Please read if you plan to tune your ECU by another tuner
on a more serious note
on topic:
You said it was locked, yet he unlocked it in 15min...
I also heard that PC gets their tunes stolen or copied
maybe there was a reason for it?
But sharing information is what the forum is far and for that i thank you MJ
Off topic, but related
MJ mods are pretty much stage 2 (pulley/tune and headers)
mufflers/ cat delete & K&N do not give serious power for the data recorded by numerous members, primary cat delete could be good for 5-10 rwhp, but has draw backs.
Stock tune with a modified pulley has shown to give -HP and /or only gain trq. Your 470-480whp on stock tune sounds off, as timing will be pulled from the boost...hmm unless your car does not have the MB recall flash
No tune on a 55k gives serious power alone...it complements your mods and makes them work. At best a tune has shown to be around 15-20rwp if you have allot of mods. Not taking anything away from your tuner, but if the results are true you have killed renntech, kleemann, powerchip and every one else with those results for a stage 2, or even 4 & 5 if you take into account the 522whp.
This is what i know
line up and do a side by side with someone with stage 2 to compare
Last edited by Zod; Jun 2, 2009 at 06:10 AM.
. Everyone could have easily added on a 20% increase given the current conditions and dyno used in comparison to a dynojet but they didn't. I'm just saying. THis is just my outlook on dyno numbers and how they could easily be influence for people that want to see higher numbers. Than again I'm still a newbie and have a lot to learn...who knows.
he didn't have the header until few months ago. I think I'll remember when I dropped of his car at Vadim for him. if missing a 20-25rwhp mod is called "technically stage 2"...then ****...my car is technically stage 3. since I just need to add some stage 3 mods.
These types of threads have been on MBWorld a lot as of late. A whole lot, and those that are looking at different tuners or thinking of modding their car it makes think think once, twice, and three times about doing it period.
Who do you trust? Who can you trust? So far it looks like Kleeman is the only one that is solid. Note I said looks like which is perception, and often taken as reality. This hurts any other tuners out there, just my .10.
Everyone here (except you) knows the fact claim of 469 BHP MB puts out is purely due to marketing
ALL the E55/S55/CL55/early SL55's dyno the same @ 400-420 rwhp on Dynojet = average 500 Crank HPBassn_07 is reporting heart-breaker Dyno results from Mustang Dyno, they read lowest of all dynos but said to be the closest to actual #'s being put to the ground...You are totally lost in this conversation, just zip it
Last edited by Thericker; Jun 2, 2009 at 05:14 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Everyone here (except you) knows the fact claim of 469 BHP MB puts out is purely due to marketing
ALL the E55/S55/CL55/early SL55's dyno the same @ 400-420 rwhp on Dynojet = average 500 Crank HPBassn_07 is reporting heart-breaker Dyno results from Mustang Dyno, they read lowest of all dynos but said to be the closest to actual #'s being put to the ground...You are totally lost in this conversation, just zip it

the post you quoted was solely for the purpose of showing not all dynos are the same, but I guess you did not get that.
These types of threads have been on MBWorld a lot as of late. A whole lot, and those that are looking at different tuners or thinking of modding their car it makes think think once, twice, and three times about doing it period.
Who do you trust? Who can you trust? So far it looks like Kleeman is the only one that is solid. Note I said looks like which is perception, and often taken as reality. This hurts any other tuners out there, just my .10.
stock E55 dyno at 335rwhp? that's 10% off what the stock crank claim is 470 ish. if 335rwhp is correct then stock E55 only makes 418hp with a 20% loss? come'on...do some calculation before giving other people doubtful craps
MB does w/quoting E55 makes 469BHP
Last edited by Thericker; Jun 2, 2009 at 05:57 AM.
I do not get people that buy these cars and just keep them for decoration
it is meant to be driven

and for the shadyness...well yes it does happen, but to be fair if one makes a statment agenst some one, it is only fair that they can say their part to...
I think you need to have yourself checked by a shrink. good luck to you The Ricer. be strong and admit you need help is the first step towards happiness.
edit: because the admin don't want me to show the title of your PM to me in this thread. too bad, but how sad it is that you can't win an argument that you have to resort to name calling to someone's PM. seriously...take the suggestion above and see a shrink asap.
Last edited by FrankW; Jun 2, 2009 at 07:15 AM.
I think it is important to clarify a few things, as it seems there is way too much misinformation and as FrankW stated "hating" going on.
3. As a third party that was involved with PC when Jesse was an employee, I will tell you 100% that Jess stole tunes from Powerchip, sold evosport IP and Powerchip IP that he stole. It is a shame that our justice system and the consumers allow people to get away with this (this is why I don't practice Law, I could not deal with the injustice that our justice system allows).
Thanks
Brad
People do this with far too less thought and good people trying to earn a living are harmed. Most of the people that do this don't think or try to realize that while modifying their car is a hobby, those they are talking about live and breathe and eat based upon sales, and often threads that have little fact but are full of hearsay and opinion seriously harm that ability to live/breathe/eat.
How would any of you like it if someone went on a forum for your industry and slandered/libeled/defamed you based on nothing more then pure hearsay or opinion (posted as FACT)? I know the answer, it is "I would not like it" or maybe "I would sue them" - people need to consider this before posting. While being a passion or hobby for the consumer, it is a REAL business to those that are selling these parts, and 99% of these businesses are small (1-10 people) and threads like this DO have a REAL impact on the bottom line.
That is the power of the internet, good and bad. Sadly it is used for bad far more then good.
Thanks
Brad
[preface] I have nothing to do with this (dont even live on the same continent)
You publicly declared in your first post in this thread that someone - by name, is 100% guilty of industrial espionage in circumstances where the complainant's lawyers (no doubt) couldnt establish (or wouldnt advise to commence) an IP suit based on a 51% + proof, or the police refused to get involved (in what is a criminal allegation). In this context, with respect, your above quote is perhaps the most hypocritical thing I have ever read.
Last edited by acb; Jun 2, 2009 at 07:43 AM.
.
Reinforcing here that dynos are tools for demonstrating increases/decreases from a baseline point, and all but worthless if the baseline doesn't exist or if the car's taken to multiple dyno brands, shops, etc, while changing mods at the same time. That doesn't appear to be the case here, as MJ50 dyno'd at the same, independent 3rd party shop, to compare the tuning (at least, that's how I read it).

evosport and FD use Powerchip.
LET/Eurocharged, VRP, Kleemann, Renntech, Brabus, Carlsson, et. al. do not use Powerchip. Consequently, I'd conclude your position that "all the top tuners use Powerchip" is a bit misinformed.

You publicly declared in your first post in this thread that someone - by name, is 100% guilty of industrial espionage in circumstances where the complainant's lawyers (no doubt) couldnt establish (or wouldnt advise to commence) an IP suit based on a 51% + proof, or the police refused to get involved (in what is a criminal allegation). In this context, with respect, your above quote is perhaps the most hypocritical thing I have ever read.
It has nothing to do with not being to find guilt, it has to do with (1) paying 10K-50K to sue someone civilly and (2) the very real likelihood of the guilty party claiming BK. Then you are stuck with a verdict you like, a big legal bill and no way of ever collecting any money. This leaves you worse then when you started.
And yes, the police will not get involved in civil actions in the US, especially in CA.
It is very unfortunate.
It has nothing to do with not being to find guilt, it has to do with (1) paying 10K-50K to sue someone civilly and (2) the very real likelihood of the guilty party claiming BK. Then you are stuck with a verdict you like, a big legal bill and no way of ever collecting any money. This leaves you worse then when you started.
And yes, the police will not get involved in civil actions in the US, especially in CA.
It is very unfortunate.
As for the Dyno numbers,
correct me if I am wrong, but Powerchip just flashed your car correct? They didn't actuall DYNO-tune your car , correct?
But SI actrually Dyno tuned your car. Those are two completely different forms of tuning.
So comparing your Powerchip "flash" numbers with your SI "DYNO" tune numbers isnt really a fair comparison, now is it?My point is, I know that if you did a Dyno tune with Powerchip, the results would not have been the same.
As far as the 522 RWHP, and the additional 10% dyno addition BS, thats the lamest thing I have ever heard. I recommend that you go to this place called Autowave in Huntington BEach. They have a Dyno Dynamics Dyno, and the dyno operator could care less WHO tuned your car, he just gives you ACTUAL numbers that your car puts down that day.
I can almost guarantee that your car wouldnt break 450 RW on that dyno in its current state of tune.
And I can GUARANTEE, after witnessing what powerchip did to my E55 on the Dyno, That the PC dyno tune would be FAR superior to the SI dyno tune.
MJ, I have nothing against you, your a good guy in my book. Im just stating my opinion.
Last edited by Blue_Monster; Jun 2, 2009 at 07:06 PM.









