MHP v2 63 Tuning Track Results!
10-11-2008, 03:33 AM
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
After launching with the MTs there's no way in hell I'm going back to the Nittos, except as pure street tires. 
We have a few track rentals (local guys) coming up in the next few weeks. Although the track sucks (Trails) I should be able to do some back to back comparos.
Remember too that v2 ECU tuning makes more power than v1 (added timing, leaner A/F) and the shifts are quicker/firmer as well (most notably in the 3-4). Hell, I could always swap back to the stock Pirelli's and spin my way to a 120+.
Damn you guys just have to drive my car. Are you coming to MIR?
We have a few track rentals (local guys) coming up in the next few weeks. Although the track sucks (Trails) I should be able to do some back to back comparos.
Remember too that v2 ECU tuning makes more power than v1 (added timing, leaner A/F) and the shifts are quicker/firmer as well (most notably in the 3-4). Hell, I could always swap back to the stock Pirelli's and spin my way to a 120+.
Damn you guys just have to drive my car. Are you coming to MIR?
I believe you are part of this, jr is not gonna hold this much longer.
10-11-2008, 03:46 AM
#27
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
10-11-2008, 11:00 AM
#31
Member
Pull up the covers.....I think this puts this issue to bed.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
10-11-2008, 11:59 AM
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Pull up the covers.....I think this puts this issue to bed.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
many of us speculated over a year ago the c63 was going to be the fastes 63 platform (because of weight) with a simple tune and that hasn't even been proven yet...but it's getting close.
10-11-2008, 12:20 PM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GT-R
Pull up the covers.....I think this puts this issue to bed.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
Andy great job buddy....very impressive results.
Last edited by NXtremeJeep; 10-11-2008 at 12:39 PM.
10-11-2008, 12:48 PM
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Pull up the covers.....I think this puts this issue to bed.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
Sorry Andy about the HiJack. Do you have any E55's in the shop that want the ECU/TCU tune?
Last edited by Hammer Down; 10-11-2008 at 01:01 PM.
10-11-2008, 01:27 PM
#36
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
10-11-2008, 01:36 PM
#37
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Absolutely no disrespect to Enzom/Lorenzo his car is unquestionably quick/fast. I just can't wait to run my car at MIR. As we'll see on 11/15, Norwalk in October is not the same as a sea level track in November.
As of last night we've decided to forgo doing headers/exhaust/CAIs until after MIR just to show what our tuning alone can do in a favorable environment.
Thanks
Last edited by MHP; 10-11-2008 at 01:48 PM.
10-11-2008, 01:48 PM
#38
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
10-11-2008, 01:49 PM
#39
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Thanks mikey
10-11-2008, 01:55 PM
#41
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
10-11-2008, 02:33 PM
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
V12-Biturbo
NP bro. Yes, we have results otw (as in, in the mail) and at least one coming to MIR.
Absolutely no disrespect to Enzom/Lorenzo his car is unquestionably quick/fast. I just can't wait to run my car at MIR. As we'll see on 11/15, Norwalk in October is not the same as a sea level track in November.
As of last night we've decided to forgo doing headers/exhaust/CAIs until after MIR just to show what our tuning alone can do in a favorable environment.
Thanks
Absolutely no disrespect to Enzom/Lorenzo his car is unquestionably quick/fast. I just can't wait to run my car at MIR. As we'll see on 11/15, Norwalk in October is not the same as a sea level track in November.
As of last night we've decided to forgo doing headers/exhaust/CAIs until after MIR just to show what our tuning alone can do in a favorable environment.
Thanks
I'm just confused as to the constant reference to 117-118 traps for a STOCK 55, when it's only been done by a few 55's but everytime somebody asks what's the highest trap speed a stock 55 can do, people here always seem to quote 118, when in reality the conditions ie DA were FAR from average.
Isn't this true? & the average STOCK 55 trapping more like 113-116 mph
10-11-2008, 02:37 PM
#43
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'm NOT nut riding or trying to take credit away from either Enzom/Lorenzo but what DA was present when these record runs were recorded in stock 55's , wasn't it somewhat negative DA ie -1500 or more
I'm just confused as to the constant reference to 117-118 traps for a STOCK 55, when it's only been done by a few 55's but everytime somebody asks what's the highest trap speed a stock 55 can do, people here always seem to quote 118, when in reality the conditions ie DA were FAR from average.
Isn't this true? & the average STOCK 55 trapping more like 113-116 mph
I'm just confused as to the constant reference to 117-118 traps for a STOCK 55, when it's only been done by a few 55's but everytime somebody asks what's the highest trap speed a stock 55 can do, people here always seem to quote 118, when in reality the conditions ie DA were FAR from average.
Isn't this true? & the average STOCK 55 trapping more like 113-116 mph
10-11-2008, 02:37 PM
#44
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Good point Sean, though I can't answer those questions I'm sure someone on here can.
Rob/Gixer with the quickest/fastest stock E63 emailed me congrats few weeks back after v1 testing. Nice guy, wish he was still around. Anyway, I believe his best came at -1500'DA (maybe lower?).
Rob/Gixer with the quickest/fastest stock E63 emailed me congrats few weeks back after v1 testing. Nice guy, wish he was still around. Anyway, I believe his best came at -1500'DA (maybe lower?).
10-11-2008, 02:40 PM
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
I'm not 100% sure, but I believe the DA was not that much into the negatives during Enzom's record-breaking run (11.77). I'd guess that it was maybe half of that.
Still pretty ideal conditions....Errrrr must've been BELOW Sea Level track then...J/K
but important!!!!
10-11-2008, 03:12 PM
#48
MBWorld Fanatic!
10-11-2008, 05:53 PM
#50
MBWorld Fanatic!
Jacks 55 torched the other stock 55's at this event by 2-4 mph all day. I trapped 115.7 which was higher than all the OTHER stock 55's BUT my car had an ECU tune so not really fair.
stock 55's range from 108-113 same for 63's .. Very few cars hit 114+ unless the DA is below 1000 ft.
Jack's 55 is the fastest stock 55 West of the Mason/Dixon
To be fair, I was also torched by a stock 55, a tragic loss, but hey stuff happens. Traction SUCKED which actually aided trap speeds
stock 55's range from 108-113 same for 63's .. Very few cars hit 114+ unless the DA is below 1000 ft.
Jack's 55 is the fastest stock 55 West of the Mason/Dixon
To be fair, I was also torched by a stock 55, a tragic loss, but hey stuff happens. Traction SUCKED which actually aided trap speeds
