Check your VRP Pulleys, Please
#101
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
I was originally going down that path. Your double-talk convinced me to pursue the refund.
You never even considered that the pulley was bad per our conversations (when I finally got involved). You were too busy pointing the finger elsewhere for me to feel like you would "step up." Never once was it stated that everything would be taken care of, no questions asked.
You asked me how much I paid for the item, I told you. There was no mention of a tool, shipping costs, or anything else. Making this up as we go along? For sure.
When I got a hold of you, after three weeks, you stated that this was the first you had heard of the issue. So which is it, were you working with Erick waiting on info, or were you not in the loop?
Three weeks is long enough to erode whatever goodwill existed towards VRP's intentions. You even went so far as to blame Vadim for not communicating the problem to you. Is that my fault?
"I'll make sure LET doesn't touch another VRP part.." was another phrase from you that comes to mind from our initial conversation. Quick to blame, slow to refund.
I was informed that you had dropped LET as a distributor, is that not the case? If it is, should I pursue a refund from a company that has NO chance of recovering monies from the manufacturer? I'm not that stupid, Vic.
If this had been handled appropriately from the get-go, I would be posting that up as well; I said so much in our e-mails. "I would like nothing more than to be able to post up how well VRP handled the situation" is what was written.
Originally Posted by vrus
How many vendors have you dealt with that refund money on product sight unseen with just a verbal word that the product is bad? Especially on something like a crank pulley where most of the time its an installation issue.
Last edited by ChicagoX; 06-30-2008 at 08:03 PM. Reason: clarity, sig removal
#102
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
When Sunil did mine he removed a plate on what I believed was the transmission(don't hold me to that). By screwing in a bolt or something he was able to prevent the crank from spinning and isntalled the pulley with ease. Nothing was attached to the pulley and no dismantling necessary. I watched the whole thing.
Blaming someone for using the tool you provided is wrong, IMO.
Last edited by ChicagoX; 06-30-2008 at 08:03 PM. Reason: sig removal
#103
I truly feel there was a mistake made during install.
I truly feel that something happened and someone tried to cover up the damage with a black paint/substance.
Everyone can have a bad day.. If a shop has installed 30, 40, 50 or 100 pullies, it doesnt mean someone can't make a mistake. We are all human.
The shop being CPT is even more delicate for me because I've never heard a bad thing about them. I know you guys have all had great things to say about CPT and I agree that they are a good shop, but, it doesnt mean the tech doing the install couldn't have made a mistake, got scared and didnt want to admit to everyone that he screwed up.
You really can honestly look at those pictures and say that the hardened steel snout on the back of the pulley was damaged during the torque procedure?? I just dont see that happening.
There would be a concave structure formed on the frontside or backside of the pulley if it was warped during torque. There is ZERO damage to the face or rear of the pulley.
The only way the keyway could get chewed up like that is if the key is not fully inserted and the bolt was torqued down.
I truly feel that something happened and someone tried to cover up the damage with a black paint/substance.
Everyone can have a bad day.. If a shop has installed 30, 40, 50 or 100 pullies, it doesnt mean someone can't make a mistake. We are all human.
The shop being CPT is even more delicate for me because I've never heard a bad thing about them. I know you guys have all had great things to say about CPT and I agree that they are a good shop, but, it doesnt mean the tech doing the install couldn't have made a mistake, got scared and didnt want to admit to everyone that he screwed up.
You really can honestly look at those pictures and say that the hardened steel snout on the back of the pulley was damaged during the torque procedure?? I just dont see that happening.
There would be a concave structure formed on the frontside or backside of the pulley if it was warped during torque. There is ZERO damage to the face or rear of the pulley.
The only way the keyway could get chewed up like that is if the key is not fully inserted and the bolt was torqued down.
I would also like to correct some of the misinformation.
No one had a bad day! No one is covering anything up!
The installation is not the problem. Look at what side of the keyway is damaged. If the pulley was not fully inserted on the crank it would be impossible to torque the bolt and keyway would be damaged back to front and not to the side.
The installation is very straightforward, unless your pulley requires different torque specs, it was installed properly.
#104
When Sunil did mine he removed a plate on what I believed was the transmission(don't hold me to that). By screwing in a bolt or something he was able to prevent the crank from spinning and isntalled the pulley with ease. Nothing was attached to the pulley and no dismantling necessary. I watched the whole thing.
#105
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
I really hope this issue comes to a conclusion soon, but it doesn't look like it's headed that way. We have one party saying it's an install issue and that they've installed the same pulley correctly on multiple cars with no problem. On the other hand, the other party says that it's a pulley issue and that they've installed multiple other pullies on many cars with no problem (Kleeman pullies, ASP, etc....). The situation is further complicated when both parties involved are great vendors and are highly respected by many. Maybe a third (neutral) party should examine the pulley and issue an opinion
Unfortunately, only one side can be correct in this scenario.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Last edited by MB_Forever; 07-01-2008 at 12:52 PM.
#106
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
Im not quite sure what you mean by this.. I refunded LET their DEALER price. They refunded you the PURCHASE price. I sent back 100% of the money for the product. I thought you had kept the waterpump pulley to use with your new pulley. .I didnt realize you took the WP pulley off also.
I dont understand what you are misreading about my post?? I gave LET back what they spent on the product, period.
YES. I said it was the first time I had heard about YOUR Issue. The only issue that was reported was about MARCUS'S pulley.. Your name didn't even get mentioned.. It wasnt until MARCUS emailed me that he said there was "ANOTHER CAR" that had the same problem.
Even Vadim thought we were all talking about Marcus' car originally because in conversations LET just said a "Customer Car".. Then the next day Marcus happened to call Vadim, so Vadim put 2 and 2 together and thought Marcus was the person LET was talking about.
Vadim was working with Erick waiting on info. I was dealing with MARCUS via emails about his situation. I didnt know your problem existed until Marcus told me via email. You know all of this because I told you this same stuff in email myself.
Again, the delays were on your side not ours. Vadim told Erick to send pictures, get the crank bolt and provide information. That was never done and that was what Vadim was waiting for to help you guys.
During that period, Marcus had started emailing me and he and I were discussing HIS situation, not yours.
EXACTLY! I was upset at LET because they let you go 3 weeks and didnt just give you the refund. WHY would they let it drag out for 3 weeks if everyone thought it was a bad product??? They should have given you back the money DAY #2 and then dealt with me.
Again, YES. Absolutely true.. I dropped LET as a distributor because I found out through my Pulley manufacturer in Australia that Jerry from LET called and tried to purchase OUR Pulley using the part # that was stamped on the front of the pulley.
I received an email from the manufacturer telling me that Jerry was trying to purchase the pullies directly and circumventing VRP.
What would you have done in my shoes?? I dropped them as a vendor because I determined at that point I could no longer trust them with any information or product.
I told Vadim, Sunil and everyone else involved to not provide any info or product to anyone from LET.
How much better could it have been handled?? Vadim asked for data and input and received NOTHING. What do you guys expect him to do when no one is providing him with any information??
The point was that if you had a pulley from another manufacturer and you called them and said the pulley was bad, you would have had to not only supply them with information, but you would have had to send the pulley back, wait "X" number of months and then hope for a refund.
It doesn't seem to me that anything I did or tried to do is making you happy.
I dont understand what you are misreading about my post?? I gave LET back what they spent on the product, period.
Even Vadim thought we were all talking about Marcus' car originally because in conversations LET just said a "Customer Car".. Then the next day Marcus happened to call Vadim, so Vadim put 2 and 2 together and thought Marcus was the person LET was talking about.
Vadim was working with Erick waiting on info. I was dealing with MARCUS via emails about his situation. I didnt know your problem existed until Marcus told me via email. You know all of this because I told you this same stuff in email myself.
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
When I got a hold of you, after three weeks, you stated that this was the first you had heard of the issue. So which is it, were you working with Erick waiting on info, or were you not in the loop?
During that period, Marcus had started emailing me and he and I were discussing HIS situation, not yours.
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
Three weeks is long enough to erode whatever goodwill existed towards VRP's intentions. You even went so far as to blame Vadim for not communicating the problem to you. Is that my fault?
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
"I'll make sure LET doesn't touch another VRP part.." was another phrase from you that comes to mind from our initial conversation. Quick to blame, slow to refund.
Again, YES. Absolutely true.. I dropped LET as a distributor because I found out through my Pulley manufacturer in Australia that Jerry from LET called and tried to purchase OUR Pulley using the part # that was stamped on the front of the pulley.
I received an email from the manufacturer telling me that Jerry was trying to purchase the pullies directly and circumventing VRP.
What would you have done in my shoes?? I dropped them as a vendor because I determined at that point I could no longer trust them with any information or product.
I told Vadim, Sunil and everyone else involved to not provide any info or product to anyone from LET.
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
I was informed that you had dropped LET as a distributor, is that not the case? If it is, should I pursue a refund from a company that has NO chance of recovering monies from the manufacturer? I'm not that stupid, Vic.
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
If this had been handled appropriately from the get-go, I would be posting that up as well; I said so much in our e-mails. "I would like nothing more than to be able to post up how well VRP handled the situation" is what was written.
It doesn't seem to me that anything I did or tried to do is making you happy.
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
LET did just that on a set of headers. I'm not quite sure what other vendors have to do with the way you handled this deal, nor what misinformation has been posted.
#107
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
Al,
Respectfully, did you see the pics I posted? Does it not look like someone sprayed or painted black paint over the damaged area? If that is just too many CSI episodes clouding my eyes then I will retract the statement, but that is what it LOOKS like to me.
As for the keyway how would it be back to front? if the key didnt go all the way down into the keyway and the bolt was torqued, it would notch the key. once the car was started, the pulley would be wobbling all over the place and at that point it would damage the keyway. Is that not right?
I agree the install is straight forward.. the torque specs are same as factory for ANY crank pulley on this car.
Respectfully, did you see the pics I posted? Does it not look like someone sprayed or painted black paint over the damaged area? If that is just too many CSI episodes clouding my eyes then I will retract the statement, but that is what it LOOKS like to me.
As for the keyway how would it be back to front? if the key didnt go all the way down into the keyway and the bolt was torqued, it would notch the key. once the car was started, the pulley would be wobbling all over the place and at that point it would damage the keyway. Is that not right?
I agree the install is straight forward.. the torque specs are same as factory for ANY crank pulley on this car.
Vrus,
I would also like to correct some of the misinformation.
No one had a bad day! No one is covering anything up!
The installation is not the problem. Look at what side of the keyway is damaged. If the pulley was not fully inserted on the crank it would be impossible to torque the bolt and keyway would be damaged back to front and not to the side.
The installation is very straightforward, unless your pulley requires different torque specs, it was installed properly.
I would also like to correct some of the misinformation.
No one had a bad day! No one is covering anything up!
The installation is not the problem. Look at what side of the keyway is damaged. If the pulley was not fully inserted on the crank it would be impossible to torque the bolt and keyway would be damaged back to front and not to the side.
The installation is very straightforward, unless your pulley requires different torque specs, it was installed properly.
#108
Al,
Respectfully, did you see the pics I posted? Does it not look like someone sprayed or painted black paint over the damaged area? If that is just too many CSI episodes clouding my eyes then I will retract the statement, but that is what it LOOKS like to me.
As for the keyway how would it be back to front? if the key didnt go all the way down into the keyway and the bolt was torqued, it would notch the key. once the car was started, the pulley would be wobbling all over the place and at that point it would damage the keyway. Is that not right?
I agree the install is straight forward.. the torque specs are same as factory for ANY crank pulley on this car.
Respectfully, did you see the pics I posted? Does it not look like someone sprayed or painted black paint over the damaged area? If that is just too many CSI episodes clouding my eyes then I will retract the statement, but that is what it LOOKS like to me.
As for the keyway how would it be back to front? if the key didnt go all the way down into the keyway and the bolt was torqued, it would notch the key. once the car was started, the pulley would be wobbling all over the place and at that point it would damage the keyway. Is that not right?
I agree the install is straight forward.. the torque specs are same as factory for ANY crank pulley on this car.
If they pulley would be wobbling "all over the place", there would be damage in other areas, and not just on the keyway.
#109
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix by way of Texas
Posts: 1,010
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
I just went outside and took a picture of my stock pulley, which was removed 5/22/08 and replaced with a red VRP pulley. My stock pulley also has the same notch that Fast55 mentioned and the damage apparently on the pulley being discussed in this thread. I also took a short video of my pulley wobble, which is ever so slightly there. This was installed at VRP at Vadim's shop in Costa Mesa and the car has been pulling like a freight train (and after a good wash and waxing, I now ingest 911 Turbos, M6s, etc...
). Since belt squeal was mentioned,...the belt squeal I have asked about a couple of times and Jangy gave me a heads up about, is subsiding with time...go figure. I have both to email if anyone is interested. I hope this information continues to confuse everyone.
Also, I would like to point out, if you buy a product at Walmart and are unhappy with it, you take it back and get refunded from the place you bought it from, not hunt down the actual manufacturer (hell, which would probably be in China from my example...LOL!). While I think the question about the pulley integrity/install is still being debated, I would like to say LET's customer service should be questioned as they didn't pony up a refund immediately and simply deal with VRP. Or maybe, we are all just so in touch with each other that the lines get blurred.![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Also, I would like to point out, if you buy a product at Walmart and are unhappy with it, you take it back and get refunded from the place you bought it from, not hunt down the actual manufacturer (hell, which would probably be in China from my example...LOL!). While I think the question about the pulley integrity/install is still being debated, I would like to say LET's customer service should be questioned as they didn't pony up a refund immediately and simply deal with VRP. Or maybe, we are all just so in touch with each other that the lines get blurred.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#110
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
Thanks for your input. I see your point.
At the point where I was forced into the deal, VRP offered to refund me directly, later retracting it. I was later told to get my refund from LET. LET had already told me that they had been dropped as a vendor of VRP products. At that point, I merely requested Victor honor what he promised "to get this deal behind us," since the whole thing "had gone on way too long."
Was the delay in reply during my install an attempt at punishing LET for the hurt feelings about the sour deal Victor has posted up? I guess we'll never know.
We discussed the ASP pulley kit coming with a WP pulley, but that's a trivial issue. Please keep the remainder of the funds, and next time I go to CPT, I'll grab the WP pulley as a souvenir.
Please be clear that I'm not looking for anything from you or VRP besides the pulley refund...the point of this thread was to avoid potential damage and angry modders, which is bad for everyone. It was no different than a recent thread about a failed WP pulley by another manufacturer on two cars, which prompted a redesign and recall within a week's time.
At the point where I was forced into the deal, VRP offered to refund me directly, later retracting it. I was later told to get my refund from LET. LET had already told me that they had been dropped as a vendor of VRP products. At that point, I merely requested Victor honor what he promised "to get this deal behind us," since the whole thing "had gone on way too long."
Was the delay in reply during my install an attempt at punishing LET for the hurt feelings about the sour deal Victor has posted up? I guess we'll never know.
Originally Posted by vrus
I refunded LET their DEALER price. They refunded you the PURCHASE price. I sent back 100% of the money for the product. I thought you had kept the waterpump pulley to use with your new pulley. .I didnt realize you took the WP pulley off also.
Please be clear that I'm not looking for anything from you or VRP besides the pulley refund...the point of this thread was to avoid potential damage and angry modders, which is bad for everyone. It was no different than a recent thread about a failed WP pulley by another manufacturer on two cars, which prompted a redesign and recall within a week's time.
Last edited by ChicagoX; 06-30-2008 at 10:19 PM. Reason: spelling
#111
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
other pulley
Here's some pics of the other pulley. Please note the complete absence of black paint on the damaged areas. ![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
In a couple, you can see the entire keyway bulging or shifted over.
![](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/ChicagoX/5b4e0497.jpg)
![](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/ChicagoX/a688ff14.jpg)
![](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/ChicagoX/4c61a6b4.jpg)
Back of the pulley, purely cosmetic:
![](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/ChicagoX/c3a4565c.jpg)
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
In a couple, you can see the entire keyway bulging or shifted over.
![](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/ChicagoX/5b4e0497.jpg)
![](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/ChicagoX/a688ff14.jpg)
![](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/ChicagoX/4c61a6b4.jpg)
Back of the pulley, purely cosmetic:
![](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/ChicagoX/c3a4565c.jpg)
![](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d18/ChicagoX/fa3e4d99.jpg)
#112
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
Not going to sit and watch this cloud, since there are just too many here that have seen and played with these pulleys. Just because the damage may not have occurred during the install process does not mean it was not an install error. I've seen the etchings in the nose of a stock pulley from just that.
Why not VRP and LET offer to pony up the cost to have the pulley forensically tested? It is done everyday and it will settle this once and for all. Screw a post manufacturing and release Quality Control test that was never validated. Give 4 samples, the two that "failed" a "normal" one and an OEM one, to the experts and see what they say. It will cost all of $500 to tell what the black stuff is. This would be an easy case....
#114
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
S600TT, R350
The woodruff key slot does not provide support for the pulley, bolt clamping does. When there is no clamping, then the slot is trying to keep pulley from moving on the crank and this is what happens. Unless it is made from titanium, woodruff slot will start to deform.
Properly installed this is how I could run an aluminum pulley on C32s.
The flakes you see on the last two pictures is from paint that did not stick to the rubber.
#115
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
I think a forensic test would be a great idea for all involved, especially if the costs are so minimal. I spent more than that on spark plugs trying to diagnose the zero power issue.
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Let me reiterate. I am not seeking anything from VRP, LET, or CPT. I posted up what I thought was a legitimate concern for a $40k bottom end, and then the crapola started. Too many have sat silent while others were harmed, either by coincidence, neglect, or blatant criminal activity in one case. As soon as my header install is complete, I will post up what happened there as well. There were issues, as with any new product, and they were resolved in a professional, timely manner.
#116
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
I am the one who packaged and shipped the pulley, and I noticed exactly zero black stuff. For all I know, VRP put it there, since everyone's so eager to point fingers around. Look at the pics - does anyone think you can use a paintbrush to cover up that sort of damage ? Silliness.
I'm just getting everything addressed from the member's side. This is news for us. Now, it does become just between your word and Victor's.
I think a forensic test would be a great idea for all involved, especially if the costs are so minimal. I spent more than that on spark plugs trying to diagnose the zero power issue.![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Let me reiterate. I am not seeking anything from VRP, LET, or CPT. I posted up what I thought was a legitimate concern for a $40k bottom end, and then the crapola started. Too many have sat silent while others were harmed, either by coincidence, neglect, or blatant criminal activity in one case. As soon as my header install is complete, I will post up what happened there as well. There were issues, as with any new product, and they were resolved in a professional, timely manner.
I'm just getting everything addressed from the member's side. This is news for us. Now, it does become just between your word and Victor's.
I think a forensic test would be a great idea for all involved, especially if the costs are so minimal. I spent more than that on spark plugs trying to diagnose the zero power issue.
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Let me reiterate. I am not seeking anything from VRP, LET, or CPT. I posted up what I thought was a legitimate concern for a $40k bottom end, and then the crapola started. Too many have sat silent while others were harmed, either by coincidence, neglect, or blatant criminal activity in one case. As soon as my header install is complete, I will post up what happened there as well. There were issues, as with any new product, and they were resolved in a professional, timely manner.
#117
MBWorld Fanatic!
First of all, I am saddened that this issue has come to what it has. I'm not going to place blame to anyone for why it has, but I'd like to ask all involved parties to try and put the negative and ultimately destructive language aside and try and work this out like the community of enthusiasts we are. I think there are legitimate issues here but I don't think excessive harm has been done where we have a blown motor or anything to that effect so we aren't beyond being able to work this out rationally.
Vadim,
I appreciate you putting in your input. You took my calls and were kind enough to try some trouble shooting initially when we discovered this problem, which was appreciated.
However I need to ask you two questions with what you keep posting - and keep in mind, I'm trying to discuss here rather than argue (even though I realize my rhetoric tends to be somewhat argumentative):
#1 - You keep referring to improper installation - how are you saying this was improperly installed? Are you saying it wasn't torque'd to spec? It wasn't seated properly? Please clarify.
#2 - How can you possibly explain the logic behind a shop that has done dozens of these installs actually commit the same error twice on ONLY VRP cars? I mean if you knew CPT, and you can search on here to see his reputation, you would see where I am coming from. I asked for objectivity and even if CPT was ABC shop or XYZ shop... for an EXPERIENCED shop to commit the same error twice after having done DOZENS of the same straightforward, no-rocket-science install just doesn't make sense to me.
Please remember that RIGHT after your VRP pulley was taken off, Wayne had an ASP pulley installed and it did not wobble. CPT did not install my and Wayne's pulley's at the same time, and I have not asked but there may have been another install in between ours.
Finally, I'd also like to address your aluminum comments - not all aluminum is created equal and aluminum is subject to certain elements that can play into the theory that the center/inner pulley piece distorted during install causing the keyway to bell out slightly as well as unbalance the pulley assembly causing it to wobble and in the process press against the key in the keyway, damaging both parts.
-m
I'm scratching my head here.
This pulley has the same problem as the other one. Lack of clamping due to not properly stretched crank bolt.
The woodruff key slot does not provide support for the pulley, bolt clamping does. When there is no clamping, then the slot is trying to keep pulley from moving on the crank and this is what happens. Unless it is made from titanium, woodruff slot will start to deform.
Properly installed this is how I could run an aluminum pulley on C32s.
The flakes you see on the last two pictures is from paint that did not stick to the rubber.
The woodruff key slot does not provide support for the pulley, bolt clamping does. When there is no clamping, then the slot is trying to keep pulley from moving on the crank and this is what happens. Unless it is made from titanium, woodruff slot will start to deform.
Properly installed this is how I could run an aluminum pulley on C32s.
The flakes you see on the last two pictures is from paint that did not stick to the rubber.
I appreciate you putting in your input. You took my calls and were kind enough to try some trouble shooting initially when we discovered this problem, which was appreciated.
However I need to ask you two questions with what you keep posting - and keep in mind, I'm trying to discuss here rather than argue (even though I realize my rhetoric tends to be somewhat argumentative):
#1 - You keep referring to improper installation - how are you saying this was improperly installed? Are you saying it wasn't torque'd to spec? It wasn't seated properly? Please clarify.
#2 - How can you possibly explain the logic behind a shop that has done dozens of these installs actually commit the same error twice on ONLY VRP cars? I mean if you knew CPT, and you can search on here to see his reputation, you would see where I am coming from. I asked for objectivity and even if CPT was ABC shop or XYZ shop... for an EXPERIENCED shop to commit the same error twice after having done DOZENS of the same straightforward, no-rocket-science install just doesn't make sense to me.
Please remember that RIGHT after your VRP pulley was taken off, Wayne had an ASP pulley installed and it did not wobble. CPT did not install my and Wayne's pulley's at the same time, and I have not asked but there may have been another install in between ours.
Finally, I'd also like to address your aluminum comments - not all aluminum is created equal and aluminum is subject to certain elements that can play into the theory that the center/inner pulley piece distorted during install causing the keyway to bell out slightly as well as unbalance the pulley assembly causing it to wobble and in the process press against the key in the keyway, damaging both parts.
-m
I'm scratching my head here.
#118
MBWorld Fanatic!
This pulley has the same problem as the other one. Lack of clamping due to not properly stretched crank bolt.
The woodruff key slot does not provide support for the pulley, bolt clamping does. When there is no clamping, then the slot is trying to keep pulley from moving on the crank and this is what happens. Unless it is made from titanium, woodruff slot will start to deform.
Properly installed this is how I could run an aluminum pulley on C32s.
The flakes you see on the last two pictures is from paint that did not stick to the rubber.
The woodruff key slot does not provide support for the pulley, bolt clamping does. When there is no clamping, then the slot is trying to keep pulley from moving on the crank and this is what happens. Unless it is made from titanium, woodruff slot will start to deform.
Properly installed this is how I could run an aluminum pulley on C32s.
The flakes you see on the last two pictures is from paint that did not stick to the rubber.
As for black stuff? geez there is crap load of black stuff in my engine bay...and it could get anywhere intentionally or by accident. Who cares?!!!
Move on... life is short.
Last edited by stevebez; 07-01-2008 at 06:29 AM.
#119
I've bought VRP parts and an ECU tune in the past and based on that experience and from what I've read in this thread, I wouldn't hesitate to buy from them again.
That's not to say that I'm calling Chicago wrong, but it stinks for him.
That's not to say that I'm calling Chicago wrong, but it stinks for him.
#120
[QUOTE=ChicagoX;2913275]
Was the delay in reply during my install an attempt at punishing LET for the hurt feelings about the sour deal Victor has posted up? I guess we'll never know.QUOTE]
come on now chicago be fair on this point. LET went to the maker in australia to try and purchase vrus product directly. that is uncool and should be dropped immediately like they immediately were.
Was the delay in reply during my install an attempt at punishing LET for the hurt feelings about the sour deal Victor has posted up? I guess we'll never know.QUOTE]
come on now chicago be fair on this point. LET went to the maker in australia to try and purchase vrus product directly. that is uncool and should be dropped immediately like they immediately were.
#121
MBWorld Fanatic!
The woodruff key slot does not provide support for the pulley, bolt clamping does. When there is no clamping, then the slot is trying to keep pulley from moving on the crank and this is what happens. Unless it is made from titanium, woodruff slot will start to deform.
One such example is the crank pulley on a supercharged mini-cooper, it has no key way and is conical to provide the needed clamping force but it requires a hefty pulley extractor to remove.
#122
MBWorld Fanatic!
After reading this ad naseum , looks like most of the E55's have some wobble from minimal to harmful. Is this not just par for the course when "modifying"? We all take risk in search of more HP , spped , better times etc and it seems 3 weeks is a short time to comb over such complexities. I applaud Wayne and Marcus for bringing the problem to light but the finger pointing back and forth is elementary and unprofessional. I really have high respect for all involved and hope cooler heads prevail
#123
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
+1million on Juice's comment above.
I highly respect all you guys and hope this can be resolved and we can all go back to owning posers etc.
Wild that Al chucks parts. Even when I was a 18 yr old kid working at a shop, they always preached SAVE ALL OLD PARTS just in case.
Ken, my installer always leaves me a box of dirty parts in my trunk after each mod to chuck at my leisure.
This thread is so hot (angry) now, I want to be clear. THAT IS NOT POINTING A FINGER OR BLAMING ANYONE. I just was commenting on the procedure of throwing away old parts.
I highly respect all you guys and hope this can be resolved and we can all go back to owning posers etc.
Wild that Al chucks parts. Even when I was a 18 yr old kid working at a shop, they always preached SAVE ALL OLD PARTS just in case.
Ken, my installer always leaves me a box of dirty parts in my trunk after each mod to chuck at my leisure.
This thread is so hot (angry) now, I want to be clear. THAT IS NOT POINTING A FINGER OR BLAMING ANYONE. I just was commenting on the procedure of throwing away old parts.
#124
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
CLK500/Range Rover HSE/E55 AMG/Bmw 328Xi coupe/BMW 4.8x/Bmw 335i/GS350/Audi S5/E350
I have just a few comments reading through this thread.... As it is quite interesting...
Chicago-X... it certainly looks like you are in a situation that no modders should ever want to go through.... With that being said, I think you are getting extremely worked up and offensive towards the wrong company... I dont think you should be too concerned about if it were a bad puller or if it was a bad install. You should mostly be concerned about either getting your money back or getting a pulley that works. And in the end, that is what you got, an ASP pulley. But I dont see why your soo upset with VRP. The company you are endorsing that has gone miles and miles for you has in actuality let you down. They were suppose to refund you the money or get you up and running. As they are the one making a profit on your purchase. VRP sold LET the pulley and inturn LET sold it to you, of course with some mark up somewhere along the line. I guess it comes down to business ethics... By just reading the posts, it looks as though VRP HAS taken the loss regardless of bad install or bad pulley. You should look more into the companines you endorse as they dont have much business ethics (e.i going behind a companies back and trying to purchase their parts directly from the MFG.) The three week down time that you are so upset about was due to LET not getting your money back. They should have been the sole party responsible for the refund if they are as stand up as you say they are.
Looks like you got your refund, your beast is running strong... Thats the main point and the most important point!
Let the two companies duke it out...
Again this is coming from someone who has no connect with VRP or LET or CPT. Just a forum member.......
Chicago-X... it certainly looks like you are in a situation that no modders should ever want to go through.... With that being said, I think you are getting extremely worked up and offensive towards the wrong company... I dont think you should be too concerned about if it were a bad puller or if it was a bad install. You should mostly be concerned about either getting your money back or getting a pulley that works. And in the end, that is what you got, an ASP pulley. But I dont see why your soo upset with VRP. The company you are endorsing that has gone miles and miles for you has in actuality let you down. They were suppose to refund you the money or get you up and running. As they are the one making a profit on your purchase. VRP sold LET the pulley and inturn LET sold it to you, of course with some mark up somewhere along the line. I guess it comes down to business ethics... By just reading the posts, it looks as though VRP HAS taken the loss regardless of bad install or bad pulley. You should look more into the companines you endorse as they dont have much business ethics (e.i going behind a companies back and trying to purchase their parts directly from the MFG.) The three week down time that you are so upset about was due to LET not getting your money back. They should have been the sole party responsible for the refund if they are as stand up as you say they are.
Looks like you got your refund, your beast is running strong... Thats the main point and the most important point!
Let the two companies duke it out...
Again this is coming from someone who has no connect with VRP or LET or CPT. Just a forum member.......
#125
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
![Exclamation](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon4.gif)
The delimma is bigger than just ChicagoX and Marcus's pullies. There are serious claims and accusations being made here. If CPT, ChicagoX, and Marcus Frost truely believe that there is a design flaw with the pulley, then all other VRP pullies will likely have to get double checked in order to prevent potential engine problems. But to me, this scenario seems unlikely since Jangy's car under-went so many HARD miles on the dyno and on the track under extreme conditions with no aparent problems. Also, many other members seem to have installed that same exact pulley with no instances at all. I understand that CPT did a lot of pulley installs, but that doesn't mean there was no chance for error. We've all heard of even highly skilled doctors perform the same operation for 20 years yet still make a mistake from time to time. Sometimes even the best makes mistakes. Now, I'm not saying CPT made a mistake in installing both pullies, rather I'm saying that the logic of installing many pullies alone only makes CPT less likely to make a mistake, but definitely not immune from doing so. Unfortunately in this case, both experts seem to have opposing opinions: some say the problem lies with the install while others believe it's the pulley, and this of course, puts us at a dead-end
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Last edited by MB_Forever; 07-01-2008 at 06:01 PM.