VRP cams
#51
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55 AMG and 2003 C320 4Matic Miss my 993 Turbo above!!
Great Documentation
Hey Vadim,
Great Job documenting the gains based on your ECU DYNO tuning. So if I understand correctly, the ECU tune picked up 43hp (red to blue) when the cams came installed to you? Adam put the cams in with no ECU tune. Than Rocket lets you at it and now you have picked up 43HP. So, is this all from the tune or getting the CAMS to work properly with an ECU tune or a mixture of both? DOes this mean that anyone getting the CAMS is going to need an extensive ECU/DYNO tune to get them to work properly.
Great Job documenting the gains based on your ECU DYNO tuning. So if I understand correctly, the ECU tune picked up 43hp (red to blue) when the cams came installed to you? Adam put the cams in with no ECU tune. Than Rocket lets you at it and now you have picked up 43HP. So, is this all from the tune or getting the CAMS to work properly with an ECU tune or a mixture of both? DOes this mean that anyone getting the CAMS is going to need an extensive ECU/DYNO tune to get them to work properly.
#52
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
I've said it all along. The differences are NOT small.
#58
MBWorld Fanatic!
indeed difference is only in weight: should you instal 20" "lighter" rims&tire, ie same weight as 18" have, there should be no difference.
btw, PLEASE, VADIM, if available post the CRANK POWER GRAPH too, that is certainly more sexy
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
I guess its slope be upward till limiter
.. unfortunately tranny losses increase more than proportionately
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
last: .. the gain obtained is from LONG HEADERS+ CAMS, right?
#59
MBWorld Fanatic!
nope, reread what jangy is saying. even if two wheels are the same weight, the one with the weight further from the center will negatively affect hp. so 20" rims that weigh the same as 18" rims will not necessarily make "no difference".
#60
MBWorld Fanatic!
ps: Michael, do you still have SLR cams installed? ... just wondering how many HP you could get after a similarly deep fine tuning ..
ciao
Last edited by dyno; 02-16-2008 at 09:11 PM.
#62
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
It is, but you have to remember that the dyno wheel is the resistance. as it pushes back on the drivetrain, the motor has to TQ the power to the "floor". It is just like using a different lengthed wrench to hold a steadily spinning wheel. You will wear out faster, etc. etc. The object on a dyno is to twist the wheel up to a particular speed over a specific timeframe. That basically is the definition of TQ.
#63
MBWorld Fanatic!
It is, but you have to remember that the dyno wheel is the resistance. as it pushes back on the drivetrain, the motor has to TQ the power to the "floor". It is just like using a different lengthed wrench to hold a steadily spinning wheel. You will wear out faster, etc. etc. The object on a dyno is to twist the wheel up to a particular speed over a specific timeframe. That basically is the definition of TQ.
should leverage be the issue, as you are saying, then please make Victor happy and install 16" rims to quickly achieve 700hp.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
thanks for discussing
but must go ..bed.
#64
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
I'm confused. How is the ability to accelerate not the same as power in this case? The dyno is not measuring actual power, it is measuring the power put down as a function of time. lets assume you are going to dyno at a set rpm, say 3000 revs/min. Again, go back to my analogy of using a wrench to turn the wheel. Do you think that keeping the wheels running at speed is easier with a short or long wrench? It is the same with the dyno.
I can't put 16s on my car, but if all Victor wanted was numbers, they would put my car in first and screw with the dyno. He wants 700 horses, assuming that all else is equal. All of these variables are exactly why I NEVER listen to a specific number. The dyno is simply a tool to track changes, IF you have set a reference point or at least have something to compare it to.
I can't put 16s on my car, but if all Victor wanted was numbers, they would put my car in first and screw with the dyno. He wants 700 horses, assuming that all else is equal. All of these variables are exactly why I NEVER listen to a specific number. The dyno is simply a tool to track changes, IF you have set a reference point or at least have something to compare it to.
#65
MBWorld Fanatic!
yes, i'm still running the slr cams and i've wondered the same thing myself. i know i have a good bit of hp still hidden in my ecu.
#67
MBWorld Fanatic!
compression ratio
what do you think Guys about pros and cons from lowering the compression ratio, as it is in SLR ?
.. higher output raises engine temp issues and maybe this causes earlier knocking sensors activation and therefore, retarding...
.. higher output raises engine temp issues and maybe this causes earlier knocking sensors activation and therefore, retarding...
#68
Out Of Control!!
Lowering c/r with head gasket or pistions? What do you have in mind?
Either way you will have less power with the same amount of boost. You would have to raise the boost to see any gains.
Either way you will have less power with the same amount of boost. You would have to raise the boost to see any gains.
#69
MBWorld Fanatic!
I think we were thinking of shaving the pistons one time to raise compression ratio instead and add a tune for C16 race gas, it was just a project to see how it would react. According to my tech the car would have made some crazy power.
#70
MBWorld Fanatic!
I think you mean shave the heads Jodster to raise the CPR!! Shaving the pistons would do the opposite (Lower CPR) unless he added longer piston rods while doing that.
Last edited by ProjectC55; 02-17-2008 at 01:57 PM.
#71
MBWorld Fanatic!
#72
MBWorld Fanatic!
No probs! Too much Mangu y chicharon de pollo!!
Este es mi plato favorito.![bow](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bowdown.gif)
Shaving the heads and porting them will give you nice pwr though as long as the piston recesses for the valves allow it.
I'm surprised you're not going 55 again with all this nice stuff VRP's coming out with. The SW looks reliable and promising but we'll confirm that after we see some more cars from there run.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![bow](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bowdown.gif)
Shaving the heads and porting them will give you nice pwr though as long as the piston recesses for the valves allow it.
I'm surprised you're not going 55 again with all this nice stuff VRP's coming out with. The SW looks reliable and promising but we'll confirm that after we see some more cars from there run.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#73
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yup.. Unfortunately that is correct.. We've spent a tonne of money on R&D, dyno time, programming time and people time (Jeremy, Vadim) and everyone else involved in making these tunes.. The last thing I want is to give them away to other dealers.. So, because of this, the files are exclusive to VRP only.
If Funktion is interested, I am happy to have some representation in that area. I'd like to get someone to cover NY/NJ and WA/VA area.
I have a new Detroit location that is coming online shortly and I am trying to lock in a Florida location.. Once those centers are in place, we'll have complete USA coverage.
If Funktion is interested, I am happy to have some representation in that area. I'd like to get someone to cover NY/NJ and WA/VA area.
I have a new Detroit location that is coming online shortly and I am trying to lock in a Florida location.. Once those centers are in place, we'll have complete USA coverage.
Last edited by Ghostrider; 02-17-2008 at 03:22 PM.