Stock Dyno Figures for an SL55 2004 -- thoughts?
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Stock Dyno Figures for an SL55 2004 -- thoughts?
So finally after 40k miles said oh heck lets see if this car is a dud or not.
So it came back with 410rwhp and 468 rwtq. I did a search but its been so long since anyone did a stock dyno pull that I cant find real info! Everyone is off making 550rwhp that these stock numbers are really boring now!
Thanks for the info. Hope these numbers are not dud status. I just want to make sure I have reasonable power after 40k miles.
Final note. This was on a dynapac. How do these results compare to other load dyno machines? Any draw backs to this style of testing?
So it came back with 410rwhp and 468 rwtq. I did a search but its been so long since anyone did a stock dyno pull that I cant find real info! Everyone is off making 550rwhp that these stock numbers are really boring now!
Thanks for the info. Hope these numbers are not dud status. I just want to make sure I have reasonable power after 40k miles.
Final note. This was on a dynapac. How do these results compare to other load dyno machines? Any draw backs to this style of testing?
#5
Out Of Control!
That seems a bit low.
I say this because i've seen dyno charts from a W211 E55 posted by Vadim that ranges somewhere in the 390-429rwhp. I would think the SL55's would be a tad bit higher.
Pump maybe?
I say this because i've seen dyno charts from a W211 E55 posted by Vadim that ranges somewhere in the 390-429rwhp. I would think the SL55's would be a tad bit higher.
Pump maybe?
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
stock numbers range from 410-420 430 is the good ones
#7
Out Of Control!
Trending Topics
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
I will post my dyno plot tomorrow but yes it seems a tad low. For the record my BMW track car was tested on the same dyno and it came in about 10 rwhp low for its upgrades as well. The Dynapac is normally a bit lower than a dynojet from what I have seen. So say it is at 420hp and I think the car is healthy. After 3 15 second pulls the car never had a super charger issue so I think the pump is ok for now. That being said I am on pump number 4 at this point!
#12
Administrator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Anybody who has 469 crank hp on a E55 got a bad car.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
410 on dynapack, is a healthy motor under LOAD.
Here is more about Dynapack.
http://www.dynapackusa.com/differences.htm
Here is more about Dynapack.
http://www.dynapackusa.com/differences.htm