W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

E63 Edmunds video review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-30-2009, 09:53 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
jimmysanjuan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 119
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2023 GLE 53
E63 Edmunds video review

Here's a good video review with some nice shots and sounds. Enjoy
http://www.************/car-videos-09...nz-E63-AMG.htm
Old 12-30-2009, 10:00 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
emoving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
3-five-five/ TUNDRA/ 07 997 cab
That's awsome, is it me or does that look like it was filmed at The Tail of the Dragon in NC.
Old 12-30-2009, 10:48 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bobgodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,763
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts
2004 E55
Same video, just direct link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe...layer_embedded
Old 12-31-2009, 05:41 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
VCA_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'15 E63S wagon
"It's an awesome car, better overall than the last generation E63, and especially better than the old E55."

...yeah, but...but...but....it doesn't have forced induction and stuff, so it sucks!
Old 12-31-2009, 09:32 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cahiil55k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,044
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
211-55
Originally Posted by mugatu22
"It's an awesome car, better overall than the last generation E63, and especially better than the old E55."

...yeah, but...but...but....it doesn't have forced induction and stuff, so it sucks!
No no you got it all wrong...it doesn't have enough torque They just need to work on that 1/4 mile a bit too.
Old 12-31-2009, 02:30 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Marcus Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Real Cars
Originally Posted by mugatu22
"It's an awesome car, better overall than the last generation E63, and especially better than the old E55."

...yeah, but...but...but....it doesn't have forced induction and stuff, so it sucks!
While I am sure the move away from Airmatic has yielded better handling characteristics, the now staggering 4300lb curb weight and paultry 112mph trap speed weigh heavily against this car and I'm afraid having a flappy paddle gearbox isn't going to make up for it. I will take my "inferior & outdated" E55 any day over it, although I will also admit I am watching the new M5 development very closely as well (with it's speculated TT V8)

-m
Old 12-31-2009, 03:30 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alextaylor29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Queen Creek AZ
Posts: 1,097
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E55 AMG
In 2011 isn't AMG going back to a TT V8? So I think the E63 will be gone soon.
Old 12-31-2009, 08:25 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
E63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for posting that video. Its nice to see yet another source confirming the significant handling improvements in the 2010 E63. It's good news for fans of the AMG E-Class that the breed continues to evolve and improve with each iteration.

For those who are ready for a new car, like the 2010 styling, and care a lot about handling, videos like this provide helpful data for them to use in making their purchase decision. For those who are not ready for a new car, do not like the styling, or do not care that much about handling, these videos may not interest them.

Originally Posted by Marcus Frost
While I am sure the move away from Airmatic has yielded better handling characteristics, the now staggering 4300lb curb weight and paultry 112mph trap speed weigh heavily against this car and I'm afraid having a flappy paddle gearbox isn't going to make up for it.
-m
I am not sure about the 4341 pound curb weight that is quoted in that video. The test sheet from Car and Drivers test shows they measured a curb weight of 4167 pounds. Does anyone know the factory quote for weight? The C&D test sheet also showed a trap speed of 115.
(see http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...ef8ea98893.pdf )

I am confused by your reference to a "flappy paddle gearbox". If you are talking about the shift paddles, they seem to be the exactly the same as in the W211 E63, and there is nothing "flappy" about them.


Originally Posted by emoving
That's awsome, is it me or does that look like it was filmed at The Tail of the Dragon in NC.
The scenery looks pretty dry to me. I would guess So Cal, not NC.

Last edited by E63AMG; 01-01-2010 at 01:37 AM.
Old 12-31-2009, 08:38 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
LB63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: el clinico magnifico
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63, S550
Originally Posted by alextaylor29
In 2011 isn't AMG going back to a TT V8? So I think the E63 will be gone soon.
I can't wait for the 2011 battle royale: E55 TT versus M5 TT
Old 12-31-2009, 09:38 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by E63AMG

I am confused by your reference to a "flappy paddle gearbox". If you are talking about the shift paddles, they seem to be the exactly the same as in the W211 E63, and there is nothing "flappy" about them.

.
It's a term used by Jeremy Clarkson on Top Gear. Also, he was saying it's (the true automated-manual) a good thing, it's the lack of FI he's lamenting...

For the record, I like the new E63. Superior car to the W211 but I'm still drawn to the styling of the W211...

-Rob
Old 12-31-2009, 11:06 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
LB63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: el clinico magnifico
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63, S550
Originally Posted by E63AMG
Thanks for posting that video. Its nice to see yet another source confirming the significant handling improvements in the 2010 E63. It's good news for fans of the AMG E-Class that the breed continues to evolve and improve with each interation.
I'm excited about the improved handling too, however the carry-over engine was not a smart move especially when the 2011 model year will have the TT.

That's what I'm waiting for, better handling and greater (and more modable) power.

The one thing I'll miss though is the exhaust note of the 6.2
Old 01-01-2010, 05:14 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
Mikesamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Prius because I'm green
This car had the Pano roof, could explain the 4300 lbs not 41xx. It also looks like the track was Fontana and that track isn't a fast track, bring it to Sac next time to get the numbers we all want!

Still would rather have my E55 any day as far as AMG goes, I am thinking of an E550 as a commuter since I can't find a nice used CLS 550.

Quick question for the experts to debate, does anyone think they will build a new tranny for the new 55k engine line up that's coming out? I have the 7speed on my other benz and it just seems like too many gears to go throw in the quarter mile and I'm curious can it handle as much torque as my 5 speed?
Old 01-01-2010, 05:57 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by Mikesamg
This car had the Pano roof, could explain the 4300 lbs not 41xx. It also looks like the track was Fontana and that track isn't a fast track, bring it to Sac next time to get the numbers we all want!

Still would rather have my E55 any day as far as AMG goes, I am thinking of an E550 as a commuter since I can't find a nice used CLS 550.

Quick question for the experts to debate, does anyone think they will build a new tranny for the new 55k engine line up that's coming out? I have the 7speed on my other benz and it just seems like too many gears to go throw in the quarter mile and I'm curious can it handle as much torque as my 5 speed?
The 7-speed can NOT handle as much torque as the 5-speed tranny. The 5-speed is very tough that is also used in the V12 models including the black series, which output 738 ft-lbs of torque, which is also electronically limited to save the tranny . I'm not sure how the MCT in the SL63 and the new E63 will handle in the power department though
Old 01-01-2010, 06:04 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
Mikesamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Prius because I'm green
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
The 7-speed can NOT handle as much torque as the 5-speed tranny. The 5-speed is very tough that is also used in the V12 models including the black series, which output 738 ft-lbs of torque, which is also electronically limited to save the tranny . I'm not sure how the MCT in the SL63 and the new E63 will handle in the power department though
That's what I was told as to why the 5 speed was built and is still around. I'm just curious about the 7 speed in conjunction with a 55tt engine? Do you think AMG has to rebuild a new tranny?
Old 01-01-2010, 06:28 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sack5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,947
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
2015 AMG C63 S
The handling, performance, sound, tranny, etc. are all nice adds for the 2010 E63. Problem is, the price tag of over $100K, gasp. It is still easy to pick up a new '09 and save 30K, so why go for these slight improvements??

I suspect the pano roof is the cause of that ridiculous curb weight.

Nice video documenting the new ride; however, I wouldn't want to be the lucky buyer of this test vehicle....
Old 01-01-2010, 07:02 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
220S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
Originally Posted by sack5000
The handling, performance, sound, tranny, etc. are all nice adds for the 2010 E63. Problem is, the price tag of over $100K, gasp. It is still easy to pick up a new '09 and save 30K, so why go for these slight improvements??
+1 that's the reason I bought my '09. I prefer having the W211 E63 now at a huge discount and maybe getting a much improved W212 E63 with FI later on. And I'll be ready to choose between it and the new F10 M5.
Old 01-01-2010, 09:56 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ny
Posts: 4,454
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Anything W/4Wheels
car is phat but 12.7 at 112 that a big

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E63 Edmunds video review



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.