W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ride height (pics)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-08-2013, 05:41 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
bcr4d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bowie, Md
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 CLK550
Ride height (pics)

Took my car to the dealer for an alignment and was told that they had to adjust the ride height before doing the alignment. I purchased the car about a year and noticed it appeared to be lowered but I liked the look. Anyway after work was done I now notice that it sits a little higher than before. My question is does the height appear normal for an 07. Also I've heard that you can lower the car using star; which probably was done before I purchased it. I really want it lowered a bit without going the spring route. (Pic)
Attached Thumbnails Ride height (pics)-image.jpg  

Last edited by bcr4d; 12-08-2013 at 06:02 AM. Reason: Forgot pics
Old 12-08-2013, 08:23 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GregMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The Granite State
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
.
You can lower with STAR, but you'll need to do the alignment again...

-G
Old 12-08-2013, 08:48 AM
  #3  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes on 242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Ride heigh looks normal
Old 12-08-2013, 09:29 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
allenjdmb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 41 Posts
E 63S Wagon Renntech, E55 Renntech, SL65, SL 55 030, ML, bunch of old ones--they come, they go...
To me,

it looks very slightly lowered from stock. I started a thread here a few months ago when I was trying to get my height right. Measure it from the ground, thru the center of your wheel center cap, to the bottom of your fender lip. See what you get. I'll have to check (see if you can find the thread), but I think most of the sensibly lowered cars here measure about 26.5 " under those circumstances. Just a thought.
Old 12-08-2013, 04:58 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
bcr4d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bowie, Md
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 CLK550
Sorry it took so long to respond but I had a very busy and long day. The ride seems to be a bit more comfortable than before. Thanks for all the replies and I'll think about it for a while. Thanks again
Old 12-08-2013, 05:29 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
viren.89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,242
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
I just got alignment done again. Last time it was at the end of September.

This time I told them that the car is set according to ROW settings not North America. The sheet they gave me back shows

that the alignment was off and now everything is in green. The car is a bit lower, now in ROW, the car does indeed sits lower compared

to North America settings.
Old 12-09-2013, 12:04 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
jaedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
w205 C63s, w212 E63,w219CLS500-SOLD! w211 E63, 2006 E60 M5 (KABOOM!)
Originally Posted by shardul
Ride heigh looks normal
I second this. Seems normal to me.
Old 12-09-2013, 09:28 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
bcr4d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bowie, Md
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 CLK550
Thanks for the input. I guess my car was lowered with star and after the adjustment to do the alignment the height looked higher. Thanks again
Old 12-10-2013, 12:33 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
They didn't fully explain why they needed to raise the car, did they? I assume the car was lowered a good bit? If so, they most likely couldn't get the alignment back in spec and therefore told you that. What they should have done is told you how far they could get it back towards spec in the current ride height and let you decide. The actually physical ride height has nothing to do with being able to make alignment changes in a car.
Old 12-10-2013, 12:31 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
ALEN35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: salt lake city, utah
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 sl65 amg
I have 20" rims on my car. Back looks lower than the front. Is that normal?
My car is bone stock.
I am running 245/35/20 front, 275/30/20 in the back!
Old 12-10-2013, 01:12 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
60nomad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2011 CTSV auto, 06 E55 white pano, 87 Grand national, 63 split window
I think the height looks great right where it is now and if it rides better too...leave it alone.
Old 12-10-2013, 09:00 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by ALEN35
I have 20" rims on my car. Back looks lower than the front. Is that normal?
My car is bone stock.
I am running 245/35/20 front, 275/30/20 in the back!
The rear fender lip is lower than the front lip which can cause the car to look like it's squatting in the rear.

Also, if you didn't know, those are the wrong size tires for 20s on these cars; ~1.1" too tall. The correct size with be 245/30 in the front and 285/25 in the rear.
Old 12-11-2013, 11:00 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
ALEN35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: salt lake city, utah
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 sl65 amg
I didn't know!
Are u sure because it drives well!
If I go lower there would be bigger gap
How dose it impact the car?
Old 12-12-2013, 12:05 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by ALEN35
I didn't know!
Are u sure because it drives well!
If I go lower there would be bigger gap
How dose it impact the car?
Stock front tire: 245/40_18 is 25.7" tall
Stock rear tire: 265/35_18 is 25.3" tall

Suggested front tire: 245/30_20 is 25.8" tall
Suggested rear tire: 285/25_20 is 25.6" tall

Your front tire: 245/35_20 is 26.8" tall
Your rear tire: 275/30_20 is 26.5" tall

Since your tires are taller, your odometer records mileage at a different rate and your speedometer reads too slow. When your speedo says you are traveling @ 60mph, you are actually doing 63mph.
Old 12-12-2013, 09:45 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
allenjdmb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 41 Posts
E 63S Wagon Renntech, E55 Renntech, SL65, SL 55 030, ML, bunch of old ones--they come, they go...
Realistically,

the rear tires are OK. Fractional differnece there. But the fronts really are too tall. A 245/30 or even a 235/35 (depending on the brand) is the proper way to go....
Old 12-12-2013, 10:37 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
ALEN35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: salt lake city, utah
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 sl65 amg
Thanks!
I guess it is time for some new tires!
Old 12-15-2013, 08:46 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by allenjdmb
the rear tires are OK. Fractional differnece there.
Say what? The difference between the stock front tires and his are 1.1" and the rears are 1.2". How are the rears ok, but not the fronts?
Old 12-15-2013, 09:43 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
allenjdmb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 41 Posts
E 63S Wagon Renntech, E55 Renntech, SL65, SL 55 030, ML, bunch of old ones--they come, they go...
What I'm saying...

is that although the numbers confirm a difference, many of us are running 275/30 on the rear with good results. Also, you certainly are aware that a 275/30 is not a 275/30 is not a 275/30. 285/25/20's are a disappearing breed, and those of us with vossens (and others with 10.5 rear wheels) find they stretch out nicely. We do agree that his fronts are a good bit out of the parameters.
Old 12-16-2013, 12:31 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Yes, I do agree that tires can vary slightly between manufacturers, but he certainly should not run a 275/30 in the back along with a 245/30 in the front. Got rake?
Old 12-16-2013, 06:34 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
allenjdmb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 41 Posts
E 63S Wagon Renntech, E55 Renntech, SL65, SL 55 030, ML, bunch of old ones--they come, they go...
Yes,

I do have a little. That s the way I prefer it, as do many suspension tuners. Allows for compensation under acceleration and a loaded trunk. Obviously, you don't like it that way, and that's all good. Your car looks nice in your sig pic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Ride height (pics)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM.