E55 AMG vs MODDED 09 CTS-V
Heres a little extra. A clip of my E55 racing a modded Evo. No idea about these cars what version, year, or mods. Italianstal you might kno what version n year. We kno u dont talk about mods
.https://mbworld.org/forums/kill-stor...ml#post3905652
With your mods I was expecting you to start pulling away from the start instead of having that sudden burst of speed after your second upshift.
I'm not doubting the prowess of the CTS-V, I would have expected you to win even if you were stock. I'm just wondering what caused that sudden burst of speed after the second upshift.
By the way look here Stock cts-v vs havely modded CLS55 AMG ... enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMQpjaTvhaY
how were you so sure it was "stock" ??
turns out it ws not.
Nobody is bashing the V around here... great car for the money.
But modded vs stock a beat down was expected.
Stock vs Stock.. it will win but not with those margin.
Personally, I don't like to post things before knowing all the facts.
With your mods I was expecting you to start pulling away from the start instead of having that sudden burst of speed after your second upshift.
I'm not doubting the prowess of the CTS-V, I would have expected you to win even if you were stock. I'm just wondering what caused that sudden burst of speed after the second upshift.
In the end I really dont care but I dont see how something like that can happen with out a little help from the bottle. I didnt hook that great either but I mean 1 full gear for me is pretty long to be neck and neck and then POOOOOOOOOF hes gone.
I showed every1 I know this video without me saying anything and every person said hes spraying. Its opinions and experience and in the end none of my business. Like I said fun times, FAST AS HELL regardless
Is anyone really THAT surprised that a car with 556hp stock and so much more modded did that to a stock 55 which run 500 stock.
Weird seeing their reaction. As if the stock 55 is a Turbo Supra or somethin.
Just found that weird. Carry on.
Is anyone really THAT surprised that a car with 556hp stock and so much more modded did that to a stock 55 which run 500 stock.
Weird seeing their reaction. As if the stock 55 is a Turbo Supra or somethin.
Just found that weird. Carry on.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
He clearly stated he didn't floor it until 80 mph. I have run my share of stock 55/63 vs my 600 & the story never changes you guys think stock 55/63's are the end all/be all
Reality says differentp.s., Gotham CTS-V = Bobby aka Italian Stallion
Last edited by 220S; Jan 22, 2010 at 06:32 PM.
Yo Bobby! tell Rob/olegixxer what up!
I ran against a E55 with tune/180mm pulley/headers and he actually gave me the head start and instantly caught up and starting walking me hard.
I know he gave 2/3 throttle and his tires werent catching but I actually didnt launch that good either that video but once I caught grip my car was going and he was still at my side where the E55 instantly took off. Now I dont see the E55 doing what the CTSV did to me up top like that which gave me the assumption that hes spraying.
If he woulda took off from 45mph I prob would have never assumed he was spraying. I do believe the dued I'm just trying to say its not not that krazy to have believed he had nos.
1. No one is under the assumption that a stock E55 cannot lose.
2. The race was supposed to have been against a stock CTS-V.
I hope another race can be arranged with confirmation (instead of assuming) that it is a stock CTS-V. What I mean by "confirmation" is just asking. There should be no reason to lie.
3. The assumption was that E55AMGGG04's healthy E55 would have most likely lost but not by much (see posted vids of the CTS-V vs the M5 and 212 E63 showing that the CTS-V won but not by much, let alone winning by bus lengths).
4. The modded CTS-V had traction problems due to bad tires/road temperature necessitating the driver to not go full throttle thereby resulting in them being neck-and-neck until the second upshift.
5. Once hooked up the modded CTS-V displayed its power which resulted in the surprising surge of speed. I say surprising because the assumption was that the CTS-V was stock, they were neck-and-neck for a while, and then it just took off on the second upshift.
This sudden burst of speed shouldn't have happened with a stock CTS-V but after finding out it was modded and had traction issues it makes sense.
6. A modded CTS-V without traction problems would have resulted in an even bigger lead.
7. The E55 is a great car.
8. The CTS-V is a great car too.
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/e60-m5-e61-m5-touring-discussion/150167-caddy-dealer-gave-me-2010-cts-v-drive-night-3.html#post1726835
Also, the SMG was very cool but it could get tiresome with all the clunking and the random jerky starts. Plus my girl couldn't drive the SMG smooth and with this car, anyone can get behind the wheel and never know it has 700hp (modded).
The V was introduced by GM specifically to be an E60 M5 and E63 eater.
When the E63 TT and F10 M5 come on board, things will change again. And again, and again.
Any stock E55 and E63 is getting long in the tooth.
1. No one is under the assumption that a stock E55 cannot lose.
2. The race was supposed to have been against a stock CTS-V.
I hope another race can be arranged with confirmation (instead of assuming) that it is a stock CTS-V. What I mean by "confirmation" is just asking. There should be no reason to lie.
3. The assumption was that E55AMGGG04's healthy E55 would have most likely lost but not by much (see posted vids of the CTS-V vs the M5 and 212 E63 showing that the CTS-V won but not by much, let alone winning by bus lengths).
4. The modded CTS-V had traction problems due to bad tires/road temperature necessitating the driver to not go full throttle thereby resulting in them being neck-and-neck until the second upshift.
5. Once hooked up the modded CTS-V displayed its power which resulted in the surprising surge of speed. I say surprising because the assumption was that the CTS-V was stock, they were neck-and-neck for a while, and then it just took off on the second upshift.
This sudden burst of speed shouldn't have happened with a stock CTS-V but after finding out it was modded and had traction issues it makes sense.
6. A modded CTS-V without traction problems would have resulted in an even bigger lead.
7. The E55 is a great car.
8. The CTS-V is a great car too.
The V was introduced by GM specifically to be an E60 M5 and E63 eater.
When the E63 TT and F10 M5 come on board, things will change again. And again, and again.
Any stock E55 and E63 is getting long in the tooth.
Re: Nitrous on the V?
Seriously, I can't even imagine...I bet it would be incredible! I used it on my 94 GT to get it into the low 13's
sorry, no help here
Ross
If there is a modded E55 out here please get him back for me
. LOL j/k all fun but car is sick fast.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUTtIPlycIo
Dont feel bad at all. It wasnt a fair race anyways. A stock AMG Vs a Modded CTS-V? Come on man. Why not just have a 1,000 Supra vs. a E350


......................... .......Well its not that drastic.


Lets mod that AMG and then run it against the modded CTS-V
Last edited by C280 Sport; Jan 22, 2010 at 09:06 PM.
Re: Nitrous on the V?
http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums/2098208-post4.html
I was a somewhat convinced that a 600hp car can pull once it gets traction but this new tidbit of information my require me to rethink that.
I do find it conceivable that he has a sneaky pete especially since he is so hush-hush with his mods because he races for money.
Im not sure, i didnt hear any traction lost from the CTS-V my window was open slightly and i was starting right at it, he did end of second and most of third and by the end of third its like he got hit by a ****ing truck, and his exhaust sound even changed hahaa..
Thing is fast, w.e. mods he got, the tune/pulley/worked E55 AMG we raced about 2 months ago didnt pull that hard!
Was fun anyways.
Re: Nitrous on the V?
http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums/2098208-post4.html
ahahah whatever man. In the end really doesnt matter. The dued runs for money so for his best interest he shouldnt say what hes running under the hood.My first impression was that he was spraying. Is it possible if hes modded that he can do that to me without spray.....possible yeah. I thought about it and I dont see why he would spray vs a stock E55 just for fun
. Not that I'm saying he did or even has nos but no point to it.
Re: Nitrous on the V?
http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums/2098208-post4.html
Maybe it's just me, but I don't get this. Why hide anything, mods or NOS? I thought the whole point was to see what these cars can do and share that info? It's not like this is F1 racing or something, or with big money involved

I just don't get not being forthcoming about your car. It's like a little kid hiding stuff to cheat at a game just so he can win.

edit: I guess he does run for money. He's a hustler. Makes more sense now.







