W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

verdict on cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-17-2007, 09:35 PM
  #26  
dsc
Super Member
 
dsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E55
Originally Posted by KamzAmg
OPPS..my bad..
the loss is estimated around 20%...right?
if thats the case..yes! he is above 600 at the crank!

-K
Mustang Dynos read lower than DynoJet and Dyno Dynamic reads lower than Mustang. It's probably more than 600 at the crank.
Old 04-17-2007, 10:11 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
2MANYCARS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Long Island & Hong Kong
Posts: 1,264
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
20+ to list......
Originally Posted by ROCKETW19
i need more info first! you know i dont want to take my car apart! but if it is realy worth it i will.
Cams are good, you need cams..........cams..........and more cams......
Old 04-18-2007, 09:07 AM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55 RUSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E55K
OK...which Cams then ???
Old 04-18-2007, 09:53 AM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SleeperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
Am I just being paranoid. I just don't understand why it makes sense to open your engine and put in new cams for 15hp. Will it really make your car that much faster? I think a larger heat exhanger, stickier tires (to put the power to the ground), and other mods to focus on keeping the engine cool make much more sense. Can someone please prove me wrong and show me 1/4 mile results before and after cams.
Old 04-18-2007, 09:57 AM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SleeperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
and less weight. My next mod....
Old 04-18-2007, 10:12 AM
  #31  
Super Member
 
305-E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Miami,FL.
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2017 Charger Hellcat
Sleeper how much is your E making to the rear wheels if you don't mind me asking?
Old 04-18-2007, 11:41 AM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
V12Godspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South FL & NYC
Posts: 5,768
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Your worst nightmare...
Originally Posted by SleeperX
Am I just being paranoid. I just don't understand why it makes sense to open your engine and put in new cams for 15hp. Will it really make your car that much faster? I think a larger heat exhanger, stickier tires (to put the power to the ground), and other mods to focus on keeping the engine cool make much more sense. Can someone please prove me wrong and show me 1/4 mile results before and after cams.
Give me 2 more weeks...I am the test mule here in NYC.
Old 04-18-2007, 01:11 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Originally Posted by SleeperX
Am I just being paranoid. I just don't understand why it makes sense to open your engine and put in new cams for 15hp. Will it really make your car that much faster? I think a larger heat exhanger, stickier tires (to put the power to the ground), and other mods to focus on keeping the engine cool make much more sense. Can someone please prove me wrong and show me 1/4 mile results before and after cams.
don't worry, i'll get you some 1/4mile results. unfortunately they won't be direct comparisons until summer is over because of our extreme desert heat. based on my experience, even with the limited data from this dyno run, i fully expect a MINIMUM of 2/10th and 2mph from the cams.

you also mentioned stickier tires. i've only run on street tires so far and i believe i was near their limit before the cams so traction may become an issue now. if so, it's entirely possible that my future 1/4mile times may actually suffer without moving to d/r's.

keep in mind, you're not really opening the engine up. they're pretty much a bolt-on upgrade. cooling mods are definitely a good thing and no one could criticize you for going in that direction.

Last edited by chiromikey; 04-18-2007 at 01:13 PM.
Old 04-18-2007, 01:40 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
ROCKETW19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Originally Posted by SleeperX
Am I just being paranoid. I just don't understand why it makes sense to open your engine and put in new cams for 15hp. Will it really make your car that much faster? I think a larger heat exhanger, stickier tires (to put the power to the ground), and other mods to focus on keeping the engine cool make much more sense. Can someone please prove me wrong and show me 1/4 mile results before and after cams.
i am paranoid also bro thats why i started this thread to see what people thought. i agree with the rest of your post also but damm i already did all that and some. there are no more bolt on mods left to do. unless you call nos bolt on.
Old 04-18-2007, 04:12 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SleeperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
2/10 of a second doesn't excite me considering that I can see that variability depending on track conditions and launch. 2 mph does get me very excited, but can one really expect 2mph from 15hp. Question: I believe Rock got 125mph trap speeds before cams. How does he achieve this? In my opinion cooling and weight reduction are better mods. I for one am anxious to see VRUS' new heat exchanger mod in action. As for further upgrades, I don't think they are necessary. If anything you have too many considering the cars limited cooling capacity. At this point we are seeing diminishing returns from addtl mods. Why do you think stock cars and stage 1 and 2 cars are so strong at the track. I hate to bring this up....ughhh, but why is there a video of an M6 walking a stage 4. COOLING! At this stage we need to think about cooling mods..
Old 04-18-2007, 04:16 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SleeperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
MIG-E55Rocket,
Before you put the cams in, get the ECU flashed. You have a beast already my friend.
Old 04-18-2007, 04:43 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
V12Godspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South FL & NYC
Posts: 5,768
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Your worst nightmare...
Originally Posted by SleeperX
MIG-E55Rocket,
Before you put the cams in, get the ECU flashed. You have a beast already my friend.
I will....I have an intercooler so big, I am affraid it won't fit in my car, lol! I am working on that already...hehehe
Old 04-18-2007, 10:09 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
2MANYCARS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Long Island & Hong Kong
Posts: 1,264
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
20+ to list......
Mig,
Good luck to your project, you will hear burbbling noise once you have the cams installed like mine. How big is your intercooler? I bet it's not as big as my APS intercooler on my EVO.
Old 04-19-2007, 12:05 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
ROCKETW19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Originally Posted by SleeperX
2/10 of a second doesn't excite me considering that I can see that variability depending on track conditions and launch. 2 mph does get me very excited, but can one really expect 2mph from 15hp. Question: I believe Rock got 125mph trap speeds before cams. How does he achieve this? In my opinion cooling and weight reduction are better mods. I for one am anxious to see VRUS' new heat exchanger mod in action. As for further upgrades, I don't think they are necessary. If anything you have too many considering the cars limited cooling capacity. At this point we are seeing diminishing returns from addtl mods. Why do you think stock cars and stage 1 and 2 cars are so strong at the track. I hate to bring this up....ughhh, but why is there a video of an M6 walking a stage 4. COOLING! At this stage we need to think about cooling mods..
i already have the heat exchanger and pump upgrade + the 10deg star mod also. i think the kleemann car already reached the speed they were racing to. i dont think the kleeman guys are that stupid to not know the pump was out. besides even if the pump was out the M6 caught up so fast he had to have let off.
Old 04-19-2007, 12:25 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SleeperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
Originally Posted by ROCKETW19
i already have the heat exchanger and pump upgrade + the 10deg star mod also. i think the kleemann car already reached the speed they were racing to. i dont think the kleeman guys are that stupid to not know the pump was out. besides even if the pump was out the M6 caught up so fast he had to have let off.
Yes, but I think a big heat exchanger would allow the car to produce even more power.
Old 04-19-2007, 04:33 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55 RUSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E55K
Everyone talk about cooling and etc...but I dont think Kleemann, MKB, Carlsson, Brabus, Vaeth, Evotech are stupid enough not to include cooling MODS in their stages...

Infact only MKB offers bigger cooler on thier 680 HP 55 and Evotech on their 700HP beast...but any 55 below 620 HP do not have any additional cooling mods with all major tuners...They put Cams before cooling and do work on transmission ECU and reinforcing...and Cooling is the last mods they do...

Last edited by E55 RUSS; 04-19-2007 at 09:10 AM.
Old 04-19-2007, 05:51 AM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by E55 RUSS
Every on tank about cooling and etc...but I dont think Kleemann, MKB, Carlsson, Brabus, Vaeth, Evotech are stupid enough not to include cooling MODS in thier stages...

Infact only MKB offers bigger cooler on thier 680 HP 55 and Evotech on their 700HP beast...but any 55 below 620 HP do not have any additional cooling mods...they put Cams before and them do work on transmission ECU and reinforcing...and Cooling is the last mods they do...
Still I think cooling would be the best mod for a modded 55. After I get the best cooling application done I would inquire about cams. This is the same premise done on high hp Turbocharged cars.

More boost ,then you need a more efficient intercooler to dissapate the heat.

Bigger Turbo,then you go cams and bigger intercooler.
Old 04-19-2007, 10:44 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmf003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'03 SL55
Hi, guys. Got the dyno results today. 439 HP, 443 ft lbs TQ on a Mustang dyno. The car has SLR cams and VRP 80 mm throttle body.

Some more details here: https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...32#post2152032
Old 04-19-2007, 10:48 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
ROCKETW19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Originally Posted by jmf003
Hi, guys. Got the dyno results today. 439 HP, 443 ft lbs TQ on a Mustang dyno. The car has SLR cams and VRP 80 mm throttle body.

Some more details here: https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...32#post2152032
with no base line the info dosnt help! but thanks for share anyways.
Old 04-20-2007, 12:10 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmf003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'03 SL55
Yeah, I had planned to have a dyno done before my first mod but due to a scheduling glitch, it never happened.

Other forum members have posted results of 390 HP to 410 for their stock 55K engines on a Mustang dyno. If my car was in that range then I'm getting at least 30 additional RWHP from the cams/TB combo.

So it's not the hard data that you and others would like to see but it's consistent with the notion that the cams are adding 15 to 20 RWHP to the engine.

Originally Posted by ROCKETW19
with no base line the info dosnt help! but thanks for share anyways.
Old 04-20-2007, 12:16 PM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SleeperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
Originally Posted by jmf003
Yeah, I had planned to have a dyno done before my first mod but due to a scheduling glitch, it never happened.

Other forum members have posted results of 390 HP to 410 for their stock 55K engines on a Mustang dyno. If my car was in that range then I'm getting at least 30 additional RWHP from the cams/TB combo.

So it's not the hard data that you and others would like to see but it's consistent with the notion that the cams are adding 15 to 20 RWHP to the engine.
I have to disagree with this statement.. I bet the TB added at least 20-25rwhp.. Implying to me that the cams added about 5-10hp... but then again this doesnt mean much without a baseline...
Old 04-20-2007, 12:37 PM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Originally Posted by SleeperX
I have to disagree with this statement.. I bet the TB added at least 20-25rwhp.. Implying to me that the cams added about 5-10hp... but then again this doesnt mean much without a baseline...
imho, i don't think the tb is going to show that much hp on a mustang dyno...more like 12-18hp tops. but i could be wrong...at least my wife tells me this all the time.
Old 04-20-2007, 01:14 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SleeperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
Originally Posted by chiromikey
imho, i don't think the tb is going to show that much hp on a mustang dyno...more like 12-18hp tops. but i could be wrong...at least my wife tells me this all the time.
There is only one way to solve this.. time slips....
Old 04-20-2007, 01:16 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmf003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by chiromikey
imho, i don't think the tb is going to show that much hp on a mustang dyno...more like 12-18hp tops. but i could be wrong...at least my wife tells me this all the time.
Hi, Michael! Thanks again for the spacer and tech info. The installation went smoothly and I'm lovin' the results!

SleeperX, the TB install definitely added a significant amount of HP to the engine. The car was noticeably quicker after the install.

Renntech claims their 80 mm TB will produce +15 HP (difference between Stage 3 and Stage 4) to +20 HP (standalone claim) which is close to the numbers you've suggested but a little lower.

I also used the lowest possible figures when I made my "at least 30 additional RWHP" comment. If stock 55Ks measure at 390 HP to 410 HP, my increase was in the range of +30 HP to +50 HP.

Using your numbers of +20 to +25 for the TB, the cams would have produced +5 HP (worst case) to +30 HP (best case). Midpoint of that range is +17.5 HP. Using Renntech's numbers, the cams would have produced +10 HP (worst case) to +35 HP (best case). Midpoint of that range is +22.5.

So no guarantees but I really do believe the numbers are consistent with the cams producing +15 HP to +20 HP.

Last edited by jmf003; 04-20-2007 at 01:23 PM.
Old 04-20-2007, 01:21 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmf003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by SleeperX
There is only one way to solve this.. time slips....
There you go! We need a Pinks All Out AMG episode.

Last edited by jmf003; 04-20-2007 at 01:26 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: verdict on cams



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 AM.