Who has the highest dyno numbers these days? - Page 3

05-07-2011, 10:31 AM

#51

GT-ER

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Jun 2010

Location: Puerto Rico

Posts: 4,173

Likes: 0

Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

2005 E55 AMG

Quote:

Originally Posted by mthis

From the other side of the forum to here i got a 63 for what its worth, my best dyno with my set up was 444RW SAE DynoJet 5th gear 1-1 and my car went 11.1 and 11.2's in (1000DA plus)up to 127MPH.
Oh yea at that time i only had Tune/Headers/LSD/Filter/DR's

Your car probably also weighed in a LOT less than the E55's in this forum which makes the comparison null.

Reply Like

05-07-2011, 12:38 PM

#52

mthis

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: Ny

Posts: 4,454

Likes: 171

Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts

Anything W/4Wheels

Quote:

Originally Posted by skratch77

Did you ever get a chance to weigh your car?

Yes sir. 3910# without me and 1/4 tank of gas

Reply Like

05-07-2011, 12:40 PM

#53

mthis

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: Ny

Posts: 4,454

Likes: 171

Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts

Anything W/4Wheels

Quote:

Originally Posted by GT-ER

Your car probably also weighed in a LOT less than the E55's in this forum which makes the comparison null.

100# dift That's about it compared to a e55 with out pano.

Last edited by mthis; 05-07-2011 at 01:00 PM.

Reply Like

05-07-2011, 02:06 PM

#54

skratch77

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 6,694

Likes: 19

Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts

2005 E55

Quote:

Originally Posted by mthis

Yes sir. 3910# without me and 1/4 tank of gas

444whp sounds about right.I weighed mine the day I ran the 11.3 at the track and I was 4460 with me in the car.

Reply Like

05-07-2011, 02:21 PM

#55

mthis

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: Ny

Posts: 4,454

Likes: 171

Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts

Anything W/4Wheels

Quote:

Originally Posted by skratch77

444whp sounds about right.I weighed mine the day I ran the 11.3 at the track and I was 4460 with me in the car.

I was reading some where that e55 with out pano was under 4050#'s and with pano 4150#. Is that close.

Reply Like

05-07-2011, 02:25 PM

#56

skratch77

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 6,694

Likes: 19

Received 374 Likes on 275 Posts

2005 E55

Quote:

Originally Posted by mthis

I was reading some where that e55 with out pano was under 4050#'s and with pano 4150#. Is that close.

I read they were 4200 without pano and that makes sence since my car has no pano and I weigh 215.

Reply Like

05-07-2011, 02:28 PM

#57

mthis

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: Ny

Posts: 4,454

Likes: 171

Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts

Anything W/4Wheels

Quote:

Originally Posted by skratch77

I read they were 4200 without pano and that makes denver since my car has no pano and I weigh 215.

That make sence. 300#'s =3tenths So u rite on.

Reply Like

05-11-2011, 12:33 PM

#58

choppo

Member

Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Atlanta

Posts: 170

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

2010 C63

This is what playing with timing,fuel "E85" & boost on a cobra with a 2.8 Kenny Bell on top will get you,

Last edited by choppo; 05-11-2011 at 12:38 PM.

Reply Like

05-11-2011, 12:51 PM

#59

AWOL

MBWorld Fanatic!

Join Date: Nov 2009

Posts: 1,006

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

e55

My E55 is at 3980 currently, quarter tank. Lightweight battery will net me a loss of another 35 lbs.

Reply Like

Reply Subscribe