W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why do SLR's put down 600+whp on our same superchargers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 11-14-2011, 07:14 PM
  #51  
Junior Member
 
BRUTALLYHONEST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Heaven
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 SLR
Originally Posted by GT-ER
I saw an SLR supercharger the other day and the rotors themselves looked IDENTICAL to ours in size...the part where the gears go is different ( apparently it's geared for more boost ). I also saw an SLR put down 630whp on a dynojet.

This being said, where are we losing so much power? I really, honestly believe that our intercooler is to blame. It's just so small and packed so tight that I believe it's too restrictive. Has anyone done any testing to see what the pressure drop is before and after the intercooler? How about the heads? Are the SLR heads any different?

The SLR has something VERY right going for it and I don't think it has anything to do with it's supercharger.
The SLR supercharger is geared differently and also has top mount coolers in addition to more aggressive cam profile. Those are the main reasons.
Old 11-14-2011, 08:34 PM
  #52  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AgSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida-Germany-New York
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
2004 E55,1969 300SEL6.3,2011 ML350 BlueTec Diesel,2005 ML400 CDI
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
I'd be surprised if the factory SLR con rods were Ti.

I'd also be surprised if anyone (who knows what they're doing) recommends a Ti con rod in a high-torque application like a supercharged motor.
You make a very valid point
Old 11-14-2011, 09:59 PM
  #53  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
I'd be surprised if the factory SLR con rods were Ti.

I'd also be surprised if anyone (who knows what they're doing) recommends a Ti con rod in a high-torque application like a supercharged motor.
I understand why you would be surprised if someone recommends a Ti con rod in a high-torque application like a supercharged motor. And for the record, no one recommended it, however we have been working very closely with PAUTER for many months now to create a Ti con rod for my application. They're not set against it and I wouldn't say that they don't know what they're doing either.

A blown C6 LS7 Z06 has more torque than our stock 55K's and I have yet to see a failure from their stock Ti con rods...
Old 11-20-2011, 08:17 AM
  #54  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
Forgot to mention the all mighty C6 ZR1 uses exotic Pankel titanium connecting rods in it's supercharged LS9 which easily handles 638 hp at 6,500 rpm and 605 lb-ft of torque at 3,800 rpm.

The LS9 successfully completed more than 6,800 hours of dyno testing, including a simulated 24 Hour Le Mans race and was held to passenger-car durability standards test of more than 100,000 miles.

Last edited by Havoc; 11-20-2011 at 12:58 PM.
Old 11-20-2011, 06:05 PM
  #55  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AgSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida-Germany-New York
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
2004 E55,1969 300SEL6.3,2011 ML350 BlueTec Diesel,2005 ML400 CDI
If you want 'em, this is a good source.

http://tricktitanium.net/titanium-connecting-rods

One interesting aspect of titanium is that it virtually never fatigues. Anything which adds lightness helps.

There are really no secrets to building exotic highly reliable engines and the 113 can be taken to any level you choose. It still amazes me what can be accomplished with a GMC motor for so little money (comparatively speaking).

If, in the future, I decide to keep the E55 forever (at my age, forever ain't that long), I would probably go for a complete engine rebuild using the various exotic materials and components just for the satisfaction. I did this with my M100 motor and the funny thing is that I used Chevy valve springs because they turned out to be the best for that motor.
Old 11-20-2011, 06:41 PM
  #56  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Why is it a problem to use titanium rods? I seen quite a few big power engines use them.
Old 11-20-2011, 08:33 PM
  #57  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
Originally Posted by GT-ER
Why is it a problem to use titanium rods? I seen quite a few big power engines use them.
Without proper forging, prep, and coating titanium will corrode and scratch which causes cracks and some require maintenance, like replacement, equal to Aluminum rods due to stretching.
Old 11-20-2011, 08:43 PM
  #58  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by Havoc
Without proper forging, prep, and coating titanium will corrode and scratch which causes cracks and some require maintenance, like replacement, equal to Aluminum rods due to stretching.
True, but we are talking about companies that know all of this building them aren't we? Building Titanium rods is not exactly a back yard project.

Regardless, I really see no point in using them in a 55K engine.
Old 11-20-2011, 09:57 PM
  #59  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
Originally Posted by GT-ER
True, but we are talking about companies that know all of this building them aren't we? Building Titanium rods is not exactly a back yard project.

Regardless, I really see no point in using them in a 55K engine.
Yeah, it really comes down to the specific application since the material alone is extremely expensive minus the extensive machining. For all out racing, there's no need to go the extensive machining route since everything will get replaced regardless, but for street use proper measures should be used to ensure longevity.

For my build, I went with larger forged pistons which are heavier than the stock cast pistons so I decided to go with Ti rods to help reduce the added weight. I believe they will be very beneficial for my particular build.
Old 11-21-2011, 01:06 PM
  #60  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,230
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
CLS55 AMG
a bit off topic, but it seems like you're putting a lot of money into your motor Havoc, what power level are you trying to accomplish? It almost seems that it would have been more cost effective to just source an SLR motor
Old 11-21-2011, 01:22 PM
  #61  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
Originally Posted by xpl0sive
a bit off topic, but it seems like you're putting a lot of money into your motor Havoc, what power level are you trying to accomplish? It almost seems that it would have been more cost effective to just source an SLR motor
Not going for a specific power number, doing a fully built motor and will see what the end product delivers. Nah, it'll still be cheaper than the SLR engine especially since I would mod the SLR engine anyway!
Old 11-21-2011, 03:50 PM
  #62  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,659
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by Havoc
Forgot to mention the all mighty C6 ZR1 uses exotic Pankel titanium connecting rods in it's supercharged LS9 which easily handles 638 hp at 6,500 rpm and 605 lb-ft of torque at 3,800 rpm.

The LS9 successfully completed more than 6,800 hours of dyno testing, including a simulated 24 Hour Le Mans race and was held to passenger-car durability standards test of more than 100,000 miles.
Whatever it is made of, it still was no match for the Beast, see vid in my sig from this past weekend
Old 11-21-2011, 04:43 PM
  #63  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AgSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida-Germany-New York
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
2004 E55,1969 300SEL6.3,2011 ML350 BlueTec Diesel,2005 ML400 CDI
Originally Posted by Havoc
Yeah, it really comes down to the specific application since the material alone is extremely expensive minus the extensive machining. For all out racing, there's no need to go the extensive machining route since everything will get replaced regardless, but for street use proper measures should be used to ensure longevity.

For my build, I went with larger forged pistons which are heavier than the stock cast pistons so I decided to go with Ti rods to help reduce the added weight. I believe they will be very beneficial for my particular build.
In the early 60's we used cast Hepolites (now known as A E Pistons) which we would apply a Sanford hard coat to (which has since been vastly improved) and I think would be quite beneficial to the 113 cast pistons. The longest we dared go was 6 hours of race conditions at 13,000 RPM with complete disassembly between races and Zygloing each piston. Yes, the Hepolites were light as feathers and in a race engine we didn't care about regular replacement, but we have all seen the vulnerability our 113's cast pistons.

For what you are doing with your 113 and what AMG did with the SLR motor, the forged pistons were the only way to go. However, what you chose to do by compensating for the weight with titanium rods is very clever and should have been implemented by AMG for their $400K+ SLR.
Old 11-22-2011, 10:49 PM
  #64  
Super Moderator
 
splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,365
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
GMC - Miata - Trek - P-Car
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
I'd be surprised if the factory SLR con rods were Ti.

I'd also be surprised if anyone (who knows what they're doing) recommends a Ti con rod in a high-torque application like a supercharged motor.
With all due respect, we’ve always known you as a well-informed and knowledgeable enthusiast.

GM’s supercharged LS9 ZR1 pumps out 605 lb-ft at 3,800 rpm.
Less bottom-end torque, though no slouch in the output and longevity department would be Porsche’s formidable GT3 RSR, 959, 935 and 962.
It’s probably no coincidence they’re all equipped with Pankl titanium connecting rods.

disclaimer: their purported benefits are likely inconsequential to the performance of any M113K. :)

http://www.pankl.com/

Last edited by splinter; 11-22-2011 at 11:07 PM. Reason: add link

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Why do SLR's put down 600+whp on our same superchargers?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.