W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Have you guys seen the new numbers for the GTR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-15-2011, 01:53 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,658
Received 66 Likes on 55 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
Have you guys seen the new numbers for the GTR

I could not believe my freakin eyes when I saw it. I was in Publix with my daughter and decided to make a sweep through the magazine isle.

I forgot what mag it was but it had the Z06, GT500 and the GTR on the cover. Well, I lunged at it in excitement almost dropping my daughter which she responded, " daddy, what is wrong with you?"

I quickly turned to the specs page, and it lists that car sprinting from 0-60 in 2.9 sec and running the 1/4 in 11.2sec at 126mph. Those 2012's GTR's are insane, imagine what a cobb tune will do to that thing, maybe 9'sI seriously doubt there is anything on the street that is going to touch a tuned 2012 GTR, how are they making that car so quick?
Old 03-15-2011, 02:09 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
mchapparone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Huracan. S63. CL63. E55.
GTR's are rockets man and the 2012 just takes it to the next level..
Old 03-15-2011, 02:18 PM
  #3  
Member
 
Nstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: W Coast & E Europe
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 E63, 07 RS4, 04 GT3, 10 LR4, 02 Pajero
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
I seriously doubt there is anything on the street that is going to touch a tuned 2012 GTR, how are they making that car so quick?[/COLOR][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE]
Gotta call you on this bud, the 997 Turbo s has posted in the high 2s to 60 in numerous tests and runs better at higher speeds than the Nissan. GTR is a very good car and a fair whack cheaper but the P would be my choice.
Old 03-15-2011, 02:20 PM
  #4  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 795 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Not dissimilar to the change in numbers that that 997.1TT put up against the 997.2TT... The Point 2 is just that much stronger with the PDK for shift speed and small bump in boost and HP.


EDIT: Nstar is right, the Stock 997.2 TT S will beat the 2012 GTR--- 0-60, 1/4 traps, and other important measurements... stock vs. stock

Last edited by Vic55; 03-15-2011 at 02:28 PM.
Old 03-15-2011, 03:04 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,658
Received 66 Likes on 55 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
really, I did not know that 997 was that brutal, what is it's 1/4 and 0-60?
Old 03-15-2011, 03:14 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
I was gona say the new 997.2 has been putting these numbers down also
Old 03-15-2011, 03:17 PM
  #7  
Super Moderator
 
BenzoBoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
W221
Whether 997.2 TT S OR 2010 GT-R...you can't go wrong with either!

I thought I could hold my own for being a somewhat quick sedan for a couple more years, but this is gettin ridiculous!
Old 03-15-2011, 03:18 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
AMG_RL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55 AMG, 72' Toyota Carina, 63' Ford F100, 72' Mercedes 250c, 15' Harley Davidson Softail
aside from the veyron, the 997.2 was the fastest car ever to hit 0-60 (2.9something....little faster than GT-R) that motor trend ever tested. the car is an absolute animal! Vic is right the 911 would beat the GT-R stock for stock.

that being said check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OutkvEm90Y

0-60 in 2.6! and check out the speedo at 3:35 The guys at AMS are simply amazing with turbo cars.
Old 03-15-2011, 03:21 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Das Geld 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,249
Received 176 Likes on 145 Posts
SL55, S500
Alot of the 10 sec 55k Guys are hitting high 2's, low 3's also.

0-60 is a useless measure of a car's performance anyway.
Old 03-15-2011, 03:23 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
W109 W211 6.2L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 388
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
2008 W463 G500, 2003 Terminator Cobra (710RWHP), 2012 S350 Bluetec, 2010 911 C4S, 2007 VRSCDX
Since the GTR is a Japenese car for well over 60K, I will pass and take a nicely used and tuned SL65 AMG that runs 11.3s and its still a convertible , and doesn't look boy ricer. Japenese cars do not do it for me the 997.2 on the other hand does! It is an amazing car, from the motor to the styling it is truely timeless!
Old 03-15-2011, 03:24 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
AMG_RL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55 AMG, 72' Toyota Carina, 63' Ford F100, 72' Mercedes 250c, 15' Harley Davidson Softail
Originally Posted by Das Geld 2
0-60 is a useless measure of a car's performance anyway.

car bowler's would beg to differ.
Old 03-15-2011, 05:39 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alextaylor29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Queen Creek AZ
Posts: 1,097
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E55 AMG
All,

Couldn't one just buy a used CL65, mod it for $3K and generate similar numbers, perhaps not at launch but 0-100 and in the quarter? You can get a 2005/2006 CL65 for $45K, mod it and have 850 ft.lb and 750HP. The cars weights are similar I believe.

Isn't a 6.0 V12 TT > 3.8L (?) V6 TT?

Or am I missing something? (Totally possible by the way, but this is my next car/next plan. New these cars were $200K)

Link to just one example: http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...e&rdpage=thumb
Old 03-15-2011, 05:47 PM
  #13  
Member
 
Nstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: W Coast & E Europe
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 E63, 07 RS4, 04 GT3, 10 LR4, 02 Pajero
Originally Posted by alextaylor29
All,

Couldn't one just buy a used CL65, mod it for $3K and generate similar numbers, perhaps not at launch but 0-100 and in the quarter? You can get a 2005/2006 CL65 for $45K, mod it and have 850 ft.lb and 750HP. The cars weights are similar I believe.

Isn't a 6.0 V12 TT > 3.8L (?) V6 TT?

Or am I missing something? (Totally possible by the way, but this is my next car/next plan. New these cars were $200K)
Well, you'd be buying used rather than new, you'd have a car that can't handle a damn versus one that handles excellently, you have a 5 sp auto versus a dual clutch and you'd have to funnel that power through the rear wheels as opposed to four.

Look CL65 is a very nice car and has many advantages over a GTR but to answer your question, yes, you're missing a lot.
Old 03-15-2011, 05:48 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alextaylor29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Queen Creek AZ
Posts: 1,097
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E55 AMG
Makes sense thanks!

Alex
Old 03-15-2011, 05:50 PM
  #15  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 795 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by Das Geld 2
Alot of the 10 sec 55k Guys are hitting high 2's, low 3's also.

0-60 is a useless measure of a car's performance anyway.

I agree about the 0-60 but recently I have been getting a lot of dig runs with my GT-R and its not even close.


Originally Posted by alextaylor29
All,

Couldn't one just buy a used CL65, mod it for $3K and generate similar numbers, perhaps not at launch but 0-100 and in the quarter? You can get a 2005/2006 CL65 for $45K, mod it and have 850 ft.lb and 750HP. The cars weights are similar I believe.

Isn't a 6.0 V12 TT > 3.8L (?) V6 TT?

Or am I missing something? (Totally possible by the way, but this is my next car/next plan. New these cars were $200K)

Link to just one example: http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...e&rdpage=thumb

I owned a CL65 W215 and had the ECU modded for more boost. While there are many faster CL's than I have there is zero comparison to my GTR and even my 997TT from a dig and runs up above in the 160's. The CL is a GT cruiser pig with numb steering and mush brakes (my opinion) and I dont see a zero to 60 even close to under 3 with the CL. Yes there are CL's running low 130's in quarters but there are tons of older (not the new model) GTR's doing the same thing on a simple midpipe and tune. Then there are the heavier modded ones that just would crush the CL. I think CL weighed about 4700 lbs and my GTR is closer to 3900 lbs. I wont even speak to handling, steering, braking- as those items dont compare.

Two different cars with different transmissions, gearing, aerodynamics, weight, etc. They are also clearly two different ways to get from Point A to Point B via luxury, handling, speed, acceleration...
Old 03-15-2011, 05:59 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
Clark94t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
94 Supra 04 E55
watch this GTR run 1:30.6 at Road Atlanta on a STREET TIRE!!!!!!!! in traffic lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZFCXOfQzl0
Old 03-15-2011, 06:13 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alextaylor29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Queen Creek AZ
Posts: 1,097
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by Vic55
I agree about the 0-60 but recently I have been getting a lot of dig runs with my GT-R and its not even close.





I owned a CL65 W215 and had the ECU modded for more boost. While there are many faster CL's than I have there is zero comparison to my GTR and even my 997TT from a dig and runs up above in the 160's. The CL is a GT cruiser pig with numb steering and mush brakes (my opinion) and I dont see a zero to 60 even close to under 3 with the CL. Yes there are CL's running low 130's in quarters but there are tons of older (not the new model) GTR's doing the same thing on a simple midpipe and tune. Then there are the heavier modded ones that just would crush the CL. I think CL weighed about 4700 lbs and my GTR is closer to 3900 lbs. I wont even speak to handling, steering, braking- as those items dont compare.

Two different cars with different transmissions, gearing, aerodynamics, weight, etc. They are also clearly two different ways to get from Point A to Point B via luxury, handling, speed, acceleration...
Thanks Vic55, just the kind of response I was hoping for as you've owned one in the past.
Old 03-15-2011, 06:44 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,658
Received 66 Likes on 55 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
Excuse my ignorance, but what year did the 997 .2 come out, and when you refer to PDK, I am assuming your are refering to the dual clutch setup?
Old 03-15-2011, 06:53 PM
  #19  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 795 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
Excuse my ignorance, but what year did the 997 .2 come out, and when you refer to PDK, I am assuming your are refering to the dual clutch setup?
The 997.2 and PDK came out in 2010. The PDK is an option on this model and yes its a true double clutch unlike my MCT on the W212. This is the normal Turbo model with 500 hp... the Turbo S came out as a 2011 model and gets an HP bump to 530. All Turbo S's come with PDK standard and other goodies (ceramics, tq vectoring, and others) but the sticker is up there in the 170's.
Old 03-15-2011, 07:09 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
118E63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
amg
I'm seriously considering a GTR as my next vehicle...a few friends have them&they are absolutely RIDICULOUS w just the most basic of mods.A lil more than $1000 has you solidly into the 10's and they just get faster/quicker from there. Drop less than $10k into in&ur running hi 9's @ 140+mph and its still a daily driver if you choose it to be
The transmission is simply amazing w virtually zero power interruption during shifts;this alone is key when a GTR runs another car w similar HP,the other cars(even the awesome PDK)will lose precious time during shifts where as the GTR just keeps pulling.

I can even deal with the appearance(which is purely personal opinion) of the GTR since it offers so much performance
Old 03-15-2011, 07:27 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tgoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'13 GT-R AMS Alpha 9+, CLA45, E55
Originally Posted by 118E63
I'm seriously considering a GTR as my next vehicle...
Agreed. One will no doubt be in my stable next spring.
Old 03-15-2011, 08:51 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Well you guys know about the worst disaster in Japan now. I wonder if the Nissan factory is affected? I don't think making of the GTR is a priority on their list. Sorry its off topic. But I feel so bad for Japan.
Old 03-15-2011, 10:03 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
V12Godspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South FL & NYC
Posts: 5,768
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Your worst nightmare...
The GTR is an animal. I would not mind owning one in a distant future, albeit the 997.2 is a sex machine that goes even faster.
Old 03-15-2011, 11:02 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Lycan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 E63AMGP30
I might have to look into one of these....very nice.
Old 03-15-2011, 11:29 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jrcart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Naperville, IL/Chicago
Posts: 6,621
Received 53 Likes on 43 Posts
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Heres another interesting number for the GT-R, sales are down nearly 70%...they can't give the things away. A local dealership has a brand new 2009 sitting on the showroom floor discounted to hell and they cant sell it, the same dealer is sitting on 2 2010s as well. Nissan had to bump the performance if they ever wanted to sell another one. It seems they are fragile little things too, seems like every track event i do there is a GT-R going home on a flatbed. Fast cars with great performance but I never own one.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Have you guys seen the new numbers for the GTR



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 PM.