W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Sheesh, there are some nasty cars debuting this year, namely the ZL1 Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 01-22-2012, 05:55 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,659
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
Lucky for me and the domestic beasts, but I am not a big interior, options, gadget guy. The simpler, the better. For me, I am in total bliss sitting in a 500rwhp fox body mustang with rollup windows as I am in a 06 E55.

I never use any of the crap that is in my E55, never.... For me, it would be perfect if the E55 I got came with a race package, or option delete, LOLL!!

Now back onto the Camaro, I think the ZL1 with auto tranny, big stall, VB, and TCU tune with a monster cam and 150 shot, Longtubes, upper and lower pulley, CAI and a custom dyno tune on top of the already great platform, would call for a hard to beat package. Offcourse I would leave the rest of the exhaust alone and install electric cutouts right off the headers. What is great about the LS motors is that they love to run on open headers, making around 15-20rwhp with the cutouts open.


When they hit the local dealerships soon,I will be sure to test drive one to its fullest and let the fellas know what we are up against.

Last edited by chawkins2001; 01-22-2012 at 05:58 PM.
Old 01-22-2012, 08:33 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
JAYCL600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 20854
Posts: 3,704
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
new balance
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
500rwhp fox body
My man
Old 01-22-2012, 08:37 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
iLLuZioNz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FBO 2005 E55 w/ LSD
^both my H/C Z06 and my first GTO w/ big cam and my buddies big cam CTS-V lost crazy power with cutouts open right off after the collectors. Noticeable decrease in torque for sure, im guessing because there was very little backpressure.
Old 01-22-2012, 08:45 PM
  #29  
Super Member
 
Infiniti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 935
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
a unicorn tuned p30 e63
at the very end of the day if you have a gtr you are in a Nissan a zl1 your in a Chevy.I like the interior and exterior of the e-class. I am a c6 zo6 fan Chevy or not that car will run with minimal mods. they broke into the 10's stock on drs.
Old 01-23-2012, 02:50 AM
  #30  
Super Member
 
bbearden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 626
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
'03 E55 (My Daily), '01 ML 320 (Wifey), Twin Turbo '69 Camaro (In Progess)
I am surprised they're using an IRS with that much power. I would have figured they would have went with a solid rear axle, especially taking into consideration how many owners will track these cars.
Old 01-23-2012, 05:48 AM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,659
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by bbearden
I am surprised they're using an IRS with that much power. I would have figured they would have went with a solid rear axle, especially taking into consideration how many owners will track these cars.
Yes, that is disappointing. I hope the arms are setup with the right bushings and wheel hop does not rear its ugly head
Old 01-23-2012, 08:59 AM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by bbearden
I am surprised they're using an IRS with that much power. I would have figured they would have went with a solid rear axle, especially taking into consideration how many owners will track these cars.
Why? Most companies have already mastered IRS setups to the point where solid axles are useless. Vettes and Vipers have IRS and they work great. F-bodies have solid axles and they suck ( the entire unit has to be replaced with an aftermarket setup to hold big power ). Even the CTS-V, which had a crappy IRS setup in the 1st gen, now has a setup that seems to hold big power.
Old 01-23-2012, 09:14 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,659
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by GT-ER
Why? Most companies have already mastered IRS setups to the point where solid axles are useless. Vettes and Vipers have IRS and they work great. F-bodies have solid axles and they suck ( the entire unit has to be replaced with an aftermarket setup to hold big power ). Even the CTS-V, which had a crappy IRS setup in the 1st gen, now has a setup that seems to hold big power.
Dumbest statement I have seen come out of your mouth in a while Solid equipped cars are where its at on the track and autocross.

Look at the simple generation transformation from the 2000 Cobra R (irs) equipped, to it's latest replacement, the Laguna Seca Boss 302 (Solid equipped). Ford even admitted it was a HUGE mistake to put the IRS into the terminator (03/04) cobra, it has never put another IRS in any mustang since, why, because once you get to a high HP level, the IRS just cannot handle the power like a solid will.

Mark my words, this year when some members invest in Weistec blowers, the IRS on our cars are going to start having problems like we have never seen before.

That is why I said going from a low 500rwhp E55 to a low 600rwhp E55, you are going to start encountering problems that have not been seen before. The terminator IRS has aftermarket products out for it that are WAYYYYYY ahead of anything avaibale to the E55 IRS. Even with that support from the aftermarket, you still see horendous wheel hop at the 600HP level, even with built CV joints, hubs, DSS level 5 shafts, you dead hook to hard, and SNAP....
Old 01-23-2012, 09:33 AM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
e55amgrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Dirt Scooters
I'm partial to solid rear ends also and i fought the IRS with my cobra and a GTO but things have come along ways too. The biggest problem with IRS is the cost it takes to make them bullet proof. I had everything done on my cobra and never had a problem but my after fighting my GTO and spending thousands on hubs and gforce axles and everything else i ended up putting a ford 8.8 in and problem solved. Theres been several 7 second supra's and some corvettes too but again im sure it would of been easier/cheaper to go with a solid rear.
Old 01-29-2012, 12:45 AM
  #35  
Super Member
 
pullejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 888
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'12 E63, E55(sold), C32 (sold), '65 Skylark GS 445 convertible, '12 ML350
I'm psyched what Ford & GM are doing. Corvette has owned ALS for a while...no one would even race them basically... The Mustang is getting serious... Their drivetrains and price points are just about the best in the world. But fit and finish still has a ways to go. That said...most of the people who buy them (Camaros & Mustangs) really don't care about that as much as people who will buy a BMW or Mercedes.

All cars are evolving so quickly that I'm almost now starting to expect this from all mfgs.

I still think a tt E63 tuned well vs. a ZL1 will still hold its own. Yep...it's more expensive...but it's still better.

My first and only trip to the track there was a sick SLP ZL585 Camaro that everyone was watching and talking about. I was hoping I would get lined up against this "11.4 sec 1/4" beast (and this one had additional work). My last run I did. And I totally walked him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKWZe2fRiAs
Old 01-29-2012, 10:20 AM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by chawkins2001
Dumbest statement I have seen come out of your mouth in a while Solid equipped cars are where its at on the track and autocross.

Look at the simple generation transformation from the 2000 Cobra R (irs) equipped, to it's latest replacement, the Laguna Seca Boss 302 (Solid equipped). Ford even admitted it was a HUGE mistake to put the IRS into the terminator (03/04) cobra, it has never put another IRS in any mustang since, why, because once you get to a high HP level, the IRS just cannot handle the power like a solid will.

Mark my words, this year when some members invest in Weistec blowers, the IRS on our cars are going to start having problems like we have never seen before.

That is why I said going from a low 500rwhp E55 to a low 600rwhp E55, you are going to start encountering problems that have not been seen before. The terminator IRS has aftermarket products out for it that are WAYYYYYY ahead of anything avaibale to the E55 IRS. Even with that support from the aftermarket, you still see horendous wheel hop at the 600HP level, even with built CV joints, hubs, DSS level 5 shafts, you dead hook to hard, and SNAP....
No need to insult me...FIRST, nearly EVERY automotive company, except FORD, feels they are useless so I guess they are dumb as well....I know Topfuels and such use them cause there is nothing else that can hold that kind of power..but for regular vehicles, they are USELESS. SECOND, Autocross? LMAOOOOOOOO....and I'm the dumb one.

Maybe FORD has yet to learn how to make an IRS setup but there are Vettes, Vipers and Supras in the 7's on their IRS setups.

But that's not what I wanted to get at, since 1/4 mile isn't everything and solid axles ARE better for 1/4 mile. It's everything else they suck at.

you want to talk Autocross? FAST cars in circuit racing use solid axles? I've never heard of such a thing since EVERY SINGLE Ferrari, Corvette, Viper, GT-R, Porsche, Lambo, BMW, etc. uses IRS.

If solid axles were so AWESOME, why is it that Formula 1 cars have been so slow in taking on this AWESOME technology.

Wait...even Ford's very own GT is IRS...what were the thinking!!!???
Old 01-29-2012, 01:10 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yacht Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
WTF did Chevy take down the 750 hp ZL1?
All I can find now is a 580 hp on their website?
Are there two ZL1's ?

Last edited by Yacht Master; 01-29-2012 at 01:14 PM.
Old 01-29-2012, 02:12 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AKnight55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NH
Posts: 6,752
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
This doesnt seem too impressive

http://www.dragtimes.com/Chevrolet-C...lip-23775.html
Old 01-29-2012, 02:37 PM
  #39  
Super Member
 
unagi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'14 C63 507, '11 C300, '96 Cobra, '91 Mr2
I....am not a fan of the new Camaro Styling, would much prefer the CTS-V. Victory Red and Crystal Red Metallic look great! Just better in a z06 :-).

I have to say I'm pretty excited about the upcoming GT500 w/ the 650hp engine as well as the Boss 302 of course, either way it's going to be some great comparos in the future...can't wait to see how these cars do.

GT-ER keep in mind the new GT500 is going to have launch control, also matters if you spring for the Torsen LSD as well in the performance package...
Old 01-29-2012, 02:54 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by unagi1
I....am not a fan of the new Camaro Styling, would much prefer the CTS-V. Victory Red and Crystal Red Metallic look great! Just better in a z06 :-).

I have to say I'm pretty excited about the upcoming GT500 w/ the 650hp engine as well as the Boss 302 of course, either way it's going to be some great comparos in the future...can't wait to see how these cars do.

GT-ER keep in mind the new GT500 is going to have launch control, also matters if you spring for the Torsen LSD as well in the performance package...
I don't like talking much about cars that haven't come out yet so maybe it'll be a lot better, but the current GT500's a way slower than their numbers say they should be. And not only 1/4 mile times but also their traps.
Old 01-29-2012, 02:55 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by Yacht Master
WTF did Chevy take down the 750 hp ZL1?
All I can find now is a 580 hp on their website?
Are there two ZL1's ?
I mentioned this above, SLP has a regular Camaro that they supercharge and call it the ZL1 with 750hp. Chevy has the REAL ZL1 with 580hp.
Old 01-29-2012, 02:56 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by AKnight55
It's not easy pushing 4200lbs.
Old 01-29-2012, 03:09 PM
  #43  
Super Member
 
unagi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'14 C63 507, '11 C300, '96 Cobra, '91 Mr2
Originally Posted by GT-ER
I don't like talking much about cars that haven't come out yet so maybe it'll be a lot better, but the current GT500's a way slower than their numbers say they should be. And not only 1/4 mile times but also their traps.
I hear you, lots of videos out there showing side-by-side Mustang / Camaro comparos...you can see the wheelspin clearly on the 'Stang while the Camaro launches cleanly, then the 'Stang catches up and wins. I'm not too much into the drag racing scene, where the race finishes before the first turn though

On the race course, the heavier Camaro and lack of comparative power makes it even more of a detriment...
Old 01-29-2012, 05:11 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AKnight55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NH
Posts: 6,752
Received 92 Likes on 72 Posts
2012 C63 BS & 2014 E63 Estate & 2008 CLK63 BS
Originally Posted by GT-ER
It's not easy pushing 4200lbs.
Yea I guess your right.. I didnt realize they were that heavy.. Figured it would be just under 4,000 lbs or so.. But with almost 600 hp, I would figure it would at least be in the 11s. BUT im sure they were babying it off the line so
Old 01-29-2012, 05:41 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GT-ER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by AKnight55
Yea I guess your right.. I didnt realize they were that heavy.. Figured it would be just under 4,000 lbs or so.. But with almost 600 hp, I would figure it would at least be in the 11s. BUT im sure they were babying it off the line so
It's quicker than a CTS-V that weighs the same and has 556hp so I guess it makes sense to me.

I don't care how much it runs stock, it's the aftermarket the ones that are going to have a ball with this car.
Old 02-04-2012, 03:14 AM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tgoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'13 GT-R AMS Alpha 9+, CLA45, E55
Ya ya.... I see your ZL1 and raise you THIS!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Sheesh, there are some nasty cars debuting this year, namely the ZL1 Camaro



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.