v2 Dyno Results
#26
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Thanks Sean. What gear was it in and was it corrected? Somehow I don't really buy into a 60rwhp variance from a stock motor. I know that the DJ I use reads dead on to others in the area and based on the results put out by cars that test on it. Did Juicee and Trezz test on the same DJ?
#27
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Found the dyno you were referring to as well as a bunch of others thanks to Mo:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...hlight=dyno+63
Definitely doesn't look like a DJ graph, was done in 4th gear (you can tell by the mph on the X-axis), and I see no CF.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...hlight=dyno+63
Definitely doesn't look like a DJ graph, was done in 4th gear (you can tell by the mph on the X-axis), and I see no CF.
#28
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
C&P of gravedgr's revised tune only 63 list, sorry the graph links don't work:
Updated with the latest MHP results...
Revised with latest MHP pricing for ECU only...
Revised with URL links...
=================================================
MHP (10/16/08) Click Me
$2250 (ECU only, TCU only, or $4000 for both) [revised 10/17/08, 10/10/08, 10/10/08] (money back guarantee)
Stock RWHP (5th Gear, SAE): 372 / Tune RWHP: 435 / Gain: 63 RWHP
Stock RWTQ (5th Gear, SAE): 372 / Tune RWTQ: 401 / Gain: 29 RWTQ
$35.71/RWHP gain
=================================================
VRP (10/10/08) Click Me
$1999
Stock RWHP: 371 / Tune RWHP: 429 / Gain: 58 RWHP
Stock RWTQ: 300 / Tune RWTQ: 347 / Gain: 47 RWTQ
(dyno numbers shown by speed, not RPM; dyno in 3rd/4th; torque numbers extremely questionable)
$34.47/RWHP gain
=================================================
Evosport [09/30/08] Click Me
$1990 (14 day money back satisfaction guarantee)
Stock RWHP (5th gear, SAE): 371 / Tune RWHP: 429 / Gain: 58 RWHP
Stock RWTQ (5th gear, SAE): 364 / Tune RWTQ: 385 / Gain: 21 RWTQ
$31.09/RWHP gain
=================================================
RENNTECH Click Me
$3495 (Vehicle also had cat delete, tested to a 24-26rwhp gain by itself by another member on a C63).
Stock RWHP (4th gear): 369 / Tune RWHP: 419 / Gain: 50 RWHP
Stock RWTQ (4th gear): 363 / Tune RWTQ: 393 / Gain: 30 RWTQ
(claimed crank #'s x .82)
$69.90/RWHP gain
=================================================
Kleeman (10/02/08 - Danny Boy) Click Me
$1495
Stock RWHP (4th Gear): 356 / Tune RWHP: 406 / Gain: 50 RWHP
Stock RWTQ (4th Gear): 348 / Tune RWTQ: 366 / Gain: 18 RWTQ
$29.90/RWHP gain
=================================================
Kleeman (10/05/08 - E63PWR) Click Me
$1495
Stock RWHP (4th Gear): 378 / Tune RWHP: 424 / Gain: 46 RWHP
Stock RWTQ: ??? / Tune RWTQ: ??? / Gain: ?? RWTQ
$32.50/RWHP gain
=================================================
Reported Best Results (so far) with just tuning.
Highest RWHP: MHP 435
Highest RWTQ: MHP - 401
Best RHWP Gain: MHP- 63
Best RWTQ Gain: MHP - 29
Best RWHP Gain/$: Kleeman - $29.90/hp (46 rwhp gain)
(Note: all tuner results are rounded down and do not include corrections for gear, fuel, or minor mods). Also keep in mind that a 63 will dyno 6-8rwhp higher in 4th gear (what most test in) than 5th, and 10rwtq lower in 4th than in 5th. 5th is 1:1, aka industry standard.
Updated with the latest MHP results...
Revised with latest MHP pricing for ECU only...
Revised with URL links...
=================================================
MHP (10/16/08) Click Me
$2250 (ECU only, TCU only, or $4000 for both) [revised 10/17/08, 10/10/08, 10/10/08] (money back guarantee)
Stock RWHP (5th Gear, SAE): 372 / Tune RWHP: 435 / Gain: 63 RWHP
Stock RWTQ (5th Gear, SAE): 372 / Tune RWTQ: 401 / Gain: 29 RWTQ
$35.71/RWHP gain
=================================================
VRP (10/10/08) Click Me
$1999
Stock RWHP: 371 / Tune RWHP: 429 / Gain: 58 RWHP
Stock RWTQ: 300 / Tune RWTQ: 347 / Gain: 47 RWTQ
(dyno numbers shown by speed, not RPM; dyno in 3rd/4th; torque numbers extremely questionable)
$34.47/RWHP gain
=================================================
Evosport [09/30/08] Click Me
$1990 (14 day money back satisfaction guarantee)
Stock RWHP (5th gear, SAE): 371 / Tune RWHP: 429 / Gain: 58 RWHP
Stock RWTQ (5th gear, SAE): 364 / Tune RWTQ: 385 / Gain: 21 RWTQ
$31.09/RWHP gain
=================================================
RENNTECH Click Me
$3495 (Vehicle also had cat delete, tested to a 24-26rwhp gain by itself by another member on a C63).
Stock RWHP (4th gear): 369 / Tune RWHP: 419 / Gain: 50 RWHP
Stock RWTQ (4th gear): 363 / Tune RWTQ: 393 / Gain: 30 RWTQ
(claimed crank #'s x .82)
$69.90/RWHP gain
=================================================
Kleeman (10/02/08 - Danny Boy) Click Me
$1495
Stock RWHP (4th Gear): 356 / Tune RWHP: 406 / Gain: 50 RWHP
Stock RWTQ (4th Gear): 348 / Tune RWTQ: 366 / Gain: 18 RWTQ
$29.90/RWHP gain
=================================================
Kleeman (10/05/08 - E63PWR) Click Me
$1495
Stock RWHP (4th Gear): 378 / Tune RWHP: 424 / Gain: 46 RWHP
Stock RWTQ: ??? / Tune RWTQ: ??? / Gain: ?? RWTQ
$32.50/RWHP gain
=================================================
Reported Best Results (so far) with just tuning.
Highest RWHP: MHP 435
Highest RWTQ: MHP - 401
Best RHWP Gain: MHP- 63
Best RWTQ Gain: MHP - 29
Best RWHP Gain/$: Kleeman - $29.90/hp (46 rwhp gain)
(Note: all tuner results are rounded down and do not include corrections for gear, fuel, or minor mods). Also keep in mind that a 63 will dyno 6-8rwhp higher in 4th gear (what most test in) than 5th, and 10rwtq lower in 4th than in 5th. 5th is 1:1, aka industry standard.
Last edited by MHP; 10-18-2008 at 01:31 AM.
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Found the dyno you were referring to as well as a bunch of others thanks to Mo:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...hlight=dyno+63
Definitely doesn't look like a DJ graph, was done in 4th gear (you can tell by the mph on the X-axis), and I see no CF.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...hlight=dyno+63
Definitely doesn't look like a DJ graph, was done in 4th gear (you can tell by the mph on the X-axis), and I see no CF.
Trez's 63 was dynoed at Evosport, and produced 428 rwhp 100% stock and then later reached 440 rwhp after removing charcoal filters, and is still to this day the highest dynoing 63 yet.
Juicee's initial dyno was done on the same dyno as Trez63's dyno (Evosport). There are other 63 models that are above 410 rwhp on a dynojet but all were in 4th gear: please check item number 4, 5, 6, and 8 in my first post of this thread:
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/261529-63-amg-engine-dynos.html
#30
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Juicee's car was not one of the strong 63s initially. In stock trim, it dynoed at 401 to 402 rwhp. It was only after the weight reduction, VRP custom tuning, and a lot of Juicee's aggressive driving style that the car was able to reach 440 rwhp on a dyno jet.
Trez's 63 was dynoed at Evosport, and produced 428 rwhp 100% stock and then later reached 440 rwhp after removing charcoal filters, and is still to this day the highest dynoing 63 yet.
Juicee's initial dyno was done on the same dyno as Trez63's dyno (Evosport). There are other 63 models that are above 410 rwhp on a dynojet but all were in 4th gear: please check item number 4, 5, 6, and 8 in my first post of this thread:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=261529
Trez's 63 was dynoed at Evosport, and produced 428 rwhp 100% stock and then later reached 440 rwhp after removing charcoal filters, and is still to this day the highest dynoing 63 yet.
Juicee's initial dyno was done on the same dyno as Trez63's dyno (Evosport). There are other 63 models that are above 410 rwhp on a dynojet but all were in 4th gear: please check item number 4, 5, 6, and 8 in my first post of this thread:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=261529
Trez'z car sounds like a real freak. We'll soon find out how much less restricive the stock air inlets and exhausts are on the Es than on Cs; we're tuning a E63 at our Nov. first dyno tuning day.
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
My car was destroyed daily by other 63's until I switched wheels.
I did run the white beast cls driven bt Tan, the outcome was not supportive of the disparity in dyno #s.
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2002 S430, 2004 Cobra, 2004 Tahoe
That was via a tailpipe wideband. Down low you want it leaner than richer to help with tip in and throttle response. On my FAST Dual Band (located behind the primary cats which still reads leaner than if it were properly installed before all cats which isn't possible with the stock exhaust) I read no higher than 13.5 at low end so no worries. That also means we can lean it out up top a bit more and squeeze out a few more safe horses.
Makes sense...we found that the tailpipe was consistently .5 leaner than a direct wideband in the downstream...congrats again on the numbers and track success...look forward to following your progress
#33
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
The 030 cars are heavier, especcially rotational weight, LSD, bigger brakes, suspension componets..
My car was destroyed daily by other 63's until I switched wheels.
I did run the white beast cls driven bt Tan, the outcome was not supportive of the disparity in dyno #s.
My car was destroyed daily by other 63's until I switched wheels.
I did run the white beast cls driven bt Tan, the outcome was not supportive of the disparity in dyno #s.
#34
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
#35
#36
All of this talk about stock 63 numbers makes me want to get mine dyno'd. There is a dynojet nearby and I'm going to try and make it out there by next weekend. I want to get a good baseline before I go ahead with an ECU tune and then dyno afterwards. The car should be in 5th gear right?
#37
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
All of this talk about stock 63 numbers makes me want to get mine dyno'd. There is a dynojet nearby and I'm going to try and make it out there by next weekend. I want to get a good baseline before I go ahead with an ECU tune and then dyno afterwards. The car should be in 5th gear right?
Yes, unless you have a speed limiter, then you'll have to dyno in 4th. Just remember it'll read 6-8rwhp higher and ~10rwtq lower in 4th vs. 5th. Use SAE correction and smoothing set at 5 to eliminate artificial spikes in the graph.
Good luck!
#39
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
As we all know the quickest/fastest cars make the most avg HP and TQ, not just highest peak power. Dyno Jet SAE correction, fifth gear, smoothing set at 5, straight 93 octane fresh off the street and onto the dyno. Here are the delta gains for our C63 Stage I (Thermalnators, Filters, ECU/TCU v2) v stock per 100rpm:
RPM x 1000 rwhp rwtq
2.30 +6.26 +14.21
2.40 +9.53 +20.87
2.50 +7.62 +16.03
2.60 +9.16 +18.51
2.70 +10.52 +20.46
2.80 +14.00 +26.25
2.90 +13.19 +23.90
3.00 +13.99 +24.48
3.10 +11.99 +20.33
3.20 +14.11 +23.15
3.30 +15.19 +24.17
3.40 +17.54 +27.11
3.50 +14.67 +22.02
3.60 +15.83 +23.08
3.70 +18.03 +25.60
3.80 +19.60 +27.09
3.90 +21.92 +23.56
4.00 +23.56 +30.93
4.10 +24.79 +31.75
4.20 +23.34 +29.20
4.30 +23.48 +28.67
4.40 +22.68 +27.09
4.50 +22.98 +26.82
4.60 +24.34 +27.80
4.70 +23.08 +24.81
4.80 +25.47 +27.86
4.90 +27.99 +29.99
5.00 +29.59 +31.09
5.10 +28.06 +28.90
5.20 +25.39 +25.65
5.30 +34.56 +34.24
5.40 +38.26 +37.21
5.50 +46.10 +44.02
5.60 +51.08 +47.91
5.70 +51.01 +47.00
5.80 +50.71 +45.91
5.90 +56.45 +50.26
6.00 +59.77 +52.32
6.10 +63.13 +54.36
6.20 +62.08 +52.57
6.30 +65.58 +54.68
6.40 +63.39 +52.01
6.50 +65.36 +52.81
6.60 +61.12 +48.63
6.70 Data Past this point N/A for the stock pull.
Gains derived from the raw data below:
v2:
Dynojet Research Inc.
RunFile_010.drf: 68.89 °F 29.36 in-Hg Humidity: 30 % SAE: 0.99 Average Gear Ratio: 38.00
RPM x1000 hp ft-lbs
2.30 145.83 332.92
2.40 157.10 343.80
2.50 162.95 342.34
2.60 171.85 347.14
2.70 180.83 351.75
2.80 189.65 355.73
2.90 198.25 359.04
3.00 208.70 365.36
3.10 215.55 365.19
3.20 227.33 373.10
3.30 237.69 378.29
3.40 247.67 382.59
3.50 254.62 382.09
3.60 265.63 387.53
3.70 272.97 387.49
3.80 283.84 392.30
3.90 290.80 391.63
4.00 300.28 394.27
4.10 307.00 393.26
4.20 314.60 393.43
4.30 325.97 398.14
4.40 330.39 394.38
4.50 337.34 393.72
4.60 343.74 392.48
4.70 352.99 394.47
4.80 363.45 397.68
4.90 372.36 399.11
5.00 380.35 399.53
5.10 383.62 395.07
5.20 386.48 390.36
5.30 401.73 398.10
5.40 406.19 395.06
5.50 411.11 392.58
5.60 412.57 386.94
5.70 414.92 382.31
5.80 421.47 381.65
5.90 426.05 379.26
6.00 428.50 375.09
6.10 431.28 371.34
6.20 432.04 365.98
6.30 435.15 362.77
6.40 433.23 355.53
6.50 431.35 348.54
6.60 429.99 342.17
6.70 428.71 336.07
6.80 428.50 330.96
6.90 424.12 322.84
7.00 345.74 259.38
--------- --------- ---------
MAX: 7.00 435.15 399.53
MIN: 2.30 145.83 259.38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stock
RunFile_007.drf: 75.35 °F 29.52 in-Hg Humidity: 24 % SAE: 1.00 Average Gear Ratio: 38.01
RPM x 1000 hp ft-lbs
2.30 139.57 318.71
2.40 147.57 322.93
2.50 155.33 326.31
2.60 162.69 328.63
2.70 170.31 331.29
2.80 175.65 329.48
2.90 185.06 335.14
3.00 194.71 340.88
3.10 203.56 344.86
3.20 213.22 349.95
3.30 222.50 354.12
3.40 230.13 355.48
3.50 239.95 360.07
3.60 249.80 364.45
3.70 254.94 361.89
3.80 264.24 365.21
3.90 268.88 362.09
4.00 276.72 363.34
4.10 282.21 361.51
4.20 291.26 364.23
4.30 302.49 369.47
4.40 307.71 367.29
4.50 314.36 366.90
4.60 319.40 364.68
4.70 329.91 368.66
4.80 337.98 369.82
4.90 344.37 369.12
5.00 350.76 368.44
5.10 355.56 366.17
5.20 361.09 364.71
5.30 367.17 363.86
5.40 367.93 357.85
5.50 365.01 348.56
5.60 361.48 339.03
5.70 363.91 335.31
5.80 370.76 335.74
5.90 369.59 329.00
6.00 368.73 322.77
6.10 368.15 316.98
6.20 369.96 313.41
6.30 369.57 308.09
6.40 369.86 303.52
6.50 365.99 295.73
6.60 368.87 293.54
6.70 209.52 164.28
RPM x 1000 rwhp rwtq
2.30 +6.26 +14.21
2.40 +9.53 +20.87
2.50 +7.62 +16.03
2.60 +9.16 +18.51
2.70 +10.52 +20.46
2.80 +14.00 +26.25
2.90 +13.19 +23.90
3.00 +13.99 +24.48
3.10 +11.99 +20.33
3.20 +14.11 +23.15
3.30 +15.19 +24.17
3.40 +17.54 +27.11
3.50 +14.67 +22.02
3.60 +15.83 +23.08
3.70 +18.03 +25.60
3.80 +19.60 +27.09
3.90 +21.92 +23.56
4.00 +23.56 +30.93
4.10 +24.79 +31.75
4.20 +23.34 +29.20
4.30 +23.48 +28.67
4.40 +22.68 +27.09
4.50 +22.98 +26.82
4.60 +24.34 +27.80
4.70 +23.08 +24.81
4.80 +25.47 +27.86
4.90 +27.99 +29.99
5.00 +29.59 +31.09
5.10 +28.06 +28.90
5.20 +25.39 +25.65
5.30 +34.56 +34.24
5.40 +38.26 +37.21
5.50 +46.10 +44.02
5.60 +51.08 +47.91
5.70 +51.01 +47.00
5.80 +50.71 +45.91
5.90 +56.45 +50.26
6.00 +59.77 +52.32
6.10 +63.13 +54.36
6.20 +62.08 +52.57
6.30 +65.58 +54.68
6.40 +63.39 +52.01
6.50 +65.36 +52.81
6.60 +61.12 +48.63
6.70 Data Past this point N/A for the stock pull.
Gains derived from the raw data below:
v2:
Dynojet Research Inc.
RunFile_010.drf: 68.89 °F 29.36 in-Hg Humidity: 30 % SAE: 0.99 Average Gear Ratio: 38.00
RPM x1000 hp ft-lbs
2.30 145.83 332.92
2.40 157.10 343.80
2.50 162.95 342.34
2.60 171.85 347.14
2.70 180.83 351.75
2.80 189.65 355.73
2.90 198.25 359.04
3.00 208.70 365.36
3.10 215.55 365.19
3.20 227.33 373.10
3.30 237.69 378.29
3.40 247.67 382.59
3.50 254.62 382.09
3.60 265.63 387.53
3.70 272.97 387.49
3.80 283.84 392.30
3.90 290.80 391.63
4.00 300.28 394.27
4.10 307.00 393.26
4.20 314.60 393.43
4.30 325.97 398.14
4.40 330.39 394.38
4.50 337.34 393.72
4.60 343.74 392.48
4.70 352.99 394.47
4.80 363.45 397.68
4.90 372.36 399.11
5.00 380.35 399.53
5.10 383.62 395.07
5.20 386.48 390.36
5.30 401.73 398.10
5.40 406.19 395.06
5.50 411.11 392.58
5.60 412.57 386.94
5.70 414.92 382.31
5.80 421.47 381.65
5.90 426.05 379.26
6.00 428.50 375.09
6.10 431.28 371.34
6.20 432.04 365.98
6.30 435.15 362.77
6.40 433.23 355.53
6.50 431.35 348.54
6.60 429.99 342.17
6.70 428.71 336.07
6.80 428.50 330.96
6.90 424.12 322.84
7.00 345.74 259.38
--------- --------- ---------
MAX: 7.00 435.15 399.53
MIN: 2.30 145.83 259.38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stock
RunFile_007.drf: 75.35 °F 29.52 in-Hg Humidity: 24 % SAE: 1.00 Average Gear Ratio: 38.01
RPM x 1000 hp ft-lbs
2.30 139.57 318.71
2.40 147.57 322.93
2.50 155.33 326.31
2.60 162.69 328.63
2.70 170.31 331.29
2.80 175.65 329.48
2.90 185.06 335.14
3.00 194.71 340.88
3.10 203.56 344.86
3.20 213.22 349.95
3.30 222.50 354.12
3.40 230.13 355.48
3.50 239.95 360.07
3.60 249.80 364.45
3.70 254.94 361.89
3.80 264.24 365.21
3.90 268.88 362.09
4.00 276.72 363.34
4.10 282.21 361.51
4.20 291.26 364.23
4.30 302.49 369.47
4.40 307.71 367.29
4.50 314.36 366.90
4.60 319.40 364.68
4.70 329.91 368.66
4.80 337.98 369.82
4.90 344.37 369.12
5.00 350.76 368.44
5.10 355.56 366.17
5.20 361.09 364.71
5.30 367.17 363.86
5.40 367.93 357.85
5.50 365.01 348.56
5.60 361.48 339.03
5.70 363.91 335.31
5.80 370.76 335.74
5.90 369.59 329.00
6.00 368.73 322.77
6.10 368.15 316.98
6.20 369.96 313.41
6.30 369.57 308.09
6.40 369.86 303.52
6.50 365.99 295.73
6.60 368.87 293.54
6.70 209.52 164.28