E63-Sprint Booster makes it less of a "sheep in wolf's clothing".
03-04-2008, 11:23 PM
#101
MBWorld Fanatic!
03-05-2008, 02:04 PM
#102
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Juicee, check out my comment on post #58 of this thread posted on 11/25/2007...... I posted that comment when the fastest stock E63 was 12.5 to 12.6. Here it is again.....
Only 3 months after my post, my E63 went from 12.5 to 12.2 and Oldgixxer's E63 actually hit the low 12.1 
So maybe low 12s is possible 
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
12.0s maybe pushing it a bit, but I seriously believe the 63 can do 12.2s maybe 12.1s if Enzom drives it
So maybe low 12s is possible
Last edited by MB_Forever; 03-06-2008 at 05:47 AM.
03-06-2008, 01:35 AM
#104
MBWorld Fanatic!
03-06-2008, 03:40 AM
#105
Senior Member
Two weeks ago I drove my first E63, belonging to a friend, and was totally shocked by how flat, laggy and unresponsive it felt compared to my E55 with AMG Sprint Booster.
There is just no way that anybody in their right mind who previously owned any of the 55K powered cars, would willingly "upgrade" to any of the new 63 powered vehicles (except DerekFSU, LOL).That leaves the new crop of unsuspecting, aspiring AMG owners who don't know what they are missing.
There is a small remedy for the long gas pedal travel, which delays the E63's acceleration until it's been pressed to the boards for a few long seconds.
I just installed in my friends E63 the standard Automatic version of the Sprint Booster (don't bother with the AMG version of SB in a car without the Kompressor) and the improvment was significant. My friend likes it, .[/SIZE][/B]
no way in hell a 5 year old SL55 is out performing a 63, unless its heavily modded.
63's are burying your times, better get to a track
12.343 113.700 8.000 89.940 1.855 50.0 Yes Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG 2007 Rob MacNeil
12.352 113.620 7.991 89.980 1.870 67.0 Yes Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG P30 2007 MercedesBenz_Forever
12.353* 114.780 8.040 90.800 1.952 60.0 Yes Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG p30 2007 MB_FOREVER
12.356* 111.840 7.980 88.790 1.874 70.0 Yes Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG 2005 RAFAL
kinda funny the car you put on blast has run faster than your best time.
63's are trapping 4-6 mph faster than your 55?? whats the story?
There is just no way that anybody in their right mind who previously owned any of the 55K powered cars, would willingly "upgrade" to any of the new 63 powered vehicles (except DerekFSU, LOL).That leaves the new crop of unsuspecting, aspiring AMG owners who don't know what they are missing.
There is a small remedy for the long gas pedal travel, which delays the E63's acceleration until it's been pressed to the boards for a few long seconds.
I just installed in my friends E63 the standard Automatic version of the Sprint Booster (don't bother with the AMG version of SB in a car without the Kompressor) and the improvment was significant. My friend likes it, .[/SIZE][/B]
no way in hell a 5 year old SL55 is out performing a 63, unless its heavily modded.
63's are burying your times, better get to a track
12.343 113.700 8.000 89.940 1.855 50.0 Yes Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG 2007 Rob MacNeil
12.352 113.620 7.991 89.980 1.870 67.0 Yes Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG P30 2007 MercedesBenz_Forever
12.353* 114.780 8.040 90.800 1.952 60.0 Yes Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG p30 2007 MB_FOREVER
12.356* 111.840 7.980 88.790 1.874 70.0 Yes Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG 2005 RAFAL
kinda funny the car you put on blast has run faster than your best time.
63's are trapping 4-6 mph faster than your 55?? whats the story?
I'm curious to hear Rafels reply to the above comments.. So far nothing..
03-06-2008, 09:12 AM
#106
Administrator
Juicee, get a life..........this thread is four months old and I refuse to beat the dead horse any longer.......................BTW, Your mom is fat, wears army boots and has a hairy ***.
03-06-2008, 11:47 AM
#107
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by ESIX3POWER
I'm curious to hear Rafels reply to the above comments.. So far nothing..
I'm curious to hear Rafels reply to the above comments.. So far nothing..
For those that wonder why the OP has not responded, let me take the liberty of imagining what Rafal is thinking:
Quote:
Juicee, get a life..........this thread is four months old and I refuse to beat the dead horse any longer.......................BTW, Your mom is fat, wears army boots and has a hairy ***.
sorry , when you are wrong your wrong. Ideals smashed, paradigms lost, its is likely a very difficult time for many 63 critics.
03-06-2008, 10:04 PM
#108
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55
..................."now tell me about your childhood"...................
such deep seated anxiety and need for approval must be have its foundations anchored in past childhood experiences.
such deep seated anxiety and need for approval must be have its foundations anchored in past childhood experiences.
03-06-2008, 10:28 PM
#109
MBWorld Fanatic!
Making statements void of empiracal data has risks.
Rafal and you to a certain extent in support herein of his hypothesis in regard to the AMG 63 have been put on blast in the same manner you put our cars on blast in the creation of this thread.
It will only get worse as milestones once thought unachievable by the feable , slow, sheepish 63 are toppled.
We have disproved Rafal's statements, we mock him here as a result.
03-07-2008, 08:16 AM
#110
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55
03-07-2008, 10:58 AM
#111
MBWorld Fanatic!
