2012 M5 Beats 2012 E63 in 0-1000m
03-23-2012, 02:12 PM
#26
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
93' Ultrasonic Blue Mica LS6/T56 RX7 R1 weekend/ 2007 4Runner V8/ 08' prius
The M5 engine can handle more pounds per square inch of pressure from it's turbocharger because of it's direct injection engine. It's more efficient in every way compared to older engines that are not direct injection. This is the route manufacturers are taking nowadays with forced induction engines to produce more power reliably. The new GT500 has a direct injection engine that produces 650hp stock.
03-23-2012, 04:12 PM
#27
Senior Member
Have to say I think BMW's are better than Mercs as all rounders and definitively more sporty focused. The steering is sharper, ride more planted...
Go ahead bust my ba11s.
I dont get why whenever an M car hands a merc a beating we have to start looking for excuses...?
It won, get over it.
That said the M5 seems less modable its only got a 4.4 motor and pretty high in boost already. The E will take mods much better but it needs to get the power down... Both nice cars.
Same old story... I dont think I can take another M5 v Exx for the entirety of this model range lifespan.
Go ahead bust my ba11s.
I dont get why whenever an M car hands a merc a beating we have to start looking for excuses...?
It won, get over it.
That said the M5 seems less modable its only got a 4.4 motor and pretty high in boost already. The E will take mods much better but it needs to get the power down... Both nice cars.
Same old story... I dont think I can take another M5 v Exx for the entirety of this model range lifespan.
What Steve says
03-25-2012, 12:55 AM
#28
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: oc cali.
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
The new M5 is a great looking car, but i feel sorry for the sucka who tries to roll on me in one. I got those long tubes hangin foe that ***. The G-power version looks a little short on the power compared with the previous G-Power M5. Sad to see BMW let go of the V10. That was one sweet engine.
11-05-2012, 11:30 AM
#30
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C5 LS6 and CLS55
come on guys, look at the specs. I love both cars, M5 is awesome but looks like humpback whale in my eyes. M5 has no other versions performance wise, engine output is the same no matter the options. The e63 in this video (only under assumption) doesn't have the AMG performance package.
On Paper:
M5:
560hp 500 ft tq @26 psi boost
E63:
518hp 516 ft tq @14 psi boost (that isn't ****)
E63 w/ AMG Perf Pack @18.8 psi boost
550hp 590 ft tq
The AMG would definitely win the race, it was only .3 tenths second from the M5 w/o the AMG Perf Pack. 590 tq is just nuts, and all us E55 owners know that. Torque wins as long as you can get it to the ground early and stick.
I will admit, I am a little bias, but I own both BMW and Mercs, I love them both. but if you do the math and weight of both cars 63 with Perf Pack, its no question. Or am I being a little bit too bias here? haha.
Can you imagine the 63 at 26psi? We all know the car can handle it with no problems.
On Paper:
M5:
560hp 500 ft tq @26 psi boost
E63:
518hp 516 ft tq @14 psi boost (that isn't ****)
E63 w/ AMG Perf Pack @18.8 psi boost
550hp 590 ft tq
The AMG would definitely win the race, it was only .3 tenths second from the M5 w/o the AMG Perf Pack. 590 tq is just nuts, and all us E55 owners know that. Torque wins as long as you can get it to the ground early and stick.
I will admit, I am a little bias, but I own both BMW and Mercs, I love them both. but if you do the math and weight of both cars 63 with Perf Pack, its no question. Or am I being a little bit too bias here? haha.
Can you imagine the 63 at 26psi? We all know the car can handle it with no problems.
The F10 M5s are having oil pump failures
11-05-2012, 03:28 PM
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix by way of Texas
Posts: 1,010
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
I'd like to see the comparison with the E63 and the AMG performance package as someone mentioned. Why wouldn't they have the best of each sedan is beyond me.
11-05-2012, 04:17 PM
#32
Super Member
That's one thing I dislike about Mercedes though... why have an E63 and then an E63 Performance Package? People who buy AMGs are obviously looking for performance so why build the crappier of the two and label it E63 AMG and then have the "real" performance car be the E63 AMG Performance Package. It's the same kind of thing that pisses me off about the C63 Black Series... the C63 itself should be the black series edition.
11-06-2012, 10:29 AM
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
That's one thing I dislike about Mercedes though... why have an E63 and then an E63 Performance Package? People who buy AMGs are obviously looking for performance so why build the crappier of the two and label it E63 AMG and then have the "real" performance car be the E63 AMG Performance Package. It's the same kind of thing that pisses me off about the C63 Black Series... the C63 itself should be the black series edition.
and to your comparison of a c63 to a c63 black lol
bottom line the new bi turbo has allot of room for more boost
Quote:
Originally Posted by emericr
CLS63PP versus F10M5
Please provide backup behind your claim???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blown_V8s
F10 M5 > CLS63 PP & Non PP stock for stock
F10 M5 < CLS63 PP & Non PP tune for tune
HMMM AMG engine has more displacement and way lower PSI output in stock & PP format...
M has less room to up the boost, as it is already high, plus it can not add more displacement
tadaaa the secret to the universe is solved
Last edited by Zod; 11-06-2012 at 10:35 AM.
11-06-2012, 11:04 AM
#36
Super Member
Right, but why even make two grades of an AMG? Do you see an M5 and an M5 performance package? Do you see an IS-F and and IS-F Performance Package? The AMGs, M, F should be the top of the line... when they release these packages it makes it seem like our 'non-Performance Package' cars are not top of the line.
11-06-2012, 01:14 PM
#37
MBWorld Fanatic!
Right, but why even make two grades of an AMG? Do you see an M5 and an M5 performance package? Do you see an IS-F and and IS-F Performance Package? The AMGs, M, F should be the top of the line... when they release these packages it makes it seem like our 'non-Performance Package' cars are not top of the line.
why do people mod their cars, why do people go with tuners?
simple they want more and for MB to start offering more options for real performance is what people have been asking for
as its stock and warrantied and if you are talking about sport upgrades M does it, but no power added so far
Porsche does power upgrades
Jaguar has variants as well
can go on
11-06-2012, 02:29 PM
#38
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C5 LS6 and CLS55
http://www.autogespot.com/tuning-kel...the-bmw-m5-f10!
Haven't seen an F10 M5 yet post a 10sec timeslip!
Haven't seen an F10 M5 yet post a 10sec timeslip!
11-06-2012, 03:23 PM
#39
MBWorld Fanatic!
Right, but why even make two grades of an AMG? Do you see an M5 and an M5 performance package? Do you see an IS-F and and IS-F Performance Package? The AMGs, M, F should be the top of the line... when they release these packages it makes it seem like our 'non-Performance Package' cars are not top of the line.
.. Needs to be my next AMG.. Watching that video just made me laugh and smile.. Can't wait for the price to come down in 2 yrs... AWSOME
11-07-2012, 11:09 AM
#42
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'99 ML320, '06 E55
It's too early to say the new stock M5 is faster than the new stock CLS63 or E63. This debate will happen hundreds of times on this forum, m5 forum and many other boards in the future. They are both excellent machines and I wish I had the money for either one but I will reserve my judgement on which I prefer until I see more results in the future and I actually get to drive one(if I ever do).
11-07-2012, 11:47 PM
#43
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
9 Posts
C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1, W213 E63S
yet i saw i couple of videos CLS63 beats new M6 V8TT till from 0 - 150km couple of times.
but then at high speeds the M6 destroys the CLS
but then at high speeds the M6 destroys the CLS
