Why pick 168 over a 172 or vice versa?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'05 E55, '12 C63
Why pick 168 over a 172 or vice versa?
I am trying to make a decision about which pulley to get.
I understand LTs make the car lose some boost, but how much? Is it negligible? I was thinking to get the larger pulley to make up for the boost loss (172 instead of 168).
Is the 172 a plug n play pulley set like the Renntech/Kleemann 168 set is?
PLEASE HELP ME MAKE THIS DECISION!
I understand LTs make the car lose some boost, but how much? Is it negligible? I was thinking to get the larger pulley to make up for the boost loss (172 instead of 168).
Is the 172 a plug n play pulley set like the Renntech/Kleemann 168 set is?
PLEASE HELP ME MAKE THIS DECISION!
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 E55 AMG --old cars -- E39 M5, 2.7tt Audi S4, E36 M3 **Ducati 996, 748
172 because the car handles the 168 so well --- a few mm larger should be fine... but to get full benefit you need a tune.
#5
Super Member
I've already done a ton of cooling and about to add a trunk tank so i figured I'll run a larger pulley. 180-190.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Trending Topics
#8
Super Member
#9
Super Member