VP109 Fuel
03-14-2009, 12:11 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Porsche 06' CTT, Porsche 01' 996TT & MB 04' E55-AMG
VP109 Fuel
Does anyone run this in there E55? Any gains to be had if you have the LET tune and pulley upgrade?
Thanks
Thanks
03-14-2009, 01:35 PM
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
03-14-2009, 08:27 PM
#5
Out Of Control!
How does that differ from VP109 and is there a benefit to it vs VP109?
03-14-2009, 08:46 PM
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
ms109 is oxygenated and has octane rating of 105 compared to c10 which is non-oxygentated and is only 96 octane. the ms109 will make more power if tuned for it.
Last edited by chiromikey; 03-14-2009 at 08:48 PM.
03-14-2009, 09:16 PM
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
Here is the chart for "street gas"
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/spec/Te...StreetCars.doc
It is my understanding the C-10 has the highest LHV. (contains the most energy per pound)
Now I don't want to get in to a BTU/pounds per shaft horsepower dissertation on the fuels, because I have no side by side comparison on the E55, ie one may create more torque lower in the rpm band and the other may increase the peak hp. I just don't know, I do however like the C-10 and would recommend it.
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/spec/Te...StreetCars.doc
It is my understanding the C-10 has the highest LHV. (contains the most energy per pound)
Now I don't want to get in to a BTU/pounds per shaft horsepower dissertation on the fuels, because I have no side by side comparison on the E55, ie one may create more torque lower in the rpm band and the other may increase the peak hp. I just don't know, I do however like the C-10 and would recommend it.
Trending Topics
03-14-2009, 09:47 PM
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Here is the chart for "street gas"
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/spec/Te...StreetCars.doc
It is my understanding the C-10 has the highest LHV. (contains the most energy per pound)
Now I don't want to get in to a BTU/pounds per shaft horsepower dissertation on the fuels, because I have no side by side comparison on the E55, ie one may create more torque lower in the rpm band and the other may increase the peak hp. I just don't know, I do however like the C-10 and would recommend it.
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/spec/Te...StreetCars.doc
It is my understanding the C-10 has the highest LHV. (contains the most energy per pound)
Now I don't want to get in to a BTU/pounds per shaft horsepower dissertation on the fuels, because I have no side by side comparison on the E55, ie one may create more torque lower in the rpm band and the other may increase the peak hp. I just don't know, I do however like the C-10 and would recommend it.
-"C10 – The best non-oxygenated unleaded racing gasoline available..."
-"MS109 - This oxygenated fuel produces more power than any unleaded fuel on the market..."
i fully understand and would prefer running a non oxygenated fuel for daily use in a street car, but for creating power i'd go with ms109.
03-14-2009, 10:07 PM
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
Oh agree, 33 degrees TA or more with the 109, so the tune might be exclusive. "read for chiromikey's car only"
Subscribing
03-15-2009, 09:24 PM
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: S.D Cali
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS63
go to the VP site read the memo on the fuels you will see that they all say "WILL NOT HARM CATS" but the MS109 does not say this.. That being said MS109 is the SH*T 
and does make power.. used it for 3 months straight for daily driving..
and does make power.. used it for 3 months straight for daily driving..
