W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Test Results - S63 5.5 V8 Biturbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-19-2010, 02:12 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Test Results - S63 5.5 V8 Biturbo

Autozeitung (German car mag) tested the new S63 with the 5.5L TT V8 with the performance package (571hp/664lbs-ft tq). It ran 0-100km/h: 4.5s and 0-200km/h: 13.7s. The car weighed in at a quite porky 2,308kg (5,078lbs). I think the important thing to look at is the 100-200km/h split: 9.2s.

For context the Panamera Turbo was tested by the same magazine at 0-100km/h: 3.9s and 0-200km/h: 13.5s with a 100-200km/h split of 9.6s.

If they can keep the weight down when they drop this engine in the E-class...look out...

Tom
Old 08-19-2010, 02:22 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yacht Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
Too bad they are calling it a 63, I think this is the first departure from numerical engine designation in MB/AMG history.

I'll re-badge mine
Old 08-19-2010, 02:28 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Blk04cobra1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2002 S430, 2004 Cobra, 2004 Tahoe
Originally Posted by Yacht Master
Too bad they are calling it a 63, I think this is the first departure from numerical engine designation in MB/AMG history.

I'll re-badge mine
It's close. However, the current 300 series is actually a 2.8L and the 63 series is really a 6.2L. I just had training on this and the main reason they did not re-name the cars to correspond is b/c most people think the numbers have to do with size of the car, not the motor. MB did not want any more confusion
Old 08-19-2010, 04:39 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by Blk04cobra1
...the main reason they did not re-name the cars to correspond is b/c most people think the numbers have to do with size of the car...
Twits.
Old 08-19-2010, 04:51 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,929
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
06 SL65 / 97 993tt /11 Suburban/ 2012 GTR (AMG è la mia Famiglia la Bestia è la mia protezione)
Originally Posted by TMC M5
Autozeitung (German car mag) tested the new S63 with the 5.5L TT V8 with the performance package (571hp/664lbs-ft tq). It ran 0-100km/h: 4.5s and 0-200km/h: 13.7s. The car weighed in at a quite porky 2,308kg (5,078lbs). I think the important thing to look at is the 100-200km/h split: 9.2s.

For context the Panamera Turbo was tested by the same magazine at 0-100km/h: 3.9s and 0-200km/h: 13.5s with a 100-200km/h split of 9.6s.

If they can keep the weight down when they drop this engine in the E-class...look out...

Tom
It's a shame they don't make the w212 coupe with that engine...I like the coupe look and the weight should be at least 500lbs less than the w221 platform.
Old 08-19-2010, 04:52 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
W211 BEAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 E55 BEAST
Originally Posted by Blk04cobra1
It's close. However, the current 300 series is actually a 2.8L and the 63 series is really a 6.2L. I just had training on this and the main reason they did not re-name the cars to correspond is b/c most people think the numbers have to do with size of the car, not the motor. MB did not want any more confusion
and the 55 is a 5.4 lol
Old 08-19-2010, 07:07 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by W211 BEAST
and the 55 is a 5.4 lol
I would give them a break on that, as the engine is 5,461cc's, which rounds up to the 5.5L.

Tom
Old 08-19-2010, 07:35 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by Yacht Master
Too bad they are calling it a 63, I think this is the first departure from numerical engine designation in MB/AMG history.

I'll re-badge mine
I think it actually started a little bit earlier than that.... the C230 Kompressors (the ones pre-2006) were 1.8L and post-2006 became 2.5L. I think also the C240 became a 2.6L, etc.... it started with the lower-end models and slowly moved their way up.
Old 08-19-2010, 08:22 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TopGun32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by TMC M5
Autozeitung (German car mag) tested the new S63 with the 5.5L TT V8 with the performance package (571hp/664lbs-ft tq). It ran 0-100km/h: 4.5s and 0-200km/h: 13.7s. The car weighed in at a quite porky 2,308kg (5,078lbs). I think the important thing to look at is the 100-200km/h split: 9.2s.

For context the Panamera Turbo was tested by the same magazine at 0-100km/h: 3.9s and 0-200km/h: 13.5s with a 100-200km/h split of 9.6s.

If they can keep the weight down when they drop this engine in the E-class...look out...

Tom
i would think that a 4200lb E class or CLS would be pulling a Panamera just slightly with that engine package.. or base AMG engine would be a draw.
Old 08-19-2010, 08:35 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Not so concerned with the starting line as much as the finishing line. These new motors are so ripe with potential!! Just cant imagine these things with turbs cranked up, headers, cooling mods and intake.

Gonna be insane! Ill be proud to relinquish Our titles as fastest V8s in the AMG family.

Heres hoping for quick cracking of the software!
Old 08-19-2010, 08:40 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yacht Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
I think it actually started a little bit earlier than that.... the C230 Kompressors (the ones pre-2006) were 1.8L and post-2006 became 2.5L. I think also the C240 became a 2.6L, etc.... it started with the lower-end models and slowly moved their way up.
Ya, now that I think about it there were a few others the 190E had a 2.3
and the SE450 had a 6.9
Old 08-19-2010, 08:44 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
absent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,928
Received 382 Likes on 246 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
Smile

Originally Posted by Jakpro1
Not so concerned with the starting line as much as the finishing line. These new motors are so ripe with potential!! Just cant imagine these things with turbs cranked up, headers, cooling mods and intake.

Gonna be insane! Ill be proud to relinquish Our titles as fastest V8s in the AMG family.

Heres hoping for quick cracking of the software!
Talked to Renntech (ordered the car ,October 15th prod.),they are salivating at the prospect of tuning that thing.
They expect an easy mid 600hp (with just ECU)and mid 700 lbs torque.
Old 08-19-2010, 09:15 PM
  #13  
Administrator

 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,065
Received 521 Likes on 111 Posts
Drives Slowly
Are you guys really excited about a 5,000+lbs car with 571hp? Horsepower is great but the S63 is the equivalent of a fat chick with really big *****........just because you have one outstanding attribute does not mean that the final product is desirable.

God have mercy on all of you.
Old 08-19-2010, 09:47 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
absent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,928
Received 382 Likes on 246 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
Smile

Originally Posted by Rock
Are you guys really excited about a 5,000+lbs car with 571hp? Horsepower is great but the S63 is the equivalent of a fat chick with really big *****........just because you have one outstanding attribute does not mean that the final product is desirable.

God have mercy on all of you.
It's not meant to be a nimble and light track special ,it's not meant to compete with 911 GT3s or GT-Rs.
It's supposed to be an ultra luxury daily driver with all the power you may need (or not need).
There is just something very satisfying when driving a tank like that ,when you step on it ,it takes off like there is no tomorrow.....
Old 08-19-2010, 10:20 PM
  #15  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by Rock
Are you guys really excited about a 5,000+lbs car with 571hp? Horsepower is great but the S63 is the equivalent of a fat chick with really big *****........just because you have one outstanding attribute does not mean that the final product is desirable.

God have mercy on all of you.
It would be nice to have it in a lighter platform. Unfortunately MB historically uses tiny turbos (for the engine they are on) so I dont see this case being any different. Hopefully there is room for bigger turbos. Either way it will be a monster. Oh and fat chics can always lose weight and be that dime you are lookin for. I'm hoping they put this motor in one of the smaller platforms

Last edited by blackbenzz; 08-19-2010 at 10:23 PM.
Old 08-19-2010, 10:32 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AWOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
e55
My car is 4020lbs, and I'd call it a boat.

Now these are 5000+? They need to add more hp while slimming it down.
Old 08-19-2010, 11:44 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cahiil55k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,044
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
211-55
Originally Posted by Rock
Are you guys really excited about a 5,000+lbs car with 571hp? Horsepower is great but the S63 is the equivalent of a fat chick with really big *****........just because you have one outstanding attribute does not mean that the final product is desirable.

God have mercy on all of you.
I'm with Rock on this. Alot of mildly modded 55s are hitting 200 km/h (124mph) in 12 seconds or less. The new S63 is hitting it in 13.7 seconds. I'd be curious to see how this number stacks up with previous year S600 and S65's.
Old 08-19-2010, 11:57 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Hammer Down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,275
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by cahiil55k
Alot of mildly modded 55s are hitting 200 km/h (124mph) in 12 seconds or less
and one stock one if they drop this in the E class it would truly be impressive if it can hit 124mph in 11.7 or under. IMHO
Old 08-20-2010, 12:01 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cahiil55k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,044
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
211-55
Haha I don't doubt it HammerDown. You've got a factory freak.
Old 08-20-2010, 12:51 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
absent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,928
Received 382 Likes on 246 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
Originally Posted by cahiil55k
I'm with Rock on this. Alot of mildly modded 55s are hitting 200 km/h (124mph) in 12 seconds or less. The new S63 is hitting it in 13.7 seconds. I'd be curious to see how this number stacks up with previous year S600 and S65's.
The current S63 hits 0-200km/h in 17.3sec so the new one is a vast improvement.
With all it's bulk it still manages to outperform a Panamera Turbo at midrange speeds,no mean feat in itself....
Old 08-20-2010, 01:07 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cahiil55k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,044
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
211-55
Whoa the current S63s are that slow? Well, I'm sure no one really buys them to run them down the 1/4th but 17.3 seconds definitely makes 13.7 sound fast.
Old 08-20-2010, 02:18 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CharlyE500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Socal, Chino
Posts: 4,402
Received 60 Likes on 48 Posts
E55 2006 / CLS55 / S450 / Jag XKR2011
I guess when the new S63 comes out the current one will have a big drop price if the huge different performance.
Old 08-20-2010, 03:42 AM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,950
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 CLS63 030
Originally Posted by absent
The current S63 hits 0-200km/h in 17.3sec so the new one is a vast improvement.
With all it's bulk it still manages to outperform a Panamera Turbo at midrange speeds,no mean feat in itself....

that 17 second test result is flawed the S63 tested the exact same 0-60 and clocked 13.0@110 through the 1/4 mile no possible way it takes 4 seconds to go from 110-125 not in a 63. The S63 likely is very similar to its 531 hp counterpart and ofcourse a tad slower to the 570 version.

I would be willing to bet a billiondollars the S63 could hit 125mph under 17 seconds, lol
Old 08-20-2010, 05:12 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
box986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA & now Taipei, Taiwan
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W211 E63
Originally Posted by TMC M5
I think the important thing to look at is the 100-200km/h split: 9.2s.
I would expect a stock TT S63 to have a 100-200km/h time in mid 8sec. My stcok W211 E63 ran a 9.0S in 7 degree C weather.
Old 08-20-2010, 10:44 AM
  #25  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by Rock
Are you guys really excited about a 5,000+lbs car with 571hp? Horsepower is great but the S63 is the equivalent of a fat chick with really big *****........just because you have one outstanding attribute does not mean that the final product is desirable.

God have mercy on all of you.
Rock- you are so shallow...take away the fat on a fat chick and the big ******* go too.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Test Results - S63 5.5 V8 Biturbo



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 AM.