kleeman headers with 84mm sc pulley and tune
#1
kleeman headers with 84mm sc pulley and tune
well im getting some kleeman headers this monday .anyone running same set up as I would be running ??what your experience with kleeman headers is it a new beast ?thanks
also whats the gains on rwhp and tq
also whats the gains on rwhp and tq
#3
#4
Results in my sig raced plenty to verify correct keep in mind I have trunk tank which plays big part in my power consistency. Had mine on for about 3 years no problems. Should hav been your first mod !
Trending Topics
#12
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 698
Likes: 16
From: Germany
C215 CL55 AMG, W124 500E, W210 E430, W124 300E
Hi, doesnt this also depends on the dyno type?
So i heard these cars make stock around ~394HP at the wheels at a certain dyno type. Lets call it "Type1". When you hit 481WHP at that Dyno "type 1", i would also say its 600HP at the crank.
But there is also the Dyno "Type2", where our cars make already around 435WHP stock, when you then have 481WHP (less then 50WHP gain), i would doubt its 600 crank HP.
I read some people say with a 180mm crank equivalent pulley, 82mmTB, Headers, cat-less, colder plugs, fuel-rail + bigger 6hole injectors, ECU/TCU tune, and cooling upgrades, these cars make ~550WHP.
So when this rating is on the Dyno "Type1", i would say its around 675-700 crank HP, right?
But when its on the higher reading Dyno "Type2", how much would it be.
And did anyone make this power on a Dyno "Type1" ?
So i heard these cars make stock around ~394HP at the wheels at a certain dyno type. Lets call it "Type1". When you hit 481WHP at that Dyno "type 1", i would also say its 600HP at the crank.
But there is also the Dyno "Type2", where our cars make already around 435WHP stock, when you then have 481WHP (less then 50WHP gain), i would doubt its 600 crank HP.
I read some people say with a 180mm crank equivalent pulley, 82mmTB, Headers, cat-less, colder plugs, fuel-rail + bigger 6hole injectors, ECU/TCU tune, and cooling upgrades, these cars make ~550WHP.
So when this rating is on the Dyno "Type1", i would say its around 675-700 crank HP, right?
But when its on the higher reading Dyno "Type2", how much would it be.
And did anyone make this power on a Dyno "Type1" ?
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 72
From: Indianapolis
2004 E55.98 SS Camaro.Jetta TDI. Expedition
Hi, doesnt this also depends on the dyno type?
So i heard these cars make stock around ~394HP at the wheels at a certain dyno type. Lets call it "Type1". When you hit 481WHP at that Dyno "type 1", i would also say its 600HP at the crank.
But there is also the Dyno "Type2", where our cars make already around 435WHP stock, when you then have 481WHP (less then 50WHP gain), i would doubt its 600 crank HP.
I read some people say with a 180mm crank equivalent pulley, 82mmTB, Headers, cat-less, colder plugs, fuel-rail + bigger 6hole injectors, ECU/TCU tune, and cooling upgrades, these cars make ~550WHP.
So when this rating is on the Dyno "Type1", i would say its around 675-700 crank HP, right?
But when its on the higher reading Dyno "Type2", how much would it be.
And did anyone make this power on a Dyno "Type1" ?
So i heard these cars make stock around ~394HP at the wheels at a certain dyno type. Lets call it "Type1". When you hit 481WHP at that Dyno "type 1", i would also say its 600HP at the crank.
But there is also the Dyno "Type2", where our cars make already around 435WHP stock, when you then have 481WHP (less then 50WHP gain), i would doubt its 600 crank HP.
I read some people say with a 180mm crank equivalent pulley, 82mmTB, Headers, cat-less, colder plugs, fuel-rail + bigger 6hole injectors, ECU/TCU tune, and cooling upgrades, these cars make ~550WHP.
So when this rating is on the Dyno "Type1", i would say its around 675-700 crank HP, right?
But when its on the higher reading Dyno "Type2", how much would it be.
And did anyone make this power on a Dyno "Type1" ?
It different car to car
The 180mm pulley it's self is a monster. They can approach 500 rwhp with pulley tune and cooling. It's alittle harsher to drive
Toadster's setup is a nice combo that work well together for the street. It also is very cost effective.
#14
I think this is the reason my car sucks sometimes I get beat by stock e55 :/????aand I have a 84mm sc pulley and a tune frome eurocharged I do have a 0010 bosh pump but not an upgraded heatexchanger
#15
#16
The most stingy & power robbing parasite is the heat soak. What the cars makes now and about 2 or 3 back to back runs (street or Dyno) will hurt owner egos. Ask me how I know lol
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 72
From: Indianapolis
2004 E55.98 SS Camaro.Jetta TDI. Expedition
I love my Conti extream contacts. A summer tire but bite good on cold dry roads. I'm impressed . Mine are not the S tire. Better than other drag radials I have ran in my past ls life.
#21
Perhaps a non grippy tire, I'd look there. You're in SD so don't think below temps are an issue like North Pole over here. After you address your HE
The most stingy & power robbing parasite is the heat soak. What the cars makes now and about 2 or 3 back to back runs (street or Dyno) will hurt owner egos. Ask me how I know lol
The most stingy & power robbing parasite is the heat soak. What the cars makes now and about 2 or 3 back to back runs (street or Dyno) will hurt owner egos. Ask me how I know lol
#25
Heiss
Didn't wrap my headers due to me in a time crunch - right out of box into car for same day install. If you have the opportunity to coat, I would go ahead with that. But lots of users seem to just install short or long headers as is
Didn't wrap my headers due to me in a time crunch - right out of box into car for same day install. If you have the opportunity to coat, I would go ahead with that. But lots of users seem to just install short or long headers as is