots.com/day.php?use...4&ctime=091612
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Finally took my car to get dyno'd. I can't figure out how to resize the scan to make it fit here, so I posted it here:
Car put down 419.11 rwhp and 455.82 rwtq. SAE corrected. These are about average for our cars. (Uncorrected, the numbers were 438.08 and 470.47, respectively.)
Car put down 419.11 rwhp and 455.82 rwtq. SAE corrected. These are about average for our cars. (Uncorrected, the numbers were 438.08 and 470.47, respectively.)
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 1
From: NJ
2005 E55
Thanks, guys.
The pulls were at TT Performance in Passaic, NJ. They were done in 3rd gear, as 4th supposedly hits the speed limiter.
They accidently ran one in 2nd (kickdown) and it showed only 391 rwhp. I would have thought that 2nd would show higher pwr, but guess not.
ProjectC55 - thanks for getting the scan on the thread. I have neither the skill nor the patience to play with these things.
SleeperX - I keep going back and forth about mods. Maybe next year, if I still own it.
The pulls were at TT Performance in Passaic, NJ. They were done in 3rd gear, as 4th supposedly hits the speed limiter.
They accidently ran one in 2nd (kickdown) and it showed only 391 rwhp. I would have thought that 2nd would show higher pwr, but guess not.
ProjectC55 - thanks for getting the scan on the thread. I have neither the skill nor the patience to play with these things.
SleeperX - I keep going back and forth about mods. Maybe next year, if I still own it.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
E55
Thanks, guys.
The pulls were at TT Performance in Passaic, NJ. They were done in 3rd gear, as 4th supposedly hits the speed limiter.
They accidently ran one in 2nd (kickdown) and it showed only 391 rwhp. I would have thought that 2nd would show higher pwr, but guess not.
ProjectC55 - thanks for getting the scan on the thread. I have neither the skill nor the patience to play with these things.
SleeperX - I keep going back and forth about mods. Maybe next year, if I still own it.
The pulls were at TT Performance in Passaic, NJ. They were done in 3rd gear, as 4th supposedly hits the speed limiter.
They accidently ran one in 2nd (kickdown) and it showed only 391 rwhp. I would have thought that 2nd would show higher pwr, but guess not.
ProjectC55 - thanks for getting the scan on the thread. I have neither the skill nor the patience to play with these things.
SleeperX - I keep going back and forth about mods. Maybe next year, if I still own it.
Super Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 771
Likes: 13
From: USA
E550
Yes, you can unlock more power by leaning out the fuel mixture at high rpm's, and its a relatively cheap mod. I recomend also getting the johnson pump for the IC at the same time. MB does it to cool the engine off.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 1
From: Mia
2005 E 55
Finally took my car to get dyno'd. I can't figure out how to resize the scan to make it fit here, so I posted it here:
http://www.dropshots.com/zoomin.php?...070414&cimg=12
Car put down 419.11 rwhp and 455.82 rwtq. SAE corrected. These are about average for our cars. (Uncorrected, the numbers were 438.08 and 470.47, respectively.)
As you can see from the graph, the A/F was off the charts above 6,000 rpm. I know the factory program is designed to protect the motor, but I was surprised to see it dive so far down to 10:1. Imagine how much more there is to uncork with a modest tune.
Oh, by the way, my engine was built by "P. Pankratz"
http://www.dropshots.com/day.php?use...4&ctime=091612
http://www.dropshots.com/zoomin.php?...070414&cimg=12
Car put down 419.11 rwhp and 455.82 rwtq. SAE corrected. These are about average for our cars. (Uncorrected, the numbers were 438.08 and 470.47, respectively.)
As you can see from the graph, the A/F was off the charts above 6,000 rpm. I know the factory program is designed to protect the motor, but I was surprised to see it dive so far down to 10:1. Imagine how much more there is to uncork with a modest tune.
Oh, by the way, my engine was built by "P. Pankratz"
http://www.dropshots.com/day.php?use...4&ctime=091612
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 0
From: So.Ca.
E55
Most pulls are made in 4th gear.The ratio is 1:1,I believe.Not sure if your numbers would be off by much or at all.Im guessing maybe a few points lower?
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
'04 E55
Finally took my car to get dyno'd. I can't figure out how to resize the scan to make it fit here, so I posted it here:
http://www.dropshots.com/zoomin.php?...070414&cimg=12
Car put down 419.11 rwhp and 455.82 rwtq. SAE corrected. These are about average for our cars. (Uncorrected, the numbers were 438.08 and 470.47, respectively.)
As you can see from the graph, the A/F was off the charts above 6,000 rpm. I know the factory program is designed to protect the motor, but I was surprised to see it dive so far down to 10:1. Imagine how much more there is to uncork with a modest tune.
Oh, by the way, my engine was built by "P. Pankratz"
http://www.dropshots.com/day.php?use...4&ctime=091612
http://www.dropshots.com/zoomin.php?...070414&cimg=12
Car put down 419.11 rwhp and 455.82 rwtq. SAE corrected. These are about average for our cars. (Uncorrected, the numbers were 438.08 and 470.47, respectively.)
As you can see from the graph, the A/F was off the charts above 6,000 rpm. I know the factory program is designed to protect the motor, but I was surprised to see it dive so far down to 10:1. Imagine how much more there is to uncork with a modest tune.
Oh, by the way, my engine was built by "P. Pankratz"
http://www.dropshots.com/day.php?use...4&ctime=091612
My car was built by "P. Pankratz" as well but doesn't run as strong, so he must have been having a good day when he built yours
