Know your rights people
There's FOUR pages of court rulings, most citing that driving is a right, NOT a privilege requiring licensing!
I dont agree with these check points, they are illegal as far as I am concerned.
I also disagree with those random check points asking for DNA for money! WTF is going on with our country!
http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Nor...232438621.html
So just because those officers or whoever is "DOING THEIR JOB" It does not make it right.
My .2 cents
My .02 is in with you.
This storm troopers abusing his authority as a cop to show who was the boss.
The "disrespect" of the kid not rolling down his window was an attack on his a-thor-rie-tie, as Carmen from South Park would say.
Looks like you are the dumb one, you have all this wealth of knowledge and all these cases to back you up but I bet you have a valid drivers license. Who's the dumb one? Yep, its your right to drive once you exercise your right to go get your license.
It's hard to debate people with no intention of learning or even having an open mind. No wonder this country is in the state it's in!
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I do agree that he had his window down and was able to converse. There was no reason make him roll it down completely. He got pissed quick but he was legally there and has a legal right to check his driving status and well being as stated by the Supreme Court. Once he could not smell alcohol or detect drugs, he should have passed him through. Our Ohio Supreme Court says the contact should be over within about 30 seconds if none of the above are detected. It is funny that this little a$$clown went out with the intention of being a little ***** and got what he wanted.
Do you have a valid license? If so...why?
Nice response. We will take that as a yes. Preach what you practice or STFU. Just another blowhard. You do the same instead of pulling the lines that support your theory.
Last edited by emoving; Jan 8, 2014 at 08:15 PM.
the police are counting on the fact that YOU don't know YOUR rights....
it's a good thing to be aware of your rights.....
I agree with that, he went a little overboard. He should be able to handle a little game playing. It was not in harm and when he realized he was not drunk he should have sent him on his way. He let the kid get the best of him for sure.
It's a lame BS excuse to fabricate probable cause so they can ransack the car and see if they can find any excuse to further **** the driver. Period.
Last edited by emoving; Jan 8, 2014 at 09:47 PM.
You post some nonsense yet you do the opposite of what you believe in. Who is the f*uktard. Give up your license and let us know how it goes. Travel the roads as the Supreme Court says without a license. Its your right. What are you waiting for. Just blowing some more hot air.
I challenge you to look up 10% of the cases I provided in the link. The main point that you've lost due to your innate ignorance is that, even people who are supposed to enforce the law often times don't know the laws they're enforcing or the rights they're supposed to recognize. I hope even you can agree with that!
Btw, traveling without a DL is quite easy. Just because you're not personally aware of your rights doesn't mean others all over this country aren't either! More people than you can imagine are exercising their rights. Can it cause a hassle if you get stopped...sure! But it doesn't mean it's illegal just because LEO's are trained to enforce an unconstitutional law. I wouldn't argue about it on a traffic stop but I'd definitely win in court. With that said, please stay on point. If you have anything personal to say you can PM me...
Last edited by chiromikey; Jan 8, 2014 at 09:56 PM.
The main point that you've lost due to your innate ignorance is that, even people who are supposed to enforce the law often times don't know the laws they're enforcing or the rights they're supposed to recognize. I hope even you can agree with that!
QUOTE]
I would agree with you on that point. This guy for instance really had no right to take this kid any further then the initial contact unless he detected alcohol or could articulate some other criminal activity.
Your second point is plain stupid. So lets say you get stopped for a suspended license, are you going to win that one in court and just argue you should have never been required to obtain one in the first place?
Last edited by emoving; Jan 8, 2014 at 09:57 PM.









