W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Chrysler Warranty Denying suspension failure due to aftermarket intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-28-2014, 11:14 AM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
guysandiego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 E55 AMG --old cars -- E39 M5, 2.7tt Audi S4, E36 M3 **Ducati 996, 748
Chrysler Warranty Denying suspension failure due to aftermarket intake

Dealership called -- Car went in for warranty work... air suspension failure at all 4 corners--- probably pump, keyless entry not working -- dynamic seat not working - electronic trunk not working -- motor mounts --

Warranty company sent out a guy to inspect the car -- he gave the verbal ok for everything ----

5 days later -- Dealership calling and saying the warranty company is denying all claims because of the intake/exhaust. Dealership is attempting to reason with them.

Contract is very clear: Will not cover repairs that are a result of modifications.

This is their reason for denial --- Very obvious that these repairs are not a result of modifications.

Any and all advice is welcome on my situation. Live in Jacksonville, Florida.

Waiting for further details from dealer before I call the warranty company.
Old 04-28-2014, 11:37 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Denroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: A to the Z (the state)
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
'06 E55
Might want to read up on the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and then go back and talk to them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnuso...s_Warranty_Act

Basically gives consumers protection from shady warranty practices. Not sure how it works with the third party warranty.
Old 04-28-2014, 11:44 AM
  #3  
Member
 
1SickCLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
CLS55 AMG
same dealio with third party
Old 04-28-2014, 11:47 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
keep in mind its a service contract, not a warranty, so that might have an effect on the legality.
Old 04-28-2014, 02:12 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,631
Received 1,085 Likes on 872 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Magnuson Moss wouldn't apply but the modifications have nothing to do with the failures. I would go ahead and call Chrysler Contracts directly and ask that it be escalated to a manager.

Last edited by BlownV8; 04-28-2014 at 09:37 PM.
Old 04-28-2014, 07:27 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StarvingArtist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: DownEast Maine
Posts: 1,780
Received 105 Likes on 99 Posts
CLS 55 AMG E500 99 ML320
I'd be mad enough to hire an expensive lawyer!
Old 04-28-2014, 10:43 PM
  #7  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
guysandiego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 E55 AMG --old cars -- E39 M5, 2.7tt Audi S4, E36 M3 **Ducati 996, 748
update -- Chrysler admits the needed repairs are not due to the modifications.

However, my car is not eligible for any coverage -- contract states that modifications that would void manufacturer warranty are not eligible. my exhaust/intake


I said that their are just trying to weasel out of the contract -- Inspector refused to give or transfer me to a supervisor or legal department.
Old 04-28-2014, 10:43 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
moosejaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
none
Send a letter via certifed esquire and be done with it.
Old 04-28-2014, 11:20 PM
  #9  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
guysandiego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 E55 AMG --old cars -- E39 M5, 2.7tt Audi S4, E36 M3 **Ducati 996, 748
Originally Posted by moosejaw
Send a letter via certifed esquire and be done with it.
I dont understand-
Old 04-28-2014, 11:27 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,631
Received 1,085 Likes on 872 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Originally Posted by guysandiego
update -- Chrysler admits the needed repairs are not due to the modifications.

However, my car is not eligible for any coverage -- contract states that modifications that would void manufacturer warranty are not eligible. my exhaust/intake


I said that their are just trying to weasel out of the contract -- Inspector refused to give or transfer me to a supervisor or legal department.
Look on your policy and get the number for their corporate office. What they are saying doesn't make any sense. Now, you can quote the Magnuson Moss Warranty act. Nothing you have done will "void" the manufacturers warranty so how could it have voided the Chrysler warranty.

Modifications by itself can't void a manufacturers warranty. They have to prove something you did caused a particular part to fail. If they can prove that, they can deny coverage for that part but they can't just void a warranty. Make sure you read your Chrysler warranty and see where they stand on the issue. If it is not in writing, they can't deny.
Old 04-28-2014, 11:54 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Enigma94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: AZ
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C32, C55, 08 E63
I'm sad to see this happen to you as I would be furious to pay so much for a warranty to then have them try and get themselves out of the warranty with no real legitimate reason.

I'm glad to see this topic come up when it did because it's informed me of my rights within the warranty and I feel much better about extending my CPO now that I know they can't legitimately void it for things unrelated to the issues at hand even with modifications present on the car.

Like blownv8 said, look on your policy and get the number to their corporate office. If you don't like the answer from the person you are talking to and they refuse to transfer you(which is total BS) then hang up and call back. Do this as many times as you have to in order to get in contact with somebody who isn't an asshat. Keep track of every persons name and ID number you talk to and if they give you some BS about not transferring you I'd put that in writing and send that to the corporate office via certified mail.

Last edited by Enigma94; 04-28-2014 at 11:57 PM.
Old 04-29-2014, 12:21 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CharlyE500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Socal, Chino
Posts: 4,402
Received 60 Likes on 48 Posts
E55 2006 / CLS55 / S450 / Jag XKR2011
I had the Chrysler ext warranty and they did not cover whatever they mentioned when they sold me the contract. Valve gasket was leaking but they refused. I am lucky, for the past 5 years, only valve gasket need seal and water pump.
Old 04-29-2014, 12:29 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,631
Received 1,085 Likes on 872 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
The Chrysler Warranty I had was great. It covered so many things and they never gave the dealership any trouble with the repairs. They lost so much money on MB's that they stopped writing them.
Old 04-29-2014, 06:59 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
berti_00's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Clearwater Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,379
Received 117 Likes on 75 Posts
2016 Cls63s AMG
these warranties are scams
Old 04-29-2014, 07:07 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
moosejaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
none
Originally Posted by guysandiego
I dont understand-
Have your lawyer send a letter
Manufacturers and warranty co can do as they please

It's up to you to enforce the magnusson moss act
There's no secret warranty police willing to do this for you
Old 04-29-2014, 08:04 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Sir-Boost-a-Lot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,092
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
1967 Pro Touring turbo LSX Camaro
^exactly.

If anything, letters from your legal council may push them towards a "cost of defense" type settlement where it's cheaper for them to fix your car then it is to defend themselves in court and win.
Old 04-29-2014, 09:46 AM
  #17  
Member
 
firstbenzforme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CA/NYC/Jersey Shore
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Current 2014 Maserati Quattroporte and 2017 GLE 63 AMG retired 2007 E63 AMG
aftermarket warranties aren't scams.

please don't misjudge my position, i hate what they are doing and wish the OP a positive outcome. but these contracts really aren't for people who are modding. (even if it is just exhaust and intake) OP said the contract states in writing that any mod that would void the manufacturer warranty renders the car ineligible. They all say that. You need to hide your mods when making a warranty claim...always. best likely outcome for him now, IMO, is that they cancel the policy and return him a prorated dollar amount for the remaining time/miles on the contract..which he can use towards this big repair bill.

I think this really highlights for everyone to either find a trusted AMG shop through this site, or make legitimate friends with a SA at your dealership. You think this is the first time these people dealt with the chrysler adjuster? Hayle no! They see it all the time. If they knew the OP and knew his car any mechanic/SA/shop owner with a conscience would call and be like "yo, guydiegodude..get your intake and exhaust of this thing b4 the adjuster gets here so you don't get #crewed" on your warranty.
I think they are as responsible for your current predicament as the warranty company.
Old 04-29-2014, 09:49 AM
  #18  
Member
 
firstbenzforme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CA/NYC/Jersey Shore
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Current 2014 Maserati Quattroporte and 2017 GLE 63 AMG retired 2007 E63 AMG
oh and if you do plan to go the legal route and fight this out.. delete your sig with that laundry list!
Old 04-29-2014, 10:13 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by firstbenzforme
OP said the contract states in writing that any mod that would void the manufacturer warranty renders the car ineligible.
To get technical here....Those mods would not have voided the entire warranty, only coverage of specific items.
Old 04-29-2014, 10:25 AM
  #20  
Member
 
firstbenzforme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CA/NYC/Jersey Shore
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Current 2014 Maserati Quattroporte and 2017 GLE 63 AMG retired 2007 E63 AMG
True.
And nothing in his sig should have anything to do with suspension, directly.
I'm thinking they will say the mods are evidence of the car being driven outside the manufacturers maximum operating specifications and bla bla bla.
Old 04-29-2014, 10:53 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HeissRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 4,429
Received 60 Likes on 42 Posts
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by firstbenzforme
True.
And nothing in his sig should have anything to do with suspension, directly.
I'm thinking they will say the mods are evidence of the car being driven outside the manufacturers maximum operating specifications and bla bla bla.
Any excuse they can think of.....

I am so thankful I never had any problems with my extended warranty through USAA.
Old 04-29-2014, 11:13 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Benz-O-Rama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
Burden of proof is on the warranty company for the mods causing the failure, no?
Old 04-29-2014, 11:50 AM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
moosejaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
none
Originally Posted by Benz-O-Rama
Burden of proof is on the warranty company for the mods causing the failure, no?
the burden of proof is on the warranty company....

after you have presented them with a letter from your attorney

until then ur SOL
Old 04-29-2014, 12:19 PM
  #24  
Member
 
firstbenzforme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CA/NYC/Jersey Shore
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Current 2014 Maserati Quattroporte and 2017 GLE 63 AMG retired 2007 E63 AMG
i agree with the moose man
burden of proof matters only between the lawyers..if the issue ever gets there.

right now, the burden is on the OP to pursue them for payment. spending his time, money, and a ton of aggravation to go after them.

Gotta ask if it's worth it?
Most aftermarket warranties dont cover seats, keys, or power trunks anway.
So OP is left with airmatic pump and motor mounts on the repair list. Thats not that big of a bill. To quote one Henry Hill, "The way i see it, everyone takes a beating sometime."
Old 04-29-2014, 01:38 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Denroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: A to the Z (the state)
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
'06 E55
My warranty was awesome. Covered everything from engine mounts to keyless go doorhandles (3 of them!) and even a new rear main seal. All totaled, I had over $4k worth of warranty claims on a $1500 warranty. Granted, these were at MB dealer prices, but it was still great to have. I had Assurant through USAA.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Chrysler Warranty Denying suspension failure due to aftermarket intake



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 PM.