E63 Regret
) the OP in this case bit the bullet, bought the car with these issues more than likely existing from the wonderful private party or dealer, and should take the car to the dealer for some diagnostic. These are the main issues that go on with this car so knock on wood you should be fine if you don't notice anything else going on in the car. E55's have the better transmission that's for sure, watched a 1,000HP Chrysler 300C do some passes a few weeks ago with an E55 transmission converted in it. My point is, all motors and platforms have had their fair share of issues, regardless of price point. More expensive brand new definitely does not equal "should be more reliable"
Last edited by MIKESV8; May 3, 2013 at 02:12 AM.
I was working out in LA a few years ago when the owner of the company I was helping took me to lunch in his wife's E55. He had done the usual list of bolt ons to the car but never told his wife he screwed with it. I was amazed how quiet and smooth this car was, and even in deep 11 second trim, his wife drive their kids around in it and had no idea it was so fast. I wanted one bad.
So fast forward and I go out to buy one, and since they're not made anymore I want the newest one. So I go drive a clean black 2009 E63 not knowing that the body style stayed while the blown engine went away. We pull out of the car lot and I get a little feel for it first before getting on I4 where I can stretch its legs safely. I floor it coming off the on ramp and never forget the disappointment... "what the f**k is this crap?" The salesman was cool as hell ,but to him he's all pumped up over there like we're coming off turn 4 at Daytona or something. Instead he's looking at the sour look on my face and I'm asking him what's wrong with it? I only then found out the differences in years, and then I found this forum.
Don't get me wrong, the 6.2 is a sick engine, it just belongs in the C class or the SLK, and that's about it. A TVS2300 Eaton on top of it like the GMs got on their 6.2 (C6)would have made all the difference in the world. The 7 speed Trans is an OK bandaid for the weak powerband, but it's no substitute for FI.
So at that point, the 06 was the only option for me but I didn't like that some of the body parts were older so I had already collected most of the 63 exterior conversion parts before I even bought my car

I understand that the 55 isn't perfect, but its damn close, so MB should have been tweaking the nuances of the 55K like the undersized intercooler, instead of shooting themselves in the foot with the NA engine.
Last edited by Sir-Boost-a-Lot; May 3, 2013 at 07:27 AM.
but I really do not care about the difference between a deep 11 car and a slow 12 second car. I drive it to enjoy and since 100km/hr or 62mph for the younguns is max here in Canuck it only takes away a few heartbeats of life to get there. LOLHad the cars for years now and can count the number of times on two hands that the throttle was near the floor, but enjoy your 55's we are all in the same vein. AMG
but I really do not care about the difference between a deep 11 car and a slow 12 second car. I drive it to enjoy and since 100km/hr or 62mph for the younguns is max here in Canuck it only takes away a few heartbeats of life to get there. LOLHad the cars for years now and can count the number of times on two hands that the throttle was near the floor, but enjoy your 55's we are all in the same vein. AMG
Check this out a slouch C63 apples to apples FI
Look what that slug 63 motor does with a little force feed



