MHP v2 63 Tuning Track Results!

We have a few track rentals (local guys) coming up in the next few weeks. Although the track sucks (Trails) I should be able to do some back to back comparos.
Remember too that v2 ECU tuning makes more power than v1 (added timing, leaner A/F) and the shifts are quicker/firmer as well (most notably in the 3-4). Hell, I could always swap back to the stock Pirelli's and spin my way to a 120+.

Damn you guys just have to drive my car. Are you coming to MIR?
I believe you are part of this, jr is not gonna hold this much longer.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
many of us speculated over a year ago the c63 was going to be the fastes 63 platform (because of weight) with a simple tune and that hasn't even been proven yet...but it's getting close.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
Andy great job buddy....very impressive results.
Last edited by NXtremeJeep; Oct 11, 2008 at 12:39 PM.
TCU/ECU tune makes this stock C63 as fast as stg3 E55(pulley/tune/headers). MIR will just further reinforce this point I think. Obviously we need a greater sample size and durability time....but so far---mission accomplished.
Sorry Andy about the HiJack. Do you have any E55's in the shop that want the ECU/TCU tune?
Last edited by Hammer Down; Oct 11, 2008 at 01:01 PM.
Absolutely no disrespect to Enzom/Lorenzo his car is unquestionably quick/fast. I just can't wait to run my car at MIR. As we'll see on 11/15, Norwalk in October is not the same as a sea level track in November.
As of last night we've decided to forgo doing headers/exhaust/CAIs until after MIR just to show what our tuning alone can do in a favorable environment.
Thanks
Last edited by MHP; Oct 11, 2008 at 01:48 PM.
Absolutely no disrespect to Enzom/Lorenzo his car is unquestionably quick/fast. I just can't wait to run my car at MIR. As we'll see on 11/15, Norwalk in October is not the same as a sea level track in November.
As of last night we've decided to forgo doing headers/exhaust/CAIs until after MIR just to show what our tuning alone can do in a favorable environment.
Thanks

I'm just confused as to the constant reference to 117-118 traps for a STOCK 55, when it's only been done by a few 55's but everytime somebody asks what's the highest trap speed a stock 55 can do, people here always seem to quote 118, when in reality the conditions ie DA were FAR from average.
Isn't this true? & the average STOCK 55 trapping more like 113-116 mph

I'm just confused as to the constant reference to 117-118 traps for a STOCK 55, when it's only been done by a few 55's but everytime somebody asks what's the highest trap speed a stock 55 can do, people here always seem to quote 118, when in reality the conditions ie DA were FAR from average.
Isn't this true? & the average STOCK 55 trapping more like 113-116 mph
Rob/Gixer with the quickest/fastest stock E63 emailed me congrats few weeks back after v1 testing. Nice guy, wish he was still around. Anyway, I believe his best came at -1500'DA (maybe lower?).
stock 55's range from 108-113 same for 63's .. Very few cars hit 114+ unless the DA is below 1000 ft.
Jack's 55 is the fastest stock 55 West of the Mason/Dixon
To be fair, I was also torched by a stock 55, a tragic loss, but hey stuff happens. Traction SUCKED which actually aided trap speeds








Thanks mikey
Still pretty ideal conditions....Errrrr must've been BELOW Sea Level track then...J/K
but important!!!!