Race coming up. My car VS older CTSV with magnusson. What cha think
Really cool guy who was telling me about his Caddy.
Be interesting to run them and was wondering what you guys thought of this matchup. It's pretty cool, he has some strong points and so do I.
His car:
CTSV running 10.5 to 1 compression ratio LS6 and he has added a Magnusson SC so he can't run tons of boost. Claims with tuning, he has it up to 482 wheels while my car pulled bout 460 or so on his dyno. Chicago X and I are working on it some more tonight (keep in mind, I am a mile high roughly, with DA's that run 5-6K) 460 or so is a good thing up here.
My Car: He claims it has mountains of torque compaired to his
CTSV runs 3.73's stock from factory
Mine: 2.82's from SL diff in rear.
CTVS stick 6spd while mine is auto
3.73s and a stick should mean kill city on me from a dig correct?
From a roll, what do you guy think? Claims he's had it up near 200mph approaching 6th or in 6th....I forgot.
Anyway, if he does bring it tonight and we have some fun, I'll try to get it on vid.
Last edited by Jakpro1; Apr 21, 2009 at 02:20 PM.
can't wait for the vids!
Here is a CTS-V LS6 with Magnusson S/C running 11.8s @ 121+mph with 482rwhp. Not sure how your higher altitude would affect these #'s.
I think you will take him from a dig (from what I understand those cars are difficult to launch...and somewhat brittle) and should initially pull him from a roll. He will probably start pulling on you as speed builds past 100mph.
Good luck!!
Tom
Last edited by jrcart; Apr 21, 2009 at 01:49 PM.
No other real mods besides tuning.
CTSV's came factory with sticks?? How cool!
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Jim said "sticks" as in manual gearbox. I thought the same thing and had to read it a second time.
Jim also said 10.5 to 1, I think he meant the compression of the engine...trying to say that the dude wasn't going to run too much boost with such a high compression engine.
Tom
I also bet my life he has sub-frame work he is not mentioning, no way in hell is he running 10.5's with stock rear-sub frame assembly and suspension.
We had a V in the stable and sold it after 6 months because of this (and many other equally stupid issues).
Exploit your opponents weakness and you will win.
Jim said "sticks" as in manual gearbox. I thought the same thing and had to read it a second time.
Jim also said 10.5 to 1, I think he meant the compression of the engine...trying to say that the dude wasn't going to run too much boost with such a high compression engine.
Tom
10.5:1 is the stock compression for the LS6 I beleive, Lingenfelter can bring up to 11.5:1 and still run a low boost Magnusen charger. I am still questioning the 482rwhp, the most I have seen out of a Magnusen on an LS6 V is 450rwhp, cat-back, intake, ECU and throttle body mods, most of them come in around the 435 mark.
10.5:1 is the stock compression for the LS6 I beleive, Lingenfelter can bring up to 11.5:1 and still run a low boost Magnusen charger. I am still questioning the 482rwhp, the most I have seen out of a Magnusen on an LS6 V is 450rwhp, cat-back, intake, ECU and throttle body mods, most of them come in around the 435 mark.
Check out the link to the dragtimes slip in my first post in this topic. The guy lists a bunch of mods for his CTS-V with Magnusson S/C and it put down 482+rwhp on a Dynojet.
Tom
Just in case, here is a link
http://www.lingenfelter.com/engine-p...r-package-m112
Last edited by jrcart; Apr 21, 2009 at 02:49 PM.
Jim, as I previously stated if he is making 482 there is more done to his car than he is letting on.
Last edited by jrcart; Apr 21, 2009 at 02:47 PM.








